CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Christian Cook6 › Posts

Posts by Christian Cook6

69 posts shown.

The X-Men series (2000-2019) in Movies ·
Sandra Brown said:It’s also quite impressive how they lay out the entire backstory for the first three films—specifically regarding Professor Xavier and Magneto.
My only real grievance is the absence of Ian McKellen; he's easily the standout actor in the whole X-Men series 👍

I'm with everyone on this. 🙂

Adam Chavez4 said:What’s wrong with Wolverine? 🤷 Personally, I think he’s the absolute best part of the whole thing.

Look, I can just speak for myself. 😁 This movie's a snooze—the characters are totally bland and mostly miscast (except for Wolverine). But honestly? The biggest letdown is Gambit. He’s nothing like he was in the comics or the animated series; it feels like they just slapped the same name on a completely different character. 😁
The X-Men series (2000-2019) in Movies ·
So? For me, X-Men: First Class was 🙂
Man, I just realized I completely blanked on that Wolverine one—honestly, it’s so bad I actually forgot 😵 My bad, I'm spacey, and I have zero clue if this can even be fixed 🤔
as of last night, I'm officially throwing Andrew Garfield into the Spider-Man mix 🙏
Warm Bodies (2013) in Movies ·
so what’s the move? zaljubljeni godzilla 🤣
It’s RDJ, hands down—watching his interviews and stuff, he just gives off those Tony Stark vibes. Plus, his Sherlock take had that same energy, so I honestly can't picture anyone else playing Iron Man. Right behind him, I'd say Hugh as Wolverine, since his version is basically a carbon copy of the Logan I grew up watching in the cartoons. 🙂You could've thrown a few more X-Men guys into the poll, but whatever, cool survey though. 🙂
V/H/S (2012) in Movies ·
doesn't look all that bad to me🤷
Katy Perry: Part of Me (2012) in Movies ·
I was just reading about this today. Honestly, they're being so dense—why would they drop her movie in theaters the exact same week Spider-Man comes out? 🙄
Not like I actually care how much her flick pulls at the box office, but still...
Ice Age: Continental Drift in Movies ·
feralranger81 said:I actually walked out of the theater after just thirty minutes today. Honestly, if you're over the age of six, watching something that poorly synchronized is just a miserable experience.

And you didn't even know it was dubbed until you walked into the theater 🙂
Taken 2 (2012) in Movies ·
William Martinez18 said:Is there any way to download it already? I can't find it anywhere 😠

dude, it hasn't even hit theaters yet
Shame (2011) in Movies ·
Kimberly Mendoza66 said:At the very least, this is a film defined by a question mark. It leaves so much unsaid, which I suppose is baked right into the title itself. The unspoken truth here is that the protagonist is haunted by something from his childhood—something that refuses to stay in the past and continues to bleed into his adult life. If you ask me, the root of all these traumas is Brandon himself; he’s a sexual addict, and that’s a heavy diagnosis to carry. When Nevolko lets Sissy move in, it feels less like hospitality and more like a sense of obligation—as if he simply owes her that much. As for the underlying incestuous undertones between them, you don't really need to spell it out; their casual nudity suggests a physical intimacy that clearly existed before. I don't think anyone forced their hand; it feels more like Brandon was the one who initiated things with his younger sister. That's what’s destroying him. He fled to New York to escape it, he carries the shame of it, he avoids Sissy’s calls, and he breaks down whenever she starts singing New York, New York. But he just can't help himself. Let's be honest: he's deeply unwell. His drive is so primal that he could probably find gratification in anything, and that one gay scene doesn't change the fact that he isn't necessarily gay or bisexual—his libido is just pure, raw mechanics, devoid of actual emotion. That explains why his budding relationship with Marianne fails to stir him. On the flip side, you have to wonder why Sissy would repeatedly attempt to take her own life, judging by the scars on her arm. Why does she go back to live with her brother? Does she feel she has no other choice, or is it pity? Is she forgiving him? Is she trying to save him? Their closeness feels far too intense for a typical sibling bond, and I almost get the impression that Sissy is the one constantly pursuing him. I don't know, but regardless, the lead actor delivers an absolutely brilliant performance! This is definitely a film worth watching a second time 🙂

I'm with you on everything—especially about Sissy hitting on him. In those scenes where he walks into the bathroom while she's showering, or when she climbs into his bed... I got that exact same vibe. She's pushing him, and he's clearly enjoying it even while he's fighting himself. He's caught in this loop of loving it and hating himself for loving it at the same time. 😁
The movie was okay, but the ambiguity bugged me a bit. Reading the synopsis didn't really grab me, but I watched it because I love Carey Mulligan and Michael Fassbender.
That restaurant scene was the highlight for me—just a classic, super awkward first date 😁 I think anyone can relate to that scene.
As for the part where he couldn't get it up with her—I took that to mean he's become so used to sleeping with strangers that actually liking her was what threw him off.
Rise of The Avengers in Movies ·
grandpa's Russian😁
Quote : Swagger
Andrew Ross4 said:Honestly, all this complaining about the movie... what exactly were you people expecting from a movie based on a comic book? Clearly, absolutely nothing. But seriously, not one single person here has actually read a Captain America comic. If you had, you’d realize that out of everything, Captain America is probably the most faithful adaptation ever brought to the big screen.

That doesn't make it a better movie, period. ☕

Quote : Swagger
John Peterson3 said:That tells us plenty about the source material. The movie itself feels bloated and sluggish—fun at times, sure, but mostly just tedious.

If they had integrated the whole Hydra myth more realistically into actual WWII history, or made the core conflict about preventing the misuse of that blue energy (whatever that was) rather than just the rapid development of a weapon powered by it (which happened suspiciously fast from discovery to field deployment, if I might add), and if the CGI were more convincing, it would have been better.

As it stands, it’s just full of clunky elements monkey wrench from start to finish.

Thor, which I found much more enjoyable, also had flaws—that city sequence felt a bit too much like the Liberators—but it works because of Thor himself. His journey from an arrogant instigator to someone who actually stands for something manages to carry the rest, even if those themes could have been handled with more depth. It still holds up.

Meanwhile, Skipper Yankee remains the exact same person throughout, just starting out scrawny and ending up on steroids. There is no character arc, no meaningful struggle, and zero growth beyond running around and throwing a shield.

🙂
Honestly, Thor had some moments that actually cracked me up—man was hilarious sometimes. But Cap? Captain America: The First Avenger just wasn't even on that level.
briskeagle3 said:That’s the core issue with movies like this—they try way too hard to be taken seriously. We all know that fairy tales actually offer more realism and better life lessons than these flicks where reality is just reduced to a black-and-white zone. You've got this ultimate, invincible hero fighting against ultimate evil, except the villain actually has an Achilles' heel while the "good guy" is basically flawless.

When a movie is going to lie to my face, I at least want that lie to be believable—to have some sort of logical foundation—rather than feeling like it was scripted for a six-month-old baby (and honestly, even babies aren't buying these tropes anymore). The audience has evolved, the world has changed, and information is easier to access than ever; it’s only natural that I want the story to make sense.

Now, look, I wasn't raised on comic books about infallible, all-powerful superheroes, so maybe I don't have the standing to critique this.

My heroes growing up were characters like Zorro, The Lone Ranger, and Commando Mark—though by puberty, I couldn't stand their nonsense anymore, so I pivoted to the incomparable Mr. No and eventually Alan Ford.

Still, this movie is still better than Iron Man 1 & 2, where you're basically dying of boredom. And what kind of "superhero" is he if everyone knows his secret identity (Iron Man)? His enemies could easily exploit that—it's just silly. The only thing that comes to mind as being genuinely good in this genre is the X-Men franchise.

Actually, there are only two truly great takes on this theme so far:
WATCHERS kick ASS
WATCHERS kick ASS

Then there's RoboCop, which was built from the ground up as a cinematic superhero; he's top-tier, and even after watching him a few times, it’s always a blast.

P.S. I watched the new Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray yesterday, and unlike this nonsense, it was a genuine thrill to watch—so much so that I immediately hopped onto IMDb to see if there's a sequel. I'm still riding that wave of satisfaction, unlike this movie, which I'd already forgotten about while it was still playing.

Same here. If someone had asked me who the bad guy was while the movie was still playing, I wouldn't have even had an answer.🤣
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) in Movies ·
briskeagle3 said:I popped this one on Blu-ray yesterday—and honestly, when you pick a movie like this, you're basically expecting non-stop action from start to finish followed by some massive, epic showdown. Instead? I got a bit of a letdown—there was barely any action, and that final confrontation felt pretty weak.

It’s the same old story we saw in Iron Man 1 and 2—with these kinds of flicks, I'm really just looking for a steady stream of small action beats leading up to one massive finale—not getting bogged down by all this heavy drama, as if it were some serious prestige drama. 3/5

guess you must've hated Spider-Man then😁
The Fault in Our Stars (2012) in Movies ·
image

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1937264/

Tessie gets hit with a leukemia diagnosis and finds out her time is running short. With her best friend Zoe by her side, she starts checking things off a bucket list before she goes...

Looks solid—especially since Dakota is in it. She’s such a killer actress. 👍
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) in Movies ·
Anthony Hayes8 said:At this rate, Ryan Reynolds will have played three comic book heroes by the time he's done with Green Lantern. :)

Man, what a joke—the guy has zero actual acting talent.

OT: Captain America: The First Avenger was boring as hell and honestly, the character just gets on my nerves. Chris was way better when he was playing Human Torch in Fantastic Four.
Jaws in Movies ·
Is this actually one of the best movies you've ever seen?
Look, I'll do you a favor and drop a few recommendations so you can finally see what real cinema looks like 😛 😉
Savages (2012) in Movies ·
Man, I just read over the plot for this movie and it sounded totally brainless
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter in Movies ·
In the trailer, they’re calling it ''based on a true story'' 😂
Snow White (2012) in Movies ·
Justin Rogers5 said:I thought this Snow White was way better than Kirsten.🤷Just talking about acting skills, really. I’d just pluck her eyebrows for her. Roberts switches up her accent twice during the movie, but overall, it’s a great, dreamy film. That fight between the Prince and Snow White actually reminded me a bit of that scene from Zorro, but it was executed really well—and sexy.

same here