CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Kate Harris4 › Posts

Posts by Kate Harris4

89 posts shown.

Shrek 1, 2, or 3? in Movies ·
Shrek The Halls (2007) (TV)

image

Trailer.

I wanted to give all the fans of the Shrek series a quick heads-up about that New Year's special TV release—you know, the one that dropped just a few days before the ball dropped back in late November 2006 here in the States.

I thought about throwing it into the poll, but honestly? It’s just a thirty-minute TV special cluttered with commercials—hardly worth the vote.

If you haven't sat down to watch this yet, consider this your official heads-up and recommendation to catch it before the New Year rolls around! 👍
Shrek 1, 2, or 3? in Movies ·
I’ve always been a fan of Shrek 1, though I have to admit the sequels actually hold their own too.👍

Just gave myself a little nudge—I'm heading off to grab all three Shrek movies in H.264 or HD 720p. I already have the whole trilogy, but they're stuck in that old DivX format and honestly, life is too short for low-quality video.
Shrek 1, 2, or 3? in Movies ·
image

Shrek So, let's talk about Shrek. This computer-animated flick dropped back in 2001, and honestly, it’s wild to think about the grind behind it—the animation process actually kicked off way back on Halloween in 1996. That means they were grinding away at it for over four and a half years before anyone even saw it on screen. It's based on that William Steig book from 1990, but man, the sheer amount of time they spent making those pixels move is just insane.

So, let's talk about Shrek. This movie actually made history by snagging the very first Oscar for Best Animated Feature—a category that didn't even exist until the 2001 film year. It’s currently sitting at number 160 on IMDb's top 250 list, which is honestly impressive when you consider how much junk gets pumped out these days. Critics absolutely loved it, but more importantly, it hit that sweet spot where kids and adults could actually enjoy it together without feeling like they were wasting their time.

Look, let's be real—Shrek was such a massive phenomenon that he basically single-handedly shoved DreamWorks right into the face of their biggest rival, Walt Disney Pictures, especially when it came to the whole CGI animation game. It wasn't just a hit; it changed the hierarchy of the industry. Eventually, the guy became the unofficial mascot for everything DreamWorks put out in the animation world.

The voice cast is actually pretty stacked—you’ve got Mike Myers voicing that big green ogre Shrek, then Eddie Murphy comes in as Donkey, that fast-talking sidekick who basically stumbles into Shrek's life. Plus, you have Cameron Diaz handling Princess Fiona, and John Lithgow plays the delusional Lord Farquaad.

Look, we need to talk about Shrek (2001). Even decades later, this movie still hits different—and I’m not just being nostalgic. It basically took everything we thought we knew about fairy tales, threw them into a blender, and served up something brilliantly irreverent. Back then, everyone was obsessed with that polished, "perfect" Disney aesthetic, but DreamWorks came along and decided to flip the bird to all of that. They gave us an ogre who actually had some grit, rather than some sanitized prince waiting for a kiss to fix his life. The animation holds up surprisingly well too, especially when you're watching it in HD 720p. And let’s be real—the Shrek soundtrack is legendary. You can’t even mention this movie without thinking of "I Need a Hero." It’s iconic. The chemistry between Mike Myers and Eddie Murphy? Unbeatable. Donkey is easily one of the best sidekicks ever put to film, period. It’s more than just a goofy comedy, though. It’s got layers—just like an onion, if you want to get cheesy with the metaphors. It mocks the whole "Prince Charming" trope while actually telling a pretty decent story about self-acceptance. If you haven't revisited it lately, do yourself a favor and go watch it. It's a classic for a reason.
image

Shrek 2 (2004)
image

Shrek The Third (2007)
image

Awards: It actually picked up a Saturn Award for being the best special edition DVD out there.

The Shrek series—honestly, where do we even start? It’s one of those rare franchises that actually managed to subvert everything we thought we knew about fairy tales back in the day. Instead of the usual sanitized, princess-perfect nonsense you see from studios like Walt Disney Pictures, we got something gritty, hilarious, and just plain weird. Looking back at Shrek 1, it was such a massive pivot for animation. You had Mike Myers bringing this incredible, layered energy to the lead, paired with the absolute legend Eddie Murphy as Donkey. That dynamic alone carried so much of the weight. And let's not forget the soundtrack—the Shrek soundtrack is still iconic. It didn't feel like some manufactured, safe movie music; it felt alive. Then you move into Shrek 2, which many people argue is actually better than the original. The stakes felt higher, the humor was sharper, and adding Antonio Banderas as the suave version of his Zorro persona was a stroke of genius. Even when they started hitting the sequels like Shrek The Third, there was still that core DNA that made the whole thing work. It wasn't just about the slapstick; it was about poking fun at the very tropes the industry was built on. It’s a wild ride through layers of satire—kind of like how a good onion works, if you want to get all deep and philosophical about it—but mostly, it’s just a masterclass in how to take a tired concept and flip it on its head.
Shrek 1, Shrek 2, Shrek The Third (IMDb)
image

Shrek 1 - trailer
Shrek 2 - trailer
Shrek 2 - trailer Shrek 3

The Shrek soundtrack—man, where do you even start? It’s honestly one of those rare cases where the music isn't just background noise; it’s basically a character in itself. Most movie soundtracks feel like a cheap collection of songs slapped together to sell CDs, but this one actually had some soul. It captured that specific, messy, irreverent energy that made the whole movie work. Without that perfect blend of pop and rock, the vibe would have been totally different. Just a total classic.

image
Iconic Female Characters in Movies ·
Christian Taylor3 said:Way to go, Jackie H.—honestly, you’ve totally made up for it now 😁 I mean, sure, we can talk about whatever else, but can we please take a second to acknowledge Ripley? We're talking about one of the most legendary, one-of-a-kind heroines of our era— Sigourney Weaver! 🙏

p.s. Seriously though, where was Annalee call/Winona Ryder in Alien: Resurrection? 🤷 Just kidding, briskhound2, it's a solid 5/5 from me 🙂 Still waiting on our first female heroine to actually post. 593, where you at?

Look, I don't see why I should have to explain myself or make excuses to you 🤣

Unbelievable. One minute they're saying the poll sucks, and the next they're giving it a perfect 5—talk about being contradictory, but hey, who even cares what you think anyway? 😛
Iconic Female Characters in Movies ·
Christian Taylor3 said:p.s. man, Sigourney Weaver / Ripley is such an icon—it’s about way more than just being a hot girl! 😁

🙂

Look, you're totally missing my point. I'm not saying I'm obsessed with them because they're attractive—though, sure, why wouldn't I be? I meant that those characters are just incredibly badass. Most people seem to think that's all there is to it, so I figured I'd just leave it at that instead of getting into a whole debate.
Iconic Female Characters in Movies ·
A vote for Ripley and Sarah Connor 👍
Those two women are absolute powerhouses—honestly, you just don't see anyone tougher than them, and they have so much depth as characters.

imageimage

I’d throw Laurie Jupiter / Silk Spectre II, played by Malin Akerman, into the mix too.

image

The poll is solid. I don't get why people are acting like there's some kind of "mutiny on the ship" happening here—it’s basic math, you can't please everyone at once. Shout out to the guy running the poll.👍
Dammit 😠

I can't even vote, for crying out loud—half of these movies aren't even on my radar 🤷
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
A persuasive win for the first movie—congrats to everyone who voted for it! 🙂

Honestly, I’m pretty shocked by how low the turnout was. I mean, we're talking about the Blade trilogy here. It might not be some cinematic masterpiece, but it definitely holds its own. 😕

Thanks to everyone who took part in this poll 👍
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
Roger Bishop22 said:The first one is easily the best. Honestly, that original movie is one of the greatest films ever made—absolute perfection. 👍

I still remember how much hype they built up for it; I was dying to see it, and when it finally dropped, it totally blew my mind.
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
vividtrucker10 said:I went looking through those ridiculous little polls to figure out who I’m actually voting for. 🤣

You’ve gotta be kidding me—you're absolutely losing it! 🙏😍
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy in Movies ·
We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen... LOTR 1 takes the crown! Congratulations! 👍

All jokes aside, I really thought the third installment was going to pull this one off—but nope, the first one was just too convincing, winning by an 11-vote margin.

Huge thanks to everyone who cast their vote! 👍
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:Honestly... IMO the Blade series absolutely crushes the entire Underworld trilogy...not even mentioning how great the first one was...it's a real shame about the third installment being just mediocre...exactly like Underworld: Blood Wars...

Oh, sure😂...funny joke there🤣

Blade 1 and 2 are decent enough, while the third one is definitely weaker—but personally, I still think the Underworld trilogy holds up better than the Blade trilogy.

Don't be ridiculous, Underworld: Blood Wars is actually a great movie.
Best trilogy ever? in Movies ·
lonesailor6 said:Look, I just put them there because Alien 4 and Indiana Jones 4 were filmed quite a while after the original trilogy, so that's why.

So what does it matter when they were filmed?! 😂 🤣
Let me try to explain this to you: Imagine if Rob Zombie directed Halloween in 2007, the second part in 2010, and then a third one in 2047—and then you run a poll in 2048 titled "Which of these two Halloween films is better?" If you ignore that third one just because it was made much later, you're missing the point. Why wouldn't you count that third installment? You get what I'm saying?

I voted for these trilogies:
Back to the Future
The Godfather
The Lord of the Rings
- I totally forgot to vote for the original Star Wars trilogy, even though the newer ones are fine too.

There are plenty of movies listed here that aren't actually trilogies—they're quadrologies. We're talking about titles like: Alien, X-Men, Terminator... all of those have four sequels, not three. Honestly, I don't know why they're even in a poll about trilogies; it's obviously not right. 😕
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy in Movies ·
Joshua Taylor3 said:In my book, Alien, Back to the Future, and Star Wars—if you even count it as a trilogy—are all better. LOTR is fantastic, sure, but it’s not the absolute best trilogy out there. Honestly, the only way to actually decide which one takes the crown is to run a poll. If people want one, we should just open it up.

Look... you've got a point there. I completely blanked on "Back to the Future"👍
And let's be real, Star Wars is actually a six-film saga. While all three parts of Back to the Future and LOTR are basically flawless, with Alien you've only got two really solid entries before things shift. That's why it can't hold its own against them in a "best trilogy" category.
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy in Movies ·
Benjamin Hernandez3 said:Let’s settle this once and for all—what is actually the greatest film trilogy ever made? I feel like I hear people arguing about this constantly, and half the takes are just straight-up garbage. You’ve got your massive sci-fi epics, sure, but then you have the stuff that actually tells a cohesive story from start to finish without tripping over its own feet. It’s not just about the spectacle or how much money they dumped into the CGI—it's about whether the payoff actually feels earned. Most modern franchises feel like they're just milking a concept until it's dead, whereas the real classics actually know how to close the loop. 👍

I’m right there with you on that one. 👍

Look, I’ll say it: there isn't a single trilogy out there that hits quite this high. Honestly, maybe Alien could have actually given them a run for their money if things had gone differently—specifically, if the third installment hadn't been such a massive step down from the first two, and if they hadn't completely scrapped any plans for a fourth one altogether.
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
briskhound2 said:Honestly, I think the second one is slightly better, though if we're being real, the whole franchise feels like a step down compared to the Blade trilogy or The Matrix. Still, there are enough decent moments to make it watchable. Plus, let’s be honest—Kate and Rhonda look five times better than Wesley Snipes and Keanu Reeves 😁
.
@Kate Harris4
Why wouldn't you just drop a link to the movie (or at least an IMDb page) so people actually have the info? Someone might actually find a comparison or a recommendation through it.

To me, Blade is a worse series than Underworld, but The Matrix is top-tier 👍

As for IMDb—first off, I thought posting public links was against the rules, and second, everyone knows how to use IMDb. You just type "Underworld" into the search bar and boom, you're there.
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
Underworld II or Underworld: Evolution 👍

I’m putting my vote down for the second installment of the Underworld series—it’s just a hair more interesting to me than the first one or the third.
Honestly, I was torn—actually, I was stuck in a three-way tie in my head😂 and maybe I should have just gone with the first one since it's just as great as the third, but look—when you absolutely love the Underworld franchise, picking just one movie is a damn nightmare.
The Underworld Saga (2003-2009) in Movies ·
image

Alright, let's settle this once and for all—which one is actually the best flick in the Underworld series?

Underworld (2003)

image

Underworld: Evolution (2006)
image

Underworld: Rise of the Lycans
image

An immortal battle for supremacy
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy in Movies ·
Keith Kelly3 said:first one, just because of the atmosphere

Honestly, I think all three have equally killer atmospheres👍
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy in Movies ·
@ Olivia Alvarez

😲

Seriously, you are an absolute fanatic when it comes to TLOTR 👍
But I have to ask—do you even watch anything else, or is your entire life just centered around the lord of the ring?! 🤣

And here I was thinking I was some kind of hardcore superfan just because I've sat through all three movies nine times already 😂