If you’re talking about that thread you started over on the forum—the one that’s already been locked—your only move is to ask a moderator to wipe it. You can't do it yourself.
As for the username, there's a master thread Changing your handle at the top of this PDF, but you don't actually meet the requirements to change it right now.
mellowowl38 said:I remember seeing this design on the kit calendar for the first time, and now here we are, staring at them right before the big game against San Diego. Honestly, they went on this whole big production about how the squad would be rocking the new kits for every single match this season... so, uh, anyone else noticing the total lack of sponsors?
Terry Fisher2 said:The Poles—who’ll be holding nothing but air in the final round, just like us.
I'm dead 🤣🤣
frozentiger6 said:Personally, I couldn't care less about this game's score.
It's not about the team or the players—it's about the incompetent hack on the bench and that fat mobster in the stands.
I hope they lose by ten and never see New York City again.
If Nikola Karabatic told them to pack it up at the start of February, I wouldn't want to see them play ever again. Let Kopljar run the show in the next period—to hell with both of them.
crimsongardener17 said:It’s a lot less than what was mentioned above—but there’s still zero logic in claiming an Olympic silver carries more weight than a World Championship gold. It just doesn't make any sense.🤷
Hmm... World gold versus two Olympic silvers at the USOPC—it’s a weird comparison. 🤔
It's not exactly an easy call to make—not that anyone actually wants to deal with it.
If they hadn't focused solely on the World Championships, the European Championships, and the Olympics—ignoring the Ski Federation entirely—Ivica would have been ahead. Everyone knows how much an Olympic medal actually matters in this business—so the USOPC really shouldn't have pulled this amateurish stunt. 🤷
placidfalcon4 said:Which two losers? 🤦 Especially this Kostelić guy—he knows exactly how little Červar actually understands about handball, so he just dismisses other sports like that. A total joke.
Look, he might not have the handball IQ of Červar—not by a long shot—but his coaching record is solid enough to be undeniable.
Honestly, I’d argue the Blankins have had a bigger year than Ivičin—which suggests that's how the coaching hierarchy should actually look. The old Janičin wins align with what the Blankins are doing now. They don't align with Ivica at all. It's just basic logic.
I don't really get why Coach of the Year has to be based solely on an athlete's podium finishes. Take Blankin—she’s been head and shoulders above the rest for years now; this season isn't exactly a massive leap from her previous ones. It's a similar story with Ivica—even his critics have to admit that grabbing two medals at the Olympic Games is a huge deal. Personally, I think the award should go to the coach who actually facilitated the most significant breakthrough with their athlete or team during that specific year. 🤷
By the way—today's win by Ivica was a total reality check for gips—clearly he knows how to time his peak better than that old man does. ☕
Carl Brooks22 said:Look, why don't you just tell us who has the better look—Ivica il or Blanka—so we can end this debate and let the moderator close the thread.
Morgan Rodriguez57 said:As far as I can tell, it's always the head coaches getting the spotlight, not their assistants... any award really belongs to the whole staff, not just one guy... you know Marinović, sure, but are you actually familiar with the coaching staffs at Arsenal besides Wenger, or at Bayern aside from Van Gaal, etc.?
Your examples aren't exactly hitting the mark—these are teams training 20 to 30 athletes, whereas here we're talking about a single person. Plus, Wenger is the one calling the shots on tactics and giving advice before and during the game. Have you ever seen Blanka consulting with Joška during a competition? No. That’s why Marinović should be the lead—he’s the one handling the high jump, while brko deals with conditioning and the "marginal" stuff. If they were actually going to give an award to Blanka's coach, Bojan is the one who should take it, in my opinion.
Morgan Rodriguez57 said:The best part of this argument—if you can call it that—is the claim that they just don't like Joško and Blanka, so they shouldn't get an award... 🤦
Only the trolls are buying that logic☕
Anyone actually paying attention—the real users here—can see there's more to the post than that.☕
Kudos to blankin and Joško, but I’m siding with Bojan Marinovic here.
First off—I can't stand blankin herself, and her inner circle is just as grating. They both come across as incredibly full of themselves and condescending, which isn't exactly a trait I care for. 🤷
Second, there’s a clear distinction between the two—Bojan actually handles everything for his athletes, from physical conditioning to technical drills. On the other hand, Vlašić wouldn't be worth a damn without Marinovic; all those meal plans and training schedules don't mean much if blankin were left to her own devices. She’d likely just be another talented high jumper with zero results, because frankly, I doubt Joško has the technical expertise to coach the nuances of the jump. That’s Bojan’s real edge. If anyone deserves credit for blankin's success, it’s Marinovic.
Matthew Wilson50 said:I figured you'd say something like that. ☕
I guess it's easy for you to stay happy when you don't have to deal with moving messages around or cleaning up threads since you aren't quite as high-profile as I am. ☕ 😁