Even a cheap 300W unit would handle this easily since it barely pulls 100W total—given we're looking at a 65W CPU and a 35W GPU. It seems to be some entry-level Fortran model, maybe from the PNF or APN series, so I guess there isn't much to worry about.
It’s not exactly a steal, I guess, considering you can pick up a brand new GTX 960 for barely $567, and this thing is actually more powerful while pulling way less power.
Generally speaking, you get a noticeably better picture quality, less eye strain, and those viewing angles you mentioned.
In scenarios where input lag is the priority—like gaming—there isn't much of a difference anymore between TN and LCD/OLED/VA panels compared to how things were a few years back.
I’d say grab some cheaper RAM if you can find it, toss in a WD Blue or a Seagate 7200, and maybe pick up an extra cooler—maybe an NVIDIA Kepler or an LC-CC-95.
So, do you already own it, or are you looking to buy?
If you're buying, keep in mind that's just a TN panel. You'd probably be better off grabbing something with an LCD or OLED panel, though they do run a bit higher in price.
AMD FX-6300 processor Spire Maverick 6009 gaming case, no PSU included ASUS GA-970A-DS3P motherboard 2x Adata DDR3 4GB 1600MHz, AD3U1600C2G11-R Silverstone Strider Essential ST40F-ESB (400W) power supply Spire Kepler Rev.2 cooler XFX AMD Radeon R7 265A 2GB DDR5, XFX-R7-265A-CNF4 graphics card Seagate BarraCuda HDD (3.5", 1TB, 32MB, SATA III-600)
Total: $1425 CNN
There’s a similar case available with two fans (it's on sale), a slightly better power supply from Hexe plus, and a drive with a 3-year warranty—everything else stays the same. You'd probably have to pay an extra $27 for shipping, though.
Bryan Taylor6 said:your processor is pretty weak... maybe grab a better used one, like an i5. You have plenty of RAM, though... so upgrading should be easy enough.
What do you mean an i5? I've got a Core 2 Duo that’s more than enough for this.
The only thing is the RAM, or maybe an SSD if the motherboard has at least SATA II support.
EDIT: I forgot the graphics card plays a part here too. Maybe that's slowing things down if the integrated graphics are terrible—which they probably are (like some old Intel GMA 4500 or something).
That’s basically what I was thinking with the polished 😬 ...though maybe that's the wrong way to put it, since they're moving from GCN 1.2 to GCN 1.3 😉
Gary Anderson38 said:Honestly, I'm not even looking at AMD's 300 series anymore. Next gen? Yeah, right.
They just recycle the same old chips for three years and slap new names on them. 😁
It looks like only the R9 285, R9 290, and R9 290 x will be recycled—basically just bumped clock speeds and slightly tweaked power draw. We might see two enthusiast models (the R9 390 and R9 390 x, which preliminary numbers suggest offer a 40-60% jump over the R9 290 x), along with some polished GCN 1.3 versions of the R7 260X, R9 270/270X, and R9 280/280X.