CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › rustydrifter10 › Posts

Posts by rustydrifter10

2089 posts shown.

What's the editorial policy regarding Nazism and Nazis? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
wiredangler5 said:It’s true, opening that door creates endless possibilities for this kind of thing. But honestly, we've dealt with reports regarding controversial signatures, locations, or avatars countless times before. Aside from things that are strictly illegal—where there's absolutely no room for debate—we've always handled everything else on a case-by-case basis.
The reason we operated that way was because we didn't want to open Pandora's box by issuing a blanket ban on one specific thing, which would just trigger ten other similar issues and make life incredibly complicated for everyone.
So, those kinds of reports were resolved by looking at the specifics: the context, whether it was actually offensive, the underlying message being sent, and so on...


I actually really enjoyed this little history lesson, though I do need to look over the other sections of this PDF. Look, promoting Nazism or any other criminal ideology is strictly forbidden, but not everything that touches upon them counts as active promotion. While many avatars, signatures, quotes, or locations leave zero doubt about their purpose, many others involve decisions that are much more nuanced and require looking at the situation from multiple angles.

Even though I totally get what Slavko and the Jew were aiming for when they were explaining to wiredangler5 why his signature was considered problematic, I personally don't think there's anything here that warrants us removing it—plus, wiredangler5 explained himself so thoroughly, which I really appreciate. Some people might find it morally questionable, sure, but he isn't breaking the rules.

I actually noticed wiredangler5's signature a long time ago, but since I didn't know who said it, I did a quick Google search. That's how I found out it was part of a motivational speech by one of those Nazi radicals, but even then, I didn't think it needed to be taken down. After this whole thread popped up, I took a closer look at the situation, read through everything you all wrote (you guys actually could have avoided the trolling!), did a bit more digging, and my opinion hasn't changed. There will always be misinterpretations, as some of you pointed out, but that's why we're here—to clear things up and resolve these dilemmas.
New emojis on the forum! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
image - 🙂
image I honestly don't even know how to respond to that one! Just a single emoji? You really went for the minimalist approach there, didn't you? 😂
image Oh, look at that! Just a little ":dama:" to brighten things up. I love the energy!
image 🔥
image Hey there! Just popping in to say hi!
image I honestly can't even begin to describe how much I love this! It’s just one of those things that hits different, you know? Total perfection.
image :(face:
image image shame
image ☕️ Just grabbing a quick coffee!
New emojis on the forum! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
image - 🤦
image Is it a :lolli: or a 🍭?
image - 🕺
image I can't believe I actually said that! My bad.
image Hey there! Should I go with a ":hihot:" or maybe just a ":haha:"?
- 🙂
image So, what’s the move? Are we grabbing a drink 🥃 or heading straight for some tacos 🌮?
image I couldn't agree more!
image - 😒
image I honestly don't even know where to start with this one... just sitting here staring at my screen like, ":there:"! It’s one of those moments where there's just nothing left to say, isn't there? Just a total blank.
New emojis on the forum! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
New topic for our emoji set! I’m going to keep this thread locked, but I wanted to move all the final emoji choices we picked out from this previous thread over here so everything stays organized and easy to find in one spot.
Petition to bring Facebook back in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jack Bishop94 said:Hope it happens fast 🙂 uhhh, what was that 🤦🙂
And why did the :2up: disappear?

Honestly, I'm right there with you! The IT guys actually told me to just bundle up all the emoticons we want into a zip file (which 👋 will then put together for us) and we'll make sure to include the facepalm too. We still have a bunch of other icons that haven't been uploaded yet, so we're going to have to go through them all, clean out the junk, and finalize the list.

As for the :2up: icon, it basically became collateral damage when they were rolling out those 503 and 504 errors. 🙂
Petition to bring Facebook back in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jason Morgan said:How on earth is it possible that nobody seems to have a clue what actually happened with Facebook?
This forum is starting to feel like a David Lynch film.

Don't worry, we'll get it back. 😳 I'm really hoping it happens soon, along with all those new emojis we've been suggesting. Honestly, I'd trade every single one of them just to have Facebook back. 😢
Why was the masculinity thread locked? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Alright, there we go—I've just kicked off a brand new thread for us. I'll see you all over there! 👋
Paul Ruiz86 said:This thread is really just for people who feel like they’ve been swept up in a bandwagon they don't actually belong to—I'm basically asking you guys to just take a breath and stop.

Honestly, this whole thing was perfectly fine yesterday, so I'm not quite sure why you felt the need to reopen this unnecessary debate today.

Paul Ruiz86 said:Feel free to just lock this thread. I've made my point.

Alright then. Thanks.
Paul Ruiz86 said:On that other thread , instead of just messing around, you all had a chance to actually step up and handle things properly. But honestly, you didn't just miss the mark—you actually leaned into it and added a bit of fuel to the fire where it really wasn't needed. Please, let's try not to do that next time—that’s my sincere request.

Look, an admin made one little internal joke that was clearly meant more as a lighthearted jab at the thread starter—who, by the way, was right there in the mix with them. That single post really doesn't warrant its own massive blowout thread; it feels like everything else is totally under control right now, and I don't see any kind of coordinated effort to mock or bully our fellow female users. If you're looking back at the original discussion that kicked this whole thing off, everyone was acting pretty much exactly how they usually do on that PDF, and things settled down quite quickly. I think the moderator even stepped in with a casual little nudge that everyone respected, so the conversation just moved along naturally and kept its usual vibe.
placidorca16 said:For instance, user Leonora is out here comparing feminists to Nazis and calling them "vermin":

Then there's this post by Bailiff—I reported it myself, but the mods just ignored me:

I also flagged this one from Felixx, where he doubles down on women being "intellectually and fundamentally inferior"—same result, obviously: 🙄,

There’s an endless stream of stuff like this in this thread—mostly from Bailiff, but others too. I’ve stopped reporting them since, frankly, it feels like a waste of time.

Looking through the linked posts, I don't see anything that warrants banning anyone. Everyone involved actually expressed their views quite politely and backed them up with solid arguments. Instead of reporting, you could just lean into the spirit of the forum and try countering them with different perspectives to dismantle their points. Not every single statement that doesn't favor women or violates the Constitution is grounds for a ban.

I'm locking this thread now because, like Pringles mentioned, if you want to debate feminism itself, there are plenty of other places to do that. And hey, Strile can always chime in later if they feel like reopening the topic.
Requesting a ban for harassment/insults ☕ in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Alright, you said we could finally wrap this thread up. 😳
The thread was actually reopened yesterday, so we don't really need this specific topic anymore.
Why wasn't this post moderated? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Michelle Phillips54 said:Man, there is just so much unnecessary spamming through reports and DMs. Just take a breath and try not to take these things so personally.

Now that you’ve put that out there in a post, I really hope you're feeling better about everything and that we can finally put this whole chapter behind us. 🙂

I think we definitely can. 🙂
Just venting, but I had to! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Linda King said:I’m officially dropping my complaint—this thread stays alive! It’s up on LDS!

slywolf45 said:Brenda, all the way!

🙂

👋
Social Sciences: "Racism has arguments for... in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The Moderator has already laid out why this thread is being locked, so let's move the conversation over to a more appropriate spot.
Fundraiser for Reddit in Feedback & Suggestions ·
We aren't actually collecting any donations at the moment, but I really want to say a huge thank you to everyone who’s expressed an interest in helping out. It truly means a lot to me, and honestly, I’m counting on your amazing support whenever we decide to get things moving again. 😁
Nicholas King said:Unless, of course, they actually consider "fixing" it to mean just letting the whole thing boil over.

It’s true what they say—one second you're right in the middle of a heated debate, and the next, the admins swoop in and shut the whole thread down before you can even get another word in edgewise.

Nicholas King said:Between that admin-colored font and the absolutely brutal way this was launched, I have to wonder—is there any method to this madness? It feels totally senseless. When you start handing out bans for perfectly harmless posts, or if you decide to swing every bit of moderator power you have at people, it’s going to leave a certain impression, don't you think? I honestly can't stop thinking about this whole concept of monolithism—that idea of everyone being perfectly unified and acting as one single, unbreakable unit. It’s such a heavy topic when you really sit down and chew on it, isn't it? You look at how certain groups try to present themselves to the world, projecting this image of absolute, unwavering solidarity, and it makes you wonder what's actually happening beneath the surface. Is it genuine, heartfelt unity, or is it just a carefully constructed facade designed to make them look stronger than they actually are? To me, it feels like we often mistake conformity for cohesion. There’s a massive difference between people standing together because they truly believe in the same thing and people standing together because they're too afraid to stand apart. When everything is forced into this rigid, monolithic mold, you lose all that beautiful, messy individuality that actually makes a community vibrant. It’s almost like trying to force an entire orchestra to play only one single note; sure, it would be perfectly "unified," but man, it would be incredibly boring! I’d much rather deal with the chaos of different voices coming together than the sterile silence of a monolith.Honestly, looking back as far as I can remember, you guys haven't actually settled a single thing...

And here we go again—just more finger-pointing and petty insults thrown around just for the sake of tearing someone down. Honestly, if this is how people want to communicate, I’m just not interested in playing along.
Morgan Carter said:Alright, then you tell me—out of all those posts, how many actually ended up getting a warning or a ban?

I honestly can't give you an answer because I don't have the direct links handy, and I have no clue where they're buried in this thread. Look, Scotsman is the supermod over in the Politics section, so if he hasn't responded to the appeals yet, maybe just shoot him a quick DM with some clearer directions on how to track down those specific posts.
Nicholas King said:I'm going to quote myself here, just to add a little emphasis with some bolding:

Honestly, with some people you can get away with anything, and with others, even the smallest thing triggers a reaction. It’s just how it goes sometimes.

Morgan Carter said:So, what I'm trying to understand is how it's possible that after forty-five warnings about what's happening in this thread, you still haven't seen the point in actually looking into what's going on.


Look, if there's an official appeal open on the Admin Forum, then either a supermod or an admin has already looked into it, or they're about to. It's been explained a million times: hit the report button, and if nobody responds within 24 hours, then you escalate it further.

Nicholas King said:It seems like everything is perfectly fine according to the boss, I guess.

As long as that's the case, this is where we'll stay. Don't get me wrong, I don't have any grand illusions, no hidden agendas, and I'm certainly not looking for a fight—I simply responded because I was asked to provide concrete evidence.

Alright, then I guess we've settled this. 🤷
northerncyclist2 said:I mean, seriously, how much do we have to pay Anderlon to get a status like that? Honestly, I wouldn't even mind being some untouchable outlaw in the middle of nowhere where nobody can lay a finger on me.

Look, if you've actually got ideas like that, just take them straight to him; don't come in here trying to troll the thread with this stuff.