ruggedjackal46 said:The death toll in the USA is ten times higher than what we're seeing in China. What kind of leadership does that even suggest?
Sweden has a death count roughly equal to our current infection numbers. Look, countries like Sweden or Germany can afford to take those kinds of risks because they have robust healthcare systems capable of absorbing a massive surge in patients. Our healthcare system is already straining at the seams; they're turning away people who don't even have Coronavirus just to keep up. What on earth would happen if we had 20,000 active cases instead of 2,000?
Honestly, this whole situation is a tectonic disaster. It’s a complete wreck for the economy, and it’s just as messy for politics, especially now that the crisis management team has basically become an unquestionable authority. No matter how you slice it, it's a total mess.
😂😂
Sweden has as many deaths as we have total infections right now, and honestly, countries like Sweden or Germany can actually afford to take those kinds of risks because their healthcare systems are massive enough to handle a surge in patients, whereas our system is already struggling just to stay afloat, turning away people who don't even have Coronavirus, so imagine the absolute chaos if we had 20,000 active cases instead of just 2,000.
Around here, hospitals are turning away non-COVID cases mostly out of pure fear, which is really just a direct byproduct of this whole COVID panic rather than actual hospital capacity issues—if that were the case, it would actually support your point, but I'm genuinely wondering how you managed to talk yourself into such a circular logic trap here.
btw, I can't be bothered to go digging for it right now, but I remember seeing some chart comparing things like ICU bed capacity, ventilators, and all that stuff where the US was doing better than Sweden, and Germany was sitting way up at the top.
But hey, whatever, I don't know how precise those numbers were, so if anyone actually has the data, feel free to drop it.