Posts by Laura Chavez93

And what might happen if, in a few months' time, you were to demand that you become a Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious hillbilly once again?

Hmm, I decided to pick up those from the first photo—they were quite charming, really...

on topic: I have a memory of an old film titled Soylent Green😲
...

Arthur Sanders74 said:But anyway...

Has Jordan Peterson said anything at all regarding an insect-based diet? Just so we know how to proceed...

🙂 It isn't what Peterson said—it's more about how Zizek responded to it.

@Larry Walker24/">@@Larry Walker24, why do you feel the need to label everyone else as fags?
By the way—are you speaking from actual experience with those types of people, or is this just more copy-pasted nonsense you found online...

How is it that someone suddenly decides that Judolin—after all these years—can no longer simply do as they please? 🤔

I haven't posted in quite some time due to the blatant double standards here—specifically, if anyone dares to point out that the members of this party are essentially just career activists who have spent their entire lives protesting or staging performances rather than actually building anything... and that it’s hardly surprising they are failing to deliver now, given they lack any practical competence
you get slapped with a ban
yet, calling a former mayor a deadbeat piece of trash goes completely unchallenged.
Double standards. That is all there is to it.

In my view, if one isn't permitted to write anything that doesn't align perfectly with the Democratic platform, then that rule should be clearly stated in the opening post—with an explicit threat of expulsion for anyone even considering such a dissent 🤷
This has gone too far... people are being banned simply for pointing out that the local waste management situation is a complete circus, solely because it’s being interpreted as an attack on the party 🙂

I see you're new here—it’s clear you haven't quite realized yet that Judy is allowed to do things the rest of us aren't...

Perhaps it would be prudent to establish a dedicated thread specifically for discussing why Netflix's producers seem so intent on pushing a woke agenda... the clearest example being Star Trek Discovery, where a deluge of gay, non-binary, and fluid characters—along with their interpersonal dialogues, which frankly bear little to no relation to the essence of Star Trek—became so dominant that there was essentially nothing left of Star Trek itself 🤷

To prevent any misunderstanding: I am speaking generally about activists from all political sides—though my focus lately has been on those associated with the Green Party, who have been causing far too much friction recently... they've truly overstepped their bounds.

There’s a noticeable contingent of activists from the Green Party popping up here just to push their party line,
it wouldn't be such an issue if they didn't insist on trolling every single thread regarding the new administration's performance or the Mayor's policies—they're even active over on the Washington, D.C. subreddit. They tend to get quite aggressive with anyone who dares to disagree...
I personally ended up with quite a few warnings after getting into it with one of their supporters, and several others have been banned from the Washington, D.C. sub for the exact same reason.
So, I’m curious about the moderation policy here: is it permissible to discuss local civic issues in a way that ensures Green Party activists are sanctioned when they start trolling?

driftingotter47 said:I find myself posing that exact same question to you...

The reality is quite straightforward—if a massive influx of people starts betting on a specific outcome, the odds inevitably drop... which begs the question: why would anyone bother sharing intel when they could just place their own bets and sweep the pot?
edit: though I suppose I am really just here to stir the pot for brightviper29😁

Well, there you have it, brightviper29! 🙂

If you had actually jumped into business with them, you would have had enough cash and free time to forget what life was even like... instead, you're left suffering 🙂just like some old lady who lost her cookies
. 🙂

Honestly, if I were in their shoes, I’d keep all that intel strictly under wraps—just bet on it myself and pocket the entire windfall at the end
But instead, they go and broadcast it to everyone... essentially handing out the blueprint so anyone else can get in on the action too👍

Is there an existing thread regarding Eurovision on any of the other subforums—maybe Trash, Teens, or Trkeljanje—where manchild could go ahead and post?...

bluecyclist64 said:Based on this thread, one might conclude that people with dual personalities—ah, yes—are incredibly high-strung and prone to taking offense at the slightest provocation. Please, do carry on, you provocateurs... I'm sure the psychologists and sociologists will be eternally grateful for the data.🥳

Comments like that aren't going to get your ban lifted

Frank Foster6 said:I understand the sentiment, but since I am a member of this forum, I have an obligation to respect its rules—specifically, if I make a claim, I am required to provide evidence to back it up... I cannot simply resort to archaic rhetoric and ramble about nonsense all day long... regardless, I am not certain of the precise technical term used to identify posts by bluecyclist64... some sort of daily commentary or personal musings that generally fail to address the actual subject being discussed...

Looking back over the last five or six years—tracing everything I recall or have stumbled upon regarding bluecyclist64's posts—it is quite frankly staggering that he has managed to linger on this forum for more than a few months... I can only speculate that perhaps there are private connections with the site owner that grant him such leniency, though I cannot say for sure... I simply cannot determine why he wasn't permanently banned five years ago... if I were to engage in his style of polemic, I would likely find myself banned by tomorrow...

bluecyclist64 was actually banned from Gastronomy, something no one else has ever managed to achieve🙏—not even that man-child with his endless stream of copy-paste posts...
On the off topic MK group, we once launched a coordinated effort against him (targeting bluecyclist64 specifically, rather than the man-child) and it proved effective; it seems that is the recipe for success...

Frank Foster6 said:I really ought to return the favor to bluecyclist64—to repay him for the lovely compliments he regularly showers upon my posts, even though he’s nowhere to be found in those contentious forum debates...

He is one of the more dedicated trolls on this board—an absolute nuisance, really. I can't quite pin down his utility because he contributes nothing—at least not to the history threads I follow—he functions more like some pundit commenting on daily news, using a "polite" vocabulary that would likely land most of us regular users a permanent ban if we dared to engage in discussions with such a tone...

In the five or six years I've been tracking his presence in my threads or stumbling upon him in the history PDFs, this user hasn't once provided a single link, a PDF, or a peer-reviewed paper to back up his claims. As I mentioned, his positions are mostly just personal musings on daily life—they have almost no connection to the actual topics at hand, or perhaps only touch upon them by a tiny fraction...

He is a subpar forum participant who offers nothing but grand, pseudo-intellectual conclusions that are forgotten by tomorrow—and so it goes, day after day... Therefore, it is my opinion that he should be honored with a permanent ban, allowing us to bring in a fresh commentator to take his place—out with the old, in with the new... and so on, into eternity...

It honestly surprises me that he's allowed to post anywhere at all; you'd think he would have been blocked everywhere by now 🤷
though his strategy remains predictably identical: he disappears for several months, only to resurface here playing the victim, whining about being banned so he can start posting again—claiming that enough time has passed and that there has been plenty of 🙄