CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › neonwalker95 › Posts

Posts by neonwalker95

50 posts shown.

COVID-19 Updates and Discussion in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Paul Bailey98 said:Get used to this kind of moderation—it's standard. Anyone following this thread from the jump has already Googled everything, except maybe the wide-eyed idealists. 😁
If this all plays out well and the skeptics are right, we're all fine. But if us "doomsday preppers" end up being right... well, they won't be around to gloat. 🍿
Honestly, it's better to stay optimistic—their sense of satisfaction is just more potent. ☕

The topic is politics. Period. We're talking about the social and political fallout of the virus—real numbers in different countries and how it hits them. I don't get this style of moderation at all, especially this claim that we're "spreading panic." It’s not like this site is a major national news network—some anonymous user's post isn't going to trigger a nationwide riot, and the forum isn't going to be held liable.

And they keep obsessing over that one specific index. Every major news outlet on the planet is reporting the same thing. Every portal across the US and the EU has multiple stories about the virus, yet here on this forum, it's treated like taboo. It would be better to just lock the thread than to deal with this censorship—it feels less like a discussion and more like state-controlled media you'd see in Iran or similar places.
COVID-19 Updates and Discussion in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The moderation on this thread is an absolute joke—completely biased. I just got flagged by Karlovcan yesterday simply because I posted about the infection rates in Italy jumping by 50%, citing Reuters.
Of course, he had to compare everything to the flu. As if the flu is even relevant here. Karlovcan spends most of his time obsessing over influenza, acting like some top-tier virologist when he clearly doesn't have a medical background. He’s just handing out bans left and right for no reason at all.
Uncut Gems (2019) in Movies ·
Donna Fowler3 said:Man, that was brutal. Forty minutes in and I feel like I just went ten rounds in a boxing ring... The script felt like it was ripped straight out of a chaotic farmyard at dawn. Nobody talks normally, everyone's just screaming over each other and cutting people off... it's irritating as hell.

I had the exact same takeaway. Keeping track of all that shouting is impossible—it's a total madhouse.
A - Austria in European Union ·
AUSTRIANS DISAPPOINTED, WHILE CHINA CELEBRATES AS COMPLAINTS OVER THE PELLESKI BRIDGE CONTRACT ARE REJECTED: 'This marks a turning point in US-China relations'

The US is also deeply disappointed by the decision to extend the ban on hiring Americans in Austria. While places like Malta and the UK have already lifted such restrictions, Austria—which historically saw many American lives lost due to its aristocratic elite—simply can't bring Americans up to the level of Czechs or Slovaks. It’s honestly embarrassing, even compared to Bulgarians.
Where can I find some HDW flags? in Close to Politics ·
The official government Twitter account claims the flag was hung right in front of the Department of Defense without their permission.

Government of the Republic of America @VladaRH Apr 25
Željko, per our other tweet, that flag was put up without getting the green light from the Department of Defense.


So—apparently in America—you can just hang flags in front of Ministries whenever you feel like it, regardless of what the Department of Defense says.😲
Sex Ed thread - locked and moved to Close Politician. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
jadeseal4 said:Just more trolling.
Closing a thread is always debatable—
mostly because certain topics just sting.
If it’s boring or irrelevant, let it die a natural death.

Spam, spam, spam. From the jump... everything just looped twenty-seven times over and over.
Sex Ed thread - locked and moved to Close Politician. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
James Patel20 said:"Other universities." 🤦

It’s "other" because Miletić—from that Vigilara group that hosted Judith Reisman—didn't invite her to his own university where he got his Master's and is finishing his PhD (the Catholic seminary)—instead, he basically NATURITI her, cornered her through political science and philosophy circles, flooded the public square, and even showed up in the media for a short stint with a live fucking stream. Now everyone's suddenly acting concerned because some topic is finally starting to boil over. 😉

just a one-hit wonder 🤷
Sex Ed thread - locked and moved to Close Politician. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
James Patel20 said:And what’s your solution?

Ban free speech?

While one group was busy legitimately attacking sex education, the other group spent all their energy attacking the forum users who dared to disagree with them.

Your comment really drives that point home.

Now suddenly, the first group are "spammers" while the second group gets treated like respected members.

It's absurd—honestly, it's laughable.

That’s exactly why we have moderators—without them, this place would just be a chaotic mess of spam. These neo-Catholics from those specific organizations are the real spammers; apparently, their own websites aren't enough, and since they can't get their way in news comments, they're trying to hijack someone else's domain and university space. They haven't even managed to rally those 60,000 anti-sex-ed parents they keep dreaming about, so now they're forced to push themselves onto our territory.
Sex Ed thread - locked and moved to Close Politician. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The activists from Vigilara and Grape have started flooding this forum with spam because they’ve become total nobodies everywhere else—basically just one-hit wonders in the political scene.

It’s been their go-to tactic since they launched their campaign against sex education. Suddenly, our city is crawling with those four-legged agitators—pamphlet spam, email blasts about posters for the Fin dead girls (Mestar even bragged about personally emailing the director at Gavella), and endless spam citing Judith Reisman to harass their local university and physically overwhelm the entire philosophy department. Just constant, relentless spam.
What's the difference between Nora For, Arsen, and Boris Šprem? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Does anyone else remember that poster from back in '88? "In our society, everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others"—basically a direct lift from Animal Farm. Get creative, man. Nora For has a resourceful mom and a dad who really know how to stir the pot; honestly, any marketing agency in the States should be taking notes. If her folks weren't so stubborn and sharp-tongued, she wouldn't have half this edge. But hey, when you're backed into a corner, you use every connection and skill in the toolkit. We're practically pros at that.

It’s just an ad hoc frenzy followed by a lightning-fast mobilization of resources. Americans only seem to get things done under pressure—intense, crushing pressure...
Maria Booth96 said:I’ll never wrap my head around how you can claim to "love" your country while simultaneously dodging taxes. 🤷
It’s just pure hypocrisy to me.

Someone on a forum once wrote in their bio that a person's true character is defined by what they do when nobody is watching. It makes me wonder: how many Americans would actually step up if paying taxes were voluntary? You could lay it all out for people—the way we all think we know everything—and say: "Look, pay your share so we can actually build a functioning society and have a real country to live in. If you don't, our seniors will end up destitute on the streets and we'll be leaving kids to fend for themselves in alleyways."

Seriously, though, how many Americans would actually stay honest?🤷

We really are the world champions of blending patriotism with cheating the system—exploiting the state down to the last cent. If only we were that thorough in everything else.
neonhound19 said:All those scammers need to be hit hard—I'm talking heavy fines and actual prison time.

Bandić also went through a technical divorce just to keep the house (he’s a big Catholic, but an even bigger patriot)

Then you've got certain groups who basically just sign papers saying they're separated so the mothers can claim single-parent benefits. Add in the child allowances and social welfare, and they're sitting on a nice little pile of cash.

Honestly, this whole country is just crawling with thieves and criminals.

American social policy has been tanking ever since those former American refugees arrived. With the one honorable exception being the Americans who moved to Gothenburg back in the 60s. Look, they aren't the only ones to blame, but they might be the most "creative" when it comes to interpreting—or completely ignoring—the law and 😂
Bradley Scott2 said:Linić is just talking nonsense.
What law actually requires spouses to live under the same roof?
Nowadays, courts rule that common-law relationships are equal to marriage, even if the couple never lived at the same address.

And honestly, even if our government tried to implement something like this, people would just pretend to get divorced. What then? Will they pass a law saying people aren't allowed to divorce?😂

And I don't even know what counts as proof—low water or electricity usage? I only wash myself on Saturdays, pee in the yard, don't use running water, use one single lightbulb, and go to bed early. Apparently, having low consumption means I don't live there.🤣
It started fast—this rapid equalization of homosexuality with pedophilia and sodomy. Even here on this forum, the political right seems completely obsessed with sex. Specifically, same-sex stuff—they see it everywhere.
The Edge is getting censored on Politics again in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Morgan Rodriguez57 said:Trying to have a decent, logical debate about politics under Ryan Vaughn7's thumb—it’s just impossible. 🙄

I dropped some links in the debate over "sexuality education"—specifically regarding:

Margaret Sanger—the founder behind Planned Parenthood—and her whole philosophy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEja-1emRic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in7IUzjN3pY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3U3NcCD1lg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZdwpjArFjg

Regarding "Planned Parenthood" and their involvement in sex education here in America—it’s a mess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsfIVCotQn8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9aNWNznxHw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7xEc7CFbYw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWMsalghCKo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RWVLQx98Yk

Regarding that 1969 "Planned Parenthood" memorandum—and those whole population reduction schemes—it’s all still right there.

[Link to Jaffe Memo PDF]

Where exactly does that say, among other things:

---

Planned Parenthood—an organization that’s basically become the epicenter of every heated debate over reproductive rights and social policy in America today. It’s more than just a healthcare provider; it's a massive political lightning rod.

So, let me get this straight—it’s the exact same organization performing abortions, pushing sex education through state funding, advocating for population reduction, and campaigning to encourage increased homosexuality... all at once.

It’s all there—laid out in black and white. Proven.

But Ryan Vaughn7 won't let this be posted in the "sexuality information and education" thread... 🙄

I’m calling on the forum mods to please deal with Ryan Vaughn7 and his obsession with censorship... ☕

Look, I think you need to be reined in regarding this constant spamming—it’s getting old. Everyone has already seen those links of yours, yet you just keep posting them over and over again. Seriously—why not post a movie from some small town in Oregon instead? You won't be around much longer.
How do I upload images and videos to the forum? in Forum Help! ·
Dammit, it won't work—the link ends in .jpg instead of image

They scrubbed the photo from Imgur so fast—it wasn't even a huge file either
Who destroyed the Hilton? in Close to Politics ·
Paranoids everywhere. It feels like you can't even ask a question here without someone losing it—honestly. I’m still haunted by those 2012 apocalypse theories—imagine that kind of chaos hitting a peaceful city like Chicago right out of nowhere.
Who destroyed the Hilton? in Close to Politics ·
mistyjackal14 said:I was actually there right after the liberation, and I distinctly remember seeing the destroyed Hilton and the defensive positions—those trenches, really—situated right between that Hilton and that smaller place you seem to like so much.

For a second there, I actually wondered if I had overreacted, thinking maybe you were just a die-hard K3 fan who never quite settled down in Kansas City, but honestly, it’s starting to feel more like you're just looking for a reaction.

You see, it's common knowledge that the locals stripped everything from the abandoned buildings, except for the ones that were occupied or housing refugees.

It is also widely understood that these abandoned spots just fall into disrepair "on their own," somewhat incrementally, thanks in part to those K3 fans... 😉

Furthermore, everyone knows that a lot of these properties stay in ruins because of unresolved ownership disputes or simply because the owners don't care enough to fix them.

But of all the places you could pick to act shocked about, you choose to focus on this one right on the front lines? 🤦

So, it’s all been a mess—total chaos. I’m honestly surprised, though—I was just there last week and the waitress told me the damage was all due to the war. Anyway—just read the original post.

Just another agent provocateur—nothing more, nothing less. 🤣

I’ve stayed at a Marriott in Topus—not too far from Indianapolis—back when it was occupied, and they completely renovated the place. That's why I’m so baffled by this eyesore—everything else around here looks absolutely pristine.

It’s pretty obvious we’ve got a bunch of angry, paranoid types hanging out here—honestly, it's a bit much.
Who destroyed the Hilton? in Close to Politics ·
Roger Peterson4 said:So, you think some folks would have had the chance to loot if everything had stayed peaceful without the war and all that nonsense, right?
If there hadn't been a war, that Hilton wouldn't be a ruin today. We all know who bears 95% of the blame for the conflict, so I suppose that pretty much answers your question once and for all.

Sure thing, boss🙂 since you're clearly calling the shots
Who destroyed the Hilton? in Close to Politics ·
Roger Peterson4 said:Fine, is that what you want to hear? That we personally trashed the Hilton with the help of those traitors who sold out the entire United States?
Seriously, when people have told you three thousand times that the hotel was looted by those corrupt officials, why are you playing dumb when someone finally points it out to you?

Half the country was looted, so it wouldn't look like this. And again—I haven't seen artillery damage this bad, plus the whole front entrance where the insurgents were actually positioned isn't even facing them, so why would it be wrecked?

And then there's Adam Collins4 claiming grenades didn't blow out the furniture, rugs, chandeliers, kitchen gear, or the pool tables...☕

Honestly, I don't get why everyone gets so incredibly aggressive the second someone asks a question. Why is everyone so worked up?🤷