CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › rustydrifter10 › Posts

Posts by rustydrifter10

2089 posts shown.

northerncyclist2 said:It’s already been a full month since I flagged those low-quality hosted smileys to the Admin Forum, and honestly, it feels like my message just vanished into thin air.

Meh, I’m honestly not holding my breath for a real answer here. I can already see rustydrifter10 showing up just to tell me, "I'll pass the inquiry along, but there's nothing more I can do." Oh, fantastic. Just great.

I honestly can't take on much more than this right now. I’ve received some guidance on how to move forward, but getting through it is going to take quite a bit of time—especially since my real-life schedule is absolutely slammed. My boss is constantly breathing down my neck, demanding more hours every single day, and on top of that, the administrative workload is just piling up. It's requiring a massive amount of energy lately, and frankly, I'm spread thin. Between stepping in to cover for a few moderators who are out on vacation, helping out with several PDFs, and keeping up with all my regular admin duties, I just don't have the bandwidth to prioritize the Facebook likes right now. It’ll get done once this crazy rush dies down, so please just bear with me! I really don't think it's such a huge deal if it waits a little while.

northerncyclist2 said:So, I’ve been noticing this thing lately where a bunch of folks are jumping onto the forum using the Tapatalk app just because we don't have a dedicated mobile site yet. Now, look, the forum officially supports Tapatalk, but that’s exactly where the headache starts. The Tapatalk module we’re running is ancient—like, seriously outdated—and it causes so many glitches and bugs that users end up constantly clashing with the moderation team. It’s frustrating to watch! The official line seems to be, "Hey, use Tapatalk at your own risk," but if that's the case, then why on earth does the forum even offer support for it in the first place? It feels like a total contradiction. Honestly, you guys should either just drop the support entirely so people know what they're getting into, or finally get around to updating that buggy module. If building a native mobile version is too much of a lift right now, at least fix the tools we already have so we aren't all tripping over ourselves every time we try to post from our phones!

Look, this really isn't on us. If we find out that someone actually broke a rule just because they were struggling with how this specific feature works, we’ll go ahead and pull the strike. We aren't the ones responsible for updating the system, so we can't be held accountable for technical glitches or outdated settings.
Nicholas King said:On the flip side, when it comes to AxMi, it feels like every little rule-breaking moment just slides right by without any consequences:

Look, an admin can't exactly discipline another admin, and that's the same deal for us regarding AxMi. Unless we decide to shut down a specific discussion thread entirely, the only real tool we have at our disposal is occasionally deleting his redundant posts—it’s pretty much the only technical way we can step in.
Blue Paw Association PDF Rules in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The Supermoderator mentioned we should hang tight until the mods arrive, so please, let's all just be patient and give them some space.
Posts appearing in an unknown language in Feedback & Suggestions ·
analogwalker5 said:So, are there any "approved foreign languages" allowed here on the forum?

I’d say English basically acts like a second language around here, but you still have to be a bit careful because it isn't always appropriate for every single discussion. If a specific situation really calls for it, sure, feel free to use English, but try not to overdo it—just use it when it actually makes sense. You don't always need to provide a translation, either. It’s probably a little more relaxed in threads where the subject matter itself involves another language.

analogwalker5 said:Brian Edwards78, I was posting there in a language that’s very similar to American, so it wasn't totally unintelligible to the American forum members (at least to those who can read Cyrillic).

Personally, I think Bulgarian is pretty much gibberish to most American members, and even being able to read Cyrillic wouldn't help all that much. 😁

analogwalker5 said:Besides that, I was replying to another Bulgarian forum user in that message

Except he was actually writing in Latin script and in American. 😁
Condescending, disrespectful, and passive-aggressive behavior in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Casey Bennett said:Just report any post you find offensive. If there’s no response within 24 hours, then you can head over to the community lounge to vent.

I really want to emphasize this point to the author. Go ahead and file a report, then just hang tight. If nothing happens, feel free to shoot a private message to a supermod or bring it up in the community lounge. Also, definitely take a look at the moderator's post right above mine.
Is castration a taboo topic? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Emma, thanks so much, but I really think this conversation would be better suited for the Pet forum, so could we please move over there? There's actually a master thread where you can just copy and paste everything you wrote here. 🙂
Is castration a taboo topic? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
If you want to get a new thread started, just reach out and chat with our moderator, Sarah Miller. You can always send her a quick DM if that’s easier for you.
Is castration a taboo topic? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
electricstag16 said:When I said "admin," I just meant the person in charge—like, is that the moderator? I'm still pretty new here and haven't quite picked up all the lingo yet. Thanks for clearing that up!

Well, we all have our roles to play! The hierarchy basically goes moderator, then super-moderator, and finally the admin. The moderators handle the day-to-day stuff like managing the subforums, while the super-moderators deal with appeals and weigh in on the big-picture decisions, like tweaking the site rules or adding new sections. Then you've got the admins, who can step in and override those decisions if they feel it's absolutely necessary. Ultimately, the admin has the final say, though they don't always feel the need to chime in if they're already on board with what the mods and super-mods have decided.

Before you go ahead and start that new thread, just make sure to check in with the moderator first. We try to avoid duplicate topics here, and once an old thread gets locked, you aren't supposed to just spin up a brand new one without asking.
Is castration a taboo topic? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
electricstag16 said:Alright then, I'll go ahead and start a brand new thread, and I promise to be on my absolute best behavior—let's just see how long I can actually keep it up.

You better clear that with the moderator first.
Is castration a taboo topic? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
electricstag16 said:I just asked the admins a simple question, and instead of getting a straight answer from them, I get all sorts of "responses" from everyone else except the actual admins.

Look, the standard procedure here is that moderators handle the responses—ideally, it’s the specific mod who was handling the thread and whose decision you're actually questioning. Then, a supermod steps in to review the appeal, like MS. Pringles did here, to judge if any mistakes were made and correct things if necessary. The admins aren't obligated to jump in if they feel the moderator and supermod made the right call, and honestly, I think they nailed it this time. The issue wasn't really about what you were asking, but rather the way you were going about it—your tone toward other users and how you reacted to the warnings from the mods. We tried to point out where you were going wrong and even gave you some pointers to follow, but you just brushed them off. Ultimately, the thread had to be locked because, frankly, that kind of back-and-forth just doesn't work for a healthy community.
Religion & Anti-religion subforum: the same old crowd and Meadow in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Justin Harris12 said:I’ve started this thread because I need to vent about the Religion subforum.
There are several fundamental issues with the Religion section right now.

First off, the subforum itself doesn't actually function as a space for religious discussion at all. Second, there is a specific group of users who constantly poison and troll every single thread that gets opened, regardless of whether they actually know anything about the subject matter; they just fabricate nonsense, and when serious users try to refute their lies with actual evidence, they simply ignore them by doubling down on more falsehoods and repetitive mantras until the more thoughtful contributors are completely exhausted. Lately, the Religion subforum has spiraled out of control, turning into nothing more than a breeding ground for insults and endless bickering.

The third issue involves the moderator, Meadow, who openly sides with the exact group I just described while simultaneously demonstrating an undeniable intolerance toward Muslims within the subforum.

In this thread, I intend to present evidence regarding the poor moderation of the Religion subforum and how certain users, alongside Meadow, are effectively destroying it.

I’d like to remind everyone of the appeal I filed regarding the Aisha thread and how poorly it was handled; what could have been a productive discussion was completely ruined. There wasn't even a real debate in that thread from the moment it opened—just a few posts before everything was moved from another thread's off-topic section. You all took the moderator's side in that instance, and now the thread is gone; if nothing is done, this will happen to every other decent topic on the site.

Expect the same group of trolls to show up here to try and obstruct this complaint as well.

I attempted to speak with Meadow directly to explain my frustrations with her moderation style in the appropriate feedback thread, but she shut me down curtly, telling me to take my complaints exclusively to the administrator via PM and warning me not to reply to her posts again.

posts 2356, 2357, 2358, 2359

A recent example is a post by an anonymous user on a serious topic titled "The Supernatural Works of Muhammad," where they posted a caricature of Muhammad to mock him, followed immediately by a post from another user saying, "Wow, you're so wicked," accompanied by a laughing emoji.

posts 64 and 65

posts 142, 143, 163
And finally, look at the moderator's post at 147.

posts 2967, 2971, 2972, 2974, 2975, 2977

posts 369, 371, 373, 375, 380

These are just the most recent threads and posts; I have clicked the report button countless times to no avail. How long is this mockery of believers going to be permitted in the Religion subforum?
Where does the freedom of atheists end and the protection of a believer's dignity begin? Is it really acceptable to ridicule someone just because they believe in aliens, God, or anything else that hasn't been scientifically proven yet?

Do those who don't believe in God or religion have the right to spread blatant lies under the guise of free speech whenever they feel like it?

I sincerely hope this is reviewed seriously, even though I am just one ordinary user.

Look, the Religion subforum wasn't designed to be a safe space where you can't criticize religions or faith. If people want deep, faith-based discussions, we have the Theology and Religious Practice subforum for that.

Justin Harris12 said:I’ve started this thread because I need to vent about the Religion subforum.
There are several fundamental issues with the Religion section right now.

First off, the subforum itself doesn't actually function as a space for religious discussion at all. Second, there is a specific group of users who constantly poison and troll every single thread that gets opened, regardless of whether they actually know anything about the subject matter; they just fabricate nonsense, and when serious users try to refute their lies with actual evidence, they simply ignore them by doubling down on more falsehoods and repetitive mantras until the more thoughtful contributors are completely exhausted. Lately, the Religion subforum has spiraled out of control, turning into nothing more than a breeding ground for insults and endless bickering.

The third issue involves the moderator, Meadow, who openly sides with the exact group I just described while simultaneously demonstrating an undeniable intolerance toward Muslims within the subforum.

In this thread, I intend to present evidence regarding the poor moderation of the Religion subforum and how certain users, alongside Meadow, are effectively destroying it.

I’d like to remind everyone of the appeal I filed regarding the Aisha thread and how poorly it was handled; what could have been a productive discussion was completely ruined. There wasn't even a real debate in that thread from the moment it opened—just a few posts before everything was moved from another thread's off-topic section. You all took the moderator's side in that instance, and now the thread is gone; if nothing is done, this will happen to every other decent topic on the site.

Expect the same group of trolls to show up here to try and obstruct this complaint as well.

I attempted to speak with Meadow directly to explain my frustrations with her moderation style in the appropriate feedback thread, but she shut me down curtly, telling me to take my complaints exclusively to the administrator via PM and warning me not to reply to her posts again.

posts 2356, 2357, 2358, 2359

A recent example is a post by an anonymous user on a serious topic titled "The Supernatural Works of Muhammad," where they posted a caricature of Muhammad to mock him, followed immediately by a post from another user saying, "Wow, you're so wicked," accompanied by a laughing emoji.

posts 64 and 65

posts 142, 143, 163
And finally, look at the moderator's post at 147.

posts 2967, 2971, 2972, 2974, 2975, 2977

posts 369, 371, 373, 375, 380

These are just the most recent threads and posts; I have clicked the report button countless times to no avail. How long is this mockery of believers going to be permitted in the Religion subforum?
Where does the freedom of atheists end and the protection of a believer's dignity begin? Is it really acceptable to ridicule someone just because they believe in aliens, God, or anything else that hasn't been scientifically proven yet?

Do those who don't believe in God or religion have the right to spread blatant lies under the guise of free speech whenever they feel like it?

I sincerely hope this is reviewed seriously, even though I am just one ordinary user.

Now, you should definitely report Trolling, but expressing an opinion that clashes with religious teachings, questions them, or even denies them? That isn't Trolling.

Justin Harris12 said:I’ve started this thread because I need to vent about the Religion subforum.
There are several fundamental issues with the Religion section right now.

First off, the subforum itself doesn't actually function as a space for religious discussion at all. Second, there is a specific group of users who constantly poison and troll every single thread that gets opened, regardless of whether they actually know anything about the subject matter; they just fabricate nonsense, and when serious users try to refute their lies with actual evidence, they simply ignore them by doubling down on more falsehoods and repetitive mantras until the more thoughtful contributors are completely exhausted. Lately, the Religion subforum has spiraled out of control, turning into nothing more than a breeding ground for insults and endless bickering.

The third issue involves the moderator, Meadow, who openly sides with the exact group I just described while simultaneously demonstrating an undeniable intolerance toward Muslims within the subforum.

In this thread, I intend to present evidence regarding the poor moderation of the Religion subforum and how certain users, alongside Meadow, are effectively destroying it.

I’d like to remind everyone of the appeal I filed regarding the Aisha thread and how poorly it was handled; what could have been a productive discussion was completely ruined. There wasn't even a real debate in that thread from the moment it opened—just a few posts before everything was moved from another thread's off-topic section. You all took the moderator's side in that instance, and now the thread is gone; if nothing is done, this will happen to every other decent topic on the site.

Expect the same group of trolls to show up here to try and obstruct this complaint as well.

I attempted to speak with Meadow directly to explain my frustrations with her moderation style in the appropriate feedback thread, but she shut me down curtly, telling me to take my complaints exclusively to the administrator via PM and warning me not to reply to her posts again.

posts 2356, 2357, 2358, 2359

A recent example is a post by an anonymous user on a serious topic titled "The Supernatural Works of Muhammad," where they posted a caricature of Muhammad to mock him, followed immediately by a post from another user saying, "Wow, you're so wicked," accompanied by a laughing emoji.

posts 64 and 65

posts 142, 143, 163
And finally, look at the moderator's post at 147.

posts 2967, 2971, 2972, 2974, 2975, 2977

posts 369, 371, 373, 375, 380

These are just the most recent threads and posts; I have clicked the report button countless times to no avail. How long is this mockery of believers going to be permitted in the Religion subforum?
Where does the freedom of atheists end and the protection of a believer's dignity begin? Is it really acceptable to ridicule someone just because they believe in aliens, God, or anything else that hasn't been scientifically proven yet?

Do those who don't believe in God or religion have the right to spread blatant lies under the guise of free speech whenever they feel like it?

I sincerely hope this is reviewed seriously, even though I am just one ordinary user.

Honestly, Tyler Cruz32 is incredibly dedicated to the Religion subforum, and from what I've seen, there haven't been any major inconsistencies or signs of bias. I actually want to take this moment to thank her for all the hard work she puts in to keep the Religion subforum a civilized place.

Justin Harris12 said:I’ve started this thread because I need to vent about the Religion subforum.
There are several fundamental issues with the Religion section right now.

First off, the subforum itself doesn't actually function as a space for religious discussion at all. Second, there is a specific group of users who constantly poison and troll every single thread that gets opened, regardless of whether they actually know anything about the subject matter; they just fabricate nonsense, and when serious users try to refute their lies with actual evidence, they simply ignore them by doubling down on more falsehoods and repetitive mantras until the more thoughtful contributors are completely exhausted. Lately, the Religion subforum has spiraled out of control, turning into nothing more than a breeding ground for insults and endless bickering.

The third issue involves the moderator, Meadow, who openly sides with the exact group I just described while simultaneously demonstrating an undeniable intolerance toward Muslims within the subforum.

In this thread, I intend to present evidence regarding the poor moderation of the Religion subforum and how certain users, alongside Meadow, are effectively destroying it.

I’d like to remind everyone of the appeal I filed regarding the Aisha thread and how poorly it was handled; what could have been a productive discussion was completely ruined. There wasn't even a real debate in that thread from the moment it opened—just a few posts before everything was moved from another thread's off-topic section. You all took the moderator's side in that instance, and now the thread is gone; if nothing is done, this will happen to every other decent topic on the site.

Expect the same group of trolls to show up here to try and obstruct this complaint as well.

I attempted to speak with Meadow directly to explain my frustrations with her moderation style in the appropriate feedback thread, but she shut me down curtly, telling me to take my complaints exclusively to the administrator via PM and warning me not to reply to her posts again.

posts 2356, 2357, 2358, 2359

A recent example is a post by an anonymous user on a serious topic titled "The Supernatural Works of Muhammad," where they posted a caricature of Muhammad to mock him, followed immediately by a post from another user saying, "Wow, you're so wicked," accompanied by a laughing emoji.

posts 64 and 65

posts 142, 143, 163
And finally, look at the moderator's post at 147.

posts 2967, 2971, 2972, 2974, 2975, 2977

posts 369, 371, 373, 375, 380

These are just the most recent threads and posts; I have clicked the report button countless times to no avail. How long is this mockery of believers going to be permitted in the Religion subforum?
Where does the freedom of atheists end and the protection of a believer's dignity begin? Is it really acceptable to ridicule someone just because they believe in aliens, God, or anything else that hasn't been scientifically proven yet?

Do those who don't believe in God or religion have the right to spread blatant lies under the guise of free speech whenever they feel like it?

I sincerely hope this is reviewed seriously, even though I am just one ordinary user.

I really don't see any truth to your accusation that some people are getting preferential treatment over others. Tyler Cruz32 communicated with you, sure, but at the end of the day, the decision rests with her. If she makes a final call, you can't just keep reopening the same argument in a new thread. If you're truly unhappy, you should take it up with the supermoderators or the admins.
Posts appearing in an unknown language in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Generally speaking, we don't allow posting in foreign languages like the ones you mentioned, though we might make an exception or allow it partially depending on the context. It really comes down to the specific situation—it’s a totally different story if someone is just flooding the boards with Mandarin spam versus someone just dropping a single post. Please, go ahead and send over the links to the posts that are bothering you so we can take a look and check things out.
Religion & Anti-religion subforum: the same old crowd and Meadow in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Justin Harris12 said:Here’s the latest post where some user is getting away with talking trash about me and Muhammad. They’ll probably claim it’s all under "freedom of speech," while I’m certain they’ll try to find some technicality to get me flagged—maybe claiming an image is too big or something equally ridiculous. That's what I'm talking about.

image

http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?t=480339&page=123

Regarding the police, let me be clear: I didn't say I was heading down to the station tonight. I was supposed to take everything over this evening, but I didn't make it. Tomorrow, though, I’m going to head over to the local Islamic community center a bit earlier to have a serious talk with them. I've already been in contact with them, and since they have people involved in politics and even on the City Council, I'm confident that if there's enough evidence, they will report this to the authorities. The police might not be able to unmask everyone behind these racist posts, but one thing is certain: they can shut down any platform that spreads racial and interfaith hatred. Don't kid yourselves into thinking you're running some untouchable site that exists outside of American law. If there's sufficient evidence, a court expert could easily request a temporary injunction to shut things down. I don't know exactly how it will play out, I'm just laying out the possibilities.

We'll see how Tyler Cruz32 and Nicole James respond, and we'll see exactly how things unfold on the Religion subforum firsthand.

Just report the post and give it 24 hours. Honestly, there’s really no point in rushing straight to the PŽK moderators the second something happens and then trying to argue a few minutes later that they didn't sanction it for one reason or another.

Let’s all just take a breath, calm down, and stop poking each other with these constant provocations; we'll look into what's actually going on.

As far as reporting things to the police or the news media goes, you should absolutely do whatever you feel is necessary, but please, don't come in here making threats.
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Brian Edwards78 said:I’m right there with you. It’s an Exercise in futility. Honestly, just like everything else lately. It always feels like people are just talking big without any substance behind it.👋

At the end of the day, I've just got your word and my own conscience; there isn't much I can actually do about any of this after all these years have passed.
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
You can find all my threads right there on my profile, so feel free to hunt through my clones if you need to. Until then, I don't see any point in dragging this whole thing out any further.
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
How on earth could you not remember the exact thread they used as the basis for your Permaban? Is that kind of thing just supposed to slip your mind? 😁 I honestly have no clue which username you were using when you tried to appeal the ban, so I can't even track down the specific topic. But hey, since you probably know exactly how many clone accounts you've got running around, it should be pretty easy for you to go hunting for it. 🙂
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
You probably remember the exact title of the thread you started when you were trying to get unbanned, right? I tried looking through your profile to find it, but maybe it was under a different username back then. And just so we're clear, I wasn't the one who pulled the ban on Brian Edwards78.
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Brian Edwards78 said:
The Permaban that was slapped on this account belonging to Brian Edwards78 has been overturned because it was totally unjustified.

Can anyone drop a link to the thread where they actually confirmed all that?
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Brian Edwards78 said:What kind of process does the admin team actually use to decide if a ban was justified or not? Especially in those cases where the initial ban was handed down by an admin themselves.
Do they even bother looking at the arguments or the evidence provided while someone is under a ban, or what's the deal?

Of course they take everything into account! They review the claims from both sides before making a final call. But honestly, that’s a whole different conversation than changing a username or trying to hide your identity. Besides, you totally dodged my actual question.
Changing my username and not hiding it in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Brian Edwards78 said:How on earth is someone supposed to prove they shouldn't have been banned when they can't even post anymore?

We've got the Catch-22 here.

Are we still just talking about hypothetical scenarios and generalities?