Posts by Maria Nelson2

neonharbor18 said:http://www2.myp2p.eu/index.php?part=sports

You’ll definitely get the broadcast there, just tune in on the day and you're set; just make sure to install Hulu beforehand since the link is right on the site, and honestly, the picture quality is probably the best you're going to find.👍

The law👍

Raymond Ortiz89 said:I have a feeling Heifeld might actually outdo him this time around.

As if he isn't already planning on making a spectacular dent in the retaining wall instead.😬>

darkmarlin16 said:If they actually hand Heikki a car that isn't a total disaster, he’ll leave everyone in the dust, though there's a good chance he just lands at Ferrari to play teammate to Fernando, much like Kimi did.

John Doe😂😂😂😂😂 and then what exactly happens after that?/

Heikki 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

placidsurfer9 said:😁 yeah, whatever, just tell me who you actually think is going to dominate this season.

I’d put my money on Ferrari if I could actually trust their drivers to stay out of their own way, but honestly, I'm just hoping for a podium spot for McLaren.

placidsurfer9 said:since I’ve already laid out my own take on this, what do you actually think
is going to be running the show there?

Look, just watch me—I'm not about to let any accidental bias slip through here! 😂

😕 Wtf?? What are you on? Send some my way. 😁

placidsurfer9 said:what happened back in 2006 at this track?

There’s a line about that right at the start, so just give it a read unless you want me typing it all out again for you.☕

Jason Campbell70 said:If I had just sat here and typed "Schumacher wins," I probably would've been slapped with a ban for spamming or trolling.😠

Exactly. 👋

placidsurfer9 I can't even begin to process what they just said. It’s honestly exhausting how people try to make sense of things that clearly don't have any logic behind them, much like watching a slow-motion wreck on a rainy Sunday at Spa-Francorchamps.
Whatever happens, we’re taking this one!

Look, the race hasn't even happened yet, so you really can't claim to know how it's going to go down.☕

placidsurfer9 said:Ferrari is totally dominating here!! I honestly think it'll be the same story next year!!

They haven't been dominant at all over the last three years.☕

Elizabeth Hughes said:mistybear87, what’s even the point of calling it a photo corner if there aren't any actual pictures in it? 😕



That one race where I finally realized I couldn't stand Coulthard anymore.

Tricycle 👏
🤣🤣

neonharbor18 said:Maybe Nico Rosberg😁—who knows, right? I mean, did you just stumble upon some groundbreaking new way to make money online by starting a thread on this forum?🤷

👍 Nah, the guy’s just completely lost it.

hollowhawk412 said:I wasn't even trying to convince you... if you actually listened, you'd realize I was saying McLaren's wings aren't even
subject to any kind of restriction... I'm not the one making that claim

Man, what a mess... honestly, you're always the one digging your heels in on something, aren't you? 😉

hollowhawk412 said:Just look at this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRI6tbrApd8

and this too

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euApi...eature=related

if you actually bother to read the comments, there are people out there claiming that vibration doesn't necessarily mean you have flexible
aero components...

I mean, half the stuff on a race car vibrates...

flexible wings are banned because they let teams cheat by
adjusting downforce on the fly...

but this whole phantom vibration thing we saw with the R28 has absolutely nothing to do with flexible aerodynamics.

You haven't convinced me.☕

Jason Campbell70 said:


I mean, Gilles was basically eating him alive out there on the track🙏🙏🙏

Not quite on the track, if you ask me☕

hollowhawk412 said:Well, there you go... now nobody’s ever going to be able to tell what you're actually thinking about 🤷

Just ask away; I don't mind explaining myself, even if it feels like a lost cause sometimes.☕

mistybear87 said:sharing what you see is fine
but picking fights or trolling isn't

on the flip side, if they're calling the Renault mass damper a moving aero device, I'm surprised the FIA hasn't jumped on these engine covers yet... unless politics is already at play ☕

Looking at how things went down, Renault managed to dodge a much heavier accusation. It’s all just politics, really ☕

mistybear87 said:I doubt the people in charge of scrutineering were recruited through some random Craigslist "Other" category ad.

You know perfectly well there’s no room for interpretation during technical inspections; if the measurement falls outside the allowed limits, it's illegal, plain and simple.

And that whole argument about things being disorganized or poorly defined doesn't hold water for one reason... any rule that leaves even a tiny bit of wiggle room will eventually be bypassed by someone, sooner or later. The only way to prevent that would be for the FIA to hand every team a blueprint and ban any deviation whatsoever, but then you have to tell me—would you really want to watch Formula 1 if every single car looked and performed exactly the same? ☕

Look, if the FIA sets specific limit values, and someone gets caught because they didn't follow those rules, fine. But from what I've seen over the last few years—and honestly, a long time before that—the FIA tends to hand out penalties based on completely nonsensical or non-existent regulations, assuming they even bother to issue a penalty at all. You saw that entire mess last year when that private war between Dennis and Mosley went public, and we all saw how that played out. On top of that, you've got the head of the FIA openly admitting favoritism toward certain teams and suing news outlets just for expressing an opinion, which is a basic democratic right that he clearly can't grasp, probably because he was raised in such an absolutist environment. It's all just a mess.

And I'd definitely prefer to see more teams actually fighting for a spot on the podium.☕ Besides, everyone can't be identical anyway.

mistybear87 said:both of you need to chill out and stop acting like teenagers!!!!!

The FIA runs its own tests to check how much wing flex and other aero bits can move before they get flagged.

All your endless arguing doesn't mean a damn thing until the FIA actually decides a bodywork design is illegal for one reason or another.

Until then, it’s a legal upgrade, and I’m honestly sick of hearing this childish bickering about it.
Consider yourselves warned. ☕

But is that proof even based on actual engineering standards, or is it just whatever whim comes from one of the most disorganized and legally vague organizations on the planet?

P.S. And the boss is basically a masochistic neo-fascist.
🤷

Just asking because I'm curious.

hollowhawk412 said:but where exactly is it moving...

I haven't noticed any movement at all...

So what's the move now? I'm telling you, nothing is shifting.!!!

And neonharbor18 gave a pretty solid response there...

I remember reading this ridiculous joke on an overseas forum about movable aerodynamic parts

where some guys suggested banning engine pistons since they technically move...
and send vibrations through the entire chassis...so by that logic, the whole chassis is
movable😁

I can tell you for a fact that when an engine is running, those components near the block vibrate like crazy for anyone sitting close enough...it’s just how engines work.

But honestly, I've seen the whole cars shaking, especially
when they hit the curbs...they vibrate like hell, so what are we supposed to do about that?

The mockery went so far that someone actually proposed that Alonso's hand, the one he used to wave at Scott Speed
should be declared a movable aero component...

Arthur Doyle70, do you remember how much Hamilton's rearview mirror was vibrating
last year in Brazil?.

I'd bet anything that rearview mirrors—anyone's, really—vibrate more than anything else we've talked about so far...

Since everything fell apart for him a year ago, I can still recall it vividly.😉

Now, whether rearview mirrors vibrate the most, I wouldn't bet my life on it; maybe there's someone here who actually worked on an F1 chassis and could provide some technical substance instead of just making guarantees. Right now, you sound like you're trying to sell me a side-mirror on late-night TV.

Jason Campbell70 said:Give me a break,😁

Does anyone actually remember back in 2006?
The FIA got hit with all these complaints because people suspected part of Ferrari's nose was movable.
If they were actually cheating, we're talking about tiny adjustments, just a few millimeters here and there—specifically right at the connection point where the
winglet meets the nose.

By the next race, right after the FIA sent out their warning, suddenly there wasn't a trace of any movement left.

I’m just hoping the FIA stays consistent this time and sends a similar memo to everyone else using questionable aero tricks, like Red Bull and General Motors.☕

Oh, they’d love to send a memo, but you know their boss is currently way too preoccupied with his own legal battles to worry about running the FIA or cleaning up the rulebook; once he's done dealing with the courts, maybe then we'll see something happen...😁