CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › boldhound8 › Posts

Posts by boldhound8

1193 posts shown.

Proposal to abolish PDF PŽK in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Here are a few more examples I've got...

Look, I really don't want to dive into their business right here. They have their own specific thread for that, and I seriously don't want us getting bogged down in the nitty-gritty details about them just yet. What I’m trying to do is just point out certain things I've already brought up in my previous posts by using these kinds of broad, general topics—the same kind of stuff you see floating around on Reddit all the time.

Case 1
So this guy goes and files a complaint, right? And look, the moderator hasn't actually said a damn thing yet, but the admin has already dropped three separate posts. And guess what? Even after those three posts, absolutely nothing is fixed. There’s no "this is my final word" or anything like that—they just keep making excuses and dragging it out. Above the admin, you've only got the big boss, but even if he stepped in, I'm pretty damn sure nothing would get resolved.😁

This whole mess would be fixed instantly if they just dropped all the charges and cleared the user's name. Whether the mod was actually right or not shouldn't even matter at this point—that’s the real failure of the FBI. From my massive amount of experience, users just can't handle being penalized. Even when someone is 200% in the wrong, they still refuse to back down and just keep dragging it out.
And then when they finally take it too far and someone starts handing out bans like candy, suddenly they're some kind of degenerate, and all of us "troublemakers" are just lumped together in one big group. Total double standard.😁

Case 2.
What am I even supposed to say about this? Honestly, maybe just hit them with a permanent ban so they can stop terrorizing the forum once and for all.😁

Case 3.
Or this? I’m pretty sure there are already like 101 threads about how this place is going downhill, but whatever, every single one needs its own space to point out that everyone here is a total fraud, a thief, and a straight-up criminal—yet they still show up and keep posting anyway.😁 Look, I think we’re all on the same page here. I’ve been hanging out here for four years, every single day, so you should already know how much it drives me crazy when this site glitches and crashes constantly. It’s an absolute joke. But honestly? That’s just the reality you have to deal with. If you really want to play the rebel and act like you've discovered some huge problem, do us all a favor and actually use your brain: search the archives first. Go find one of the hundred old threads where people are already complaining about it instead of being that person who opens yet another useless new thread. Just get with the program.

Case 4.
What am I even supposed to say about this? It’s so obvious. All I see is that one user can't stand the other guy, so now he's running to the FBI to cry about "justice" just because he hates the topics the other dude posts. Give me a break.
I don't see anything anywhere about him actually reporting the guy, and then the mods just totally ignored it. Plus, I can't find a single one of those supposedly controversial posts he made. It's all nonsense.
What's the deal with this?🤷 Honestly, I think this whole thing is just hilarious.😁

Just so you don't go around claiming I'm only picking on certain forum users, I've thrown this one into the mix too:
Case 5.
It’s been 50 days and this guy is still sitting around waiting for an answer... it’s like what I told him back then:
Donald Trump said:...

I mean, come on. Surely someone who moved things around will show their face within a month, right?🙄...and actually explain themselves for why they did it. Honestly, when I see this kind of "moderation," it just makes me sick.

Honestly, it makes me sick. On one hand, we’re all out here playing this little game called democracy—acting like the FBI actually gives a damn about rules or banning people for nothing—but then you look at the moderators. You’ve got someone who hasn't even bothered to show their face or explain themselves, even fifty days after some major intervention. It's pathetic.

* * *


So what’s the bottom line here? How are you guys even looking at the FBI?😁 Look, the easiest thing to say is just scrap it, right? But would shutting it down actually solve anything? Do you honestly think people would stop whining?
On the contrary, if you shut down the FBI, the whole circus just moves over to the main subforums. Shutting it down is pointless—even if it just acts as a dumping ground for complaints, it's better than having nothing at all...
I do agree that it's not the right way forward, though. The real path is reform. But we need a reform that includes "reforming" the users themselves. There's no point in filing appeals against the green branch if we aren't willing to accept that there's someone above us who can just look at a complaint and go, "this appeal is nonsense, denied" and we just have to deal with it. If we can't handle that, then the FBI really is useless...
We accept this in real life (even when things aren't fair or injustice happens), so why can't we accept it on the forum and actually strive for some kind of ideal?

My vision for a reformed FBI would be a place where a user only comes to complain after they've exhausted every other option with the problematic mod and their buddies on that specific subforum. In that FBI appeal, they lay out their side of the story, provide arguments, whatever... And the thread should be software-locked so only the user (if they have more to add) and the mods/admins can post (sort of like how it's set up on KzB now).
After that, the moderator weighs in on the thread, and then an admin or that aforementioned "moderator council" makes the final call. Whatever the decision is, both the mod and the user have to live with it, the topic gets locked, and we move on to the next victory...

Now, maybe this is all just an illusion or chasing something impossible, I don't know. Not that I'd ever get the chance to find out because I have zero intention of starting my own forum.😁

Anyway, morning.🙂
Moderator bans in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Michael Sanders13 said:If I recall correctly, Mr. Ex once mentioned he’s got two strikes against him🤷

having 4😢
Look, like I already said, the bans are there, but the moderators can't just hand them out themselves—so wasting your time clicking that little report triangle is pretty much pointless. If you see someone posting garbage, just take it straight to the PM or the admin instead. Honestly, that's my recommendation. Jerry Garcia I'm telling you right now, mark my words—it's actually going to work.😉
Proposal to abolish PDF PŽK in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Rachel Sanchez11 said:http://reddit.com/showthread.php?t=376185
boldhound8, I honestly have no clue what the thought process was behind this post, or even where the disagreement lies...
But man, crushing someone's little dreams just because you can be incredibly petty...
Especially since he actually had a decent idea about making the forum easier to navigate.
It’s kind of a shame when a site builds up these illusions for people that it just can't actually fulfill...
And that whole sense of democracy, that feeling of playing fair—that used to actually mean something here. I remember days when that mattered a hell of a lot. Nowadays, people live under the delusion that it still exists. Maybe it's time we just come out and say it plainly: it doesn't.

And you actually hit on the real issue...
Look, you can't just walk all over a moderator who isn't getting paid, especially when you're turning a blind eye every time they mess up. You try to settle things with them in a small group, trying to convince them to stay in their role. Because, let's face it, someone has to clean up the massive pile of crap in politics and general nonsense. If someone is moderating 500 posts a day for free and dealing with some random guy jumping around—I think his name was 😁—or banning some random person nobody cares about, they're just doing it. They'll show up, cause absolute chaos, get someone in deep trouble, and then take a permanent ban. Then, in the end, they just make a clone account that nobody recognizes, and that's that. Life goes on, the clone ends up being one of three hundred billion others, and in the background, things just keep moving like they always do...
Then someone shows up with a bright idea...
And gets shut down immediately.
Just because he mentioned paying moderators—you know, like raising funds so a few guys could grab some burgers and fries without having to dig into their own pockets...
Do you see the kind of vision the guy had?
But hey, nothing new on this forum...
There have been hundreds of attempts like this, and they all end up in the exact same way...
Some topics are basically eternal taboos, and if you even touch them, exile is pretty much guaranteed...

So how do we actually fix the problem with this thread?
I actually suggested a moderator council once upon a time, back when there was a plan to organize the political sections...
And they just laughed me out of the room back then...
If the moderators are discussing it now, I swear I am laughing my head off...
The hypocrisy is unreal...
(Not that they actually read my old post before starting this discussion, though)

I don't know about you, man, but I'm telling you, that guy's dream of being a "moderator" has been dead for a year already😁 And btw, the guy is way too old to have his "childhood" dreams crushed by anyone.😁
Anyway, you're right about the ideas. He's got plenty of smart ones (and sure, some stupid ones too, obviously😁), but hardly any of them ever get implemented. Why that is, I haven't a clue...

Rachel Sanchez11 said:http://reddit.com/showthread.php?t=376185
boldhound8, I honestly have no clue what the thought process was behind this post, or even where the disagreement lies...
But man, crushing someone's little dreams just because you can be incredibly petty...
Especially since he actually had a decent idea about making the forum easier to navigate.
It’s kind of a shame when a site builds up these illusions for people that it just can't actually fulfill...
And that whole sense of democracy, that feeling of playing fair—that used to actually mean something here. I remember days when that mattered a hell of a lot. Nowadays, people live under the delusion that it still exists. Maybe it's time we just come out and say it plainly: it doesn't.

And you actually hit on the real issue...
Look, you can't just walk all over a moderator who isn't getting paid, especially when you're turning a blind eye every time they mess up. You try to settle things with them in a small group, trying to convince them to stay in their role. Because, let's face it, someone has to clean up the massive pile of crap in politics and general nonsense. If someone is moderating 500 posts a day for free and dealing with some random guy jumping around—I think his name was 😁—or banning some random person nobody cares about, they're just doing it. They'll show up, cause absolute chaos, get someone in deep trouble, and then take a permanent ban. Then, in the end, they just make a clone account that nobody recognizes, and that's that. Life goes on, the clone ends up being one of three hundred billion others, and in the background, things just keep moving like they always do...
Then someone shows up with a bright idea...
And gets shut down immediately.
Just because he mentioned paying moderators—you know, like raising funds so a few guys could grab some burgers and fries without having to dig into their own pockets...
Do you see the kind of vision the guy had?
But hey, nothing new on this forum...
There have been hundreds of attempts like this, and they all end up in the exact same way...
Some topics are basically eternal taboos, and if you even touch them, exile is pretty much guaranteed...

So how do we actually fix the problem with this thread?
I actually suggested a moderator council once upon a time, back when there was a plan to organize the political sections...
And they just laughed me out of the room back then...
If the moderators are discussing it now, I swear I am laughing my head off...
The hypocrisy is unreal...
(Not that they actually read my old post before starting this discussion, though)

Look, we've known each other a long time, so don't try to twist my words.😉
Those "contributions" you're talking about are peanuts. Moderators are basically disposable. Even if all 100 or however many of us quit right now, the owner would find over 100 replacements within 24 hours. It's incredibly easy to find people to moderate, so don't act like you're indispensable.😉
It’s not even about wanting to get rid of someone, it’s about all the absolute nightmares and endless headaches 🙂 that dream just listed. Why the hell are you people always digging for it? You see a "conspiracy" in every single little thing, for God's sake.😁
Proposal to abolish PDF PŽK in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hey guys and girls...

Look, I’m not trying to be the admins' defense attorney here—especially since I don't even know half of them personally—but you people have massive, totally unrealistic expectations. Let’s get one thing straight right out of the gate: nobody here is getting paid. Everyone does this for the hell of it, including the admins. I’ll take this list and, without naming names because I don't want to start a war, give you the actual reality of the situation:
There are 20 people on this list.
2 of them are total strangers to me.
2 handle the server backend and have zero connection to the community side; they basically just act as moderators.
6 of them are just clones from some failed project long ago.
And yeah, blah blah, I won't go on forever, but looking at this entire list, I only see 2, maybe 3 people who actually show up. So that’s the administration problem right there. How can a forum with over 100,000 users, 300k threads, and 13M posts only have 3 active admins? It’s like they’re getting a paycheck or something, for god's sake.😁

What I’m trying to say is that all of you screaming about how admins should be these perfect little judges—try stepping into their shoes for a second. Let's say you’re the #1 admin and your main interest is Soccer. What the hell would you know about banning someone in Politics? Or Economics? How much do you actually follow Fashion or Cars?
You say, "Oh, it's easy to check." Yeah, right. Like hell it is. To really get to the bottom of a mess, you have to sink an insane amount of time into it, there's a mountain of complaints, and everyone is breathing down your neck waiting for an answer...
Do you get what I'm saying?🤷

Seriously, what kind of hierarchy is this where you have over 100 moderators and 20 bosses, yet maybe 3 are actually doing anything? It’s freaking impossible to run like that.🙂
It’s like the CEO of ExxonMobil worrying about why a single employee at a tiny gas station in rural Ohio is taking the company truck to go look at a vineyard.😁

Since having 20 active admins would be a total luxury, I think it’s a way better option for colleagues to just watch out for each other. For example, if I’m in the Soccer section, I’m definitely not going to jump to defend a colleague like unknown or unknown if I know they screwed up, just like I don't expect them to jump to my defense if I mess up. But damn, you guys hate that idea because you think we’re all best buddies just because we’re in the same group, the moderator group. You don't realize how massive and sprawling this forum is. I don't even know who the Economics moderator is; honestly, I don't even know where the Economics section is because I haven't spent four seconds there in four years...

Would you guys be open to a suggestion, like forming a "Moderator Council" to deal with mistakes? Basically, a council of 10 mods—one from Sports, one from IT, one from Society, one from... whatever, and maybe 2 admins. Then that council could discuss the complaints?
Now, some of you will call this garbage, and others will claim such a council would just protect the moderators anyway.😁
So what then? You gonna take it to the Supreme Court?🤷 Even then, it wouldn't be fair to anyone...

Man, I wouldn't abolish the FBI, I'd rather moderate like Adolf Hitler...
....
Ugh... I started writing all this detail and now I've lost interest. That's unknown's job, let him deal with it. I’m just gonna push my ideas through in Soccer and the Internet sections.🙂

* - Just so it doesn't look like I'm stealing someone else's thought, this idea has been on the moderators' radar for ages, but it just sat there. Nothing ever actually happened...
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
I swear, I can’t make heads or tails of this legal garbage😁 Can someone actually explain when the statute of limitations finally kicks in for me?
11/10/07 - I was flagged for some misdemeanor
12/15/07 - Got hit with a ruling saying I'm guilty
12/17/07 - Filed an appeal with the high court in Washington, D.C.
09/17/08 - High court ruled I'm guilty. No more appeals. Since I'm not paying up, it's tax evasion, which means jail time.

So, once the statute of limitations runs out, which law am I looking at—the old one or the new one?🤷
From what I gather, the clock starts ticking from the moment the violation happened, so 11/10/07. And since that was before the law changed on Jan 1st, shouldn't the old rules apply? That would mean the statute of limitations expires on 11/10/09.
Am I right about this?🤷
Proposal to abolish PDF PŽK in Feedback & Suggestions ·
darkseal15 said:Everything said here holds water.

Donald Trump:

I saw it, I really did.
And frankly, that’s a much fairer way to handle things—not pretending to be something you're not.
(I actually provided a link to some legitimate, unresolved appeals—so go ahead, feel free to weigh in on those.
I have zero doubt you could pull a dozen ridiculous grievances out of your hat if you tried.
I'm not arguing that they don't exist.

But what's problematic is when mods only react to the nonsense while ignoring the actual, well-reasoned arguments.
It really makes you think the mods are just playing games—if they're only ever responding to things that are laughably stupid.

I can't, and I freaking won't.🙂
Believe it or not, I’m just one tiny little moderator—one out of over a hundred.😉Look, I just moderate the Internet and Soccer forums, nothing more, nothing less. And while we're at it, let me add something to my bio: I’m not even listed on the moderator list. Honestly, the reason why doesn't matter to you, but the bottom line is that I don't attend those "staff meetings." I'm not making big decisions, I'm not voting, and I'm not doing anything other than running those two specific boards. Basically, I'm not some expert qualified to chime in or comment on stuff that has zero to do with me—especially when I don't have a clue what's even going on. Now, I'm not saying there aren't legitimate complaints out there, but let's be real: 90% of this forum is just pure, unadulterated trolling. It serves absolutely no intelligent purpose. If anything, it’s just toxic. It hurts "you," it hurts "us," it hurts everyone. Period.😉

And yeah, I think you guys totally misread why I even showed up here. I didn't come here to play some fake "opposition" role or get into endless shouting matches with you people. I’m not here to play bodyguard for the moderators or talk trash about everyone else just for the hell of it. No. I came here to state my piece and leave it at that. I have zero interest in starting a fight or dragging out some massive showdown. Users vs. Mods. It’s the same old story, isn't it? Every single time.Honestly, I'm way past all that. It just doesn't move me anymore.😉
If you’ve got a specific question or a legit grievance regarding my account, come talk to me right here. Otherwise, just pretend I don't even exist...
Proposal to abolish PDF PŽK in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Sandra Parker3 said:Just opening up a complaint book doesn't prove you're democratic. Someone actually needs to sit down, read through them, and deal with what’s being reported.

Even if 90% of the complaints are a circus, that doesn't mean we should ignore the rest. You want links?

I'm with you on that.

Sandra Parker3 said:Just opening up a complaint book doesn't prove you're democratic. Someone actually needs to sit down, read through them, and deal with what’s being reported.

Even if 90% of the complaints are a circus, that doesn't mean we should ignore the rest. You want links?

Look, 90% of this place is a total joke. The remaining 10% is actually decent, and that’s what we need to focus on fixing. The real issue is when an entire subforum gains a reputation for being nothing but a circus. When nine out of ten threads are just mindless trolling, people stop showing up. It becomes a complete disaster. And don't get it twisted—I'm not making excuses for the irresponsible moderators here. They should be stepping up regardless, because keeping things under control is literally their job. I'm just calling it like I see it.

That’s exactly why I think we'd be better off without him. Honestly, those tiny amounts of complaints—like 10% or less—are incredibly easy to handle directly with the Prime Minister or through some other way of just talking it out. It's not that deep.🙂
Proposal to abolish PDF PŽK in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I voted for the moderator option because the author treated us like absolute garbage, just dividing us up like we're nothing but cattle.😍

Why? Because the complaint subforum is completely useless. In some desperate attempt to please everyone and act like they’re all about being super-democratic, the admins opened up "complaints and grievances" and a "banned users corner" (which has been around forever). Now that move is coming back to haunt them every single day. In their pathetic rush to be "fair" and "democratic," those two subforums turned into a playground for idiots, and honestly, the site feels way less fair than it did before they even existed.

Major props to anyone standing up against injustice—I've been there myself, playing the black sheep among the mods more than once—but let's be real: over 90% of the complaints (maybe even more😉) are a total joke. Before a thread even gets locked or someone gets handed a few warnings, it turns into a complete farce, like a bad comedy sketch. You want proof? Just ask me. I can pull up 15 ridiculous examples in fifteen minutes, though the most insane ones usually get deleted first.😢

I don't know if you guys have checked out anything besides Reddit, but I have, and I haven't found anything anywhere else even close to this mess. No endless warnings, no other nonsense. Users should act like users, mods should mod, and if someone goes too far, give them a warning—if they keep acting up, just ban them for good and move on. It shouldn't be a circus. There shouldn't be petitions, comedies, or tragedies; there's nothing like what's happening here. Justice is five times more effective elsewhere, so you decide. You think I'm full of it? Go ahead, look around for yourselves.😉
Look, this isn't news, and honestly, the headline is total garbage because Damir Vrbanović doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.😁 What "Europa League"? That’s just some nonsense made up by our local reporters. The competition is the UEFA Europa League, and starting next season, it’s moving to that new format everyone's already talked about.

We already went over this extensively in another thread, and we all agreed the system isn't nearly as revolutionary as these clueless American journalists and football officials try to sell us. Sure, there are a few perks—I mentioned one above—but there are definitely some downsides too...
At the end of the day, we'll see how it plays out next year. Don't go expecting some massive revolution; if the game itself doesn't actually improve, then even with a different format, we're just going to keep seeing the same old results.☕
Thomas Johnson7 said:
The UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa League formats as we know them are being retired next season. In their place comes the new Europa League. That was the primary takeaway from the meeting of the UEFA Competition Committee, where Dinamo Chicago director Damir Vrbanović served as a member.

Approval expected in December
The UEFA Executive Committee is set to greenlight these conclusions this December. This shift is particularly good news for clubs like Dinamo Chicago. Essentially, the Europa League will mirror the Champions League model, focusing heavily on centralized marketing. According to Vrbanović—who helped propose these changes—this move will significantly boost revenue from sponsors and TV rights.

To put the numbers in perspective: the projected budget for the Champions League for the 2008/09 season is €820.5 million. Clubs will receive 75 percent of that, while UEFA takes 25 percent. Last year's budget sat at €820,353,000.

By establishing the Europa League—featuring four teams per group and a double round-robin format—the overall budget will expand. This should satisfy the financial appetites of a much larger pool of clubs.

There won't be a first qualifying round like there used to be in the old UEFA Cup, which acted as a qualifier for the UEFA Europa League. Instead, there will be preliminary rounds for the Europa League. Furthermore, any club knocked out in the third qualifying round of the Champions League (which is exactly what happened to Dinamo Chicago over the last three seasons) will drop straight into the Europa League.

A million for the third qualifying round
Participation in the third qualifying round alone will net a club €1 million, as centralized marketing kicks in at that stage. The coefficient calculation is also changing.Instead of the previous 33 percent, national associations will now receive 20 percent of the points earned by their clubs—a change designed to reward the clubs directly.


It’s official now. ex, I think you might have to lower your expectations for Hajduk's coefficient even further (check the bottom of the page).

Honestly, this is the only thing worth talking about. Period.😁 Look, this is all just about the money... on paper, sure, everything looks absolutely flawless. It sounds like a dream scenario. But honestly? We'll see if any of this actually holds water once it hits the real world. Talk is cheap.

Look, we’ve still got plenty of time to fix that coefficient. No need to freak out just yet—we can turn this around. Slow and steady wins the race.😉
And honestly? This is just straight-up garbage for our clubs too.
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
brightwalker4 said:Got a quick question for you geniuses... 😉

A few months back—more like over half a year, actually—I drifted off the road in my car. Nothing major, just ended up taking out a chunk of some elderly lady's fence. The cops showed up, scribbled some stuff down, and left... (they didn't give me anything, no paperwork, nothing at all)

I settled everything directly with the lady so she wouldn't sue me... (don't even ask how I handled things with her) 🤣

Negooooo, so now the mailman shows up... carrying a blue envelope specifically for me...

I wasn't home, so my old man picked it up for me—well, he tried to, anyway. Now I’ve got this notice saying I need to pick up the shipment at the post office within ten days, otherwise, it goes back to the sender...

I'm wondering if there's any way to force someone to pick that up, or can you basically drag your feet forever? (I mean, can they actually make you go grab your mail?)

Thanks a million. I promise I won't be drifting into grandmas' yards ever again. 🙏

Nope. But hey, instead of the mail carrier showing up, you might get the cops knocking on your door after the second or third attempt.😁
doduše, you don't even have to open the door for them, blah blah blah...
Check how much time is left before it expires and play it smart—drag it out a bit, file a complaint, stall for time...😉
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
casualcrane2 said:Hey everyone! So, I just got a summons for a misdemeanor hearing at the local court, but I’ve already got some major plans on the calendar for that day. Does anyone know if it’s actually possible to get a postponement? Thanks!

Yeah, you can.😉
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
Jesse James5 said:The statute of limitations for enforcing misdemeanor penalties doesn't start on the day of the act. It starts once the ruling becomes final... which in this case means we're looking at an appellate decision made during the Supreme Court session. (So, the statute of limitations plus another four years).

So basically, I get to live in constant fear until February 2nd, 2012.😁
Thanks for all the input.😘
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
Jesse James5 said:If the IRS can't collect anything, they’ll still report back to the court, and the judge will issue a jail sentence regardless. You do have the right to appeal that...
The statute of limitations kicks in two years after the misdemeanor ruling becomes final, assuming the old laws still apply... (I didn't catch the exact dates)😉).

But look, here's the deal😢
This whole mess goes back to February 2008.
So we're talking four years, if I'm remembering right—but from what date exactly? Are we counting from this new Supreme Court ruling, or that old decision from the Misdemeanor Court?
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
Jesse James5 said:If you're thanking me, I'm actually a woman 😉
Fines over $167 are collected forcibly by the IRS; they try to collect for six months, and once that period lapses, the process ends. If the fine hasn't been paid—or even if it's only partially settled—the court issues an order for supplemental jail time, for $233 three days..

Look😉
The IRS has nothing to take from me😉
What about jail👋 Is there a statute of limitations on that, or am I stuck on their list forever?😁

Thanks again😉
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
Grace Turner said:Just take your paperwork down to the Municipal Court of Los Angeles, head straight to the enforcement division, and tell them what's up. You'll probably have to sign a statement agreeing to swap the fine for some community service, and then you should be all set.

Jesse James5 said:You can't appeal a Supreme Court decision, which is why there aren't any instructions on further legal remedies provided at the end.
Your only options are to pay the fine or, potentially, if the amount doesn't exceed $167 perform community service instead. If you have court costs, you'll need to cover them; otherwise, if you're employed, they'll just be deducted from your income.

Thanks, guys.
But we're talking about $233 here. So I can't even swap that for service?
$50I mean, I can definitely handle the court costs (honestly, I wouldn't mind paying them anyway, 😁)
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
I just got hit with the ruling from the Supreme Court regarding my appeal against that initial decision from the Split Municipal Court. There isn't a single word at the bottom about what I can actually do next...

Basically, those "big shot" judges up in the city just doubled down and confirmed I'm guilty,🙄 so now what? What's my move?
  • I'm assuming an appeal is off the table, and honestly, it probably wouldn't change a thing anyway.
  • Is there any way—and if so, how, when, and where—I can swap out those few hundred bucks for some community service? Because let me tell you, I am broke as hell.

>
CONCACAF Player of the Year nominations in Soccer ·
Michelle Palmer6 said:As much as I hate to admit it, Cristiano Ronaldo truly earned this title. And no, I’m not just talking about him scoring that penalty in the Champions League final 😁
. He’s clearly ahead of the likes of Fernando Torres, Rio Ferdinand, and Lionel Messi...

Maybe we should throw a poll in here to see what everyone else thinks...

With over 20 players involved?😁 Give me a break, I'm totally over it.😁

Anyway, who's actually gonna win? Honestly, I couldn't care less.😉
Traffic violation procedures in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
lonewalker2 I can't even begin to process this nonsense. It’s absolute garbage. Seriously, how does anyone look at this and think it makes any sense? It’s total madness!
So, here's the deal—I’m trying to figure out my next move. What am I actually looking at here? How much is this fine gonna hit me for, and is there any way to shut this whole punishment thing down before it even starts? Help a guy out.


And you think you have some kind of right to judge? Give me a break. I'm here.😕

Look, I’m honestly not in the mood to go digging through all that paperwork right now, so you're gonna have to do the legwork yourself. But if I had to bet? Based on that new law they just pushed through, that fine is easily gonna land somewhere between $2,000 and... well, you know how it goes. It's gonna hurt.$1667

Look, you can try to dodge the whole thing by waiting for the statute of limitations to run out—which is two years, maybe four if you're lucky—but let’s be real, your chances of that happening are basically zero. You could also try appealing to get the penalty slashed if you actually have some legitimate grounds, but based on what you've told me here? Yeah, you've got nothing. Honestly, the only way you're seeing a lighter sentence is if you just plead guilty, show some actual remorse, and go through all that "I'm so sorry" nonsense. But hey, like fifty other people have already said that in this thread, so you know it's true.

Once all that mess hits the fan, you’re looking at two options: cough up the cash in installments or just pack your bags for prison. Period.
Anyone know the best forums for the Germany area? in Forum Help! ·
Does Snoop Dogg know?🤷