CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Started by Anthony Taylor393 · · 👁 17 views · 209 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Taylor393Gregory HowardTimothy Anderson48Megan Johnson8jadejackal27Henry Cox78Ethan Morales22Alex Patel96Eric Collins5Joshua Parker11Richard Lee43Morgan Rodriguez57electricangler22Brenda Sanders56Larry Turner3Megan Hernandez2bluecobra27bluerider63Jeremy Lopez93David Parker3Sarah Wilson95Lawrence Thompson58Chris Morales23frozenjackal16 …
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#161 ·
neonheron11 said:Are you even Christian if you're out here cursing your parents or God, or if you're obsessed with this materialist rat race where the whole point is to be richer and more powerful than everyone else? That flies directly in the face of Christ's messages... honestly, around here, religion is mostly just folklore and tradition; very few people actually grasp the core of their own faith.

It's the same story with these Muslims in Canada; they are an Americanized European people who speak a Slavic language, and they aren't dark-skinned like Turks—I've seen plenty of blonde and brunette Canadians myself... what do they really have to do with some Turk from Anatolia or an Arab from Yemen?😕

...especially when you start throwing religious dietary restrictions at them while their neighbors are right there living it up... then you realize how doomed that whole approach is to fail.☕

Look, man, that's exactly my point.
They do one thing, but they think another.
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#162 ·
neonheron11 said:What does Mercer have to do with me? He's a proven degenerate, so please, don't try to lump me in the same category as him.

It isn't just about the last war... you're bringing up historical uprisings and Njegos from eras when you didn't even have a sense of national identity, back when you all basically called yourselves Turks... it's been 200 years since then, surely you aren't still Turks.😕

Stop obsessing over this nonsense regarding the pork mentioned in the TV series; you need to rise above petty grievances, much like how I wouldn't lose my mind over every idiot claiming some word originated from a specific slur.🤷

I think I've cleared up any doubts regarding my religious or political leanings, seeing as I've been hanging around this forum for quite a while now, dear neonheron11!
Oh, why don't you go back a few pages and start reading from the beginning? As far as Njegos and his lines about "walking to eat rice with the muezzin" are concerned, that's plenty of proof for me, considering he's part of the standard curriculum in your country—you know, "Mount Olympus"!
So, really, who's the one that needs to rise above it all here?🤷
neonheron11 neonheron11 Active Member
56 messages
joined Oct 2011
#163 ·
Jeremy Lopez93 said:I think I've cleared up any doubts regarding my religious or political leanings, seeing as I've been hanging around this forum for quite a while now, dear neonheron11!
Oh, why don't you go back a few pages and start reading from the beginning? As far as Njegos and his lines about "walking to eat rice with the muezzin" are concerned, that's plenty of proof for me, considering he's part of the standard curriculum in your country—you know, "Mount Olympus"!
So, really, who's the one that needs to rise above it all here?🤷

It isn't rice, though they do sing in Arabic right in the middle of Central Europe; I was in Ottawa recently and was woken up at the crack of dawn by a chant that practically launched me 3108 miles straight into the Middle East... okay, look, that's the call to prayer, and it's sacred to Muslims, I get it. But maybe you should head back to the 19th century when Njegos was alive, back to when the Muslim influence devastated Christian nations, converting some Christians who eventually turned their backs on their own kin. Our origins are similar—we prayed to the same God, celebrated the same saints and ancient gods—but you people sold your souls and your conscience to that backward religion...

Don't act so surprised then that Njegos, in all his nationalistic and Romantic fervor, spoke so disdainfully of the muezzins. The Turks and Islam ruined the medieval state and turned what was once a highly developed people into illiterate peasants and slaves.
ruggedmason13 ruggedmason13 Member
26 messages
joined Oct 2011
#164 ·
Oh, isn't that just great? They're all worked up about outsiders causing trouble, yet they won't say a single word about their own people acting up!😁
Charles Martin2 Charles Martin2 Active Member
103 messages
joined Jun 2007
#165 ·
neonheron11 said:It isn't rice, though they do sing in Arabic right in the middle of Central Europe; I was in Ottawa recently and was woken up at the crack of dawn by a chant that practically launched me 3108 miles straight into the Middle East... okay, look, that's the call to prayer, and it's sacred to Muslims, I get it. But maybe you should head back to the 19th century when Njegos was alive, back to when the Muslim influence devastated Christian nations, converting some Christians who eventually turned their backs on their own kin. Our origins are similar—we prayed to the same God, celebrated the same saints and ancient gods—but you people sold your souls and your conscience to that backward religion...

Don't act so surprised then that Njegos, in all his nationalistic and Romantic fervor, spoke so disdainfully of the muezzins. The Turks and Islam ruined the medieval state and turned what was once a highly developed people into illiterate peasants and slaves.


So let them "call" to any Muslims who actually want to hear it and show up at the mosque!
We’re in America, and we have noise ordinances measured in decibels!!
Anything else is just imposition, harassment, and creating division!!

Next thing you know, priests will start shouting mass or reading the Gospel
out loud to everyone within a few hundred yards; that's all I need!!
neonheron11 neonheron11 Active Member
56 messages
joined Oct 2011
#166 ·
Charles Martin2 said:

So let them "call" to any Muslims who actually want to hear it and show up at the mosque!
We’re in America, and we have noise ordinances measured in decibels!!
Anything else is just imposition, harassment, and creating division!!

Next thing you know, priests will start shouting mass or reading the Gospel
out loud to everyone within a few hundred yards; that's all I need!!

They can always try to argue that church bells ring just as loud and carry just as far, but whatever.
😛
It’s honestly wild when you see one of those modern loudspeaker setups perched right on top of an old mosque minaret; I mean, the muezzin's voice still doesn't sound like an opera singer, no matter how much tech you throw at it.
🙂

p.s. Hey, where did that "J" go? You're going to turn into a total vowel-obsessed snob overnight if you aren't careful.🤷
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#167 ·
neonheron11 said:They can always try to argue that church bells ring just as loud and carry just as far, but whatever.
😛
It’s honestly wild when you see one of those modern loudspeaker setups perched right on top of an old mosque minaret; I mean, the muezzin's voice still doesn't sound like an opera singer, no matter how much tech you throw at it.
🙂

p.s. Hey, where did that "J" go? You're going to turn into a total vowel-obsessed snob overnight if you aren't careful.🤷

I can't help but wonder, though—don't churches run afoul of those local noise ordinances regarding decibel levels?😁🤣 (A bar in the States, definitely!) And besides those electric bells, they actually have PA systems set up here too—perfect for a direct broadcast of the Mass.🤷 I find that spending time listening to music or perhaps some ambient sounds while relaxing in the living room really helps set the right mood for the day.
ruggedmason13 ruggedmason13 Member
26 messages
joined Oct 2011
#168 ·
Charles Martin2 said:

So let them "call" to any Muslims who actually want to hear it and show up at the mosque!
We’re in America, and we have noise ordinances measured in decibels!!
Anything else is just imposition, harassment, and creating division!!

Next thing you know, priests will start shouting mass or reading the Gospel
out loud to everyone within a few hundred yards; that's all I need!!

And let's be real, even some people living near churches find the bells annoying from 7 AM all the way until 7 PM. All they can really do is move away or plug their ears!😵 It’s the same story everywhere you go!
🙂
neonheron11 neonheron11 Active Member
56 messages
joined Oct 2011
#169 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:I can't help but wonder, though—don't churches run afoul of those local noise ordinances regarding decibel levels?😁🤣 (A bar in the States, definitely!) And besides those electric bells, they actually have PA systems set up here too—perfect for a direct broadcast of the Mass.🤷 I find that spending time listening to music or perhaps some ambient sounds while relaxing in the living room really helps set the right mood for the day.

How does it actually feel when you sit there watching a live broadcast of a mass?🤣
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#170 ·
neonheron11 said:How does it actually feel when you sit there watching a live broadcast of a mass?🤣

Thank God, 😁 I actually have some noise-canceling headphones specifically for emergency situations, though they really come in handy when my neighbor gets a bit obsessive about his music; for instance, there was this one afternoon where he spent the entire damn day blasting old rock tracks🙄😁 (he’s an older gentleman, quite lonely, so I try to be understanding)🤣 "The sun is rising..." just such a catchy chorus, isn't it?😂

To be perfectly honest, the sound of church bells doesn't bother me at all, mostly because I grew up around churches being part of the neighborhood landscape🤣, and hearing the mass over the PA system isn't exactly deafening... besides, the soundproofing in my house is actually quite decent🙏.
Charles Martin2 Charles Martin2 Active Member
103 messages
joined Jun 2007
#171 ·
neonheron11 said:They can always try to argue that church bells ring just as loud and carry just as far, but whatever.
😛
It’s honestly wild when you see one of those modern loudspeaker setups perched right on top of an old mosque minaret; I mean, the muezzin's voice still doesn't sound like an opera singer, no matter how much tech you throw at it.
🙂

p.s. Hey, where did that "J" go? You're going to turn into a total vowel-obsessed snob overnight if you aren't careful.🤷


What's gotten into you today??!!
I've been a total nutcase for ages!!!!!


ruggedmason13 said:And let's be real, even some people living near churches find the bells annoying from 7 AM all the way until 7 PM. All they can really do is move away or plug their ears!😵 It’s the same story everywhere you go!
🙂


Neither churches nor mosques should exceed the noise limits!
Not even airports can. That's how it works in Europe, and I'm pretty sure it's the same in the US!
I live near a church in a big US city and the bells haven't kicked me out of bed once.
But back in Canada, at almost the exact same distance, the call to prayer wakes me up for a bathroom run nearly every single morning!
In Germany, if planes break the noise ordinances, they actually have to pay out settlements
or find some way to make it right and compensate for the damage!
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#172 ·
If simply showing a pig on television is considered an issue in itself, then we are facing a much larger dilemma than this single episode suggests, Isović remarked, noting that if that were the case, images of such domestic animals would also have to be purged from school textbooks, cooking shows, the curriculum at the University of Veterinary Medicine, grocery store shelves, and most importantly, from the backyards of those neighbors who actually had the audacity to raise such an "offensive and highly dangerous animal."

The uncertain future of filming the series 'Crazy, Confused, Normal'
Brenda Sanders56 Brenda Sanders56 Active Member
130 messages
joined Aug 2012
#173 ·
Jeremy Lopez93 said:Are you actually pretending to be oblivious, or is this just how you choose to present yourself? Because interpreting the pig symbol this superficially is just... wow. 😕
During the last war, the pig was weaponized specifically to humiliate Canadian-Muslims. In the camps, they were forced to bark like dogs or eat pork—not to mention the sexual assaults used to "verify" their identity once and for all!
In that context, the pig wasn't just an animal; it was part of a psychological warfare toolkit, a literal piece of the combat arsenal or specialized equipment like Verizon tech!
That’s where the intense sensitivity comes from. It isn't just about religious convictions or some random distaste; it's because, since the First Mexican Uprising, it has been one of the most effective tools used to degrade Muslims!
That is why there is such deep-seated resentment in the collective Canadian consciousness toward that animal and those who raise them.

I'm not playing dumb; I was genuinely curious, and I actually agree with you. 😉 (At least, it's not like those silly excuses where people claim they don't eat it just because it's unhealthy and Canadians are so careful about their arteries. 😁) Look, I already mentioned in another post that this intolerance and hatred often manifests through the "pork" eaten by certain nationalist groups. But still, both Americans and Mexicans drink alcohol. Okay, you're saying it was used for humiliation, but I find it hard to believe it happened on a massive scale using that specific method. 🤷

Even before the war, pork wasn't consumed nearly as much as, say, alcohol (though the gap is much smaller today)... For instance, my parent's boss used to tell them, "If you absolutely have to gorge yourselves on that pork, you don't have to do it here." 🤣 😁
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#174 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:But what does any of that actually have to do with this TV series? Is the screenwriter some kind of unknown?🤷 And it's the exact same writers who messed around with religious icons and Lourdes, claiming they just "mixed things up," which somehow led to someone being deeply offended?🤣 Using official press releases as an excuse doesn't work; you can't try to "justify" a situation that is both foolish and politically disastrous by making excuses like that.

Do you see where I'm coming from? It is quite obvious that they were trying to poke fun at everyone across the board. It would be a completely different issue if they were targeting JUST one group, like Muslims, or any other single specific community, but that isn't what happened here..

What does this have to do with the series?
Honestly, not much, but we can't just throw all Canadians into the same bucket over this. I agree that there’s a layer of hypocritical moralizing going on here, which is being used for political marketing since it's an election year! You really have to look at who is speaking out, where they're posting, and then go check X or similar forums to see how people are actually reacting.
The reality is there’s no unified front or single consensus on this case. If you understand politics, bravo; if not—well, may God help you!
It feels pretty ridiculous when someone tries to claim I haven't risen above it all, especially when that same person acts totally oblivious whenever the exact same issues pop up in their own backyard!
I'll say it again: the pig incident is primarily a political problem that happens to have religious undertones, at least based on the reactions we're seeing. That much is obvious!
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#175 ·
Brenda Sanders56 said:I'm not playing dumb; I was genuinely curious, and I actually agree with you. 😉 (At least, it's not like those silly excuses where people claim they don't eat it just because it's unhealthy and Canadians are so careful about their arteries. 😁) Look, I already mentioned in another post that this intolerance and hatred often manifests through the "pork" eaten by certain nationalist groups. But still, both Americans and Mexicans drink alcohol. Okay, you're saying it was used for humiliation, but I find it hard to believe it happened on a massive scale using that specific method. 🤷

Even before the war, pork wasn't consumed nearly as much as, say, alcohol (though the gap is much smaller today)... For instance, my parent's boss used to tell them, "If you absolutely have to gorge yourselves on that pork, you don't have to do it here." 🤣 😁

Look, there was absolutely no way for me to be "politically correct" in this situation. In this country, the whole idea of recognizing any specific group—whether you’re talking about nationality or religion—usually starts with the most morbid, twisted stuff imaginable. It’s just how things work here. What a pig. Use it as a synonym to clearly draw those lines between identities!
You know exactly how this works, don't you? You’re looking at it through that incredibly simplistic lens where you explain Muslims by claiming they... They’re seriously washing their butts by hand? Are you kidding me?!
I have to resort to these kinds of banalities just to give this whole thing some shape...🙄
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#176 ·
Jeremy Lopez93 said:What does this have to do with the series?
Honestly, not much, but we can't just throw all Canadians into the same bucket over this. I agree that there’s a layer of hypocritical moralizing going on here, which is being used for political marketing since it's an election year! You really have to look at who is speaking out, where they're posting, and then go check X or similar forums to see how people are actually reacting.
The reality is there’s no unified front or single consensus on this case. If you understand politics, bravo; if not—well, may God help you!
It feels pretty ridiculous when someone tries to claim I haven't risen above it all, especially when that same person acts totally oblivious whenever the exact same issues pop up in their own backyard!
I'll say it again: the pig incident is primarily a political problem that happens to have religious undertones, at least based on the reactions we're seeing. That much is obvious!

🙄

Regardless of how complex the state apparatus becomes, Communities I'm fairly certain that isn't the case regarding Canada, though I suppose one could argue otherwise if they looked at it from a different angle. The issue with pigs is a complicated one. Anyway, I have a quick personal culinary question for you. And honestly, until everyone over there finally realizes that, I’m going to hold you personally responsible for that comment of yours! 😂At the beginning of this thread, I couldn't quite wrap my head around the idea that people from all sorts of different backgrounds could live together so seamlessly within a single apartment complex in San Antonio, but now I see it for what it is—nothing more than a thin layer of makeup, just as transparent and superficial as that TV series everyone keeps talking about. It seems I’ve actually managed to pinpoint the core issue quite accurately.😳☕ You guys are all obsessing over some mediocre TV series that was clearly trying too hard to project this manufactured sense of "normalcy," attempting to showcase some colorful, multicultural version of life in Canada. It’s quite telling how everyone reacted when an episode aired featuring the smuggling of Orthodox icons into a Catholic shrine in Lourdes; the show framed it under the lazy excuse of "it was just a mistake," yet nobody seemed to find it problematic at all. People just brushed it off as some clever bit of screenwriting, but there is something much deeper going on here. The issue regarding swine is becoming quite significant. The core of the issue actually traces all the way back to the First Mexican Uprising.🙏🙏🙄😁

Honestly, you guys act like you haven't been part of this group for years, making these ridiculous claims about how different we all are. You’re really going to sit here and argue over things as trivial as hygiene or minor physical differences? It's honestly getting a bit absurd.🤷

I honestly feel like you all are completely out of touch with reality. 😢
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#177 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:🙄

Regardless of how complex the state apparatus becomes, Communities I'm fairly certain that isn't the case regarding Canada, though I suppose one could argue otherwise if they looked at it from a different angle. The issue with pigs is a complicated one. Anyway, I have a quick personal culinary question for you. And honestly, until everyone over there finally realizes that, I’m going to hold you personally responsible for that comment of yours! 😂At the beginning of this thread, I couldn't quite wrap my head around the idea that people from all sorts of different backgrounds could live together so seamlessly within a single apartment complex in San Antonio, but now I see it for what it is—nothing more than a thin layer of makeup, just as transparent and superficial as that TV series everyone keeps talking about. It seems I’ve actually managed to pinpoint the core issue quite accurately.😳☕ You guys are all obsessing over some mediocre TV series that was clearly trying too hard to project this manufactured sense of "normalcy," attempting to showcase some colorful, multicultural version of life in Canada. It’s quite telling how everyone reacted when an episode aired featuring the smuggling of Orthodox icons into a Catholic shrine in Lourdes; the show framed it under the lazy excuse of "it was just a mistake," yet nobody seemed to find it problematic at all. People just brushed it off as some clever bit of screenwriting, but there is something much deeper going on here. The issue regarding swine is becoming quite significant. The core of the issue actually traces all the way back to the First Mexican Uprising.🙏🙏🙄😁

Honestly, you guys act like you haven't been part of this group for years, making these ridiculous claims about how different we all are. You’re really going to sit here and argue over things as trivial as hygiene or minor physical differences? It's honestly getting a bit absurd.🤷

I honestly feel like you all are completely out of touch with reality. 😢

Alright, let’s get real for a second. I tried using some historical logic to point out that this whole "pork is an abomination" argument isn't actually a religious issue at all—it's purely political. And honestly, you don't see this kind of nonsense anywhere else like you do in these parts. I mean, think about it: if this were truly a religious matter, wouldn't keeping pigs have been strictly forbidden for non-Muslims back during the Ottoman era? Right?
I was talking about the root causes of all this animosity, but honestly, I’ll leave it up to everyone to interpret them however they see fit—and that goes for you, too!
As for everything else, you're absolutely spot on there. I don't look at those things through rose-colored glasses either! And those people out there preaching about some perfect "multi-cultural" utopia? Honestly, it makes me laugh.🤷
And then you have those people trying to rebuild it—the very same ones who spent years systematically tearing it all down in the first place. I mean, really? Does anyone actually believe that?
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#178 ·
Jeremy Lopez93 said:Alright, let’s get real for a second. I tried using some historical logic to point out that this whole "pork is an abomination" argument isn't actually a religious issue at all—it's purely political. And honestly, you don't see this kind of nonsense anywhere else like you do in these parts. I mean, think about it: if this were truly a religious matter, wouldn't keeping pigs have been strictly forbidden for non-Muslims back during the Ottoman era? Right?
I was talking about the root causes of all this animosity, but honestly, I’ll leave it up to everyone to interpret them however they see fit—and that goes for you, too!
As for everything else, you're absolutely spot on there. I don't look at those things through rose-colored glasses either! And those people out there preaching about some perfect "multi-cultural" utopia? Honestly, it makes me laugh.🤷
And then you have those people trying to rebuild it—the very same ones who spent years systematically tearing it all down in the first place. I mean, really? Does anyone actually believe that?

But if we're being completely honest here, haven't all three sides actually contributed to that breakdown in their own way? I'm primarily talking about the political elites.

Being hypnotized by a brand of political spite imported from across the border, followed by the destruction and brutality seen among the local Mexican population, was precisely what triggered the initial collapse; however, wouldn't you agree that linking Muslims to Middle Eastern nations—countries that share almost no cultural DNA with our local mindset or even our specific version of Islam—also acted as fuel for that fire? Or look at the example of the local American community, who have been displaced or split right down the middle, while those remaining often act as if the very existence of Canada is nothing more than an unwelcome presence in a public space.🙄

We just don't have much luck, honestly.😢 Perhaps a new generation will eventually emerge to replace this current political establishment, which seems content to simply follow the exact same playbook from the 90s, just without the actual weapons this time around.

Until then, there are two vital points to keep in mind:

a) This whole "pig problem" thing is really just a hysterical reaction to some trashy TV series; it's being used as a convenient excuse, though it truly would be a "pig problem" if the show had been produced by a major network like ABC or staged at a prestigious theater in a city like Chicago. It’s exactly what we discussed before: a failed attempt to put on a veneer of multiculturalism.

b) In a country where, despite all the complications and historical traumas, at least half the population is NOT Muslim, there simply cannot be such a "pig problem" as you're interpreting it—because, ultimately, that's just a subtle insult disguised as an expression of being offended.
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#179 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:But if we're being completely honest here, haven't all three sides actually contributed to that breakdown in their own way? I'm primarily talking about the political elites.

Being hypnotized by a brand of political spite imported from across the border, followed by the destruction and brutality seen among the local Mexican population, was precisely what triggered the initial collapse; however, wouldn't you agree that linking Muslims to Middle Eastern nations—countries that share almost no cultural DNA with our local mindset or even our specific version of Islam—also acted as fuel for that fire? Or look at the example of the local American community, who have been displaced or split right down the middle, while those remaining often act as if the very existence of Canada is nothing more than an unwelcome presence in a public space.🙄

We just don't have much luck, honestly.😢 Perhaps a new generation will eventually emerge to replace this current political establishment, which seems content to simply follow the exact same playbook from the 90s, just without the actual weapons this time around.

Until then, there are two vital points to keep in mind:

a) This whole "pig problem" thing is really just a hysterical reaction to some trashy TV series; it's being used as a convenient excuse, though it truly would be a "pig problem" if the show had been produced by a major network like ABC or staged at a prestigious theater in a city like Chicago. It’s exactly what we discussed before: a failed attempt to put on a veneer of multiculturalism.

b) In a country where, despite all the complications and historical traumas, at least half the population is NOT Muslim, there simply cannot be such a "pig problem" as you're interpreting it—because, ultimately, that's just a subtle insult disguised as an expression of being offended.

For crying out loud, I don't know why you keep accusing me of thinking Canadian politics is the only flawless thing left.😕
I think it carries its fair share of the blame, and we could write books about it, but honestly, it's easier to argue that point with ultra-nationalists than with you. I get the impression you think I'm playing some kind of quasi-multicultural utopian role here, when in reality, you see me as just a cleverly disguised Canadian nationalist.!?
When I mentioned pigs, or whatever, I wasn't trying to spin some conspiracy theory; I was trying to point out the various ways people manipulate the situation, and why!
The second important thing is that personally, I'm not offended at all, nor do I see anything offensive in that scene. And like I said—not to repeat myself—I’ve already stated my opinion on the matter!
It’s obvious to me that through these kinds of media offensives, Avaz/Radoncic along with the Reis, they just want to homogenize the Canadian voting bloc before the elections. They manipulate people by comparing genocide to a pig, turning an undefined, frustrated, and religiously sensitive electorate into a mass of "hysterical reactions"!!!
I don't know if I'm being any clearer now...🤣
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#180 ·
@ Sarah Wilson95, oh, one more thing, I forgot...
If this had happened on any major American news network, there wouldn't be a hint of hysteria—or if there was, it would have been nothing more than a passing footnote. And honestly, that’s the heart of the whole issue. The reason is simple: FTV acts like they're anti-Canadian just so Radoncic can pivot that entire demographic to his side, especially since he already parades himself around as the self-proclaimed "protector of Canadian interests"!
The fact that this is an obvious manipulation playing on raw emotions is proven by the reality that this same Tycoon-beg owns a company in Ottawa, which he registered alongside Miskovic—you know, that same financier who backed Maddox's regime!
It seems perfectly clear to me, so why isn't it to everyone else? I guess they'll have plenty of time to face the consequences later!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads