Ethan Brooks59 said:No worries, Peter Peterson. Why don't you go ahead and satisfy my "curiosity"—just so I don't end up using some "passionate chemo-enthusiast's manifesto."
Answer me this: Does carrots Cure sarcoma? Does baking soda Cure breast cancer? Does beets Cure lung cancer?
Name one plant, supplement, or substance that can Cure cancer with absolute certainty. Which one? By what percentage? Within what timeframe? And with what specific success rate?
After that, tell me exactly how many people have been COMPLETELY cured—with confirmed medical clearance—using "Alternative" methods instead of radiation or chemotherapy, and what is the actual statistical percentage of those cures. If this stuff is such a miracle, the internet is overflowing with testimonials, so finding a number shouldn't be an issue. Don't give me vague answers like "many," "a lot," "plenty," or "several"—I want the exact number of CURED individuals, verified by clinical findings.
Let's see how "alternative" medicine actually holds up in the real world. No faith, no talismans, no wizards. Just concrete numbers.
🍿☕
No single ingredient works on its own; rather, through a healthy diet, you change the body's composition back to what it's supposed to be—healthy, free from unnatural elements and toxins that feed cancer cells—so the body just heals itself. You see miracles happen without any technology, without Star Trek nanobots, or any of those other "super-cures" found in conventional medicine.
By the way, stay on topic; this is a serious discussion, so save the trolling for somewhere else.
Whenever someone rolls out some miraculous testimony about "healing themselves" through nothing more than a clean diet—honestly, it’s enough to make you roll your eyes—it feels exactly like one of those Monty Python sketches. You know the ones. It’s that absurd, over-the-top theatricality where people act like a handful of kale and some organic blueberries are some kind of divine intervention, while actual medical professionals just stand there watching the madness unfold. It's pure farce.
You already know exactly what kind of "scientific response" they’re going to serve up—if you tried to predict their five-sentence rebuttal, you’d probably end up being off by maybe five words.
"It’s just coming from those trashy tabloid sites," they say. Or, "You're just trying to obstruct actual medicine." Give me a break. It’s almost as if you expect search results to only be valid if they originate from some massive domain like "megacorporation.com."
Of course, their goal isn’t to actually cure cancer—because if they did that, the "economic math" just wouldn't add up. A disease that funds private jets and superyachts for these outdated megalomaniacs is nothing short of a gold mine for them. They do everything in their power to ensure cancer rates continue to climb; after all, that's exactly why we've seen such a massive spike over the last few decades. We've already reached a point where we're consuming GMOs without a second thought, and honestly? Give it another twenty years and we'll probably be eating petroleum derivatives disguised as food.
It’s honestly pathetic how easily people fold for a handful of pocket change. It seems like everyone has a price these days—a tiny, insignificant amount—and they'll trade away their principles just to get it.
The moderation team really needs to step up and put an end to this relentless, baseless trolling—it’s completely unargumentative and frankly, exhausting.
I have to admit, following that whole mess regarding the IRS was incredibly entertaining. Sure, I might have gone a bit overboard a few times, but honestly, the whole situation felt completely lopsided due to the lack of moderation. I had about eight or nine different users backed into a corner with actual logic—if they want to troll and play dumb, fine, I can outmaneuver them four times over. I’m slightly disappointed the thread got shut down, though, because I still have plenty of scientific evidence left—stuff I found on YouTube that makes those globe-believers sound like they're just venting out of pure jealousy😂—which would have allowed me to finally bury the globe once and for all. Then again, maybe closing it wasn't such a bad idea; you can't just debate forever without the whole thing devolving into some endless, ideological philosophical shouting match. Besides, the globe is already RIP
Jerry Robinson56 said:You don't need to "stress out" because the act of deleting itself doesn't mean anything anymore—it’s just like shooting an innocent person... you can see for yourself there's nothing left. Meanwhile, he's already burned through his chances by being responsible for what happened before... Monty G and I have stated our positions; we offered a way to coexist, but "these people" simply aren't capable of understanding that. Rkoh was right to ban and wipe the slate clean, but this last instance—she either shouldn't have done it or at least should have been more professional; sometimes she gets caught in lies and starts playing politics. We all make mistakes, but only good people admit when they've messed up.
It isn't the fact that things are being deleted—that's your prerogative—but this time, she made a massive error, especially since it was her own decision rather than someone else just hitting a button. In a heartbeat, the "Delta Keks" guy vanished... even a casual observer couldn't read a sentence that fast. You see, it's impossible to hold a real discussion here because of the fanboys who mean absolutely nothing except acting as producers of mental delusions...
Here is a fresh, perfect example of someone who has nothing to do with the topic and hasn't understood it from the very beginning
And even when you explain it to him as clearly as water filling a swimming pool, it will still be unclear to him... because the flow of electrons (electric current) through a filament produces photons (blackbody radiation, and let me throw in Kelvin 😁)... see, that's what I'm fighting for. If I didn't know him (considering he's "highly rated"), I'd say he's just playing dumb... I've met some incredible people in my time, but Peter Peterson is a phenomenon—he truly has no clue about anything whatsoever. Thanks for everything... moving on. 😉
Ever since Gargamel took over, the moderation has been sharper than ever. Sure, they occasionally scrub my posts too, but I honestly don't mind—it’s refreshing to see that the little golden children of this forum aren't getting special treatment anymore. Finally, the rules actually apply to everyone equally.
All this whining from them just proves one thing: they were used to playing on easy mode, and now they’ve suddenly hit a wall of reality.
I mean, I still have this nagging feeling that the mods might be biased toward certain people, but who knows? Maybe I haven't looked closely enough at the data yet.
Here’s the situation. Whenever I try to engage in actual scientific debate—specifically when I’m calling out blatant falsehoods—the moderators step in and wipe my posts clean.
Because of that, I’m copying and pasting a previous post here from another thread, since I already knew they were going to delete it anyway.
saugaro said:You don't have a clue what you're talking about... send me the link. Tesla certainly wasn't the first to achieve anything in this field; at its core, a resonant circuit is the only requirement. Tesla didn't actually know what he was doing—he just pushed things to extremes by following established methods.
And what happened next? Absolutely nothing... But even that wasn't truly his work. The real author behind that patent was just some ten-year-old kid.
Another invalid conclusion, Peter Peterson... where are those 16 patents that Marconi used to humiliate Tesla?
Look, you clearly don't understand the context, but that was all propaganda... Westinghouse basically took Tesla on as an eccentric just to land the contract.
Oh sure, sounds like something straight out of Satan.com.🤣
What delusional nonsense. So, I take it that "ten-year-old kid" you mentioned was actually you?
I feel for you; it must be exhausting living in that twisted version of "reality" you've constructed. If you want to stop playing pretend, go check the court records yourself and find those 16 patents you're claiming exist.
That is, provided you can actually read English. Since you seem to be struggling, let me do the heavy lifting for you: "CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS
Syllabus
1. The broad claims of the Marconi patent no. 763,772, for improvements in apparatus for wireless telegraphy -- briefly, for a structure and arrangement of four high-frequency circuits with means of independently adjusting each so that all four may be brought into electrical resonance with one another -- held invalid because anticipated. P. 320 U. S. 38... https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed...20/1/case.html "
I just ask that I be allowed to respond to the post.
Grace Kim80 said:If you keep this up, not only is your thread getting locked, but you’re going to end up with a partial ban.
I already told you before—stop posting those theories about "child eaters"—but clearly, you weren't listening. Furthermore, we aren't some random PDF where people can just blow hot air about "bisexual orgies" without any context or relevance to the topic. Quite frankly, when the thread starter resorts to using these kinds of constructs to troll within their own discussion, the whole thing becomes worthless. If you want to talk about bisexuality and orgies, go find a hazelnut shop.
You got exactly what you asked for, and I'm not even going to dignify your insults toward me or everyone else here with a response, because I've already reported you to the mods.
Regards.
You didn't say it—go find that specific post and quote it right here. You claimed I shouldn't mention the flat earth, yet at the very same time, the Bible itself describes it—which is nothing more than censorship and a blatant suppression of free speech.
And even if you did say it, it’s obvious that it doesn't align with the fair standards of this forum.
Which essentially means anti-Christians can spit on whatever they want, while Christians aren't allowed to state a simple truth.
If I said we need to tear down bisexual orgs, the eaters, and demonic forces, that is perfectly normal—those are villains and enemies of humanity who kidnap children and sacrifice them.
Apply that same logic then: ban everyone else from mentioning pedophilia or the wealth of the church. But of course, you won't, because you love anything that drags the Bible through the mud, whether directly or otherwise. And wouldn't you know it—suddenly that doesn't count as "hazelnut" territory.
But instead, you censor everything that exposes Satan, either directly or indirectly.
Your remarks are laughable; you would have been better off not responding at all.
As for the partial ban? Oh, I'm absolutely trembling—my heart is just breaking.
Since I’m absolutely fed up with my threads getting locked every time I try to speak my mind, I’m filing a formal complaint against Grace Kim80 here.
This thread was shut down—and unless I somehow broke some obscure rule I wasn't aware of, it shouldn't have been. The "offense"? I uttered two short phrases: > bisexual orgies and child-devourers. What kind of ridiculous criterion is that????? One possible explanation is that we're looking at pure fascism—where the moderator, Grace Kim80, acts as a shield for bisexual orgies and devourers, refusing to let people realize the grim reality of what these Satanists are actually doing.
This is just one more example of how Grace Kim80 handles moderation; get her off the mod team (though, if possible, maybe just change her username first).
I know Handžo pays you guys well, but seriously, give me a break—this is way, way too much.
A backup of the post that got me banned (okay, maybe I went a little overboard with the sarcasm) Quote: For quite some time now, you can see how various "scientists" in "natural science" programs—pushing aside classic Darwinian evolutionary theory—are out there promoting the idea that aliens played a role in Earth's evolution. So, there's one thing—actually, several things—that I want to dig into. If evolution is such an exact, airtight science, how on earth can you just race from one empty hole to another with it? And again, if evolution is so definitively proven, why even bother reaching for aliens just to fill in the gaps within the theory? Furthermore, if aliens actually jumpstarted evolution on Earth, what does that even prove? Because since the existence of aliens would effectively disprove the Christian God, what's the explanation for where the aliens themselves came from? Who is the divinity that created them? If they weren't created by any God, does that mean they evolved too? And if they did, why on earth are we even talking about them when it doesn't actually explain anything about the theory of evolution? Especially considering most people don't even know—nor has it been proven—that aliens even exist in the first place?
Hey, Zachary Mendoza2. Fine, go ahead and keep locking things down—not that the moderation over at NS is anything to write home about anyway, especially since the opposition can use actual scientific methods to back up their arguments too. In my view, just because someone's take doesn't perfectly align with what's on Wikipedia doesn't mean it’s some kind of anti-science trolling.
A few months back, I ended up with a partial ban—basically out of nowhere, without even a heads-up. It was totally unfair; clearly, there was just a massive misunderstanding between us. I actually have nothing but respect for the mod team in general.👍
"You just can't grasp the conversation because you're too intellectually stunted." That’s basically the standard line from the moderator's little pets—but honestly, it doesn't bother me. If anything, these self-proclaimed geniuses provide great entertainment, and they actually help unbiased readers see the full picture, since they're so incredibly obvious and transparent—about as subtle as a neon sign.🐔 It’s almost laughable how completely unaware they are of their own absurdity.🤣 Just let them be; let them keep doing what they've always done. They're quite the entertaining bunch.☕
Zachary Mendoza2 said:Cheers. I won't interfere with your activities, but I just wanted to send my regards and let you know you've earned some credit over at natural science.
Honestly, who cares? That whole "natural science" nonsense isn't even worth a footnote in a local history book.
I’m standing with Elizabeth Jackson—honestly, most of these forum rules don't make any sense anyway. You try to step up and present a legitimate argument, only to be met with a swarm of on-duty trolls trying to insult you and tear down your credibility. The link in my signature serves as further proof of this nonsense.
In a single word: HORROR. Honestly, I’m convinced half the moderators here actually know one another personally, which makes it even harder to wrap my head around how they can sleep at night while dragging their own reputations through the mud. They moderate based on these ridiculous, arbitrary standards—scanning every single sentence just to see if they can catch me breaking some obscure rule—all while playing favorites and shielding their little inner circle from any scrutiny. It's transparent. I know exactly when I'm going to get hit with a warning or a ban, and frankly, sometimes it feels worth it just to call out this nonsense. ☕
Jerry Robinson56 said:The example was meant to illustrate just how banal you are—it wasn't an invitation for debate. You’ve already laid it all out in writing... without any provocation whatsoever. As the saying goes: you trip over your own feet, knock yourself out, and then somehow manage to do it twice more—only to turn around and blame everyone else, in this case, the moderators.
Oh, absolutely—if they actually did their jobs, these "geniuses" and provocateurs wouldn't be able to work hand-in-hand with them to ban anyone who dares to think differently.
I also gave you my interpretation of those words, you moron. You don't even have the credentials to be called an idiot, so you got that wrong too 🙂 ... A massive blunder... 👋
Of course I don't, because I'm a sane person—but your insinuations are crystal clear. You are nothing more than a standard-issue provocateur being coddled by the moderation team, which is exactly what I’ve demonstrated here.
And as for the slang... well, you might as well try buttoning your shirt in the back if you're going to use such obnoxious language; just don't cry when someone points out you're acting unhinged. Not to mention, 🤣 your "Alternative" idea is pretty bizarre.
Exaggeration proves nothing; nobody buttons their shirt from behind, and your nitpicking is nothing but a desperate, pathetic attempt to wiggle out of the absolute depths of your own defeat.
Jerry Robinson56 said:... He’s apparently baffled by how we can distinguish between pumping up a double versus just a single dose (as if 😁 were some kind of mystery)—honestly, he seems completely stumped by any number higher than one...
What you just wrote is something my grandmother could have told me. Besides, that wasn't even the point of the conversation. Sure, what you said is technically accurate, but it's frankly pathetic that it took you weeks to reach that conclusion—you've clearly been circling the drain for weeks trying to force a debate that you already lost. But look, people use that kind of jargon all the time; it's like saying someone is twice as difficult to move as a guy weighing 60 kg when they actually weigh 120 kg. The way you're trying to play the genius here is nothing short of comical. Honestly, kid, we know you're "smart"—really, bravo, bravo... 🤣
Go ahead and run off with your little clique because you clearly don't grasp the fundamentals of forces, pressure, or vacuum—you’re just conflating apples and oranges, yet you're still frustrated that I laid out hard facts that you can't actually refute. You've essentially proven your own incompetence, which is why you've resorted to these pathetic ad hominem attacks. It is honestly beneath me to even engage in a discussion with someone like you; go ahead and let your mommy give Ryan Gomez4 a pacifier since she clearly tolerates your wild, undisciplined behavior on this forum. It's no wonder you think you're an expert on everything—you're a jack-of-all-trades and a master of none.