CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › brightviper29 › Posts

Posts by brightviper29

91 posts shown.

Regarding the new FBI structure in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Nicholas Watson said:It looks like Scott Long71 has finally decided to join the rest of us in trolling the local wildlife on Reddit. ☕

There really has to be some kind of hierarchy in place, doesn't there?
Scott Long71 is essentially the guardian angel of this entire Reddit community; he’s the one who actually built this whole place from the ground up.
The Moderation Team are nothing more than glorified sheepdogs out there, aren't they?
To everyone else out there, just a heads-up: the sheep on this Reddit are a different breed of animal entirely.
That’s it, folks. It’s over.
Regarding the new FBI structure in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Adam Doyle63 said:... I started my first year of elementary school when I was 91...

Look, Adam Doyle63, you strike me as a bit too young and maybe lacking the experience needed to handle any serious responsibilities here on Reddit.
But hey, if you're really looking to step up, perhaps you could start at the very bottom of the food chain and serve as an interim moderator assistant?
Consider this my vote.
Hang in there, buddy!
Regarding the new FBI structure in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Adam Doyle63 said:I could potentially serve as a lower-level consultant for creative matters. I have quite a bit of experience dealing with both male and female moderators...

Maybe we could turn this thread into a dedicated space for users who are looking to step up into roles like moderators, advisors, expert consultants, deputies, community organizers, mentors, site administrators, or something along those lines.

It would be great if candidates could give us a quick introduction, allowing us regular users—the true lifeblood of this Reddit community—to toss out various questions so that from among the best offerings our site provides, we can pick out the absolute finest candidates. It’s perfectly understandable that some of these questions might get a little uncomfortable, isn't it? So, I'll go ahead and kick things off myself:

1 Adam Doyle63, I have a feeling you're someone in the second stage of life, meaning you're over 18; is that accurate?
2 Based on that lovely opening sentence of yours, I’d venture to guess you were once an active member of the old Democratic Party. Is that right?
3 Did you hold any specific rank during your service in the military back then, perhaps something like a corporal or a specialist?
4 Can you give us your word that if you become a moderator or an expert advisor here, you won't push any specific political agendas?
Political propaganda in the corona PDFs in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hey there, bluecyclist64, I have to say, I’ve always genuinely enjoyed our chats and found you to be such a pleasant person to debate with, 👍 though it's a real shame you don't post much in the food forums anymore, which is a section I still find myself visiting quite often. My parents used to recount stories from back in 1968, describing how the USSR surged into Czechoslovakia with half a million soldiers and 8,000 tanks, leaving innocent people in their wake. It’s almost impossible to wrap your head around the level of terror that gripped the old Yugoslavia back then, and honestly, looking at it through a modern lens, it's hard to truly grasp. My folks actually had plans to just abandon everything they owned, hop in the car, and drive toward the Italian border to see where life took them. I remember a family friend telling us about his time serving in the military stationed out in Texas; they were sent to the front lines, dug into trenches, and told to wait for the Russians with strict orders that there would be no retreating—it was fight to the death. Can you even imagine a fear like that?

Since my work keeps me traveling all over the former territories, I find it pretty striking that even highly educated, rational people from Mexico argue that the NATO bombing of Mexico was completely justified, so why should I bother writing anything positive about Americans?
Why am I bringing this up? I'm certainly not suggesting that America is perfect, righteous, or always playing fair, but when you look at the alternatives, it remains the best option available, wouldn't you agree? Just imagine what the world would look like if:
-Nazi Germany had won WWII
-The USSR had won the Cold War
-A massive Greater Mexico had been established
-Islamists had spread across Europe

...and then we have people popping up out of nowhere, spitting on America and Trump... it's just something, isn't it?
Political propaganda in the corona PDFs in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I couldn't agree more with the opening post. Just yesterday, I actually put together a little reflection on this very topic regarding the constant, orchestrated attacks leveled against the USA and President Trump. It feels like people conveniently forget everything the USA has contributed to humanity, and specifically to those of us living in this part of the world. It’s as if we just ignore how the USA has always stood on the right side of history, whether it was during WWI, WWII, the Cold War, or the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia...

I have to wonder, how would you even be typing your posts right now, or how would this forum even be moderated, if the USA hadn't won the Cold War or stepped in during the wars in the former Yugoslavia? Maybe the moderators here would be running things from some smoky dive bar, nursing shots of whiskey while listening to loud, trashy pop music in the background.***

We could probably use a bit more respect for President Trump; sure, his style might be a little unconventional,
and yeah, he can be impulsive at times, but you have to remember he is surrounded by the absolute best advisors and experts available in the entire world. At the end of the day, he remains the most influential and important person on the planet.

I even had a post removed from the Corona Greatest Hits thread, and all I did was share a link and a photo of that old 1980s Nuclear Shelter music video. I suppose it got flagged because Nuclear Shelter filmed in the USA too. It seems the moderators operate on the logic that everyone's friends are their friends and everyone's enemies are their enemies—so the moment you show support for something, suddenly you're under suspicion.

***Just take that sentence as a joke, don't take it literally.
Nicholas Davis4 said:You have a thread about COVID-19 over on the Politics board.

It seems like health isn't the main focus there, but over on politics, they’re analyzing every single breath and sneeze. Wind directions, raw statistics... you'll even find links to Chinese websites (though I highly doubt anyone there actually speaks Chinese), or mentions of people traveling via bus along routes of brotherhood and unity 😁... but generally speaking, they are sticking to the topic of the virus and illness like a moth to a flame; they aren't straying from the path.

( Interestingly enough, no one has managed to derail the debate into conspiracy theories yet—you know, claims that Elvis Presley is still alive, or that the US government is hiding little green men, or that the Earth is flat. I suppose everyone is just too preoccupied with this to dive into that rabbit hole, so those attempts were shut down early 🙏)

They managed to stretch that topic out to 930 posts in just four days.

That is exactly it, and I couldn't agree more with what was said; watching it feels a bit like watching The Simpsons, where the sheer scale of human stupidity is simply immeasurable. Isn't it interesting to try and explain why people are so captivated by the fear of some bizarre and utterly impossible way to die, such as:
-terrorist attacks
-shark attacks
-plane crashes
-snake bites
-bear attacks
-anthrax
-ebola
-mad cow disease
-bird flu...
On the flip side, most people actually pass away due to the consequences of overindulging in unhealthy, greasy, sugary, or salty food, smoking, drinking, reckless driving, simple carelessness, or overestimating their own abilities... but it's as if nobody cares about that, perhaps because it just isn't dramatic or intriguing enough.
I am increasingly starting to feel like 90% of the global population behaves like a flock of mindless chickens 😁

The fear surrounding COVID-19 is completely unfounded, and I am one hundred percent certain that not a single person on this forum is going to die from this virus.😵
Best Glucosamine sulfate supplements? in Health ·
rustymason82 said:Between standing at work for up to 12 hours a day and hauling heavy loads, my body is definitely starting to feel the strain of the years. Lately, my knees have been aching constantly, especially the right one. I've been taking Glucosamine sulfate for about a month and a half now, and I was planning on sticking with it for another three months, but my doctor told me today that I'm just throwing money down the drain.
Has anyone here actually had success using glucosamine? Is there any real point in taking it, or am I wasting my time?

Jack, your doctor is absolutely spot on here, because honestly, it isn’t just about throwing money down the drain, but rather what exactly you're actually putting into those so-called "supplements." If you really want the best remedy, wouldn't it be more effective to just try dropping a few pounds? I’m a huge recreational tennis player, and whenever I see someone on the court carrying a little extra weight, I instinctively assume they’ve got some kind of brace or compression sleeve strapped around their knees. Your knees take the biggest hit when you're carrying extra mass. To give yourself a real sense of what an extra ten pounds actually feels like, why not try strapping a ten-pound weight to your back or around your waist—kind of like how divers do it—and just walk around with it all day from sunrise to sunset? Once you do that, you'll truly understand the strain you're putting on your body.

You know as well as I do that all the best things in life don't cost a single cent, right?

casualbadger22 said:I heard Move Free worked wonders for someone who could barely even roll out of bed. That’s pretty much all I know about it.

My physical therapist basically told me straight up that there isn't some magic pill or supplement that's going to save your joints. It really just comes down to staying active and getting some sunlight. Vitamin D plays a massive role in bone density and preventing decay.

Movement naturally lubricates your joints, but that doesn't mean you need to go kill yourself at the gym for an hour. Just grab some sneakers and hit the trails; walk for more than an hour in the sun whenever you get the chance.
If cycling is more your speed, go for it.

The best proof is seeing people who prevent osteoporosis through regular exercise. Swimming is top-tier for that.

Diet-wise, eating pork tenderloin and consuming pork gelatin is really the only way we can properly get what we need. Back in the day, people used to repair their bones using homemade eggshell powder mixed with lemon juice, letting it sit before eating or drinking it.
Real, whole foods and organic products are what the body actually needs. Instead, we've just become obsessed with living on pills.
Honestly, it would be better to head out to the countryside, help out on a farm, and load up on home-cooked food rather than wasting money on all this other junk.

Unfortunately, our society is built on exploitation, so nobody has any time for anything; everyone is just desperate for a break. Anyone who can afford to escape the grind and live a normal life working 40 hours a week should just run.

As for extra weight, try carrying an extra 10 or 20 pounds around for a week and see how much your joints suffer. Those extra pounds usually come from processed junk food that wreaks havoc on your entire system.

casualbadger22, you really nailed this one; I find myself thinking all the time that we humans aren't actually that different from any other animal on this planet, though I suppose our brains did undergo a bit more development along the way, didn't they?😁At the end of the day, isn't it just true that we all need some kind of daily physical activity to stay sane, whether it's something intense or just making sure our muscles are actually doing their job? I really believe that as long as we can keep ourselves moving and keep those muscles engaged, we're doing alright, don't you think?
Quick Minutes - educational video content in Health ·
Matthew Castillo2 said:I really value any feedback, criticism, or ideas you might have, because honestly, putting together a high-quality video isn't exactly a walk in the park when you're juggling a full-time job, a relationship, and a social life at the same time.

Thumbs up for the video 👍
I am right there with you on this; producing content that is actually engaging and polished is a massive undertaking, whereas sitting on the sidelines and acting like an expert is far too easy. My overall impression is very positive, especially considering this is all being driven by pure passion and a hobby.

It might be worth touching upon the whole controversy surrounding cholesterol in eggs, as I think it’s always beneficial to tackle a topic by looking at both the benefits and the potential downsides. I remember about ten years ago during a routine checkup at my doctor's office, they told me my cholesterol was at 5.1 😲 which felt like I was right on the edge of the limit to me. My doctor gave me this look of genuine concern, so I pointed out that I know people with levels hitting 6 or even 8, so a 5.1 didn't seem like such a big deal. She just looked back at me and said, "You don't realize how dangerous this can be; that's the absolute upper limit, it's like redlining a car engine at 6,000 RPMs." Then she started grilling me on whether I eat fatty foods or how many eggs I go through in a week.

Have you ever thought about bringing your girlfriend on board to help with the editing side of things? You know as well as I do that having a dedicated hand for production can really help drive up those view counts. 😁
Keith Allen77 said:.. yesterday some lady called me and said this: "sir, the operator made a huge mistake during your last call by forgetting to offer you the vitamins you take before, with, or after Proster, so we're offering an 'apology' and a special deal on those vitamins for $83 when they usually cost $267..."

Keith, come on, just admit that even you don't buy the nonsense this so-called "lady" is feeding you. Honestly, even the Trotter family wouldn't fall for such a cheap and low-rent stunt.
The whole point of this forum is to provide actual education, if you want to call it a sort of grassroots enlightenment for the general public.

Even though I don't have any issues with my prostate myself—though I do know a few older folks who have dealt with prostate cancer—I decided to do a little digging into the subject... and based on what I found while Googling (which pretty much confirms what I suspected), I'd suggest watching from the 55:20 mark onwards. It’s only a few minutes long, and there, a top-tier expert and intellectual, Mr. Kraus, gives a brief and clear explanation of everything.

I realize your question isn't directly related to the video in the link, but it really does hold the answers to questions just like yours.
Torecan (tietilperazin) in Health ·
brightwalker32, the silver lining here is that you aren't facing anything life-threatening, which is what Brandon Newman95, Ladybug, and Jacob Sullivan91 were all picking up on—it really just looks like some heightened anxiety and depression. It’s nothing catastrophic or scary, and honestly, isn't it a blessing that we live in an age where you can just hop online and educate yourself about what's going on? So, try to keep your focus on those specific diagnoses without letting them overwhelm you. There's nothing strange, crazy, or shameful about this; if it makes you feel any better, there are hundreds of much more severe and dangerous conditions out there that people deal with every day.

So, just take a deep breath and keep moving forward.
If I were in your shoes, my best advice would be to shake things up and make a radical change in your routine—maybe pick up a new sport, dive into a hobby, start researching something fascinating, or even just commit to some intense daily walks to get your heart rate up. Is there anything more satisfying than pushing yourself physically until you're completely wiped out, playing around like a kid, feeling that total release, taking a hot shower, and then finally drifting off to sleep?
Trust me, it works wonders.
Flu symptoms in Health ·
Henry Hernandez68 said:Is it actually normal for a primary care doctor to insist you show up in person just to get a sick note for the flu?

The guy was hit with a 102 fever yesterday afternoon—muscle aches, killer headache, the whole classic flu experience. We were trying everything to bring the temperature down, but by this morning, it had spiked right back up. He can barely even stand; he looks like death warmed over. He calls the doctor around 7:30 AM, and they tell him it’s probably the flu and they’ll write him a sick note, but then the nurse jumps in and says, "Nope, nothing can be done over the phone, the doctor has to see him first." So now, he had to trek out there while being incredibly contagious. We sat there waiting for maybe 45 minutes because he didn't have an appointment, and honestly, he probably infected half the waiting room, including me since I had to go with him. He was so weak, and it was just brutal watching him struggle to stay upright with a massive fever just so a doctor could spend two measly minutes signing a piece of paper.😕

I really don't get this approach. Whenever I'm sick, I always head over and wait outside the door if I'm not working, because I know the nurse is always going to say you have to come in. But this is the flu! The person is a walking contagion! It's obvious that because they have to deal with all the people who are faking it, the ones who are actually suffering end up getting punished for it.🙂

That is honestly just pathetic and low; you really ought to find a new doctor.

Henry Hernandez68 said:Is it actually normal for a primary care doctor to insist you show up in person just to get a sick note for the flu?

The guy was hit with a 102 fever yesterday afternoon—muscle aches, killer headache, the whole classic flu experience. We were trying everything to bring the temperature down, but by this morning, it had spiked right back up. He can barely even stand; he looks like death warmed over. He calls the doctor around 7:30 AM, and they tell him it’s probably the flu and they’ll write him a sick note, but then the nurse jumps in and says, "Nope, nothing can be done over the phone, the doctor has to see him first." So now, he had to trek out there while being incredibly contagious. We sat there waiting for maybe 45 minutes because he didn't have an appointment, and honestly, he probably infected half the waiting room, including me since I had to go with him. He was so weak, and it was just brutal watching him struggle to stay upright with a massive fever just so a doctor could spend two measly minutes signing a piece of paper.😕

I really don't get this approach. Whenever I'm sick, I always head over and wait outside the door if I'm not working, because I know the nurse is always going to say you have to come in. But this is the flu! The person is a walking contagion! It's obvious that because they have to deal with all the people who are faking it, the ones who are actually suffering end up getting punished for it.🙂

Look, most doctors hold themselves in such high regard compared to regular folks, and honestly, both the doctors and the patients share a lot of the blame for that. When people go to see a doctor, they tend to act so subservient, treating them like some kind of sacred figure or a high-ranking government official. This sense of humility from the patient often just fuels the arrogance of doctors and medical staff in general.

So, what kind of relationship should you actually have with your doctor?
What shakes a doctor the most is the realization that their patient might actually be smarter or more informed than they are. Once that happens, the dynamic flips 180 degrees; suddenly, the doctor becomes cooperative, starts collaborating, and might even ask for your opinion or advice. The key is to create the impression that you are, well, on their level or perhaps even a step above.

For instance, I’m practically never sick—maybe a couple of days of minor colds or viruses a year, maybe even less, but that’s beside the point. I’ll call, tell them when I fell ill, call again later to say I’m feeling okay, and then arrange a time to swing by for the paperwork. I’m fairly convinced that in a few years, everything will be fully digitized and we won't even need to set foot in the health clinic at all.
wearybison8 said:...I was searching online, but it's surprisingly tough to find clear information on how long it actually takes for melanoma to penetrate deeper—is it a matter of months, or even years?
The survival statistics you see, like those five-year or ten-year rates, seem to change depending on which website you happen to land on, too...

Timothy Kim9 said:-it's melanoma. It hadn't gone deep yet,
it was mostly spreading across the surface of the skin. They did the surgery and removed the lymph nodes.
Her biggest struggle ended up being lymphedema. She didn't actually need chemo.

If you go back fifteen or thirty years, melanoma was practically unheard of among the general population, wasn't it? And just like how you inevitably stumble upon certain information while browsing the web every day, I eventually realized that I fall into a "high-risk group" myself. What does that actually entail? Well, during my childhood, I used to spend about two months every summer at the beach, and I lost the battle with sunburn more times than I can count; plus, I have blue eyes. When you combine those factors, the statistical likelihood of developing melanoma jumps significantly. At least we can be thankful there isn't a family history of it.

So, what can a person do on their own?
You can perform your own skin checks and take photos of anything suspicious; if something unusual pops up, you really need to book an appointment with a dermatologist immediately. Personally, I’d suggest finding a private specialist with a lot of experience, because when it comes to detecting melanoma, seasoned expertise is everything. In my opinion, it's much better—and honestly cheaper in the long run—to pay for a private consultation rather than waiting indefinitely in line at a public clinic.

With melanoma, the most critical factor is the depth of invasion, or how deep the cancer has moved into the tissue; the shallower the depth, the better, as the chances for a full recovery are much higher. The goal is to ensure those melanoma cells don't reach the lymph nodes or the bloodstream.

I've been trying to think of how many people I know who have dealt with melanoma, and I've come up with six, though I feel like I might have missed someone. All I can say is that every single one of them is still here and living their lives normally.

wearybison8, they haven't even confirmed melanoma in your case yet, so let's hope it stays that way.
Timothy Kim9, I assume they told you that regular check-ups are vital; while melanoma isn't strictly hereditary, the probability increases if there is a family history involved.
wearybison8 said:...can anyone tell me how long the wait is for pathology results in Chicago? (It's for a biopsy, likely melanoma)

Weary, I truly understand how agonizing and nerve-wracking it is to sit there waiting for those lab results to come back. Just try to hold onto the thought that you've done everything possible right now, and trust that the doctors have given it their absolute best. Any seasoned dermatologist can spot the difference between a melanoma lesion and a non-melanoma one with incredible accuracy—it's almost like an expert fan telling the difference between a football game and a handball match at a glance, though I suppose there are always outliers. Because they were thorough, they went ahead and performed the excision on that suspicious area.

I'm sure you've spent some time Googling things about melanoma yourself; if it turns out to be a thin melanoma that was caught early, hasn't penetrated deep into the skin, and was removed properly with those recommended safety margins, then everything should be fine. In many cases, the person is practically cured, needing nothing more than regular lifelong check-ups. You can keep a close eye on things yourself while visiting your dermatologist for professional screenings from time to time. Of course, if it has already metastasized, then it becomes a different kind of fight altogether. I am sincerely hoping and praying that your situation falls into that first category. Sending you strength! 🙂
Should I go to the ER or not? in Health ·
Dear Elizabeth,
I put together a little rhyme about the finger:

what’s the news today
how is that finger of yours 😁
we’re all holding our breath
in fear
on the spoon
on the wire
on this forum
and even so
we wait for some good news
that the finger is healthy
and right
Should I go to the ER or not? in Health ·
velvetmoose9, I totally get where you're coming from, but honestly, isn't all this excessive worrying and attention just going to make our dear little debater Amy White63 even more sensitive? It might actually end up overwhelming her or even scaring her, don't you think? And not to mention how much unnecessary strain this puts on the entire healthcare system.

I’ve always believed that in these kinds of harmless, minor situations, we should probably just assume everything is perfectly fine unless someone proves otherwise, shouldn't we?😉

Amy White63, please check back in with us in a few days and let us know how you're feeling.
Sending love 😘
Should I go to the ER or not? in Health ·
I wouldn't dream of heading to the ER right now; the weather is just miserable, which makes the staff even more cranky and sluggish than usual, and honestly, my issue is so minor—I'd almost call it ridiculous—that it isn't worth the hassle.

If you were, say, over in Canada visiting an urgent care clinic, they’d probably hand you a bill so massive you could smoke it for three days straight.
Why can't I post photos in the Politics/Current Events section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Sam Alvarez4 said:What’s the actual issue here? Are you just having trouble posting photo links?

Dear Antilles,
1.
I’m really not one to make a fuss about things, because if we all just learned how to live without constantly looking for trouble, wouldn't we realize that most problems aren't even real?👍
2.
As for those links, I don't post them because my faith won't allow it; I actually established my own personal creed just this morning, and the very first commandment is "Do not post links—post images instead." Isn't it fascinating how someone can go from being completely secular to a true believer overnight?😛

We all know there are various faiths out there, some of which might forbid images entirely, but my particular belief system is the exact opposite of that.
Why can't I post photos in the Politics/Current Events section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Look, I hear you, Charles Fox10, but what are we really supposed to do when the rules are set in stone like this?☕
Maybe down the road, we could see some leeway for tiny little thumbnails—say, 300x200 pixels in black and white—and then eventually move up to 640x480, and maybe even 800x600 later on... once everyone here finally grows up and learns some common sense, right?

Who knows, maybe it’s worth a shot to try again, so here’s a little B&W thumbnail that might actually be appropriate for a political discussion.😛

image

Well, it looks like even a tiny 300x200 image isn't considered safe, so perhaps I should just try starting with something ridiculously small like 120x80 pixels.
Why can't I post photos in the Politics/Current Events section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Here is my take on why sharing images, photos, diagrams, charts, or tables actually matters, even when you are debating politics or topics closely tied to it.

Imagine there is a heated debate going on about religious demographics—people arguing over the role of faith in society or whether certain values should be taught in schools. If you try to explain which countries have the highest percentage of believers versus where atheism is most prevalent, but you just provide a link to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...ligion_map.png, I honestly feel like you aren't really making a point at all. Why bother if you aren't using a high-quality, credible source to make it visual?

When you actually include the image itself, the whole argument suddenly becomes much clearer and far easier for everyone to digest during a discussion.

image

I truly don't get the hesitation around posting pictures; it isn't dangerous, weird, or out of line, so what is the actual threat here?
There isn't one, obviously!
Why can't I post photos in the Politics/Current Events section? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Sam Alvarez4 said:Oh, one more thing.

If you're really that desperate for people to see your photos, but can't figure out how to post them as a link, just drop a link to a PDF and tell us which page numbers they're on. Anyone who actually cares will click and take a look...

There's no need to annoy everyone else with massive images that take up 3/4 of the screen!!

Personally...
When I run into posts like that, I just skip them. And if I agree with what the commenter is saying, I still end up putting them on my "ignore" list: "Idiot. Don't read."

I completely get where you're coming from regarding the images, and honestly, you have every right to feel that way, because why should we be cluttering things up with endless photos, charts, drawings, and whatnot? It reminds me of something I heard a lifetime ago, back during those old days of heavy-handed authoritarianism and strict censorship, when one of the very first lectures I ever attended included this single line: "A picture is worth a thousand words."

A lot of time has passed since then, hasn't it? Technology has moved mountains, and I think you'll agree that since we've transitioned from physical paper to everything being digital, we're now faced with an overwhelming variety of formats; I won't even start listing them all, from JPGs and PNGs to PDFs and dozens of different CAD files.
1.
So, why shouldn't we let forum members take advantage of all this modern tech?
2.
And more importantly, why is it that we can't post images in the politics section, yet they seem to be allowed on so many other PDF-heavy threads?