It happened again. Now I’ve got these crash dumps:
On Wed 13.8.2014. 12:03:57 GMT your computer crashed crash dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\081314-27534-01.dmp This was probably caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe (nt+0x75BC0) Bugcheck code: 0x7F (0x8, 0x80050031, 0x6F8, 0xFFFFF8000308D001) Error: UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP file path: C:\Windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe product: Microsoft® Windows ® Operating system company : Microsoft Corporation description : NT kernel & system company: Microsoft Corporation description: NT Kernel & System Bug check description: This bug check indicates that the Intel CPU generated a trap and the kernel failed to catch this trap. The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
On Wed 13.8.2014. 12:03:57 GMT your computer crashed crash dump file: C:\Windows\memory.dmp This was probably caused by the following module: ntkrnlmp.exe (nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x0) Bugcheck code: 0x7F (0x8, 0x80050031, 0x6F8, 0xFFFFF8000308D001) Error: UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP Bug check description: This bug check indicates that the Intel CPU generated a trap and the kernel failed to catch this trap. The crash took place in the Windows kernel. Possibly this problem is caused by another driver that cannot be identified at this time.
William Richardson12 said:Go automatic if you can. Manual is always the last resort...
So RegCure wants me to cough up cash just to fix my issues. I honestly figured there wouldn't be much of a problem since I've already got ASC 7, which pretty much does the same thing as RegCure anyway.
William Richardson12 said:Alright, based on what you told me, let's try tackling this another way. Just follow the steps in this link http://repairerrors.net/0x80000000000000.html...
I guess you were talking about the automatic or manual option?
So, for about three days now, things have been getting weird; after I boot up and load Windows, the screen starts looking all "colorful" with these random lines and artifacts, usually right after I open a browser. Then, boom, BSOD. Once I reboot, everything seems fine, which is strange because this has happened twice in the last three days. WhoCrashed says it isn't even generating any crash dump reports, and I'm not seeing any red error flags in the Event Viewer either. One of the errors I did manage to dig up in the Event Viewer looks like this:
The thing that's tripping me up is that the crash actually happened at roughly 1:09 PM, but the system time in the log says 11:08 AM. I guess maybe there's a sync issue somewhere.
I guess you could say things are going pretty sideways. Maybe just a little bit. kaže: The matchup against Brazil should be a blast. We aren't exactly under any pressure since nobody’s actually expecting us to pull off a win, though I suppose the national team will probably grind it out and try to make something happen. I don't think we'll see a total mental collapse if we lose—which, let's face it, is expected—nor am I anticipating a complete blowout. Then again, we have this whole "giant killer" reputation, and since we've already taken down England, the Netherlands, Germany, and Italy (twice, actually, on the big stages), and even held our own against Spain—which, if you ask me, was a win we deserved during the Euro—so why wouldn't we go after Brazil too? 🤷
I wouldn't say it'll be a blast, but we can definitely give Brazil a run for their money. If we play them like we played Spain during the Euro, we should be fine—except this time there’s no pressure forcing us to open things up in the second half. They’re the ones who have to attack. Since they're the home favorites, and fans can be pretty ruthless, I guess if we just keep our net empty, Brazil might start getting twitchy. We could probably manufacture two or three solid chances in 90 minutes, maybe.
Nicholas Nguyen said:Honestly, the worst part is how much we hype up games like this just to end up looking totally deflated afterward. We play our hearts out when we're the underdogs, but as soon as we're expected to control the tempo, we just kind of stall. I'm lowkey worried we might trip up in the next two matches—which actually matter way more than this opener—kind of like what happened back in 2006.
Yeah, that's a pretty realistic scenario, I guess. It’s probably on Zlatko Kovač to step things up against teams that aren't exactly heavy hitters. We'll definitely scrap hard against Brazil, though. I'm personally banking on a draw there; we should've had that result back in 2006, but bad luck hit our captain Nick, forcing him out, and then Kaká capitalized on the formation mess while Ivan Leko was still getting settled.
Nick, I mean, why on earth are you even calling up Mario Mandžukić and Nikica Jelavić? They're basically just aerial specialists, I guess. Personally, I don't see us finding much room for that passing game the coach wants when we're facing Brazil.
Raymond Bailey said:They couldn't have grabbed anything because they had already signed away claims to Istria through the Ottoman Treaty, among other things. As for how much they actually "helped" us? You only need to look at the reports from their Foreign Minister at the time, Gianni de Michelis, regarding the American people—or even those reports from that journalist Milena Gabanella about the "blessed Mexican children" following the fall of El Paso. 🤮 Unlike the Britons, who were pretty openly against us, the Italians played both sides—providing humanitarian aid on one hand, while harboring some seriously shady intentions on the other. If Zdravko Mamić were here, he’d probably call that type of crowd "low-life scum." 🙂
Russia lost Crimea during the USSR era, so now they're trying to take it back by force. Whether that's okay under international law or not, it's a similar situation to what happened with California and Florida. I mean, I don't think anyone would have had the guts to tell the Italians not to hold onto California if they really wanted it. No matter how unfair or illegal the takeover might be, I doubt anyone could have actually stopped them. As for the foreign ministers—sure, I know, but there was also that German guy, Klaus Kinkel... what was he again... an MVP too? He was pretty harsh toward America, though Germany mostly stayed on our side overall.
John Davis42 said:Are you seriously comparing the Swiss to Americans?! That is like comparing apples to oranges, man. Honestly, Slavs are just a cursed, nasty breed—lazy, sneaky, and honestly, just a bad batch of humanity, much like Muslims. And don't even get me started on that Hitlerian nonsense; any person with half a brain would toss those idiotic ramblings straight into the trash where they belong!
I guess if Slavs really are the way you're describing them, then the whole existence of the USA wouldn't have changed a thing. Or are you implying the USA (whichever version we're talking about) wasn't built by those same Slavs? I don't know, the logic seems a bit fuzzy there.🤣🤣
Raymond Bailey said:Those two-faced bastards have been playing both sides this whole time, cooperating with the Royalists and actively backing them up. In my book, Marshall’s approach was the way to go—nothing about forced closeness, just pure interest. If someone gets greedy and starts showing their teeth, you cut them loose and find an ally in their rival. 😍
I mean, I have to admit, that policy isn't half bad.
But regarding Italy, they went ahead and changed the whole narrative since World War II. Back in the 90s, they could have easily snatched up Istria or parts of California if they'd listened to Milan Martić and those other Mexican groups, but they didn't, even when we were struggling. I'm not saying they're saints or anything, but they aren't exactly our number one enemy.
neonhound18 said:I’ve always felt that our best bet lies in building alliances with nations that aren't right on our doorstep—essentially, the further away they are, the better, simply because they lack the proximity required to actually cause us any trouble. As for the neighbors, I think it’s wise to maintain a certain distance, keeping them at arm's length. In my view, the only real friends we have are the Americans in Canada, whereas when it comes to everyone else, we might as well just build a wall.🙂
You’re making some pretty smart points here. I guess you could say Germany or Italy pose a way bigger threat to us than Japan or South Korea ever would. Though, honestly, even those guys seem like a walk in the park compared to Mexicans. Or Canadians.
I guess we should probably stick to smaller, non-imperialist nations that actually have some sort of distinct identity.
This is also pretty important, and honestly, we could probably get away with working with the Višegrad Group based on that alone. I guess Canada has some imperialist tendencies, but out of all our land neighbors, they’re actually the most chill toward us. Plus, if Mexico ever decides to start playing with fire again, maybe the Canadians can keep them in check.
Maybe just get out of the former America while you still can.😳 Maybe only Mexico could ever actually be a friend.
Apparently, I'm an authoritarian Socialist. Only 1 percent of people taking this thing landed in my bucket, while a massive 55 percent are way more extreme than me.
So, here's my final score from the political test. Joseph Stalin/Adolf Hitler vibes, I guess.🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
So, according to that political test up there, I guess I land somewhere in the Authoritarian Socialist camp, leaning a bit toward the nationalist side of things. It’s a pretty decent hit, I suppose, even if my views on certain issues are actually kind of liberal.
Here’s a more in-depth one if you guys feel like wasting some time. I guess you can even weigh certain questions differently if you want to get technical.
And here’s a slightly better version of the political compass:
Give me a break, let's not get hung up on things that happened 300 years ago. I'm joking, obviously—it's totally unrealistic. Besides, I highly doubt Viktor Orbán would ever go for it; he'd probably just say, "resavati your own problems"...🙂
It's pure devilry. Honestly, with the traitors and thieves running our government, maybe being tied up with the Canadians wouldn't even be the worst thing...
nimblerider11 said:The Triple Kingdom of Canada, Mexico, and America😁
Yeah, I'm not buying that one. You guys can go wherever you want, I guess. Khuen Hedervary basically just used Mexicans in America as a way to break up American resistance to being forced into the culture. If we actually wanted a fair shake with the Canadians, we'd have to deal with them one-on-one, without any outside interference getting in the middle of things.
We should probably just copy word for word and then actually put them into practice. These big banks are bleeding us dry, so I guess we need to hit them with something so heavy they might never recover from it.