Posts by Eric Fox7

Kyle Vaughn8 said:Is there a thread just for Ibrahimović? I mean—if Suker has his own spot 🤷

Look, Dalglish is a brand—Ibrahimovic is just a player.🤷

Where are you even looking?
Do us a favor and just drop a screenshot instead of doing that copy/paste thing—it’s impossible to read like this.

Here’s the match and the breakdown for you: http://www.pinnaclesports.com/Contes...ain/Lines.aspx

From what I know, Joe isn't exactly the go-to guy when it comes to deep breakdowns.

Wouldn't it just be easier for you to start a fresh profile from scratch? 🤣

So, we’re really looking at this after two and a half months of off-season downtime and getting ready to kick things back up for the new season?

Good grief, I have no idea where they got this sudden lack of energy from—especially since they had a full two-and-a-half-month break before this three-game stretch started.
If they can't handle a schedule like this, then honestly, they might want to consider leaving professional football behind altogether.

Another statistical play—hopefully this one lands better than my last attempt at math 🙂

St. Louis City SC vs. FC Cincinnati over 2.5 @ 1.60 (over 2.5 @ 1.90 over 3.5 @ 2.50)---- (might try to catch it live 4+ in 1st half @ 16.25 and 6+ total @ 9.00 🙂) (4-0)

It’s a massive MLS rivalry match here—top two sides fighting it out—and these are easily two of the most explosive teams in the league right now, alongside maybe LAFC.
Cincinnati hasn't been the absolute most efficient lately (goal difference is sitting at 8:4 over 5 games), but St. Louis? They’ve been absolutely flying, averaging about 4.6 goals per game.
Anyway, they say a picture is worth a thousand words... 🙂



The short version: looking at their last 20 matches, 19 of them saw at least 3 goals—just one scoreless draw and one 4-0 blowout, everything else was 3+ goals. That's 88 total goals in those 20 games, which is an average of 4.4 per match.

Head-to-head history is just as wild:

11.20.2014 MLS St. Louis City SC 3-4 FC Cincinnati
08.24.2014 MLS FC Cincinnati 1-4 St. Louis City SC
06.07.2014 MLS FC Cincinnati 5-5 St. Louis City SC
03.31.2014 MLS St. Louis City SC 3-0 FC Cincinnati
10.06.2013 MLS St. Louis City SC 2-3 FC Cincinnati

That's 30 goals in their last 5 meetings—averaging a whopping 6 goals per game 🙏)

Kickoff is in about half an hour.

Rachel Jones said:kind regards
Can I change my nickname to BlackRock?

Taken.

🤷

restlesssurfer97 said:Man, I’d love to jump in too, but I honestly have no clue what the playbook is for this game—it feels like you just toss the last ball wherever you feel like it in the moment and somehow don't end up losing everything. ☕

Well, they put it in the exact same spot as the second-to-last one. 🤷

Even though in a standard game of Nine-Ball, you could technically sink that final ball in any pocket you want 🤷

View on facebook

🙏🙏🙏

Anyone else given this a shot?

http://sprdex.com/2015-02/sprdex-kvi...fb_ref=Default

View on facebook

🤣

🤣

It’s probably just because Petković-Navarro haven't even played a single game yet.

View on facebook

Miller 🙏

Like I was saying, it’s a pretty solid approach 👋

Honestly, just one single post—this very thread you started—is enough to see that your whole approach is off base. It’s definitely one of those things they look at when deciding whether to strip someone of their partial privileges, so consider this some friendly advice.

Btw, you were hit with that partial back at the end of September.

Rachel Ortiz33 said:What kind of approach? What are you even talking about?

It’s basically just those two days where things get heated because you see the mods starting to patrol the forum more often.

I wouldn't exactly call it a "constructive approach"—just aimless venting about how unfair and arrogant the mods and admins are. Basically, calling out their management just because—heaven forbid—they haven't responded in two days (even though they aren't even required to step in until the six-month mark has passed).🤷

If I were actually in charge of this subforum, I’d tell him straight up whether or not he’s getting his partial removed—but all I can say is that with an attitude like that (which clearly caused the partial in the first place), he probably won't see it happen. Honestly, I wouldn't be the one to strip it from him anyway.
Two days really isn't long enough to start a massive drama just because someone hasn't replied yet.

@ Kyle Vaughn8

Law firms aren't allowed on this subforum—take a look at the rules and maybe get a grip on reality.