Can we just get straight to the point instead of rambling?
in Psychology & Therapy ·
Carl Rivera43 said:Since when is AI considered fake?
And then they start crying 😢 😢
201 posts shown.
Carl Rivera43 said:Since when is AI considered fake?
Ashley Bailey75 said:You're being way too literal here—I'm not talking about flavor profiles, man. The sense of smell exists specifically to warn you when something isn't right.
Don't get hung up on the smell itself; look at the sense behind it. It's what guides you through life. It's what keeps you alive. You feel emotional pain for a reason. If you ignore it for too long—or worse, if you feed into it—that's when you actually put yourself in danger. That's just facts.
Ashley Bailey75 said:Go ahead and hate me if you want, but if you're gonna hang out in this thread, actually contribute. Make a point. Explain what's bothering you or how you see things. It's a forum, for crying out loud—it wouldn't hurt to actually share an opinion instead of just dropping these tiny, useless comments that don't say anything at all.
Don't you think emotional pain works just like physical pain? Like, a built-in signal that something's wrong? Why would we even be capable of feeling it if it didn't serve a purpose?
Ashley Bailey75 said:Go ahead and hate me if you want, but if you're gonna hang out in this thread, actually contribute. Make a point. Explain what's bothering you or how you see things. It's a forum, for crying out loud—it wouldn't hurt to actually share an opinion instead of just dropping these tiny, useless comments that don't say anything at all.
Don't you think emotional pain works just like physical pain? Like, a built-in signal that something's wrong? Why would we even be capable of feeling it if it didn't serve a purpose?
Nicholas Lee41 said:Indirectly, maybe. If there wasn't any love involved, there wouldn't be this kind of suffering for those close to you. It would probably manifest in other ways, but in my experience, no kind of pain hurts quite as much as this byproduct of love.
Ashley Bailey75 said:And just like everything else in life, there's two sides to every coin.
Suffering is just as much a part of the deal as love is. Most people spend their lives running from it—trying to numb it out or ignore it—but honestly? It’s pretty valuable. It’s basically a signal that you’re off track or working against your own interests.
It's like when you smell something rotten—your body tells you to stay away because it's dangerous. Pain works the same way. It's necessary for survival.
Ashley Bailey75 said:I don't know, I'm not trying to get all deep or philosophical here, but I can't wrap my head around loving my kids only under certain conditions or specific circumstances. Just having them is enough for me to feel Love. It showed up out of nowhere and I doubt it’s ever leaving. And it doesn't demand anything back just to exist.
Look, obviously you feel grief and pain when you lose someone—only truly messed up people are devoid of those emotions. That wasn't what I meant when I said Love doesn't hurt. I meant that Love keeps you from staying in relationships that cause suffering and damage you. Loving others naturally requires loving yourself, too, so it should protect the person doing the loving.
And regarding apathy—psychology basically says emotional neglect leaves a deeper scar on kids than actual abuse does. So, any emotion at all is clearly "better" than nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Ashley Bailey75 said:I don't know, I'm not trying to get all deep or philosophical here, but I can't wrap my head around loving my kids only under certain conditions or specific circumstances. Just having them is enough for me to feel Love. It showed up out of nowhere and I doubt it’s ever leaving. And it doesn't demand anything back just to exist.
Look, obviously you feel grief and pain when you lose someone—only truly messed up people are devoid of those emotions. That wasn't what I meant when I said Love doesn't hurt. I meant that Love keeps you from staying in relationships that cause suffering and damage you. Loving others naturally requires loving yourself, too, so it should protect the person doing the loving.
And regarding apathy—psychology basically says emotional neglect leaves a deeper scar on kids than actual abuse does. So, any emotion at all is clearly "better" than nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Roger Kern16 said:I think I’ve been calling infatuation Love for way too long. Same goes for that anxiety you get from those toxic push-pull relationships... It just isn't it. Love is more of a state of being than some fleeting emotion, and you can only really measure it by actions. I don't (really) believe it should be a source of weakness, sadness, or suffering anymore; if that's what you're feeling, then it’s just pathology or something else entirely.
Ashley Bailey75 said:The opposite of Love isn't hate—it's just a total lack of it. Honestly, I think apathy is way more destructive than actual hatred.
I’m with you on this: Love isn't some fleeting feeling; it's actions, words, thoughts, and mostly just showing up for someone. And it doesn't demand anything in return.
It’s not inherently destructive, and it doesn't actually hurt. It’s just the ego getting tangled up in it that causes the pain.
Take parental Love, for example—it doesn't sting. It's selfless and exists without needing a reason. Romantic Love, though? That needs constant fuel. I’m being all metaphorical today—too much cheesy talk about Love for me, ugh.
Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
Ashley Bailey75 said:The opposite of Love isn't hate—it's just a total lack of it. Honestly, I think apathy is way more destructive than actual hatred.
I’m with you on this: Love isn't some fleeting feeling; it's actions, words, thoughts, and mostly just showing up for someone. And it doesn't demand anything in return.
It’s not inherently destructive, and it doesn't actually hurt. It’s just the ego getting tangled up in it that causes the pain.
Take parental Love, for example—it doesn't sting. It's selfless and exists without needing a reason. Romantic Love, though? That needs constant fuel. I’m being all metaphorical today—too much cheesy talk about Love for me, ugh.
Sent from my iPhone using Reddit
urbanraven said:Death is the one absolute certainty we have in this life.
Everyone who ever lived—is gone.
Everyone living right now—will pass away.
And everyone born after us—will follow suit.
It isn't death itself that scares people. It’s the great unknown waiting on the other side.
Dana Roberts said:Greetings, everyone. I’ve been an avid reader of this forum for quite some time now, but today I felt compelled to step out of the shadows and initiate what I hope will be a truly constructive dialogue on a specific subject.
I am curious to know if there is a formal psychological term for a particular phenomenon: when an individual says one thing, yet their actions tell a completely different story. Specifically, I'm thinking of those who verbally condemn a certain behavior while simultaneously engaging in it themselves. Some people might dismiss this by saying, "Well, that's just how everyone operates these days," but I find that answer rather unsatisfying. In your estimation, does this fall under the umbrella of pathological lying, or is it perhaps something else entirely—maybe a complex blend of various psychological drivers?
Matthew Castillo5 said:Where on earth do you get the idea that anyone deserves to be bullied? 😒
(unless we're talking about the bullies themselves; I'd happily see them get a taste of their own medicine just so they finally understand what helplessness feels like)
Joseph Bailey41 said:If you're in a relationship, you aren't really "yourself" or "steady" anymore, because when the person you love is hurting, it hits you hard. Unless, of course, you're a psychopath. ☕
Joseph Bailey41 said:If you're in a relationship, you aren't really "yourself" or "steady" anymore, because when the person you love is hurting, it hits you hard. Unless, of course, you're a psychopath. ☕