CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Thomas Hayes2 › Posts

Posts by Thomas Hayes2

17 posts shown.

Used PC builds: What are they worth? in Desktops ·
Timothy Kim60 said:Around $220 excluding the monitor. Maybe the monitor is $200 or something along those lines

Thanks 👍

It looks like it might be easier just to skip the hassle of selling it all...
Used PC builds: What are they worth? in Desktops ·
Hello everyone, I was wondering if someone could help me out with a quick valuation for this setup:

Motherboard: ASRock 770 Extreme3
CPU: AMD Phenom ii x4 955
Cooler: Arctic freezer 13 pro
RAM: 8 GB DDR3 (2+2 Kingmax + 4 Kingston)
HDD: WD Blue 500GB wd5000aakx-001ca0
SSD: Patriot Spark 256GB
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 ti (MSI)
PSU: I can't quite read the label, but if I recall correctly, it's an FXF 500W unit.
Case: Coolermaster Elite 335
DVD burner (I almost forgot I even had this!): LG gh22ns70
Monitor: AOC i2353Fh (23", Full HD, IPS)

I think that covers everything... 🤔
Locked out of my PC in IT Support ·
I actually dealt with a very similar headache not too long ago, where for some completely inexplicable reason, I ended up stuck with two separate administrator accounts.
Basically, I just couldn't get past the login screen when booting up my PC; no matter what I tried, it would insist on demanding a password every single time I wanted to get into Windows.

So, I eventually had this bright idea to just delete one of those accounts entirely. That’s when things really went sideways, because even after trying to clear it out, the system was still prompting me for a Windows password—except now, none of the passwords I entered would work. I even tried resetting everything through the Microsoft website, but honestly, it was a total bust.
After a lot of searching and quite a bit of frustration, I finally managed to stumble upon a workaround:
http://www.rootsh3ll.com/2016/01/how...y-keys-method/
Requesting a partial on the politics subforum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that specific acronym, but if you were trying to start a conversation or share a thought, please feel free to elaborate... I’d be more than happy to dive into a discussion with you whenever you're ready... kaže:
Dear Thomas Hayes2,

I just noticed that I’ve been flagged for an infraction over on Reddit... It was a bit of a surprise to see that notification pop up on my screen, but I suppose it happens to the best of us occasionally. I always try to keep things orderly and respectful in my discussions, though sometimes the nuances of a conversation can get a little lost in translation... I'll be sure to take a closer look at the community guidelines to make sure everything stays smooth moving forward...

I believe this is just a case of someone being a troll...
-------

-------

This violation carries a 35-point penalty and could lead to a temporary suspension of your account privileges until the period lapses. Please keep in mind that more severe infractions are permanent and will never expire...

Original Post:
I’ve been following the recent discussions on Reddit regarding the latest shifts in national politics, and I find myself quite fascinated by the sheer complexity of it all. It seems like every time we think we have a handle on the current trajectory of our country, a new variable enters the equation that completely reshapes our understanding of the landscape... It is truly remarkable how much can change in such a short period. One moment, everything appears to be moving toward a predictable conclusion, and the next, the entire framework begins to shift under our feet. I often spend my evenings reflecting on these developments, trying to piece together the various threads of policy and public sentiment to see if a coherent pattern emerges. While it can feel overwhelming at times, there is a certain intellectual stimulation in attempting to navigate these turbulent waters... There is also the matter of how different institutions react to these changes. Much like watching how a major corporation like ExxonMobil might pivot its entire strategy in response to a sudden market fluctuation, our political institutions are constantly recalibrating themselves. It is a delicate dance of power and influence, played out on a massive stage, and observing it requires a great deal of patience and a very steady hand... I am curious to hear what others think about this. Does anyone else feel that we are entering a period of unprecedented volatility, or do you view these movements as part of a much larger, more cyclical historical process? I tend to lean toward the latter, though I admit the immediacy of today's events makes it difficult to maintain a purely detached perspective...
Quote:
Quote:
I honestly feel like we haven't touched on this particular topic in quite some time, but I was thinking about it earlier today while grabbing coffee... It seems like there's always a new layer to peel back when you look at how these things evolve over time. It’s fascinating, really, how much can change just by shifting our perspective slightly... kaže:
So, I’m curious—what is the actual root of this animosity? What exactly have transgender people done to you to warrant such intense dislike?... 🍿
Here we go again... I've already been labeled a hater, and apparently, that’s just a short step away from being a fascist according to my progressive, liberal colleague on Reddit...
No, I don't harbor any hatred toward them. At the end of the day, I don't actually know a single one of them personally. Instead, I just feel a sense of pity and truly hope that people reach out to offer them some kind of support—whether that’s through psychotherapy or whatever else might be needed. In my opinion, giving them social validation or constant pats on the back doesn't actually do much to help their situation at all...
It feels exactly like congratulating a gambling addict on a single lucky win and then wishing them better luck on their next roll...

judolino said:Of course you didn't... People like that were simply unfortunate enough to be born into the wrong body...
I'm not sure if I should even get involved in whether this qualifies as an actual illness or not—though, if you ask me, we're looking at a psychological disorder rather than a physical sickness—but at the end of the day, they aren't causing any harm to anyone around them...

I suppose I’ll tone down my language then. Let’s just say they are mentally unstable, and perhaps that's a point where the two of us can finally find some common ground... 😉

I must say, I find myself reflecting on our recent discussions regarding the current state of affairs... It seems we are constantly circling back to these fundamental questions about how things ought to function in our society. While some might rush to judgment or jump to conclusions, I prefer to take a more measured approach, weighing the various perspectives before forming a final opinion. There is a certain quiet satisfaction in being able to observe the complexities of our political landscape without feeling the need to react impulsively to every headline that crosses my desk... kaže:
Well, that was certainly an interesting way to approach it! It seems you might have missed the specific part of the post I was actually quoting. I can't quite tell if that was a deliberate move on your part or just a simple oversight... either way, it does change the conversation quite a bit... 😉

If you didn't mean to do that, then you're either losing your focus or just having a bit of a slow moment...

By the way, there’s really no need to try and prove anything here—it’s simply a matter of fact. Unless you have some way to actually debunk it, the conversation is pretty much settled...

Are we throwing in a little ad hominem here? Good grief...

So, it's just a fact then—transgender individuals aren't a danger to those around them?
Well, it looks like the WHO doesn't quite see eye to eye with you:
http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/transgender/en/

judolino said:Gambling can absolutely put others at risk, which is what you missed. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...🥱

If we're going to get philosophical about it, then sure, it can be dangerous, much like any other addiction.
For instance, I have a friend who struggles with hair pulling; when I try to help by telling him to stop, he lashes out at me. In that sense, the condition itself becomes a risk to the people around them.
If we're really going to argue at a preschool level 🙄
Best Buy,
Reddit
To whom it may concern,

I am kindly requesting a move to the politics subforum.
Thank you in advance.

Warm regards.

Thomas Hayes2
Moderation issues regarding Hillary Clinton in Feedback & Suggestions ·
So, the bottom line here is that we really ought to hold their politicians and public figures to the exact same standard 😉>
...
War Dogs (2016) in Movies ·
silentgardener21 said:In an era where about 90% of movies feel unwatchable because studios are just chasing a quick buck, this film is such a breath of fresh air. It’s a genuine story told in the only way it should be: completely unobtrusive, without any filler, and free from that heavy-handed directing or scriptwriting posturing that usually ruins films by dragging them out and making them boring.

It’s basically a textbook example of how to make a top-tier movie... because when the masters take the helm, everything just seems to flow so naturally.

Off the top of my head, this might actually be one of the best films of the year.

What does "completely unobtrusive" even mean though? 😁

Personally, I thought the movie was just okay—not particularly hilarious, but not super gripping either. I honestly wonder how long it'll actually stick in my memory.
The whole sentimental angle regarding the woman and the lying, plus portraying one guy as this greedy, greasy creep while the other is some kind of naive saint... it felt a bit forced to me. I highly doubt things really went down that way in real life.

SPOILER:
And at the very end, what was the logic behind gifting that chest full of cash? Was that just a bit of unnecessary scriptwriting fluff or what? 😁
Checking your browser before browsing Reddit. in Forum Help! ·
electricnomad3 said:It’s all very cute, except I can’t even log in from my phone because this thing just keeps looping endlessly. I finally manage to get in, click on something, and then boom—it kicks me right back out to 🙄
Just get rid of this nonsense and fix the forum once and for all ☕

Honestly, I'm with you there; I don't find it charming at all. I was trying to post something yesterday via my phone (I'm using Android and Chrome) and it just wouldn't cooperate. I'd get nothing but a blank white screen after those five seconds of loading checks.
I try hitting "back," redo everything, and it's just the same old story...
13 Hours: The Siege of Benghazi (2016) in Movies ·
A few people in the first couple of posts were raving about this movie like it was some kind of cinematic masterpiece, which unfortunately lured me in with a certain level of expectation. However, I have to say, the film is quite poor.
For the first hour or so, there is virtually nothing happening; instead, we get this buildup that feels like they're preparing for World War III. It’s just total filler that unnecessarily drags the runtime out to a full 144 minutes.
After that, we finally get some action, but it isn't anything spectacular. I couldn't find a way to connect with the characters to care about their fates, nor were there any impressive directorial flourishes to speak of.
The casting felt a bit off too. I mostly remember Krasinski from The Office, and he felt somewhat out of place in this role, regardless of how hard he tried.

And then, of course, there is that unmistakable sense of Bay's American propaganda. All things considered, the movie is essentially a classic Bay propaganda flick, just with less action, less spectacle, and less interest. Honestly, I’d much rather watch Transformers and just let my brain turn off completely than sit through something like this...
What's going on with the Politics subforum? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Emily Myers32 said:I've shared my thoughts on the political scene subforum several times now. Honestly, it’s a disaster. If you want me to list the trolls, I could go on forever, but they have essentially ruined the entire section. The way people express themselves and communicate there is just irrational. You wouldn't even find this kind of behavior in some dive bar in rural Nebraska. Who else would even want to participate besides them? Just like nobody wants to associate with those local drunks, nobody wants to deal with these guys either. It seems like they're the only ones left posting, just talking to each other in an endless loop of the same nonsense.

It is what it is. It seems like there’s no intention of cleaning out that backwater crowd...
It doesn't really affect me, though; it's not my business.

I couldn't agree more. I can speak from personal experience here—that’s exactly why I stopped posting there, despite having every intention of contributing...

I know the moderation team has decided to tolerate insults directed at public figures (it seems even being incredibly disrespectful has become acceptable), but it’s a dead end. If someone jumps into a thread and starts attacking a politician out of pure frustration, a few "hyenas"—as I called them recently—will quickly join in to mock or "like" the vitriol. What kind of actual contribution does that make to the discussion?

On one hand, they scrutinize every single comma on ideological threads (like the ones about immigration and such), yet on the other, they allow this level of hostility and disrespect. 🙄

And yes, consider this a critique of the moderation, and I realize I might be risking a warning from the admins for saying this, but this is the fundamental issue, no matter how much anyone tries to look the other way...
Social media platforms existed before, and so did ads and server crashes, but the decline in engagement and interest in the political subforum started quite recently...

But anyway, I'll quote our fellow forum member Blank Page once more:
It is what it is. It seems like there’s no intention of cleaning out that backwater crowd...
It doesn't really affect me, though; it's not my business.


P.S. I know you all love hearing this, but if this post is going to earn me a strike anyway, here is one final observation: every single active moderator on the Politics subforum leans toward the left. That is also one of the reasons why interest in this section is fading...
Point Break (2015) in Movies ·
Honestly, this movie is on the level of Hana Montan 🤷
...
Handball Euro: America vs. Spain 29-33 in Other Sports ·
Emily Myers32 said:Are you trying to start something? 🤣

Hehe, just let me be, my nerves are absolutely fried today 😁
It’s definitely better for me to come here and post some nonsense than to take it out on my wife 🤦 😁

Just kidding... 😈
Handball Euro: America vs. Spain 29-33 in Other Sports ·
To be perfectly honest, this looks like a total disaster for the Americans, a massive +10 swing in favor of the Spaniards
Handball Euro: America vs. Spain 29-33 in Other Sports ·
These just aren't true... I'm making this public: I won't be watching another single game for the national team if Mirko and Čupić are in the starting lineup. And that goes for having Babić on the bench too...
The Walk (2015) in Movies ·
I’m not saying that’s his sole driving force, but there's no denying that a huge part of what he does is for the audience. Even within the movie itself, that connection with the crowd is given such specific emphasis—think about the choreographed bows, that sense of mutual respect, him looking down at the masses, the personal photos, being the center of attention on the world stage, the headlines, and even that initial lack of recognition in France... all of that plays a role.
Just think back to that one scene where he performs on the wire over the river for the very first time, when absolutely nobody cared or gave a damn, and you can see how much that stung him.

And sure, you could argue that everything I just mentioned isn't necessarily about entertaining the crowd, but rather about feeding his own ego. However, in the line of work he's chosen, those two things are essentially one and the same: an audience won't truly respect you if you haven't actually entertained them...
Victoria (2015) in Movies ·
Jamie Turner80 said:I suspect they have different pay scales for student jobs and similar nonsense. They aren't messing with minimum wage. The much bigger issue is having someone work with people without actually knowing the language, but oh well.
The film was masterfully shot—honest, continuous, with just one single take chosen from several possibilities. The actors didn't even have fully fleshed-out lines; it was mostly improvisation. However, that really limits the scope, and the characters' motivations just fall apart because of it. It also feels a bit cluttered, not necessarily with events, but with too many decisions packed into two and a half hours. Still, the experiment worked, though I wonder to what end. I would have preferred watching a better film, even if it had been more traditionally edited with seamless cuts...

I don't really know much about student pay rates, but I feel like $4 an hour is way too low again, which makes it practically the same as what we deal with here! Also, I don't quite recall the student in the movie being... well, anyway. The only thing that might make sense is if she lived in that cafe and made a deal with the owner to deduct rent from her wages, leaving her with just $4 an hour. I truly don't see how that specific detail in the film was meant to be a "wow" factor for us, unless that was the director's intention to spark this exact debate...

As for the idea that the film is overloaded with decisions for a two-and-a-half-hour runtime... honestly, it really boils down to just one decision that feels somewhat questionable in terms of realism—when she decides to drive them. But if we really dig deep, we could probably find several other inconsistencies in a script that, to be fair, is quite simple and average, making it perhaps the weakest part of the whole production. Since the actors are improvising most of the time anyway, and that one continuous shot is the main draw, I still found the film quite enjoyable. I can't remember ever watching a movie over two hours long that was filmed in one take and still managed to make perfect sense...🙏
The Walk (2015) in Movies ·
Samuel Ortiz3 said:I’d honestly just go with the documentary. Don't get me wrong, the cinematography here is solid—even if it feels a bit too "Hollywood polished" for my taste—but the subject matter just doesn't feel right for a big-budget feature film. To me, the documentary hits way harder because you actually get to meet the real-life legend who pulled off the impossible. It's much more impactful. But hey, if you're already committed to hitting the theater, grab the 3D version just for the sheer spectacle of it.

If you've already seen the documentary, I've got another one for you to check out...
😉

I couldn't agree more. This story just isn't built to be a mainstream Hollywood blockbuster. For starters, I think about 90% of the audience already knew he actually performed the stunt and survived, so there wasn't really any genuine tension to be found, no matter how hard the director tried to manufacture it. The tightrope walking sequences were decent enough, but as you mentioned, it felt a little too "Hollywood glossed over"—there was just too much CGI for my liking, which didn't really blow me away. Personally, I found the scale and those high-altitude scenes in Mount Everest much more immersive...
On the other hand, since I don't believe this should have been a feature film at all—but rather a documentary—I think everyone involved did an excellent job squeezing everything they could out of the story. Ultimately, I can't find any major flaws with the production itself; it just isn't a masterpiece for me. It's not something I'd call Movie of the Year or give a perfect 10/10. So, yeah, it earns a solid seven from me...

Since we're focusing on the film itself, I won't go off on a tangent about the act of tightrope walking or the ethics of risking one's life just for someone else's entertainment, even if people find it fascinating and worthy of admiration. That's all very interesting, but I wouldn't really 😁
Victoria (2015) in Movies ·
Hmm, I’m not entirely sure if I’d call this my absolute favorite film of 2015. However, out of everything I've watched this year—and believe me, I've seen just about everything—it is definitely the one that left me feeling the most intrigued and contemplative.
I found myself wondering how they even managed to capture all of that... how much time did it actually take? Did they rely on clever camera tricks, or was it truly shot in one continuous take? I can't help but speculate on the balance between the actors' spontaneous improvisations and the rigid, meticulous planning required for every tiny detail. And honestly, is it even realistic for her to be earning only $4 an hour in New York City? It really makes you think. 😁

All in all, the movie was absolutely fascinating. Sure, maybe it runs a tiny bit long, and perhaps a few scenes feel a bit excessive or taxing, but let's face it—since it unfolds in two hours of real-time (stretching from the dead of night until the early morning), there really wasn't any other way to shoot or structure it without making the whole thing feel fake and forced.

Kudos to the director, the cinematographer, the composer, and the entire cast and crew. It’s a solid five stars for me—a true celebration of cinema as an art form. 🙏