CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sam Green73 › Posts

Posts by Sam Green73

393 posts shown.

That’s a pretty interesting take on the idea here.
http://www.e-novine.com/sr/kultura/clanak.php?id=20826
Quincy:
It’s actually really heartening to see that even after everything we’ve been through over the last twenty years, there’s still room for coexistence, mutual understanding, and international cooperation here in the Mediterranean. This new generation of politicians—the ones who grew up amidst the ashes and ruins left behind by those before them—really seem to grasp the weight of the responsibilities they're carrying. So, what exactly are those obligations?
American Communism! in World ·
Honestly, it feels a bit too much like State capitalism, which is basically what people called Communism right before the USSR collapsed.
There are even plenty of clear examples of how massive contracts were just handed out to major American corporations during the "reconstruction of Iraq"—it was quite the 🙄 market, if you know what I mean.
Getting way too soft/tolerant lately in Psychology ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:Ever heard that phrase, "I hate Black people and racists"?

One thing I've been noticing on these forums lately. I don't want to offend anyone, but it seems pretty obvious...

I've noticed that the people who go out of their way to brag about being liberal, open-minded, or tolerant often end up being the biggest chauvinists and racists.

Like, you see women who constantly talk about fighting for gender equality, but then they turn around and defend women who commit violence against men. It's like women can never be wrong, and men are just trash who are always at fault.🙄

And what about those self-proclaimed "leftists" who make excuses for communist atrocities?

I once read an atheist saying we should basically have a holocaust for all religions. But that same person will start whining the second a church official says anything about atheists.

For example, there are tons of people who say, "No, I'm not a right-winger or a racist, I just don't like Mexicans and I don't want to see a mosque in my neighborhood."

Or someone claiming to love Jews while simultaneously backing an Iranian president who’s calling for the destruction of Israel and stuff.

What do you guys think about people like that?

Well, everyone’s got their own reasons for acting the way they do.
I’ve actually noticed a bit of a pattern lately—it seems like the more someone tries to brag about a specific positive trait, the more it feels like they're actually overcompensating for a total lack of it. It’s almost like a psychological tell.

So, what are you really hoping to get out of this discussion?
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
fadedtrucker19 said:That all sounds great and all, but smoking isn't the only way to consume marijuana... I don't smoke at all, personally, but I am definitely planning on trying some hash brownies sooner or later...

People chew tobacco, too.

Are you seriously suggesting that eating "hash brownies" poses zero risk, and therefore marijuana should be fully legal?

The actual topic here is marijuana legalization.

edit:
Oops, looks like this got moved over to the health section 😕
Damn, you guys just shut down my best argument.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Joseph Kern11 said:A 'Joint' is just as bad as five cigarettes

Well, if those five cigarettes are perfectly legal, shouldn't a Joint be legal too?
And what about high-quality skunk?

I think I saw someone mention earlier that the health risks from marijuana are pretty much on par with smoking cigarettes.
It actually reminds me of this one time—I almost lost my lunch because a bus driver lit up a cigarette while I was riding; even though I was sitting way in the back, the headache was absolutely brutal.
So, I totally get why people argue that both are harmful.

Do you honestly think we should use the LD50 as the main metric for deciding which substances stay legal?

Personally, I feel like both should be banned in public spaces (like grocery stores or malls), even if I think it makes sense to allow both tobacco and marijuana in private homes or at a pub.
Maybe we should even consider restrictions at home if there are kids around.
How to respond to a lost PM? in Forum Help! ·
No worries at all.
Looks like my messages finally made it through after all. 👍

The thread served its purpose, and honestly, I think we’ve probably moved past the point where it makes sense to keep it going.
How to respond to a lost PM? in Forum Help! ·
Or maybe he just had me on his ignore list all along
How to respond to a lost PM? in Forum Help! ·
I just replied to a private message, but now the sender is blowing up my inbox claiming they never actually got a response.
Has anyone else dealt with this glitchy mess, or am I just having the worst luck today?
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Elizabeth Parker55 said:Marijuana is harmless!

I disagree—marijuana definitely has its downsides.

The real debate isn't about whether it's "safe," it's about whether we should legalize it or not.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Jerry Wood21 said:James Turner80 thinks there's something to the idea that the marijuana myth means it doesn't cause addiction. But honestly, that just isn't going to fly.

Come on, man, don't start with this too.
If we're already dealing with plenty of legal substances out there that are incredibly addictive, then this whole argument stops being the central issue here.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
So, we're talking rhetoric here.
James Turner80 said:I mentioned I was using an vivid example just to help clarify my point a bit better.
Look, a crime is a crime, plain and simple.
The reason I brought up this specific scenario is because there are people in this thread who don't view using certain drugs as a criminal offense, so maybe this comparison will make things click for them.

A crime is simply whatever the law defines as one.
If you wanted to be descriptive, you could have talked about parking on a crosswalk or jaywalking against a red light.

Let’s try to stay on track here.

Some folks in this discussion believe that using certain drugs should be illegal, while others feel it shouldn't be.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
James Turner80 said:Look, if I pass a law that makes child abuse illegal, I’m obviously just making sure I don't do it myself (unless I sneak in some loophole for specific groups or special circumstances, of course). Even if I personally have zero urge to mess with a ten-year-old, I’m still banning the act.
So what’s the big deal or the paradox there?
With that law, I am prohibiting the act.

It honestly feels like you’re equating the exploitation of kids—or even just hurting other people—with someone simply choosing to use substances for their own enjoyment on their own terms.
Is this coming from some bad experiences of yours?
Or is it just empty rhetoric?
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Kyle Ross56 said:You honestly can't even have a serious conversation about drug legalization without people immediately pivoting to health concerns. It’s become the go-to playbook for anyone pushing the prohibitionist agenda—they use public health arguments as a convenient shield to justify keeping everything criminalized.

I think we can all pretty much agree on how things stand. Drug use is such a complex thing to wrap your head around, isn't it? It’s never just about the substance itself; it’s about why people reach for it in the first place—whether they're looking for an escape, trying to manage some heavy mental stuff, or just chasing a feeling. There’s so much nuance to how different substances affect everyone differently, and honestly, there's a lot of misinformation out there that makes things way more confusing than they need to be. More or less? Honestly, it’s just plain bad for you. There's really no way to sugarcoat it—it's harmful to your health..
Look, at the end of the day, there's no such thing as a perfect substance. Every single medication out there is basically a double-edged sword—you’re always going to be weighing the pros against the cons. Whether you're talking about something prescribed by a doctor or anything else, there's always a trade-off between the benefits you're looking for and the side effects you have to deal with. It's just the reality of how chemistry works.

I don't quite follow what you're getting at there, friend! You just dropped a single word without any context. Are you trying to start a conversation about something specific, or was that just a typo? Whatever it is, I'm all ears. Lay it out for me—give me the full story or ask your question, and let's get a real discussion going. I love diving into the details, so don't be shy! Look, we really need to talk about this because there's such a massive misconception floating around out there. When you look at the actual data, MDMA is significantly more addictive than marijuana, and it's also linked to a whole host of serious health issues. It’s one of those things where the reality on the ground is just so different from the common myths people tend to repeat.
It’s totally legal, but let’s be real—people constantly overlook how much passive smoking actually affects everyone else.
It’s honestly heartbreaking to think about how many kids out there are breathing in secondhand smoke on a daily basis. It’s one of those things that just hits home when you realize how much they're being exposed to constant tobacco smoke just by being around adults.
It’s the same story when you’re just hanging out at a local bar or grabbing a coffee downtown—you're constantly exposed to that same intoxicating allure and all the toxic baggage that comes along with it.
To be completely honest, when it comes to my own health, I feel like having someone smoking right next to me is way worse than them using needles or even popping pills. It’s just one of those things that hits differently for me.

Exactly. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about how we view alcohol in our culture. It’s one of those things that feels almost invisible because it’s woven so tightly into the fabric of everyday life here in the States. You go to a wedding, a business dinner, or even just a casual Friday night hangout with friends, and there it is—always front and center. It’s funny, isn't it? We have these massive social rituals built entirely around grabbing a drink. In some ways, it acts like this universal social lubricant that helps people loosen up and connect. I remember back in college, most of my best stories and deepest conversations happened over a few beers at a local pub. There was just this sense of ease that came with it. But then you look at the flip side, and it gets much more complicated. We live in a country where the line between "celebrating" and "overdoing it" can get incredibly blurry. There’s a real tension between the fun, social aspect of having a cocktail and the very real health concerns that organizations like the National Institute on Drug Abuse often highlight. It’s a heavy topic because it hits so close to home for so many families. I think it really comes down to balance and awareness. For some, a glass of wine with dinner is a relaxing ritual; for others, it can become a much more difficult cycle to break. It’s definitely not a black-and-white issue, and I’m curious to hear what you all think. Do you see it as a vital part of American social life, or do you think we put too much emphasis on drinking as a way to unwind?Honestly, if you look at the facts, it’s way easier to overdose on alcohol than it is on marijuana. It's just one of those things that people don't talk about enough when they're debating which one is "worse."

The whole argument that marijuana use acts as a gateway to harder drugs just doesn't hold water. Honestly, saying that marijuana leads to harder substances is like saying eating beef leads you straight to heavy narcotics—it’s a total logical leap. If you look at the actual patterns, most people who end up using harder drugs simply happened to use marijuana first. It’s a correlation, not a cause-and-effect relationship. In my opinion, the real issue lies with how we treat these substances. When we criminalize marijuana, we create this weird social stigma where users are labeled or grouped together, which can actually push someone toward more intense drug cultures. Instead of seeing a progression from one substance to another, I think it’s more accurate to say that the criminalization of marijuana creates a pathway where users might feel pushed toward harder drugs because of the way society treats them. It's less about the biology of the plant and more about the social consequences of the laws themselves.

Look, if we’ve already reached a consensus that marijuana is harmful, I honestly don't see the point in dragging this out into an endless debate over the exact degree of damage. Once we agree on the core issue, why spend all our energy nitpicking the specifics?

So, here’s the big question I’ve been chewing on: when you look at society as a whole, which path actually does more good? Is it better for marijuana to be strictly criminalized, kept illegal, or fully legalized? It's one of those massive debates that seems to spark an argument no matter where you go, but I really want to dig into what's best for the community at large.
Honestly, we really ought to be asking this same question when it comes to alcohol and tobacco, too.

I truly believe that once you reach adulthood, everything changes... upućena At the end of the day, an individual has the right to make their own damn decisions.
Personally, I’m a firm believer that smoking shouldn't be allowed just anywhere; it really needs to be restricted to designated areas only.
I really want to drive this point home. The intended recipient I mean, honestly, you could probably have a whole separate debate about where the line for adulthood actually sits. It’s one of those things that isn't as black and white as people like to pretend.

Look, I truly believe kids shouldn't have access to drugs, but we need to talk about where we draw the line. It feels like we’ve gone overboard. In my opinion, if a kid gets caught with a pack of cigarettes, it shouldn't immediately trigger an investigation by Child Protective Services or force parents to sit down for a formal meeting with social workers. It seems excessive to jump straight to that level of intervention just because a minor is breaking a smoking age law. Instead of making everything a massive legal ordeal that involves the state stepping into family business, shouldn't we focus more on the actual messaging? We already see warnings everywhere stating that minors can't buy tobacco—that should be enough. Let's keep things in perspective; there's a huge difference between a teenager experimenting with a cigarette and actual substance abuse issues. Overreacting to every little thing just creates unnecessary fear for families.

Look, I’ve always believed that addiction is a massive, heavy burden to carry. It’s a deep-seated evil that touches so many lives, and honestly, there isn't any way around saying it: addiction is a profound tragedy.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
James Turner80 said:Since everyone here seems to be stuck on nothing but the positive side of marijuana, I figured I’d chime in and talk about the downsides for a bit.

Look, the topic at hand is legalization, not whether the stuff is good or bad for your body.

Do yourself a favor and go read up on Milton Friedman's take on these kinds of issues—it might give you some much-needed perspective.

We are in the politics subforum, not the health one.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Joseph Kern11 said:If you follow that logic to its natural conclusion, the solution to any black market is basically just legalization. I know, I know—that’s probably not exactly what you were getting at, but when you strip everything else away, that’s really what it boils down to.

Look, that’s just not how it works. You don't fix the black market by just throwing more regulations at it. If you really want to tackle the underground economy, you have two real options: either tighten the screws with much stricter oversight, or—and this is the one people usually forget—just lower the tax burden. When you make it cheaper to play by the rules, people actually start following them.
Joseph Kern11 said:Look, if we’re being honest from a purely economic standpoint, there's a real downside to consider here. If a larger chunk of the population starts using weed regularly, we’re looking at a workforce that’s likely going to be less productive and less sharp. It's hard to build a high-functioning, highly educated labor market when people are constantly feeling sluggish or unmotivated. From a big-picture perspective, it just doesn't add up for the economy.

Honestly, looking at my own circle, I’ve noticed a pretty consistent pattern: most people I know who use MDMA—whether they’re doing it now or used to—are actually quite highly educated. We're talking people with college degrees, and honestly, quite a few even have PhDs. It's definitely not what you see in the stereotypes.
They weren't doing it every single day, nor were they hitting it on a weekly basis. It wasn't part of their regular routine at all.

Honestly, I’d be just as quick to send kids out to juvenile detention if they were caught smoking regular cigarettes on a street corner, but you just don't seem to grasp that not everyone fits into that "underage" category. It's a bit more nuanced than that!
I’m glad to see you finally came to your senses. Honestly, if you can't get a handle on your usage and actually keep things under control, it's much better to just stay away from it altogether.

Honestly, from what I’ve seen, most people I know who use are just doing it occasionally. They aren't some lost cause, either—they're actually pretty educated, high achievers, and incredibly efficient in their daily lives.

Honestly, if you look at it from a certain angle, the people who are constantly hooked on legal stuff—I'm talking about alcohol, cigarettes, and all that greasy fast food—seem to be in an even more pathetic state than those using anything else. It’s just a different kind of struggle.
So, why aren't you out there fighting to get that stuff criminalized? Seriously, what's the deal?
Do you have any idea how many people actually lose their lives to issues tied to alcohol, nicotine, and obesity? It’s honestly staggering when you start looking at the numbers.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
James Turner80 said:Why is there even so much noise surrounding marijuana?

I think some people might actually see this as a deeper conversation about fundamental human liberties.😉
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Joseph Kern11 said:Blah, blah, blah... honestly, I don't even care anymore. Go ahead, burn your lungs out with that weed if you want; it doesn't affect me. I tried my best to walk you through the reality of this, but you’re just being stubborn. I know exactly what’s going on in your head because I’ve been in those exact shoes, so there isn't much more I can do for you at this point.

But please, for the love of everything, stop spreading that drug cartel propaganda to everyone else. You're going to have some kid stumble upon this thread, read your nonsense, and think they should start smoking because you've so "scientifically proven" how harmless it is.

What we actually need is real education. We need people to explain what this stuff does to you—real talk, based on actual life experiences. Maybe then someone who's on the fence might decide to stay away from that poison.

The problem is, this discussion is drifting into politics rather than staying focused on health.
We really should be looking at the pros and cons of marijuana illegality.

Right now, criminal organizations hold a total monopoly on the marijuana trade. (I hope that makes sense.)

And basic economics tells us that monopolies are never a good thing.
Are we really suggesting that criminals are the right people to hand a massive market monopoly over to?
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
This is such a solid read http://leap.cc/Dedication/friedman.php.
It really breaks down how prohibition actually ends up driving crime rates through the roof.

The core issue here isn't just debating whether certain substances are bad for you; it’s about the whole argument for legalization.

Look, sure, some things might be harmful—but then again, car exhaust, charred BBQ meat, and mountains of processed sugar aren't exactly winning any health awards either.

In my opinion, we should legalize these things and instead pour massive resources into education.
It feels pretty pointless to criminalize marijuana when you've got people spending half their paycheck on regular cigarettes, not to mention the massive issue of alcoholism out there.

p.s. When I talk about education, I’m specifically talking about teaching people about addiction and providing tools for psychological self-help.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Jerry Wood21 said:Cannabis actually traces its roots back to the Old World, and by the 1500s, it had already made its way over to the Western Hemisphere. It’s easily one of the oldest cultivated plants out there. Because people have been growing it everywhere, it’s spread to pretty much every corner of the globe—you could really call it a true cosmopolitan plant. It’s incredibly hardy, too, thriving in all sorts of different climates and environments. You see it popping up everywhere, whether it's being intentionally farmed or just growing wild like a weed.

Do you honestly think where the plant originally came from matters when we're talking about legalization?
Let's try to stay on topic here.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
It’s one of those age-old debates, right? The classic chicken or the egg scenario.

I’ve been thinking lately that maybe people who struggle with social anxiety or interpersonal issues have a much stronger pull toward using weed,
and honestly, it feels like teenage brains might all be wired in pretty similar ways—regardless of whether someone is considered "neurotypical," dealing with schizophrenia, or experimenting with marijuana.

Don't get me wrong, there’s a very clear reason why we don't let minors buy alcohol or cigarettes; and in my book, regardless of what the law says about legality, kids shouldn't have access to narcotics, psychedelics, or anything else heavy-duty.