Posts by feralpilot0

Peter Stewart6 said:Yeah, it's definitely visible. As for who actually caught it or missed it, I couldn't say—but I certainly did.
So, your "I bet nobody noticed" part doesn't really hold up. 🙂

Thanks for the info, I'll go let the sysadmins know. 🙂

No worries at all. Honestly, what I read just left me feeling pretty grossed out. 🤦

Peter Stewart6, it was a joke—deliberately placed there for a reason.

feraltrucker5 said:Didn't I tell you to stop hovering around the Religion sub—honestly, enough already? 🤦 You’ve completely lost it—this is one of those cases where the truly blessed are the ones who actually see, rather than those blindly putting their faith in things that aren't even there. 😬

Molić—his madness really has nothing to do with religion, does it?

Pande? We all know who's actually installing 😁
.

Chris Lopez59 said:feralpilot0 is a moderator with double standards—someone who lets personal friendships and subjective, flawed logic dictate who gets flagged. I’m voting to strip her of her authority due to a complete failure to apply impartial or consistent rules. These are the warnings I personally received

Reddit threads
Reddit threads
(+ a yellow warning that was scrubbed from the thread—it's sitting in the DMs now—which is technically just more "trolling"; presumably, feralpilot0 realized how stupid it looked and deleted it to hide evidence of her own incompetence)

Then there's Vess, who got flagged in the same thread for simply expressing strong support and opinions regarding the discussion—labeled as "trolling" and subsequently banned:

Reddit threads

And here are some examples of posts from that same thread that went unpunished—meaning they were clearly NOT flagged as trolling:

Reddit threads
Reddit threads
Reddit threads
Reddit threads
Reddit threads

I’ve given up on posting in the Religion sub because it’s impossible to follow this moderator’s vague, imaginary set of rules

By relentlessly hammering the exact same point—say, in that thread about MTA posters claiming trams are public space, or arguing that courthouses and city halls are just advertising boards, or just replying with "no" to dodge actual debate—and refusing to budge even when faced with solid arguments, you've effectively choked the discussions in the threads where you show off your warnings. It left us no choice but to warn you for trolling.

It’s funny, really—you report others for being off-topic (usually those people just trying to clarify their point), yet you fail to notice when you're being blatant and repetitive. Then, once warned, you just act offended without any hint of self-reflection.

rapidmaker6 said:The moderator uranium is really outdoing himself this time—honestly, it’s impressive how someone can be so consistently unqualified for their own job. I just caught another ban because I was calling out the Antichrist—you know, the Devil—and having a little friendly, brotherly exchange with someone from a different religion. Is anyone actually running this place?

Dear rapidmaker6,

You know perfectly well you didn't get flagged just because you swapped out some brotherly language with a fellow Redditor—it was about making it clear you’re actually looking for a fight against... An atheist? Is that all we have left to discuss?Look, I’ve already told you—as I said before—it's exactly like that. The corner for the banned—is that where we all end up?.

It looks like others are running into the same wall with that atheist moderator. Honestly, you’d need at least a shred of empathy—or basic logic—to judge people's words like this. It makes me wonder if her terrible haircut in her avatar was the only qualification they looked at during the hiring process? Today, she slapped me with a warning for starting a new thread, followed immediately by an infraction for the exact same thing—and then, to top it all off, an infraction just for telling other Muslims to watch their backs. Is this what passes for moderation now?

To those of you claiming I have a "problem"—you all have your reasons for being banned, and trust me, it wasn't just because I felt like it—please stop making such tasteless comparisons just because I refuse to let people ignore the rules.
You had the exact same issue before—first with Shady, then with ego, and now you're dealing with me. It’s all coming from the same place, isn't it?

The link to that infraction I sent you exists because you decided to file a complaint against me on that "Islam: 114 Questions, 114 Answers" thread—which, let’s be honest, was completely out of line—and even after I sent you a PM explaining exactly why you were getting flagged, you just kept doubling down. Why bother?

You’ve been handed a yellow card—purely because you were the one to start this thread. Why bother even trying? Copied and pasted the text. Just quoting the news here—no personal commentary needed—but seriously, Red—you were absolutely drowning this thread with massive walls of text. The posts—well, they’re just posts. Are we really expected to find some profound truth in them?It was written in a foreign language—I actually asked you to stop posting in that "Why are Christians obsessed with the Roman Empire" thread—but then I saw you got carried away here. And in English, too.

She stifles every single discussion—making any kind of actual conversation impossible. She just invents excuses and acts like a regular user, yet somehow thinks she has the right to use brute force to back up her views—unlike the rest of us. I’m officially calling for feralpilot0 to be removed; we really need to put an end to her wild crusade against everyone here.

Please specify exactly how I was stifling the conversation—which, based on your posts, usually feels more like a stream of consciousness anyway—and tell me what, precisely, is so unfair about my ways of shutting things down.

I won't even bother commenting on the rest—it’s nothing but pure, calculated malice and complete nonsense.

And just a quick side note—I’m not an atheist, by the way—I'm a Christian. 😉.

🤣

:well, well, well...

This thread shouldn't be deleted—not by any means. 😁
I’m even going to protest ☕; honestly, I suspect my dear interlocutor over there feels the same way ☕

Something has gone horribly wrong here—or perhaps we've just crash-landed straight into Chick-fil-A.

Koko 😢

Well, looking at that headline, you'd think we were talking about some monumental crisis or whatever else they claim... ☕

And tell me—did you actually remember to say a quick prayer of thanks?

feralpilot0 said:And can we please just scrap this whole 'tribute to James Chavez91' thing?

*moonwalk*

Just a friendly reminder to the powers that be—don't forget about this one, either. 😍It's become a regular habit now, hasn't it? 😁

rowdyhawk10 said:Thanks in advance for clarifying things and providing a concrete example—links included, naturally—along with that brief analysis and proof. That’s it, really; just a few sentences.

Anyone else could probably write the same thing, really. I'm not asking for some massive list of fifty different links, fifty examples, or fifty separate histories—I just need one single, specific, and obviously correct example. I'm more than willing to take everything into consideration.

If someone were to start a thread like this on the Religion board—asking a question like that—we’d probably just move the whole thing over to Geography or Travel. We'll find a place where it actually belongs.

If someone posts something like, "What are the principles of mercy in Buddhism?" under a thread specifically about a different topic, that question is off-topic. You shouldn't bother answering it—even if the moderators haven't had a chance to delete it yet—because by responding, you're just adding more off-topic content to the thread. Instead, just report it as off-topic by clicking the red triangle icon.

No, I simply pointed out that, based on the circumstances, I had my doubts about how sincere her apology actually was, which turned out to be the case in the end. Hello. With the right approach. In the past, there was an apology followed by a repeat of the same behavior, which only serves to make the apology feel hollow. 😉

What you mentioned under point one—that’s just plain offensive.
How would you feel if a moderator said something like that to a member? 🙄

First off, in my specific example, I linked my own stance and the thread regarding the worst biblical quotes—which you can see below—just to clarify why all that "offtopic" talk, trolling, and everything else mentioned in the justification for those two users' bans actually happened. The topic itself was highly controversial given its core purpose:

feralpilot0 said:Since this thread is a complete mess—and there’s nowhere else to vent—rowdyhawk10, I suggest we just let this topic stay locked. There’s really no point in reviving discussions like this, especially given the toxic atmosphere in the Religion section and how quickly people jump to tear down anything that isn't "their" way. It’s clearly just a breeding ground for trolls and petty bickering.

Given that reality, it’s only natural that Christians will start digging in to defend the Bible—especially the real scholars—just as you would zealously defend Quranic Hadiths against malicious distortions...

I honestly think we're looking at a massive case of misunderstanding here...

Let’s try showing some good faith for once, shall we?

However, quite a few posts have been deleted now 😁, so linking back to them doesn't even make sense anymore; it's only useful to see how the discussion originally unfolded.
I've already said what I wanted to say about that, so I'm not in the mood to repeat myself. Basically, you still haven't explained why you were so triggered by an attempt to "expose" biblical evils, or why that interest resulted in so many bans—even against those simply trying to protect the Bible from being mocked or misunderstood...?

Especially considering the recent ban of Radeta with 500 points—honestly, it leaves some lingering doubt about how frequent these bans are and whether they're even justified.
If anyone has unresolved questions, disputes, or even conflicts, let's not settle them through posts or threats of bans. It creates a massive sense of instability here on Religion—who decides what's offtopic, what's trolling, etc.—while the users being moderated have zero tools to challenge a moderator, who is, of course, always in the privileged position.

Ultimately, you can either accept criticism or reject it, but everything said to you—at least from my side—is said with the best intentions for everyone's sake. The goal is to avoid rebellions, unnecessary dissatisfaction, and the subjectivity inherent in one's own judgment.

If someone feels wronged, they should feel free to speak up; they shouldn't have to retreat from the forum just because they don't like the atmosphere here.

Of course, all of this should be done with moderation, respect for the rules, and mutual consideration.

That's all. Nothing more, nothing less. 🙂

Aaron Harris2 said:I find this quite compelling; it delivers such an intense, powerful message!


Let's give them hell, why shouldn't we! 👍

What kind of message is "🎉"

🙄

And can we please just scrap this whole 'tribute to James Chavez91' thing?

*moonwalk*

feralpilot0 said:Since this thread is a complete mess—and there’s nowhere else to vent—rowdyhawk10, I suggest we just let this topic stay locked. There’s really no point in reviving discussions like this, especially given the toxic atmosphere in the Religion section and how quickly people jump to tear down anything that isn't "their" way. It’s clearly just a breeding ground for trolls and petty bickering.

Given that reality, it’s only natural that Christians will start digging in to defend the Bible—especially the real scholars—just as you would zealously defend Quranic Hadiths against malicious distortions...

I honestly think we're looking at a massive case of misunderstanding here...

Let’s try showing some good faith for once, shall we?

Don't get me wrong—I'm not saying I support rowdyhawk10's actions—let me be crystal clear about that. When it comes to moderating Christian themes, rowdyhawk10, you are being EXTREMELY biased. It's something you really need to face up to.

Edit: fixed

Since this thread is a complete mess—and there’s nowhere else to vent—rowdyhawk10, I suggest we just let this topic stay locked. There’s really no point in reviving discussions like this, especially given the toxic atmosphere in the Religion section and how quickly people jump to tear down anything that isn't "their" way. It’s clearly just a breeding ground for trolls and petty bickering.

Given that reality, it’s only natural that Christians will start digging in to defend the Bible—especially the real scholars—just as you would zealously defend Quranic Hadiths against malicious distortions...

I honestly think we're looking at a massive case of misunderstanding here...

Let’s try showing some good faith for once, shall we?

Rebecca Rivera2, when are you actually getting started —or is this just going to be another endless chat topic? 😁

Rebecca Rivera2, don't let them win

Users over on the Religion subreddit were calling out the banning and excessive flagging of user unknown yesterday—specifically regarding this controversial post—which was handled, quite impartially I might add, by moderator Slim Shady. That single flag resulted in a permanent ban for the user.

Since Nick has opened yet another thread in the 'complaint book' on the Religion subreddit to protest this unfair targeting—only to have Slim Shady shut the thread down almost immediately—I’m stepping in. I am requesting an objective review of this penalty, especially since the user himself is NOT going to appeal this decision.

We are all well aware of this user's writing style and his deep theological expertise; losing him from the Religion subreddit is a genuine loss to the community. We believe this was an incredibly unjust situation where a moderator and a user were debating a single topic, the moderator provoked the user with specific jabs at Christianity, and then "retaliated" with a 500 😢 point penalty.

Please take a look and help us resolve this.

Best regards.