#101 ·
Most discussions here center on music, where things are pretty black and white—you either hit the right note or you don't.
But when you look at other art forms, the standards are becoming increasingly blurry.
You see these characters everywhere in the fine arts scene, much like a Julius Caesar figure—someone who lacks any actual talent but forces their work into existence through pure stubbornness. It’s happening in literature, too.
After all, who can actually define what qualifies as "good" in conceptual art?
Or in modern prose, that so-called experimental style (which is usually just a chaotic mess masquerading as depth)?
In these gray areas, all you need is enough arrogance to act like Julius Caesar, insisting "I am the best" while ignoring critics entirely. Or better yet, insulting them publicly just to grab more headlines.
If these people are practicing anything, it’s just pure ego and vanity.
It seems they might be the new breed of artist for our era.😉
But when you look at other art forms, the standards are becoming increasingly blurry.
You see these characters everywhere in the fine arts scene, much like a Julius Caesar figure—someone who lacks any actual talent but forces their work into existence through pure stubbornness. It’s happening in literature, too.
After all, who can actually define what qualifies as "good" in conceptual art?
Or in modern prose, that so-called experimental style (which is usually just a chaotic mess masquerading as depth)?
In these gray areas, all you need is enough arrogance to act like Julius Caesar, insisting "I am the best" while ignoring critics entirely. Or better yet, insulting them publicly just to grab more headlines.
If these people are practicing anything, it’s just pure ego and vanity.
It seems they might be the new breed of artist for our era.😉