Brian Williams said:Look, you clearly don't appreciate The Ring, but one of its defining qualities is just how deeply unsettling it is... not to mention that it's exceptionally well-shot... 👍 The tension in this one is incredible, and the pacing is masterfully handled... I don't really care how many similar films came before it; this particular piece is exceptionally well-made... 👍
You’re looking for something else in movies, and I’m becoming increasingly "convinced" that it has very little to do with disemboweled guts...
No spilled guts, and Constantine is actually crying...
HU HU...
🙂
😂 😂 😂 You really gave me a good laugh...
Look, we are clearly from two completely different generations. I have always gravitated toward the old-school classics—stuff like The Pack, The Thing, Proteus, the Evil Dead series, the House of Wax original, or Day of the Dead. I prefer those older films where they didn't rely on a mountain of CGI to do the heavy lifting. Back then, the appeal was the visceral stuff—the practical effects involving guts and gore. You, on the other hand, haven't even touched those classics; you seem more interested in flashy special effects, mediocre flicks, and those mindless Japanese horror remakes like The Ring. When it comes to ghost stories, you go for The Ring, whereas I’ll stick to Poltergeist or Lady in White. And where did this sudden obsession with gore come from? Lawrence Booth2 absolutely lives for that kind of thing... 😁
Besides that, a stupid videotape, some senseless superstition, and a girl with greasy hair don't do anything to rattle me. Silent Hill 3 and 4 actually managed to get under my skin, but this American nonsense, The Ring, was more boring than anything else...
In case you haven't quite caught on yet, I prefer quality horror, whereas you seem to enjoy the mediocre stuff...
Period.