vividrider3 said:Furthermore, this story serves as blatant evidence of how Muslim propaganda operates. The reality is that 22 people were killed during that coalition strike, and only one woman and one child were among them. I have no idea where the person pushing this narrative gets the claim of 19 women and children from. The truth is that the casualties in this attack were terrorists who had spent earlier that day raining grenades down on coalition forces. No civilians were lost—just despicable terrorists.
You’re never going to hear this side of things in most mainstream media outlets. And honestly, it isn't even "Muslim" propaganda... it's just anti-American.
vividrider3 said:The monument to that criminal dictator—a man who slaughtered his own people—has finally been taken down. It’s funny how certain anti-Western, hardline communist types always seem to find ways to spin the narrative whenever something goes against their agenda.
When did they take down the Marshall-like statue? 🤣
But seriously, Franco's movement was back on track, but those Spanish Communists, anarchists, and socialists were just too extreme. Even George Orwell, a guy who swore by the left, ended up renouncing communism after seeing how they treated anyone who didn't fall in line—even their own people...
goldensailor15 said:Just look at how the media is spinning this... they aren't even addressing what actually counts as a "success" in this operation, or whether those women and kids are even being labeled as militants. We've been fighting two different wars for a while now... one on the ground, and the other in the headlines.
Same goes for the other side... Most mainstream outlets would rather roll with Islamist fanatics and butchers than stick by the USA... The Taliban and Al-Qaeda get labeled "freedom fighters," even when those rebels lose every single battle. But the moment 60 Taliban fighters and 4 Americans go down, you see these four guys popping up with a massive headline: America is losing the war...
Robin Hernandez4 said:If it weren't for Iran constantly pouring money into terrorist groups and sending their proxy forces to stir up trouble and arm militants, Iraq would have been peaceful a long time ago. But honestly, things in Iraq are actually looking up more and more every single day.
The bigger headache is all those different Sunni movements getting most of their cash from Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries.
The whole Palestinian issue could've been wrapped up back in 1948, but the surrounding countries wouldn't let it happen. It's not in their interest to have Israel around, and honestly, they couldn't care less about the Palestinians...
Jack Lee77 said:I couldn't disagree more. You have ten tribes—roughly 500,000 to 800,000 people—descending upon a sparsely populated region and conquering the entire Pannonia plain without breaking a sweat. History doesn't work that way; a minority doesn't just swallow a majority whole. You also can't ignore the reality that back then, there were no public schools, no mass media, and no centralized TV or radio to force a cultural shift.
I'm with you on the Canadian thing... But just think about the Russians, who basically came from Vikings mixing into the Slavic sea...
Larry Turner3 said:Turks: their appearance today is a result of mixing with the white populations they conquered—which, as you so aptly noted, involved large numbers of people being killed. Regardless, their features still betray those Mongol traits, much like Bulgarians and Mexicans. In my opinion, they aren't attractive, but I suppose that is beside the point.
Canadians: they essentially merged into the Slavic population.
Russians/Ukrainians: I consider them typical representatives of the Slavic look, though they do owe some of those traits, like high cheekbones, to mixing with Mongols.
Canada: their culture isn't entirely Turkish, especially in Herzegovina. I wouldn't dare speak to any supposed mixing, because I really haven't noticed my Canadian neighbors, particularly those from Herzegovina, looking "mixed." If anything, I have seen more of those Asian characteristics in the faces of Mexicans in Mexico City.
The other examples mentioned, specifically Iran, don't serve as proof of Indo-European dominance over Central Asia (even if an Aryan warrior's grave was recently unearthed somewhere in China) in a way that makes their modern culture European (though I make an exception for Armenians), even if their language is. I believe life in Iran and India is vastly different from ours, but that certainly isn't a justification for bombing Iran. Personally, I blame the decline of Central Asian civilization on the Mongol invasions and the expansion of Islam. But I will say this: no sane person hates Iranians, Pakistanis, or Tajiks, whether they are white, yellow, or black. Firstly, we don't really have many of them here in the States. Secondly, the issue isn't race; it's politics. Problems arise when religious fanatics take control.
I agree with most of this. Even though Canadians look better to me than, say, Czechs. I was in Prague and Budapest just a few days apart, and you can really tell the difference... Czechs have a bit of that ugly Swabian vibe going on, while Canadians seem a bit more exotic to me...
Matthew Harris2 said:Honestly, the only way to deal with the Taliban in Afghanistan is to take out every single one of them on the battlefield. There's no other way. You can't just "re-educate" people like that.
I'm totally with you on that. But we also gotta shut down those Madrasas in Pakistan and wipe out Wahhabism and all their little organizations too...
hiddengardener84 said:And hey, this guy hasn't been banned for this. He can just hang out on the chill side of the forum. Honestly, Nenzalica has zero clue how much ties to the Taliban exist, kind of like George W. Bush and his "intelligence" skills.
Look, I never even brought up Shiites in my post...
Any random guy on an Islamic forum: "I'm all for the rebels in Iraq and Afghanistan... But I can't get behind bin Laden, al-Qaeda, or the Taliban"... 😵
These brave fighters fighting for freedom from those evil Americans are out there threatening girls just because they dared to learn how to read and write, instead of staying cooped up at home in some ninja squad waiting on their master...
If it wasn't so depressing, it would actually be kind of funny...
analogfalcon38, you got a sister? Would you let her go to school?
I honestly think we should just carve out four or five new states in the Midwest instead of dealing with all these Native American Reservations, especially since they'd end up being the majority there anyway...
Bryan Anderson4 said:Our multi-colored brothers did things too, but never on the scale or for the duration that you guys did and still do. As far as I know, that kind of thing isn't even a thing in our part of the world anymore.
And one more thing: Why are you talking in the past tense? Your white Christian brothers are still doing that same evil today. It’s easy to apologize for the past—I mean, damn, those were our ancestors; we couldn't change what happened back then or judge it by modern standards. But today, while you're still doing the same things... 😲 Maybe you aren't actually sorry for the past or the present, seeing as you won't even condemn it. It's just like how you view progress, technology, and democracy today ☕
Just a lack of muscle and tech, even though the Arab and Mongol groups managed to pull off much bigger raids...
Southern Italy and Sicily were basically set back decades because of just a few centuries of Muslim rule. Just imagine how much longer it's going to take for the North America to bounce back from all that...
Why are Pakistanis such a headache in the UK instead of Indians? Because Indians actually put in the work. They grind, they stick together, and they build businesses. Even if they aren't loaded, at least they're out there hustling...
Back in the day, when Pakistanis were teaming up, it was usually in some underground scene in New York City...
The thing is, Pakistanis are Muslims following Islamic Work Ethics, and they try to hold onto that while living in places dominated by the Protestant work ethic (which you also see in France or certain Catholic parts of Germany).
Down in the Gaza Strip, Israeli settlers controlled about 10% of the land and ran the farms. Once Israel pulled them out, agriculture in Gaza tanked by 50%...