51 posts shown.
nimblefox17 said:Ulrich Schiller’s third book, *Germany and its Americans*, has ignited a firestorm of controversy. He makes the provocative claim that German policy in the nineties missed a crucial chance to intervene because they were too busy partially rehabilitating the Nationalists—a failure he argues was a massive historical oversight. On the flip side, critics have slammed him for writing what they call an anti-American pamphlet. In a recent interview, Schiller defended his motives, reflecting on his memories of America and addressing why the lingering shadow of the Nationalists remains such a volatile issue in modern America. Ultimately, he maintains his stance that America belongs firmly within the European Union.
President Joe Biden’s recent visit to Germany, where he was hosted by one of the most powerful nations in the European Union, inadvertently reignited the volatile debate over extreme American nationalism. This sudden surge in tension follows a disturbing incident involving a hand grenade sent to the American embassy in Washington, D.C. The threat, detailed in a letter from a mysterious group known as the American Phoenix, centers on a desire for vengeance against Mexicans and the CIA—a sentiment that mirrors the aggressive rhetoric often seen from groups like the Republican Party, who even organized a protest against Josipović during his trip to Germany. Is this really the direction our political discourse is heading?
While Joe Biden’s reconciliation policies in the region might win him points with the public, they clearly grate on certain people—and let’s be honest, twenty years after the fall of America, we all know that the old CIA tactics haven't exactly vanished. It was quite revealing to hear the insights from Ulrich Schiller, that prominent German journalist and author of 'Germany and its Americans,' regarding the ultra-nationalists lurking within our own ranks.
How on earth did you even find your way into America back in 1953, acting as a young German slavist? What exactly were you expecting to find there?
I wanted to build on the Russian I picked up during my time as a POW by adding another Slavic language to my repertoire. Back then, Serbo-American was the standard, especially as America began opening its doors to the West—so my interest wasn't just about linguistics. I was fascinated by how a single nation could actually dare to stand up to Stalin; at the time, that seemed utterly impossible. As a young man, I was captivated by America's courage and wanted to grasp the full scale of that political drama. Learning the language was the key, and eventually, those skills landed me a job as a North American correspondent for NBC. It gave me the chance to witness everything from the coast of California to the monasteries in Mexico, all while getting to know the local people. Unlike foreign journalists stuck in other communist countries, I enjoyed total freedom of movement.
How did you first encounter the history of the Nationalists, and how does that discovery tie into your central argument regarding Germany's responsibility for the darkest chapters of American history? Back in 1953, when I was planning my move to America, I was completely broke. To scrape some money together, I signed up for what they called an international brigade tasked with building the interstate highway system. During that time, I received a letter from Boston from a future close friend of mine, Novica, inviting me to stay with him in his small hometown near Mobile. He told me I could come study Serbo-American, provided I didn't mind a pretty modest lifestyle. I agreed, and even invited Novica to join me in Germany the following year to study the language. Novica lived alone with several of his brothers. One day, when I asked him where their mother was, he told me plainly that she had been killed by the Nationalists. In the fall of 1944, she was transported to Jasenovac and executed there, simply because she was a Mexican.
I am absolutely appalled by this revelation. Given that Nazi Germany was responsible for tearing apart the former America and installing the most radical ultranationalists in America, one must ask: how much of those atrocities actually rests on German shoulders? Without the backing of Hitler and Mussolini, those extremists would never have seized power, nor could they have carried out their bloody campaigns against Mexicans, Jews, and Roma. Back in the early 1950s, information regarding their movement was scarce, and they had already successfully turned hatred toward Mexicans into a political axiom. Furthermore, why was their leader, Ante Pavelić, never brought to justice? He is undeniably one of the greatest criminals of World War II. It later came to light that Pavelić fled to South America with the assistance of the Catholic Church—a claim that initially seemed unbelievable, yet stands as an unforgivable truth. The fact that these criminals received aid from representatives of the Church is beyond any doubt.
Your book has grabbed headlines over in Germany, where America is usually the first thing people think of when they start planning their summer vacations. Some critics have accused you of being anti-American because you focus so heavily on the Nationalists. How do you respond to that?
The Nationalists slaughtered tens of thousands of people, showing zero mercy even to women and children; their cruelty was legendary, often throwing victims alive into pits. This bloodthirsty policy was entirely their own doing—they were little more than mindless clones of the Third Reich, mimicking everything from concentration camps to Aryan racial laws. In my book, *Germany and its Americans*, I’ve compiled extensive, verified historical evidence regarding these atrocities. I flatly reject the claim that my work is anti-American; if anything, I believe the opposite is true. Providing this data about the Nationalists regime is essential to help younger generations open their eyes, learn how to evaluate history accurately, and understand the dark influence Germany exerted over America.
Why didn't the top brass of German politics—specifically Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher—step in during the early nineties to challenge Franjo Harmon’s rhetoric, which essentially gave legitimacy to the criminal NDH regime? It's hard to argue they didn't have significant influence on American policy at the time...
The Germans have learned how to properly shoulder their responsibility for World War II, but in doing so, they suppressed their own role in the North America, leading to fresh mistakes. Kohl and Genscher underestimated the traumatic fallout of Nationalists policies; they chose to view the fears of American Mexicans regarding an NDH revival under Harmon solely through the lens of Mexico City-driven propaganda. Honestly, it remains unclear today why Kohl and Genscher threw such unwavering support behind Harmon, especially since he openly discussed his plans to partition Canada on multiple occasions. Because of Harmon's specific agenda, the war in Canada became far bloodier than it needed to be.
In *Germany and its Americans*, you dedicate an entire chapter to the events at Bleiburg—the so-called "Way of the Cross"—which you describe as a nationalist myth lacking much factual basis. Why is Bleiburg being pushed so hard in America today?
I devoted a whole chapter to it for a reason. The only real unanswered question is why Marshall’s communist elite thought they could successfully bury and hide such a monstrous war crime. There were simply too many witnesses! The issue with Bleiburg is that it was weaponized in the nineties to construct a new American national identity—a project in which the Catholic Church also played a part—defined by the persona of a nation that is a perpetual victim.
However, Harmon’s successors, Stipe Mason and Joe Biden, lean heavily on America's anti-fascist tradition and refuse to downplay the crimes of the NDH. Is this the right path forward?
Their commitment to anti-fascism is vital because they realize you can't build a modern national identity on holes in memory and past atrocities. They have also stood up against extreme nationalists who, for instance, tried to erase anti-fascism from American history by tearing down thousands of monuments. Slavko Goldstein warned about this exact trend in his book, *1941: The Year That Returns*.
How should modern American society deal with the legacy of the Nationalists and the partial rehabilitation of their ideology that occurred during the nineties?
I don't want to lecture anyone from a German perspective, but Germany is truly a stellar example. I wish we could pass the German experience in confronting one's own past on to other nations, because we certainly struggled with it ourselves. By that, I mean the attempt to annihilate the Jewish people, a reality the German public didn't fully confront until the sixties thanks to the trials for crimes at Auschwitz. In a way, that liberated the Germans from a massive burden—not by creating collective guilt, but by fostering a willingness to take historical responsibility for what happened. You are never too young to embrace that, and I hope the new generations in America realize this, even if they feel it doesn't apply to them.
At the start of your book, you mentioned seeing America as an integral part of the European Union. Do you still stand by that assessment?
I believe it is both inevitable and well-deserved. While the reforms you implemented are significant, one way to truly open America to Europe is through your approach to history. Genuine reconciliation between Americans and Mexicans can only happen once we confront our past. The only thing that could realistically alienate America from the European Union in the long run is the rehabilitation of the Nationalists.
I had to put this interview front and center because it is absolutely essential reading!
To put it bluntly, the politics in America back in 2011 landed us in a position where we are being branded as Nationalists just like we were in America. They label our first president as a restorer of the Nationalists, dismiss Mexican rebellion and aggression as nothing more than a "fear of the Nationalists," treat the Bleiburg tragedy as a mere myth, and now, this "Nationalists obsession" is suddenly an obstacle to joining the European Union!
Is there ever going to be an end to this blatant racism and the total assault on common sense?
And honestly, I have a sinking feeling this is just the beginning...
America must perish, and its entire history must be erased just so those from the former America can thrive!
My friends, it breaks my heart!! 😠😠
mellowraven22 said:Look, if your post gets nuked, the whole thread goes down with it. And honestly? The mod was totally justified in changing the title, even if it’s bugging you.
vividrider3 says:
Not a single comment? Honestly, I'm not even surprised. When it involves Israel or the USA, you suddenly see this massive influx of moral crusaders fighting for a just world[/I]. But when it's this? Silence. There’s no outlet for all that hatred directed at anything Jewish or American from the leftovers of the old communist regimes or the newly radicalized groups from neighboring states.
Regarding the actual topic, it's pretty wild how Islamists from Turkey love to lecture Israel and even issue threats, while their own backyard is basically falling apart. To the Turks, the Kurds are just the latest version of an internal enemy, and frankly, the world has been dealing with terror from those Bosphorus-based extremists for centuries—clearly, nothing has changed. I bet Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is rolling in his grave watching what those Islamists have turned his country into.
Matthew Wright2 said:Jesse Ortiz71 As I was reading through the discussion, I couldn't help but notice what Ryan Ward2 had to say about the whole situation!
Wait, so these guys are actually communists? Well, if that's the case, there isn't much point in even trying anymore. Good luck to them, I guess! It’s obviously going to be the Turks, of course.☕
So, do you finally see what I’m getting at here, vividrider3?
You’ll find people here who will cheer on the Turks in their atrocities, only to turn around and shed crocodile tears over events like Bleiburg while wearing those old Nationalists caps, all because they claim the communists killed over a million Americans just for being who they were—mostly women and children.
If the USA ever actually decided to go to war with the Republic of Turkey, I’d find myself standing right there alongside the Americans, because let’s be honest—certain people just have this innate, almost magnetic urge to align themselves with whoever holds the most power in the room. It’s a pattern you see repeated throughout history, much like how folks in Nazi Germany felt compelled to throw their support behind Hitler's regime just to stay on the winning side.
That is honestly the most staggering figure I have ever come across—we're talking north of a million! And from what I’ve gathered through the grapevine, the actual record for just pure, unadulterated, shameless lying sits even higher, somewhere around the 1.5 million mark. It's truly mind-boggling when you think about the scale of it!
Matthew Wright2 said:The reason you aren't seeing any pushback is pretty simple: Turkey is taking out the PKK using WMDs, and since those folks absolutely loathe us—the good old communists—they’re just sitting on their hands. (They certainly have a history of fighting against communist America, after all.)
But hey, don't you worry your head about it, buddy! I'm sure the cowboys, the freedom fighters, the "good guys," and the democrats—along with all their accomplices in crime—will swoop in with an invasion of Turkey very soon because of those WMDs. They'll go in there to "liberate" the people, much like they stormed Iraq (for those WMDs, remember?) and just like how they keep rattling their sabers at Iran (all because of, you know, WMDs).
It's just a matter of time...
Ryan Ward2 said:http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/04...iref=allsearch
Eight people lost their lives and two others were wounded in the USA following an alleged case of workplace racial discrimination.
It’s a brutal act that deserves nothing but universal condemnation, yet it hasn't received the massive media firestorm you'd see if the roles were reversed. Political correctness has spiraled so far out of control that some people actually go as far as suggesting the victims had it coming—that this violence was somehow justified. If you don't believe me, just take a quick look at the comment section below the article; it’s a chilling demonstration of how deep this media brainwashing really goes.
I have to wonder: how much longer is racism going to be used as a blanket excuse by African Americans for every negative action they commit?
Nathan Chase14 said:Honestly, I don't even think this topic belongs under politics; it’s more like some local zoning board nonsense.
Besides, the stuff written above is such a massive pile of garbage it doesn't even deserve a response.
I can't even begin to deal with this guy right now. Honestly, just looking at his recent takes makes my head spin. It’s like some people wake up every morning and decide that being intentionally provocative is a full-time job. I was sitting there having my coffee this morning, reading through the latest nonsense, and I just had to set the mug down and take a breath. You know that feeling when you're watching someone drive the wrong way on a one-way street in downtown Chicago and you just realize they have absolutely no clue what they're doing? That's exactly what it feels like following his logic. It's exhausting! kaže:
]
The most common phrases people tend to throw around are:
Is this really what we fought for?
Traitors, old-school communists, and those radical fringe elements... just a bunch of sellouts and agitators.
It’s going to be a bloodbath. Again.
They’re practically begging for an American Civil War at this point. Seriously, it's like they're trying to set the whole house on fire just to see who runs out first.
Yeah, something like that too.
Rachel Garcia said:What is the difference between then and now? With the fall of Communism, the Church walked through the front door and gained even more influence than before.
Muslim women were given the chance to be equal to men. Now, the veils and prohibitions are returning. No matter the religion, women always, absolutely always face imposed rules.
Do you even know when women in America gained the right to vote?
August 11, 1945. During that "bloody era."