CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Love as a fixed idea

Love as a fixed idea

Started by northernbadger12 · · 👁 10 views · 203 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants northernbadger12Dana Morales64cosmicwolf27amberotter82rapidskipper5velvetbear11Lisa Hernandez3Thomas Moore6Gerald Ward61casualharbor9Hannah White2electricraven11Sean CruzAmy Williams73wearyorca94dustyharbor18lonegardenercosmictinker21Edward Rivera98wearyhawk83rustystag16stormycanyon11Matthew Castillo5Betty Stewart59 …
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#81 ·
Yeah, women like that are honestly just exhausting. Look, I don't claim to be any kind of fashion expert—that's way out of my league—so I’ll leave the aesthetics to the pros. But I can't help but cringe at the constant verbal sarcasm. It really has no business being in a love story... much like those necrophilic undertones you see in someone like Anaïs Nin.

We're talking about love as a fixed idea here. That's hardly off-topic.
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#82 ·
cosmictinker21 said:Yeah, women like that are honestly just exhausting. Look, I don't claim to be any kind of fashion expert—that's way out of my league—so I’ll leave the aesthetics to the pros. But I can't help but cringe at the constant verbal sarcasm. It really has no business being in a love story... much like those necrophilic undertones you see in someone like Anaïs Nin.

We're talking about love as a fixed idea here. That's hardly off-topic.

I couldn't agree more. I wouldn't want a woman like that anywhere near me—not even as an acquaintance, let alone a friend. 😱 🙂
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#83 ·
Sean Cruz said:I couldn't agree more. I wouldn't want a woman like that anywhere near me—not even as an acquaintance, let alone a friend. 😱 🙂

Fortunately, I don't have anyone like that in my circle. Not as a friend, certainly not. As for acquaintances, you just learn to steer clear once you realize what they're about. It reminds me of how Baudelaire wrote those verses about a woman who simply didn't live up to his expectations. He was probably looking for some sort of ethereal muse that matched his own intense longings... but since he was a poet, he went ahead and described that disappointment with such sheer intensity. He was just incredibly infatuated, which is a completely different emotional beast than actual love...
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#84 ·
cosmictinker21 said:Yeah, women like that are honestly just exhausting. Look, I don't claim to be any kind of fashion expert—that's way out of my league—so I’ll leave the aesthetics to the pros. But I can't help but cringe at the constant verbal sarcasm. It really has no business being in a love story... much like those necrophilic undertones you see in someone like Anaïs Nin.

We're talking about love as a fixed idea here. That's hardly off-topic.

Why shouldn't sarcasm have a place in a love story? You seem to be suggesting that "true" love only exists while a relationship is actively functioning—whether it's a marriage or otherwise. So, what happens when your partner passes away? Does the love just vanish? I'm genuinely curious. Personally, I’ve always been a bit of a cynic, and I find irony and sarcasm to be perfectly natural ways to express myself. If you can't wrap your head around that, feel free to be offended.
Gerald Ward61 Gerald Ward61 Active Member
79 messages
joined Jun 2007
#85 ·
Sean Cruz said:Exactly. 🙂

In this instance, it exists. That said, love can certainly involve togetherness, but it doesn't have to. It isn't a requirement.

Right, it's not mandatory, but it's not exactly random either... 😁

I don't know... but hey, waking up next to someone you actually love isn't a bad way to start the day. 🤣 😍

rustystag16 said:Being gay, I have this recurring habit of falling for people who are totally out of reach... it’s become a bit of a pattern at this point. I’ve actually been head over heels for unavailable people twice now—and honestly, I still haven't quite moved past it.

Am I right, manixman? 🙂
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#86 ·
Sean Cruz said:Why shouldn't sarcasm have a place in a love story? You seem to be suggesting that "true" love only exists while a relationship is actively functioning—whether it's a marriage or otherwise. So, what happens when your partner passes away? Does the love just vanish? I'm genuinely curious. Personally, I’ve always been a bit of a cynic, and I find irony and sarcasm to be perfectly natural ways to express myself. If you can't wrap your head around that, feel free to be offended.

I suppose I could be offended by someone using sarcasm as their primary way of navigating reality. Sounds exhausting...

I honestly can't imagine how I'd feel if my partner died. Lost, obviously. Devastated. But eventually, that love evolves into a part of your lived experience, a deeper understanding, and later, memories that shape who you are. That person would still be woven into my life through thoughts, feelings, and shared moments. It wouldn't be "active" love anymore, though. Real love is the legacy they leave behind within me and my life...

No one has all the answers. That's why we spend our whole lives learning...
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#87 ·
Gerald Ward61 said:Right, it's not mandatory, but it's not exactly random either... 😁

I don't know... but hey, waking up next to someone you actually love isn't a bad way to start the day. 🤣 😍

Am I right, manixman? 🙂


Personally, I've always found waking up like that to be pretty nice...😍
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#88 ·
cosmictinker21 said:Fortunately, I don't have anyone like that in my circle. Not as a friend, certainly not. As for acquaintances, you just learn to steer clear once you realize what they're about. It reminds me of how Baudelaire wrote those verses about a woman who simply didn't live up to his expectations. He was probably looking for some sort of ethereal muse that matched his own intense longings... but since he was a poet, he went ahead and described that disappointment with such sheer intensity. He was just incredibly infatuated, which is a completely different emotional beast than actual love...

Likewise. 🙂
Once you realize an acquaintance is that kind of person, you can just stop hanging out with them.

Of course. That’s exactly what I’m doing.
Even Baudelaire touched on this in his poetry—writing about a woman who simply couldn't live up to his expectations. He was looking for some sort of ethereal muse to match the intensity of his own longings and emotions. But then again, he was a poet, so he didn't exactly hold back when describing his disappointment. He was head over heels, which is a different emotional beast entirely than just being in love.

The point of the poem is simple: after sleeping with a "loose" woman, you're left with nothing but a bitter aftertaste. She isn't some "ideal" anymore; she’s just exactly what she is. Sex is just sex, and that’s the reality it leaves you with. There’s zero mention of love or falling in love here.
Gerald Ward61 Gerald Ward61 Active Member
79 messages
joined Jun 2007
#89 ·
Sean Cruz said:Why shouldn't sarcasm have a place in a love story? You seem to be suggesting that "true" love only exists while a relationship is actively functioning—whether it's a marriage or otherwise. So, what happens when your partner passes away? Does the love just vanish? I'm genuinely curious. Personally, I’ve always been a bit of a cynic, and I find irony and sarcasm to be perfectly natural ways to express myself. If you can't wrap your head around that, feel free to be offended.

Holy hell, I wouldn't give up on love even if my life depended on it... or if God called me home early. I'd never forgive him for leaving me. Honestly, I'd hold both him and God responsible. 😁
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#90 ·
cosmictinker21 said:I suppose I could be offended by someone using sarcasm as their primary way of navigating reality. Sounds exhausting...

I honestly can't imagine how I'd feel if my partner died. Lost, obviously. Devastated. But eventually, that love evolves into a part of your lived experience, a deeper understanding, and later, memories that shape who you are. That person would still be woven into my life through thoughts, feelings, and shared moments. It wouldn't be "active" love anymore, though. Real love is the legacy they leave behind within me and my life...

No one has all the answers. That's why we spend our whole lives learning...

To be honest, I’m just not feeling this. It feels less like you're speaking from lived experience and more like you're reciting lines from books you've read. It comes across as somewhat detached. Of course, that’s just my take, and I could be wrong.
As for those I’ve loved who have passed away—and I don't just mean romantic partners, but all kinds of profound connections—I still love them. It’s as simple as that.
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#91 ·
Gerald Ward61 said:Holy hell, I wouldn't give up on love even if my life depended on it... or if God called me home early. I'd never forgive him for leaving me. Honestly, I'd hold both him and God responsible. 😁

I don't even believe in God, anyway. Who would I have left to curse? 🤔 🤣
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#92 ·
Sean Cruz said:Likewise. 🙂
Once you realize an acquaintance is that kind of person, you can just stop hanging out with them.

Of course. That’s exactly what I’m doing.
Even Baudelaire touched on this in his poetry—writing about a woman who simply couldn't live up to his expectations. He was looking for some sort of ethereal muse to match the intensity of his own longings and emotions. But then again, he was a poet, so he didn't exactly hold back when describing his disappointment. He was head over heels, which is a different emotional beast entirely than just being in love.

The point of the poem is simple: after sleeping with a "loose" woman, you're left with nothing but a bitter aftertaste. She isn't some "ideal" anymore; she’s just exactly what she is. Sex is just sex, and that’s the reality it leaves you with. There’s zero mention of love or falling in love here.

Of course not. So, I don't think it works as an illustration of love. As a concept, sure. I was thinking more along the lines of other heavy-hitting verses.

I'll give my body up to cancer
in the soil of fatty breasts, where snails dwell
forgotten, I will sleep in the dark
like a seahorse hidden in the deep depths...

Uh, just off the top of my head, I might have butchered the wording...

This is just sarcasm regarding the meaning of life.

And me, in my romantic frenzy, still believe that love is one of the most precious things in existence.🙂
Gerald Ward61 Gerald Ward61 Active Member
79 messages
joined Jun 2007
#93 ·
Sean Cruz said:I don't even believe in God, anyway. Who would I have left to curse? 🤔 🤣

Him 😁.

But why would I even bother being pissed off? I’d just be one of those crazy ladies fighting with a grave. Or staring at a headstone with pure contempt instead of any actual warmth or love... 😂

P.S.: He'd probably have a fresh bouquet waiting for me every single morning. Okay, fine, maybe I'd skip a day... if I was actually feeling truly livid. 😳 🤣
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#94 ·
Sean Cruz said:To be honest, I’m just not feeling this. It feels less like you're speaking from lived experience and more like you're reciting lines from books you've read. It comes across as somewhat detached. Of course, that’s just my take, and I could be wrong.
As for those I’ve loved who have passed away—and I don't just mean romantic partners, but all kinds of profound connections—I still love them. It’s as simple as that.

You're mistaken. This is exactly what my life looks like. I lost someone I loved deeply. They aren't around anymore, so we aren't talking about an "ex"... we're talking about a love severed by death. I still love them, obviously, but it isn't the same kind of love I have for the person I'm with now...
wearyhawk83 wearyhawk83 Active Member
170 messages
joined Feb 2015
#95 ·
lonegardener said:Such as? 🤷

We keep growing and growing... but for what? Just to be "successful" once we're in the grave? What's the actual point?

Like what, exactly? 🤷

Grow, grow, grow... just so we can be "big shots" by the time we hit the grave? What’s the point?[/I]

In that second sentence, > was actually talking about the relationship itself—that high-quality bond that needs constant nurturing, attention, and care if you want it to stay alive.

When they say love makes us "grow," they mean it leads to a fulfilled life. I'm talking about a life filled with genuine satisfaction and a harmonious vibe toward yourself and everyone else. You should look at "growth" more as a state of awareness where you're making conscious, daily choices that benefit both you and those around you, making every single moment count. Some people call this "living mindfully." Once you finally wrap your head around how things work, it's all about taking action. Without that practice, you can't even enjoy a tiny fraction of what you've learned. That "awareness" is the absolute key. When we are finally ready to step up and act for our own good, then we can truly say we love ourselves. But man, it is so hard to snap out of that everyday lethargy, laziness, and lack of motivation. There are so many moving parts to getting what you want, and usually, only the person involved can actually spot them, so everyone else's attempts to help are mostly useless.

Sure, it's easy to "grow" when life knocks you down a peg or when you make a conscious choice to be better for one weekend or one hour. But trying to maintain that kind of momentum every single day—creating a literal perpetual motion machine of positive action—is basically the peak of human achievement. So, "growing" isn't about walking a path to reach some destination; it's about growing so that you actually experience the journey at every single step.
At that point, you might as well take that idea from > about "living in expanding circles" and tattoo it on your butt, because we are the ones who decide whether this natural mechanism works for us or against us.

Regarding love being a process versus a memory: the connection between two people can definitely be a process, while the memory of someone is just the aftermath of that relationship. But love itself only lives as long as it's being given or received. It doesn't exist because of the giver or the receiver; it exists because of its own essence.

Everything else is just a byproduct or an expression of it. And honestly? People express it wrong all the time, and they interpret it wrong all the time. That's why you hear all this talk about suffering, or how people mix it up with possessiveness, or identify too much with the relationship, or mistake it for dependency. Most of all, people kill it by obsessing over the past or the future, even though love only knows the present. I often find myself wondering what everyone is waiting for, because the "now" is literally happening right this second. Then I remember that some people are just fundamentally wired wrong. They think they're going to walk into a gym once and suddenly have massive biceps.

Sorry if I'm rambling here; I don't even know where I'm going with this myself right now.
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#96 ·
Thanks for putting into words exactly what I’ve been thinking and feeling myself. Sometimes my ability to be both poetic and analytical just... deserts me. And honestly, some days, I'm just exhausted.
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#97 ·
cosmictinker21 said:Of course not. So, I don't think it works as an illustration of love. As a concept, sure. I was thinking more along the lines of other heavy-hitting verses.

I'll give my body up to cancer
in the soil of fatty breasts, where snails dwell
forgotten, I will sleep in the dark
like a seahorse hidden in the deep depths...

Uh, just off the top of my head, I might have butchered the wording...

This is just sarcasm regarding the meaning of life.

And me, in my romantic frenzy, still believe that love is one of the most precious things in existence.🙂

But you were arguing the exact opposite in your previous post—that he was actually in love with her, and only perceived her that way because she failed to live up to his expectations. That isn't the case here. My point was simply that sometimes holding onto an ideal is better than having sex just for the sake of it. This isn't about a "fixed idea"; it is quite literally the realization of sex, which finally allowed him to see who she truly was. At the end of the day, physical intimacy isn't inherently an act of love; it only carries that meaning when it is actually rooted in love.
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#98 ·
Gerald Ward61 said:Him 😁.

But why would I even bother being pissed off? I’d just be one of those crazy ladies fighting with a grave. Or staring at a headstone with pure contempt instead of any actual warmth or love... 😂

P.S.: He'd probably have a fresh bouquet waiting for me every single morning. Okay, fine, maybe I'd skip a day... if I was actually feeling truly livid. 😳 🤣

My daughter actually planned to have all our loved ones buried in the backyard, just so she wouldn't have to make the trek to the cemetery. 😁 She even promised she'd bring us a little bit of her old allowance every day to keep the memory alive. 🤣

See, your ideas aren't half bad. 😍
cosmictinker21 cosmictinker21 Active Member
242 messages
joined Jan 2009
#99 ·
Sean Cruz said:But you were arguing the exact opposite in your previous post—that he was actually in love with her, and only perceived her that way because she failed to live up to his expectations. That isn't the case here. My point was simply that sometimes holding onto an ideal is better than having sex just for the sake of it. This isn't about a "fixed idea"; it is quite literally the realization of sex, which finally allowed him to see who she truly was. At the end of the day, physical intimacy isn't inherently an act of love; it only carries that meaning when it is actually rooted in love.

Well, that’s exactly my point. It’s pretty obvious the guy was in love with her and expected that feeling to be mutual. In this context, sex is just one avenue for seeking intimacy. But clearly, she wasn't carrying the same intentions he was. He felt that gap, realized it, and saw that instead of the emotional connection he wanted, he just got... well, mechanics. Purely biological. He realized she isn't looking for love, while he is. And he's looking for it from the wrong person—someone incapable of meeting his needs the way he needs them to be met.

Good luck trying to explain that to the people who think life is nothing more than a series of sports stats and weekend hobbies. If it weren't for these drives, there probably wouldn't be nearly as many affairs, flirts, or hunters out there...
Sean Cruz Sean Cruz Regular
265 messages
joined Apr 2008
#100 ·
cosmictinker21 said:Well, that’s exactly my point. It’s pretty obvious the guy was in love with her and expected that feeling to be mutual. In this context, sex is just one avenue for seeking intimacy. But clearly, she wasn't carrying the same intentions he was. He felt that gap, realized it, and saw that instead of the emotional connection he wanted, he just got... well, mechanics. Purely biological. He realized she isn't looking for love, while he is. And he's looking for it from the wrong person—someone incapable of meeting his needs the way he needs them to be met.

Good luck trying to explain that to the people who think life is nothing more than a series of sports stats and weekend hobbies. If it weren't for these drives, there probably wouldn't be nearly as many affairs, flirts, or hunters out there...

Pick a side. 😁 To me, what you're saying now seems to contradict everything else you've argued in your previous posts.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads