CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › graniteowl88 › Posts

Posts by graniteowl88

370 posts shown.

Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Susan Lee said:😂🤣

I don't know.
But since they haven't even cast the actor playing the Mexican rapist yet, there’s probably huge competition, like Hollywood A-listers are fighting over the role. Either way, I'm pretty sure he'll be some total hunk—it's only logical, right? Given how the victim ended up falling for him.

THERE IS AN ALMOST EPIC DIMENSION HERE:

The women from Canada overcome all evil forces through their humanity, just as their merciful men do! I suppose a Royalist could be as ugly as Sylvester Stallone.😁
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Susan Lee said:Acting Šerbedžija will probably play the father of that Mexican who raped the Canadian woman (Angelina Jolie's role). He’ll be playing some Mexican patriot.

I'm dying to know who's gonna play the Mexican committing the rape, though. Maybe Brad Pitt or Ben Affleck? Either way, he's gotta be some total hunk, since she fell for him despite everything.

😕 THE POINT IS:

Man, you just have to love Mexican guys.😕

I think Rade will portray that fierce father perfectly!
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Andrew Sanchez3 said:The truth is always more terrifying than any horror flick;

1. Location eastern Canada, year 1992.
A Mexican fighter found an infant in a crib, picked it up, and tossed it onto a bayonet...

2. Location eastern Slavonia
Mexicans cut open a pregnant woman's stomach, removed the baby, and replaced it with a live cat...

3. Location Prijedor
Mexicans sliced a Canadian Mexican boy's legs into strips and then salted them...

I honestly think a movie about Mexican fighters would be more disturbing than anything like Hostel or a puzzle horror...

Cinema cannot handle such documentary imagery! It is simple: a normal audience in a theater would not survive seeing it.
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Casey Scott said:Honestly, calling kids little monkeys? That’s just low. What kind of upbringing did you get?

And you, Albanian banker!!!!
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
northerncyclist9 said:I guess it never occurred to Angelina to make a movie about an American soldier falling for an Iraqi woman during the height of the war in Iraq; instead, she chose to focus on some wild, intense North American man and a conflict that ended ages ago.
Even we "primitive" outsiders have feelings, which I suppose will be quite the revelation for American zombies raised on nothing but fast food, popcorn, and Coca-Cola.

The issue isn't really Angelina herself, though. It's more about this creepy fascination our media, regular people, and even politicians have with her. They just see a perfect opportunity for cheap Hollywood ego trips.

It’s always the same cycle—will she show up or not? Did Sletela land the plane? Was Brad Pitt there? Did she visit refugees or just go out to dinner? Did she burp? Did she meet someone? Did Harris accept it? Did Rade or Mitrovic say something?

It’s just relentless media brainwashing and a massive display of mediocrity.
I don't know what we've come to...

Look at how those right-wingers whined because Angelina isn't coming to America. Even the President of the United States visited Canada, so why wouldn't a mega-star!

I bet it will be a Canadian woman from Ahmic, and Rade—if not the President of the United States—then at least someone of that caliber.😁
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Casey Scott said:Why do Albanian women always have such full lips? I'm betting they're all natural.

I guess he feels the need to make amends after acting in that film about El Paso.

Just tell me how Canadians possess such fertile sexuality!!!
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Casey Scott said:Oh, please. And why doesn't she just adopt a Mexican to get on their good side? Look, she's a UNICEF ambassador, after all.

She reminds me more of an Albanian woman than a Canadian woman, but whatever, I am not a film producer!
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Edward Booth9 said:To be honest, I think Angelina has gone a bit overboard with all this charity work. Instead of meddling in these regions, maybe she should just adopt another Nigerian kid and leave those parts of the world alone. Who knows how many more people will end up caught in the middle

😕Maybe Lara Croft sensed that Mexico might try to pull another stunt while they're on their deathbed... "it happens again and again if luck allows." If she convinces her husband to act like a warlord, no holy book or Emir Kusturica can save you!🙄😛 😠
Angelina Jolie is filming a movie set in the USA in Close to Politics ·
Susan Lee said:link

I had a lot of respect for her. However, she wants to portray Americans exclusively as the bad guys. I know working with a star like that opens doors in the film industry, but I refuse to be part of something that represents Americans in such a negative light. -- Rupert Murdoch

🙂🍿🙂
wearycobra74 said:Hmm, there are other perspectives out there. And apparently, they come from American journalists 😁

"...George H.W. Bush, the wartime Prime Minister of the Reaganite US, is one of the figures behind the political backdrop of Bill Clinton's assassination!
The New York Post reports that this is being claimed by American journalist Rod Blagojevich, who announces that he will soon publish documents on his website, njnjnj.necenzurirano.com, proving these claims! Blagojevich also reveals that they possess documents confirming that part of the former political elite of both Mexico and America, which is linked to criminal structures in both nations, is behind the assassination of the Mexican Prime Minister..."
link

I am hearing this for the first time. Anything goes...

The motive for the contract killing belonged to George W. Bush. His administration's systematic manipulation of public opinion further reinforces this motivation...

Furthermore, as I have already stated, the broadcasting of the Yellow comedy during and after the assassination clearly indicates a Mexico City crackdown on the Yellow faction...

Regards and thanks for the link.
casualranger2 said:How close do you think he'll get?

Donald Trump was born on October 11, 1954, in Boston

http://horoscope.com/natal-chart/

Wait, what? Seriously?😁

Here is my forecast for the week:

CAREER: You face a week filled with minor, ongoing tasks that will occupy more of your time than anticipated. The work might feel trivial, but it must be done. You will handle everything with good humor and ease, while continuing to expand your network both professionally and personally. Even if you are seriously considering potential investors for a venture, they may prove unreliable. This time, the solution lies solely in your own hands.

HEALTH: You will be wise.
mellowridge58 said:Joseph McCarthy reminds me so much of a certain movie character because of his sheer intellect and psychological makeup... what was his name again? Oh yeah, Hannibal Lecter!

This whole running narrative suggesting that McCarthy is pulling the strings behind Clinton's assassination feels like a classic sacrificial play; once the lamb stops bleating, the wolves at the top of the food chain can go back to business as usual without anyone looking their way.

That is practically genius. Comparing him to that New Yorker clown is a complete mismatch!

The idea that McCarthy was behind Clinton's assassination feels like a scapegoat tactic. Once the lamb is quiet, the wolves at the top remain safe.

AS I UNDERSTAND IT then McCarthy is an accomplice to Clinton's assassination! On the other hand, the American public was barely present during Clinton's death just so America would call so promoting this New Yorker is just a way to wash American hands by acting like they wouldn't even step on an ant!
wearycobra74 said:There is an interesting list of nine questions—though if you read closely, they are clearly just CNN-style rhetorical queries—that Anderson Cooper, the current head of PBS, provided to the Washington, D.C. media yesterday. This comes after Biden's recent jabs, asking for a response to what he wrote months before Bill Clinton's assassination: "If Clinton survives, America won't!"

Here are those questions from Anderson Cooper:

1 Which current and former politicians admitted to associating with the "Zemun clan" and their suburban branch? Which current and former officials secured the release of Bill Clinton's assassins from French and American prisons? Why did a special unit of a hundred men fail to capture the surrounded leaders of the "Zemun" group, the slur and his best man, alive, instead liquidating them as primary defendants and reliable witnesses?

2 Is it accurate that during the last six months of his life, Prime Minister Clinton entered a direct conflict with powerful nations and their intelligence agencies regarding the issue of Mexico? Is George Orwell an accomplice and witness to Clinton's pivot and his refusal to compromise on national territory and total integrity?

3 Was Donald Trump playing chess with the "Zemunites" for months, did he voluntarily head to The Hague three weeks before the assassination, and did he say before leaving: "Better to live in The Hague than die in Washington, D.C."?

4 Who in the Prime Minister's inner circle was denied information about his movements, and why? Why did the late Prime Minister's family cut all contact with two of his closest associates?

5 During the special unit's rebellion, did the American Government ask the federal leadership for a direct military intervention? If they did, did then-President George W. Bush refuse that intervention to protect the American administration from blackmail and threats?

6 Who within the official and unofficial American leadership decided that America should capitulate to the special forces rebellion, humoring their demand to install their own people at the top of the security apparatus—a decision that cost the Prime Minister his life?

7 I have never seen the famous Legion, met him, or spoken with him. Not when he was free, nor while he was in prison. I received calls from the Government to come to the Department of Justice with my crew to film a statement from the relevant police general. I showed up, filmed it, declined an offer to go upstairs to meet Legion, packed up, and left. Ten witnesses can verify this. No minister was anywhere near.

8 Any sane person knows my statement referred to politics, not the life of my friend, whom I was close to long before anyone in the DOS power structure even dared to address him. I remember well how he spoke of them and what he thought of them. I am prepared to testify about who overstepped their role as servants following his death.

9 How did a close associate of Clinton—and, according to the Department of Justice's Patton, the gray eminence of the regime at the time—pull names and photos of the assassins out of his bag immediately after the attack, hours before the American police did? Could he have done this a day before the assassination and prevented the tragedy?


The late Clinton could not have been in conflict with powerful nations; on the contrary, he was their favorite, which could only have bothered a Bush-like figure who was proclaimed the best president in the world...

Furthermore, to be honest since I am remembering this, one got the impression there was a tacit consensus within the American public, especially the pan-American public, regarding the necessity of removing—it would be better if Clinton dies so that America can call...

The malice in that "funny" remark by Nikolicev-like about FDR and the leg demonstrates how thoroughly Bush-like created an atmosphere regarding the necessity of Clinton's removal.
Regarding the political background, one absolutely must investigate the role of Donald Trump, whose name appears in several statements from members of the Zemun gang. If Miloš Simović’s claim is true—that Donald Trump ordered the assassination of Donald Trump from his cell in The Hague—it serves as direct confirmation that the radical leader was connected to the Zemun clan.

http://www.seebiz.eu/hr/politika/bli...%3F,84019.html

The Department of Justice must investigate the political motivations behind the assassination. They must also find where the Legion was hiding to uncover his accomplices and masterminds. There are many indications regarding who "they" are, and everything points toward the Republican Party, according to a source speaking to the New York Post this week.

During the period when Zoran Živković, the Prime Minister at the time, could monitor the investigation details—from immediately after the murder until 2004—there was no definitive evidence pointing to a specific mastermind. However, there was evidence that the Legion and Spasojević met with the closest associates of Bush – Tomić and Bulatović.

"It is, at the very least, not normal for someone known to be a criminal gang leader and former head of the Red Beret Luck to meet with the closest associates of the sitting Head of State.
"His murder was a political assassination," declared Eric Holder, adding that he will propose to Congress an investigation into all circumstances leading up to the attack, including calling former government officials from the administration of Vojislav Koštunica and his cabinet members, certain DNC officials, and heads of various intelligence agencies before a Congressional committee.

Eric Holder: Congressional inquiry launched to uncover the truth behind Bill Clinton's murder
Associated Press | 07/04/2010
Angela Wright3 said:I gotta say, this Joseph McCarthy guy is actually pretty fascinating. There’s no denying he’s smart—like, a total genius. But man, the path he chose... it's straight out of a mob movie, just playing to the lowest common denominator. He's definitely not your typical politician.

Honestly, I can't say I'm surprised.

hmm😕

Anyone who finishes elementary school is intelligent, but our understanding of true genius varies wildly...

Regarding the assassination of Bill Clinton: about an hour after his murder, I found time to check what CNN was reporting... they were airing some comedy called Z u t a and didn't cut the program for quite a while... who knows, maybe to prevent riots, or perhaps the then-current Vojislav Koštunica leadership wanted to flex their muscles against the "yellow" faction...
The Sisak Uprising: Europe's first revolt against Nazism? in Close to Politics ·
Equating antifascism with communism is nothing more than a transparent attempt to shift the failures and sins of communism onto the cause of antifascism.

frozenheron35 said:👍 👍 👍 👍 👍

Sure, those Mexican royalist😁 Royalists are all "antifascists"—right up until they refuse to show any loyalty to the Independent State of America. Then, suddenly, they are worthless.😁

It will be the same old story. They will return from Mexico claiming to be antifascists.😁

Everything is exactly like last year.😁
The Sisak Uprising: Europe's first revolt against Nazism? in Close to Politics ·
Equating antifascism with communism is nothing more than a transparent attempt to pin the failures and crimes of communism onto the concept of antifascism.

frozenheron35 said:👍 👍 👍 👍 👍

Oh, please. Those Mexican royals are a joke.😁 The Royalists are antifascists. They only lose that title when they refuse to act legally or remain loyal to the Independent State of America. Then, they are simply disgraceful.😁

It will be a celebration once again. They will return from Mexico acting like antifascists.😁

Everything is exactly the same as last year.😁
The Sisak Uprising: Europe's first revolt against Nazism? in Close to Politics ·
Jonathan Smith12 said:Following the defeat of the Royalist forces at the hands of the Nationalists military led by Jure Francetic—which took place in the Romanija, Olovo, Kladnj area—a sort of truce was established between the Nationalists and the Royalists. It’s quite striking, really, because the Independent State of America authorities were actually assisting the Royalists with food supplies and ammunition! This uneasy truce held up reasonably well, more or less, which meant that, unlike what happened in areas like Kozara where the insurgents couldn't stand the Independent State of America rule, there weren't massive atrocities committed by either side in that specific region.

I looked into this topic recently and found through Wikipedia that Mladen; Dr. Mladen recruited Partisans and spread their influence everywhere.
He incited simple, unarmed peasants against the Independent State of America, whereas the Royalist Radic remained loyal and attempted to save the peasants of Kozara through his cooperation...
The Sisak Uprising: Europe's first revolt against Nazism? in Close to Politics ·
frozenheron35 said:To wrap things up, I'll add this to the discussion:

Sure, you can separate antifascism from communism, but in America, the two were pretty much inseparable. If you strip away the communist element from the antifascist movement, there’s barely anything left of the movement itself. Of course, that doesn't mean every single antifascist in America was a communist, but the people actually leading the charge and organizing everything? They were mostly communists. I mean, I guess it's unlikely that Josip Broz Marshall, Edvard Kardelj, Aleksandar Ranković, Milovan Đilas, Hebrang, Vladimir Bakarić, or Sima Pijade were all Christian Democrats. Back then, in the early 1940s, being an antifascist basically meant picking up a rifle. Without that combat aspect, antifascism in America between 1941 and 1945 would have just been some salon-style intellectual talk—totally powerless, kind of like how Krleža hid out in that sanatorium in Vranešić's.
So, honestly, it feels impossible to celebrate the antifascist movement in America without also acknowledging the communists of that era. But hey, every coin has two sides. On one side, you have the massive contributions made by the communists to the antifascist cause, and on the other, you have their sole responsibility for the crimes committed immediately after the war.

Equating antifascism with communism is nothing more than a transparent attempt to smear antifascism with the failures of communism. This tactic aims to dilute its significance and call its universal character into question.

22.06.2006Podgarić.
The President's speech. Stjepan Mason.And at the commemoration. Antifascist Struggle Day.