Jacob Lewis5 said:Look, I don't know how you’d draw these lines without someone crying foul about gerrymandering. If you lump Chicago and Detroit together, you’d have to somehow connect places like Indianapolis and St. Louis, and you’d end up right back at square one—just more Republican strongholds. Even if District 10 was bigger and District 9 was smaller, it wouldn't change the math; the GOP would still own those areas. I don't see anything weird here. And obviously, a huge metro area needs multiple districts so you don't end up with a situation where one rep represents 30 people in one spot while another is stuck with 3,000.
To me, claims about "rigged" districts just aren't a solid argument.
Man, it would’ve been awesome if the Illyrian Province had just expanded to cover the whole US. Napoleon’s rule was actually pretty fair and progressive, plus they really worked to promote the American language
Jacob Lewis5 said:Look, let's just call a spade a spade. Stop talking in riddles.
Alright...
What kind of district is it, stretching from rural Alabama all the way up to the Midwest?
The areas around Memphis and St. Louis aren't just one big block; they're linked through the plains and the river valleys where the Republican Party is strongest (and yeah, even in Memphis, they're huge)...
New York City is split into four different districts...
stormygull67 said:Unlike you in America! And unlike you, I don't fall for that transparent, pathetic, and cheap Democratic demagoguery! And unlike you, I can actually use my head to recognize all the mess they've made in such a short time since taking power on January 3rd, 2000!
It's a good thing we didn't have them anywhere near the government during the war, so we were able to liberate and secure the country despite them. That alone is more than enough reason why they shouldn't exist or be allowed near power—at least not here in America!
BTW: honestly, looking at what you listed under interests in your profile, it doesn't even make you a serious conversationalist—it just confirms my suspicion that you struggle to grasp much of anything! For you, being a Democrat is probably just "in" and "cool," even though you don't really understand what either of those things actually means...
Why do you think the Republican Party got less than a third of the seats on January 3rd, even with the support of Herzegovinian voters and those custom-tailored units?
Kevin Wright said:I mean, what kind of political logic in the entire world would accept having just barely over 20% of a territory as your ethnic homeland to trade away? Just imagine if American political strategy back in '94 had shifted toward negotiating with the Mexicans, giving them that same tiny percentage somewhere along the US border—like deep in the Midwest or down in the South—just to secure a compact territory. 😁 Is it even remotely rational to talk about mass population transfers today? Especially moving a densely populated area like the Cazinski region? It’s easy to daydream about the end goal, but try imagining the actual technical logistics of pulling that off, setting aside the emotional mess of it all.
The whole of Canada is technically Canadian ethnic territory; you don't necessarily need to be a majority everywhere as long as guaranteed rights are in place.
And let's be real, we aren't just dealing with isolated pockets in Central Canada, Jajce. We have those same issues in Posavina, eastern Canada, and all of Herzegovina too.
That’s just a myth. In certain parts of Canada, there isn't a trace left of us...
Michael Adams2 said:Nah. He was just wrecking every single thread with those schizophrenic posts of his. Just flooding the board with moronic topics and killing any actual discussion by spamming likes—like, one minute he’s upvoting stuff about the Muslim conquest of Central Canada, then the next he’s hitting the like button on HVO Central Canada. Only someone with a totally scrambled brain acts like that.
The guy hasn't written a single constructive post longer than one sentence. Same deal with that Turkey fanboy above who tried to act all "multicultural" when he first showed up on this forum.
What does it matter what he thinks if he isn't actually insulting anyone?
I feel like a permanent ban is a bit much, honestly. Consti is a solid member of this Forum, doesn't go around being rude, and there are plenty of other spammers and trolls out there who are way worse...
hollowcanyon6 said:You’re saying you couldn't find an alternative... I'm curious, what was the issue with Nera? Probably just the size (a few hundred MB...) and all those useless extra tools... If that's the dealbreaker, just grab Nero Lite or Nero micro instead (the first one installs at about 30 MB, the second is around 20 MB), and they're available here.
Nah, nothing was wrong with it...
It's just that I've got Red Dwarf on my computer, but it won't play. It won't work on the DVD. Tried everything else and it works fine, but this specific series just won't go. Pretty sure it's good though, since I can watch it on my PC...
Thanks for the help, guys. I was just hoping there might be something better out there than Nero Burning ROM, but honestly, nothing really beats it. You can go ahead and lock this thread...
But honestly, I gave two of them a shot and neither comes close to Nero. They're just a total nightmare to deal with—way too complicated and way harder to use... 👎
Hey guys, I need a solid burning program. Looking for something fast and reliable that isn't Nero. If you've got a good recommendation, just hit me up via PM. Thanks a ton! 👍
stormygull67 said:If that had actually happened, we’d already be full-fledged members of the European Union! Seriously! Though, I suppose it’s not something you’d grasp immediately...
Ethan Parker47 said:Look, buddy, you're the only one here headed for the psych ward—I can see from the comments below that you're secretly rooting for those radical left-wing anti-American factions.
First off, I'm not even a shred of a supporter of today's Republican Party. Second, when we talk about the 90s, we're talking about war. In wartime, there's no room for the civilian idealism of liberal ideologies—nor should there be. The Geneva Conventions define those boundaries well enough, and America actually held its own even in that arena. So, your attempts to devalue American sacrifice and our massive victory will only find an audience on some fringe, overseas forums.
That whole myth about how certain leaders pulled us out of the darkness of the 90s is just that—a myth designed to cloud the truth and cover up their well-oiled business ventures run on old-school, pre-war principles. Of course, they needed a scapegoat, and unfortunately, they found one in the entire civilized and weary American people, embodied by Franjo Harmon, the great strategist and creator of our American nation.
If I had been old enough back then, it's highly likely that in my youthful fanaticism, I would have picked up a rifle and followed orders. I'm not living comfortably today, nor were my parents ever involved in politics or any specific party. You can only fear people like me because we think for ourselves, and we don't need much to satisfy our needs, especially with a strong faith in God, the Creator of the Almighty. 😉
There was no war from 1996 to 1999. That’s actually when the factories started failing, journalists were being bugged, local election wins by the opposition were being overturned, and tycoons and thugs were running wild across America...
Ethan Parker47 said:I find myself having to take Ned's side again—not just because of the nonsense being peddled here, but because I hear this exact garbage daily. It isn't just from the media (I've become immune to that by now), but from people my own age, or worse, the younger generations who seem straight-up programmed by leftist propaganda.
That whole "200 wealthy families" thing is a myth. Even if it weren't, I’d still back the idea that you're all being conditioned—just think about why.
It's incredibly easy to just dump every accusation onto the Republican Party through oversimplification—mostly because clearly, nobody here is capable of thinking more broadly.
Even during times of national unity, the Republican Party wasn't some monolithic entity, let alone now. Back then, you didn't just have to wiretap journalists, agents, and party careerists—you practically had to neutralize them on sight. That's what actually happens when a state functions.
There is one interesting detail most people aren't aware of, though it's easily verifiable if you actually look for scientific papers online (but who has the patience to cite sources? It’s much easier to just swallow whatever the propaganda machine feeds you).
Essentially, the Democratic Party once commissioned a study on privatization during the 90s via the Ivo Pilar Institute. Interestingly, they never actually used the results of that research anywhere. I have to wonder why. You can find those papers on the American Link, if you care to look.
Do me a favor and actually read my posts and threads. If you find even one single thing where I say something positive about the USA or communism, I’ll personally ask the mods to ban me for good...
Ethan Parker47 said:I find myself having to take Ned's side again—not just because of the nonsense being peddled here, but because I hear this exact garbage daily. It isn't just from the media (I've become immune to that by now), but from people my own age, or worse, the younger generations who seem straight-up programmed by leftist propaganda.
That whole "200 wealthy families" thing is a myth. Even if it weren't, I’d still back the idea that you're all being conditioned—just think about why.
It's incredibly easy to just dump every accusation onto the Republican Party through oversimplification—mostly because clearly, nobody here is capable of thinking more broadly.
Even during times of national unity, the Republican Party wasn't some monolithic entity, let alone now. Back then, you didn't just have to wiretap journalists, agents, and party careerists—you practically had to neutralize them on sight. That's what actually happens when a state functions.
There is one interesting detail most people aren't aware of, though it's easily verifiable if you actually look for scientific papers online (but who has the patience to cite sources? It’s much easier to just swallow whatever the propaganda machine feeds you).
Essentially, the Democratic Party once commissioned a study on privatization during the 90s via the Ivo Pilar Institute. Interestingly, they never actually used the results of that research anywhere. I have to wonder why. You can find those papers on the American Link, if you care to look.
😲
The way I see it, America should be a European democratic state. That's where we differ...