So, here’s how Yivanmukta continued his terrifying little crusade:
Yivanmukta said:...but from time to time I have those other experiences, the less pleasant ones, where a lot of damage was done...in moments when, say, I'd wish something bad on someone...
I've always said you could spit in God's face a hundred times and nothing under the heavens would happen, but if you do it within the mental arena of someone whose heart is deeply connected to Him, things change at the root...!
God doesn't hate or react to insults, but out of love for the one who loves Him, He sometimes reacts with full force to their emotions and inner experiences... crushing someone in that case isn't random, it's a difficult-to-understand expression of love... like a child playing and reacting to sincere "wishes" (no matter what they are)....
I assume this is just him explaining the "curse-casting" mechanism to himself and everyone else
he wishes bad things on someone ("lullabies" from the previous post), and God crushes that person
out of love and respect for him, since he's the one who loves that same God
When I spoke up in the chat about posts like these and the fact that the moderators weren't doing anything, I got these responses:
hiddenhound3's post:
hiddenhound3 said:...you know, we had even worse situations here, when Parsi was throwing serious curses at me and nobody even cared; nothing was going to happen to the forum lady, and Yivan got his lesson.
The Parsi mentioned actually showed up to the thread and denied he ever cast any curses at hiddenhound3
hiddenhound3 said:...but if you think that's not enough, you know who the admin is, so go ahead.
besides, why are you constantly attacking me and addressing me? we have another moderator here, why don't you try picking on him for once, I think he's bored... 🙄
She avoids her responsibility and dumps it onto the other moderator using vocabulary worthy of someone with a rich literary education, usually
But after some late-night thinking, hiddenhound3 came to her senses and decided she really needed to distance herself from her friend's views, so she, Sandra Parker3
reacted way too late, and honestly, it felt like she was just trying to save face
And then there's the other moderator, N'dugu, who is busy explaining why they're playing favorites and letting intimidation slide
He’s rambling on in that signature long-winded style of his, basically trying to exhaust everyone so we don't notice what he's actually saying:
N'dugu said:...Applying rules too rigidly is inherently unfair... that's just how our legal tradition works—it's easier to follow strict rules because it doesn't require much thought. You just check if a condition for a crime is met—like someone possessing an ounce of marijuana for personal use—and hand down a one-year prison sentence. That's what the U.S. Penal Code dictates. Meanwhile, you can't touch a dealer who flips it and buys a $2 million mansion, because everything is "legal" through various offshore shell companies that are impossible to track. That's why in the European Union, for example, the focus is on satisfying the principle of justice rather than just following a rule blindly.
On top of that, when determining guilt and sentencing, you always have to weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances, such as whether someone shows true remorse or if they're just demanding their own version of 'justice.' You also look at whether the individual has a prior criminal record...
And here we go... talking about criminal elements, drug dealing, buying mansions, offshore companies 🙄, the European Union
... I mean, you can try to convince yourself this has anything to do with Yivanmukta's intimidating posts, but... since he's working so hard in his intro to justify why he isn't taking action, I guess he's implying there's actually some merit to those posts, right? 🤔
Now, Yivan cannot be put in the same category as someone with 1,200 posts and a ton of interesting threads on Spirituality, compared to someone with only 62 posts on a sub-forum that, by certain standards, wouldn't even qualify as an 'established' user given the 100-post minimum.
Yeah, no, they aren't in the same league... just rack up 1,200 posts and walk around casting hexes
That's the explanation from the Spirituality moderator
...With only 62 posts, she couldn't have done anything seriously wrong, yet she acts like she's so important that she opens threads about the harms of baptism on the Spirituality board—a topic that has been debated a billion times already and has nothing new to offer...
Wait a second, are we talking about someone being intimidated here, or her right to start new topics on Spirituality?
So, let's summarize... not only is she being left alone to be intimidated by horrific imagery, but her actual right to post is being denied altogether🙏
...so she's complaining because her 'highly distinguished' handle was dragged into an awkward context, which I don't even consider a serious 'threat'....
can N'Dug explain what he means by putting "highly distinguished" in quotes like that?
but the most important question is:
where did this thread starter "Is baptizing a child in a Catholic church spiritually harmful?", fluorite, actually complain? come on, N'Dug, where did fluorite complain? spill it! ...I don't believe anyone is seriously getting worked up over such a boring topic; I think it's just a reaction from Yivan, who she's annoying because he thinks her posts are low-quality and don't add much to the discussion, so he reacted a bit too aggressively.
so, the moderator is justifying attacking users because his friend got annoyed
by what?
he thought a woman was being low-quality and wasn't contributing much to the debate!!! 🙏 🙄
N'Dug, fluorite wrote one single post—the opening post of the thread—and earned a brutal verbal beating for it, yet you claim she isn't contributing to the discussion?
she wrote one solitary post and got met with that kind of aggression
and even after you guys slapped her with a yellow card, she stayed classy and kept it civil
only to be followed by a barrage of curses from Yivanmukta; do you even read what you write?
N'Dug, oh great moderator of the Spirituality section, is it really enough for someone to seem "low-quality" to your protégé for that to serve as an excuse to act like a jerk?
go ahead, answer me...
...In that sense, for me, Yivanmukta has a certain mitigating circumstance, but everyone still needs to know their limits....
there are no
absolutely no mitigating circumstances for moves like that
you can't even say it was his first time or that it only happened once... there are simply no excuses for him
there are no excuses for you
there are no excuses for fluorite
whatever it may be... anyone even remotely intelligent and unbiased can see you're covering for your favorite, and yourself for that matter
and it's not the first time either
how long is this going to be the state of the Spirituality board?
with intimidation being tolerated and threads full of hate...
while moderators hand out cards for the slightest deviation from users they don't like?
...exactly, and please, feel free to disagree with me if you want...