44 posts shown.
For those of you who are comfortable with English, I thought I’d share this fantastic clip from a documentary I recently came across:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy-7AoxFEJA
Well, now that we have thoroughly exhausted all those debates regarding theory and religious dilemmas, shall we pivot our attention back toward gay adult content?
hiddensailor14 said:Benjamin Palmer40, what on earth possessed you to bring a topic like this to the hazelnut forum!?😲
I just pictured you wearing a kimono, and suddenly my mind was swirling with thoughts of love, eroticism, and intimacy. Oh boy.
Is the subject matter perhaps too "pre-scientific" for the hazelnut community? Is there truly anything wrong with exploring a topic rooted in some form of research if it touches upon ES? By presenting the actual facts, I am simply trying to save this forum from endless threads of "
I don't think that's right because it isn't natural".
Besides, it really all depends on how you package the idea and frame the discussion; one could approach it from a strictly scientific perspective, or they could choose a more non-scientific route. My intention was certainly the latter.
hollowtrucker77 said:this time the admin is going to ask what sperm production has to do with the hazelnut subforum??
Oh, I really didn't pose that question myself, did I? Let's find out together.
To start things off, the subforum is called hazelnut: that isn't a translation for some kind of
linden tree, but rather an acronym for love, eroticism, and sex.
The core sentence—the actual topic here—is this:
"
Men who watch gay porn produce more sperm" (Highlighted just to make those key terms pop)
Shall we play a little game of hot or cold?
Is watching porn connected to eroticism and sex? Is sperm production linked to sex and consuming erotic material? Is getting aroused by watching gay porn related to our hazelnut section? Am I getting warm? I would say—it's getting quite hot!
Aside from being
hot, hot, it deals with something I suspect very few people actually know, which makes the subject matter much more intriguing.
***
Then again, there are topics that truly have nothing to do with the hazelnut section, yet they remain here regardless. For instance... how much does a thread about sexual assault relate to this specific subforum? Am I close? Cold. Now we are rapidly approaching absolute zero. Bones are turning into ice cream. The sun is becoming an icy sphere. We are nearing absolute zero. The laws of physics are simply breaking down.
Greetings to all our regular visitors here on the forum! 👋
So, here’s how the whole thing unfolds...
One beautiful day, an anonymous registered user on the NBC forums happened to stumble upon an article online. This wasn't just some journalist spinning yarns out of sheer boredom, either; rather, the piece was actually rooted in genuine scientific research. The content struck such a chord with our unnamed user—feeling both incredibly fascinating and just the right amount of provocative—that they felt compelled to spark a brand-new discussion about it here.
NBC doesn't typically make a habit of starting new threads, mostly because they aren't usually looking for everyone's input on every little thing, so it’s actually quite hard to remember when they last kicked off a discussion. They tend to only step in and open a topic when they feel there is a genuine message worth sharing or something meaningful that we can all learn from together, don't you think?
Here is a truly scandalous point from an article that NBC decided to open a discussion about:
● Is it possible that there is a physiological connection between the type of adult content men consume and their actual biological output? Some people have been suggesting that men who watch gay pornography might actually produce a higher volume of semen, though I wonder if there is any real scientific basis to support such a claim?
Have you ever wondered if our subconscious drives are more powerful than we realize? Recent studies have suggested an intriguing connection between visual stimuli and biological responses, specifically noting that men who watch content featuring two men and one woman—or even exclusively male-centered adult content—actually produce higher sperm counts compared to those watching traditional heterosexual videos or solo female performers. It makes one wonder, doesn't it? Researchers believe this phenomenon might be rooted in deep-seated evolutionary mechanics, potentially linked to an innate, competitive drive among males to maximize reproductive potential. Isn't it fascinating how much our primal instincts might still be pulling the strings behind the scenes?
Oh yes, you hit the nail on the head—this is definitely a topic for hazelnut lovers. But strangely enough, NBC actually posted it under their pets section!
Oh, come on now, that was just a joke! The whole topic was actually started over on Hazelnut.
So, there was actually a wonderful opportunity for us to keep this conversation going with plenty of cheer and positivity for nearly twenty-four hours... until an unnamed moderator decided to wake up on the wrong side of the bed around 1:00 PM—right about the same time I did—and, with a sense of utter disdain, simply erased the entire thread. 😕
NBC doesn't have a clue who they're actually dealing with, and honestly, aren't they just kidding themselves? What on earth are you even talking about? Honestly, is she really under the impression that's how things work?I sent a quick note over to one of the regulars on Hazelnut, someone I occasionally exchange messages with, even if it's just every once in a while. She told me she wasn't quite sure why the thread had been erased, but suggested that it might be best for everyone to just reach out to the moderators directly to ask for an explanation. She seemed quite confident that whoever decided to wipe the post would eventually get back to us with a reason. As for NBC, they weren't particularly interested in getting dragged into an unproductive side conversation via private messages with the person who deleted it, so they decided to leave it alone.
For those who might still be a little confused—though I truly hope there aren't many of you left in that boat—NBC stands for me, Benjamin Palmer40. Yes, that’s exactly who I am! 😲
Let’s get straight to the point:
Is it just me, or does a policy that allows for the deletion of threads simply because they aren't blatant spam or illegal under American law feel a bit misplaced? Doesn't such a practice suggest that we are dealing more with the casual chatter of a local neighborhood bulletin board rather than the atmosphere of a truly serious, high-level forum?
Has anyone else ever experienced that moment when a serious discussion on a major forum suddenly hits a dead end because the topic gets locked? It’s always such a curious phenomenon to witness, isn't it? You’re right in the middle of a deep dive, everyone is engaging, and then—poof—the thread is gone, leaving nothing behind but a brief note from a moderator explaining exactly why they had to shut it down. Does it ever feel like the conversation was just getting started?
Of course, it seems much more sensible this way—unless, of course, there is some compelling reason to suggest otherwise?
Wouldn't it be a lovely gesture if the moderator would simply send a private message explaining the reasoning behind this decision, especially if they feel a bit too self-conscious to address the matter publicly on the forum?
Is there something I might have missed regarding this topic?
I might have actually understood why they decided to erase this, if only I had opened the thread on a National Geographic forum instead of here on Hazelnut, where you stumble upon topics that completely blow your mind and then just slip right out of your head.
To be honest, I find myself doubting that anyone would ever dream of erasing a thread like this on a forum of this caliber; after all, isn't there a certain level of respect earned when a discussion is firmly rooted in actual natural science?
I wonder, what exactly is the core of the issue here?
Is it possible that the folks over at NBC aren't exactly thrilled with what those scientific studies are turning up?
Was NBC a bit disappointed that there were hardly any homophobic outbursts to go around, and that the discussion actually managed to stay civil and normal for once?
***
Oh da, evo izvornog članka:
I’d like to offer a sincere apology in advance for the link I’m about to share; please believe me when I say it isn't my intention to cause anyone any trouble or discomfort. Could there be anything more exhilarating than a sudden, unexpected discovery? It truly makes one wonder how many secrets are still waiting to be uncovered right beneath our feet. I wonder if anyone else has been spending quite a bit of time lately scrolling through the latest headlines on CNN? It truly feels like there is always something new to discover when you dive into the news cycle, doesn't it? Could one ever truly find a way to escape? Welcome to the forum. 🙂
nimbleviper142 said:worked up 😁
you're right, I'm losing sleep over this 🤣
haven't gotten an actual explanation yet so I'm just gonna assume you're just talking nonsense
so clearly some people care about gender, but why? 🤷 personally, I don't see any reason why, or how the whole thing would change if it were a same-sex relationship. but hey, I guess that's somehow become a factor in this mess.
Looking back at your posts, you really did react exactly like someone who was genuinely worked up. It was quite a comical display of frustration. 😂
"
And why on earth does the gender of the partners even matter in this whole situation? Who cares?!? Does that actually change anything? Absolutely not, yet you all are clinging to it like a lifeline... "
well, obviously it matters to some people, but why? 🤷 personally, I can't see a single reason why, nor how the entire situation would be any different if it were a homosexual relationship. but I guess that's somehow become a major factor in the discussion.
But we are talking about a homosexual relationship here. 🤣
Gender does matter. First, it's because men and women
frequently approach certain problems from entirely different perspectives, whether that's due to their upbringing or other various factors.
Second, it's simply out of respect for the original poster and the specific issue they are facing.
Jerry Martinez5 said:Wait, did I actually say she was treating him normally?
The woman is just being stubborn. Honestly, I don't see what he can even do about it. It doesn't look like actual abuse to me, so I definitely wouldn't suggest he drop out of high school at sixteen just to try and support himself.
Maybe reach out to his dad behind her back? Who knows, maybe the father would be willing to take him in?
I was specifically referring to this point, but please, excuse me, I didn't even finish reading the rest:
It's like this. For me, the absolute worst part of everything is how his mom only lets him go out on Saturdays, and even then, only until 10 PM. She wouldn't even let him go stay at a friend's cabin for the weekend. That's all, nothing more.
I was just thinking about what Jerry Martinez5 said. 🤦
It really feels like your mother is treating you like Cinderella. It’s as if you’re some kind of servant rather than a child who deserves a decent upbringing—especially during puberty, which is already such a complicated stage for anyone to navigate, don't you think?
The constant restrictions on going out, the nagging combined with insults whenever you don't perform tasks perfectly, having zero allowance, being treated completely differently than your brother without any valid reason, and then dealing with that cold, condescending attitude... it’s honestly terrible. Wouldn't it be absurd if she acted this way while you were failing classes or refusing to help out at home? But since you're actually trying, it’s just unthinkable.
To be blunt, your mother is acting like a truly unkind person, though I'd prefer to use much harsher language if I could.
Since everyone here seems to have an opinion, I'll offer my own bit of advice: why not reach out to a trusted adult, perhaps a school counselor or a psychologist? If you explain the situation clearly and ask them to step in and speak with her, it might change things. Since she doesn't seem to take your needs seriously, maybe a neutral third party can finally open her eyes to reality. Hang in there; you have my full sympathy.
Jessica Jackson62 said:p.s. Vanja Udovičić is just so incredibly handsome! 😍 I am honestly convinced I'll marry him one day 🥳
http://i31.tinypic.com/mlqzoj.jpg
It’s alright, but nothing out of the ordinary. Don't you think the two guys standing on either side of him look even better?
Or perhaps this gentleman here, http://media.photobucket.com/image/v...a-udovicic.jpg , who is positioned to his left.
rapidbison42 said:You're a bit behind on the facts.
I suppose I am. But honestly, you have a great avatar; I’m kind of digging it.😳
Nicholas Morales48 said:Honestly, water polo is such a chaotic, ridiculous sport where even someone just casually strolling past the pool could probably outplay half the players 🤣... it’s a niche passion that almost nobody else in the world follows quite like we do 😁.
But I suppose it doesn't matter, since the mindless masses are all too busy obsessively following soccer. It really is a maddeningly simple sport to watch, isn't it? :/
I mean, sure, there might be something to kicking a ball around... provided the legs are muscular and hairy enough, I suppose. 😍
lonebadger6 said:I follow it ☕.
Alright, lonebadger6, I stand corrected by your absolutely unassailable logic—the fact that you simply
follow it is enough to settle any debate. Consider me completely defeated; I am practically bowing before you. 😛
lonebadger6 said:Yeah, an absolute failure.
In a sport that is seriously played in maybe seven or eight countries—and we've been bragging for sixteen years about being one of the top two or three nations (which, looking at our club teams and individual player names, isn't even an exaggeration)—to walk away with only four medals out of twenty-seven competitions isn't just a disappointment; it’s a total disaster.
Actually, let me correct myself... it wasn't just a failure, it was a complete
catastrophe.
Is it really such a convincing argument to claim water polo is only taken seriously in seven or eight countries, especially considering it's an Olympic sport?
Besides, what does it actually mean for a sport to be played "seriously" in a nation? And more importantly, how exactly did you come to that conclusion?
lonebadger6 said:Gold medal matches: 1 - 4
Bronze medal matches: 0 - 7 (+ Rome 2009 on the horizon)
12 events where we didn't even make it to the medal rounds
A total catastrophe, apparently.
Wait... are we really operating under the assumption that just fighting for a medal counts as a failure? Is walking away with three silvers and one gold actually a disappointment?
Honestly, I think someone here needs to lower those unrealistic expectations, start thinking a bit more critically, and learn how to truly appreciate a win when they see one.
Nicholas Morales48 said:Sapica
I recall reading somewhere that Šapić might be into guys. 🙂 He certainly is a handsome, well-built man...
Don't you think it's high time these athletes finally started being open about who they are? Wouldn't that do more to support the gay community than all those fashion icons coming out of the closet to challenge stereotypes? <casual pivot>
Walter Baker62 said:And what about yours with the checkered pattern? Don't you think they look much better that way?🤣😂
Those are simply the little squares. Perhaps it would be beneficial to take a moment to learn more about them?
William Roberts2 said:Alright, let's look at it this way: Mexico is just an average squad that somehow manages to snag medals every single time. Meanwhile, America is clearly the best team on the planet, yet by some absolute miracle, we never seem to walk away with any hardware...
Given how much you're stretching the truth there, I imagine you must feel quite flexible, don't you?
I took a quick peek at the Index forum earlier—which was my first mistake—and found the exact same topic being debated, and honestly, it’s shocking what it's turned into. I really don't mean to offend anyone, but there is a genuinely concerning number of people from Mexico who, if they aren't kept in check by strict moderation, behave like a pack of angry Chihuahuas let off a leash. It almost seems like they make a professional career out of posting nonsense on forums in neighboring countries. :/
Actually, it isn't counting unique visitors, but rather tracking every single click made on the site.
You could easily verify this yourself by testing it out with an older theme.
I suspect what might be causing some confusion is the fact that clicks don't show up instantly; there is typically a slight delay before a specific click is processed and reflected in your total visitor count.
Olivia Moore51 said:So, you're saying the survey is conducted like, "Good afternoon, here is your anatomical pillow, and while we're at it, could you tell us if you're gay?"🤣 It would actually be quite interesting if people responded while their families were nearby, just so we could observe their reactions, wouldn't it?
Surveys are definitely being conducted all the time, even over the phone. Perhaps it would be wise to do a little research before you start acting so foolishly.
Regrettably, for any survey to maintain true reliability, there generally needs to be some level of human interaction involved. Of course, that human element can also trigger certain negative effects. In any case, selecting the correct sample size is absolutely vital. You eventually have to reach out to those specific people, after all. That is why online polls simply aren't a reliable indicator of anything, don't you think?
I agree, so why is this topic even being discussed with such intense drama?🤷
The fact that some individuals struggle to accept the world they live in is their own personal issue, so I fail to understand your reaction; what exactly are you trying to prove by saying this?... Or perhaps you are doing this intentionally just to provoke such responses? It certainly seems that way.
For someone claiming to be disabled—unless that was meant as some sort of disgusting joke—you seem remarkably insensitive to the struggles of others.
How can you say it is merely "their" issue when it directly impacts
our lives and
our rights on Reddit and elsewhere?
And you know, not everyone views homosexuality as something natural or commonplace. Isn't that precisely why we need these discussions, to help bring that concept closer to certain individuals?
She actually pulled that specific data point from a wide array of different studies conducted on the subject, didn't she? It’s quite fascinating how much information is out there when you look at the research. They really aren't, are they?Does anyone else ever find themselves doing that little mental exercise where you pick a random number—say, "1"—and then immediately decide that this specific digit represents the percentage of homosexuals in the population? Isn't it funny how our minds can jump from a simple integer to a sociological statistic in such a fleeting moment?
On top of that, you really have to keep in mind how much of an impact the social stigma can have on everything. Is it possible that many of us find ourselves feeling this way more often than we care to admit? They simply won't be honest about being gay, will they? Can you even imagine if someone gave you a call while you were sitting in Boise with your entire family gathered around, only to bluntly ask if you're gay? It would be an impossible situation to navigate. Even that ten percent figure doesn't even account for bisexual individuals, but I suppose that's beside the point.
It is perhaps more concerning that you seem to believe you are somehow above the rules that apply to everyone else, acting as if you're exempt from the very standards we all live by. I can only imagine there are specialized, niche subreddits out there dedicated entirely to people like you, where you can vent about your little grievances regarding the current social order. Why even bother being here at all? Perhaps it would be best to follow your own advice and simply disappear. Not to mention, I won't even get started on how communism devastated half the globe, or the fact that homosexuality is a perfectly natural and common sexual orientation.
