For the past three years, I have been training strictly at home using a bench, some dumbbells, and a barbell. It wasn't until two years ago that I finally committed to a complete overhaul of my diet—though I'll admit, I still indulge in an occasional slice of pizza or a burger from Five Guys every now and then. 😁 I have successfully reached my target physique, and now the challenge shifts toward maintaining these results. 🙂
I caught it yesterday. What an incredible film. It’s pure, visceral, Barker-esque horror. Given how poorly previous adaptations of Barker's stories have turned out, this was a genuine shock to the system.
There is one specific moment that actually made me laugh, despite the fact that it takes place on a train crawling with bodies hanging from meat hooks; they end up standing face-to-face just like a classic Western standoff. 🙂
Donnie Darko is an absolute masterpiece, but this? This feels like some cheap sequel to an American ninja flick produced without even a hint of Dudikof's influence.😁
Sexual Magika and tantra aren't necessarily tied to emotions.
You can achieve that without even touching tantra, and honestly, you could stretch the timeline out much longer than what you’ve suggested here.
The core issue here is that people often gravitate toward tantra solely because they are chasing a specific byproduct, completely oblivious to the fact that the practice itself will fundamentally reshape their entire existence in ways they didn't anticipate. It’s the same pattern we see with other disciplines: individuals latch onto the secondary effects and suddenly find their whole lives turned upside down—essentially being 😁 when they never intended to be.
Now, I don't want to sound like I'm bragging, but... sure, it can take longer, but I have no interest in those marathon sessions that drag on for three hours or more.
Andrew Sanchez572 said:Well, goodness me, someone here simply has to be the resident ignoramus. I suppose that role falls to me 👋
Sean Cruz, please understand that magic and tantra aren't merely techniques designed to enhance one's sexual relationship with a partner—that is my primary point, and I believe it is an essential distinction to make, as most people tend to conflate the two. Both disciplines focus on accelerating karma and achieving mastery over oneself, a process where the regulation of sexual energy plays an absolutely monumental role. I certainly have nothing against your spiritual path, provided that path consists primarily of finding deeper intimacy with your partner. 👍
That being said, I am quite curious... what exactly led you to conclude that I practice sex without any emotional connection? 😕
I would argue, however, that sexual intimacy does indeed improve to some degree, simply because it grants partners the ability to manage their climax, allowing them to sustain the encounter for longer periods.
Instead of three minutes, you could be looking at thirty.😁
Andrew Sanchez572 said:Do you happen to have any other reading recommendations beyond what you’ve already listed? 🙂 (Kartikey is a warrior god 🙂)
Staying true to the spirit of this discussion, I might suggest reading "Demons of the flash". It isn't quite as groundbreaking as the work mentioned above; rather, it serves as a compilation of existing literature on the subject. However, the authors fail to cite their sources—which, frankly, is quite shameful 😁
Andrew Sanchez572 said:😂 I don't practice masturbation with a completely blank mind; rather, I aim to clear my mind of any unnecessary distractions prior to the actual ritual itself. Actually, it isn't even possible for me to truly empty my mind—I suppose what I really meant was quieting it down...
Wait, why aren't there any men here? Is Kartikey a woman? 🍿
Hmm, yes, I suppose the username caused some confusion.
Andrew Sanchez572 said:To begin with, I believe it is best to start with self-pleasure. One should truly get to know oneself before attempting to explore these things with a partner.
While it might sound unusual, using a sexual position where your head hangs off the edge of the bed—allowing the blood to rush to your head—is actually a fantastic technique for opening the third eye. You can attempt to meditate on the third eye, focusing on its opening and such... any meditation centered on the third eye works exceptionally well in this position. Of course, if you happen to have any underlying health concerns, one ought to approach these practices with a bit more caution.
The rituals themselves follow a specific structure, much like any other practice; first, you perform a banishing and protection ritual, sit for a moment in meditation to clear the mind, and then proceed to masturbation, or rather, sexual stimulation. Once you reach a state where the body no longer requires physical stimulus, you begin the visualization process, which should culminate precisely at the moment of orgasm. This is followed by relaxation and a visualization of the ritual's conclusion. Finally, you perform the banishing ritual once more, and that is that.
Now, as for the visualizations... there are many varieties to choose from. They can range from standard visualizations for energizing the body and chakras to drawing inspiration from Tarot cards. You could even try living through a myth by identifying with the protagonist... the possibilities are truly limitless.
Another excellent resource is Secrets of Western Tantra. It contains numerous described rituals and very useful advice. It even features an excellent chapter regarding BDSM and its application within sexual magic 👍 as well as explanations and descriptions of sensory deprivation and its uses. Truly wonderful books 🙏
And one absolutely ingenious ritual is the Ritual Ring Kabbalah. But really, one must read the entire book to fully grasp it.
My own recommendation for men would be to sit on a firm surface, maintaining an upright posture that leans slightly forward at approximately an 80° angle.
Of course, one must first manage to empty the mind, which is a task that proves to be quite difficult.
It strikes me as somewhat peculiar that we are discussing sexuality without any men present in the conversation 🤔 😁
Andrew Sanchez572 said:To begin with, I believe it is best to start with self-pleasure. One should truly get to know oneself before attempting to explore these things with a partner.
While it might sound unusual, using a sexual position where your head hangs off the edge of the bed—allowing the blood to rush to your head—is actually a fantastic technique for opening the third eye. You can attempt to meditate on the third eye, focusing on its opening and such... any meditation centered on the third eye works exceptionally well in this position. Of course, if you happen to have any underlying health concerns, one ought to approach these practices with a bit more caution.
The rituals themselves follow a specific structure, much like any other practice; first, you perform a banishing and protection ritual, sit for a moment in meditation to clear the mind, and then proceed to masturbation, or rather, sexual stimulation. Once you reach a state where the body no longer requires physical stimulus, you begin the visualization process, which should culminate precisely at the moment of orgasm. This is followed by relaxation and a visualization of the ritual's conclusion. Finally, you perform the banishing ritual once more, and that is that.
Now, as for the visualizations... there are many varieties to choose from. They can range from standard visualizations for energizing the body and chakras to drawing inspiration from Tarot cards. You could even try living through a myth by identifying with the protagonist... the possibilities are truly limitless.
Another excellent resource is Secrets of Western Tantra. It contains numerous described rituals and very useful advice. It even features an excellent chapter regarding BDSM and its application within sexual magic 👍 as well as explanations and descriptions of sensory deprivation and its uses. Truly wonderful books 🙏
And one absolutely ingenious ritual is the Ritual Ring Kabbalah. But really, one must read the entire book to fully grasp it.
I have one question... how on earth can one actually begin masturbating with an entirely empty mind?
Andrew Sanchez572 said:There is also an excellent chapter regarding BDSM and its application within sexual magic.
The book is decent, but if one truly intends to engage in BDSM practices, then it is absolutely essential to read the book "Carnal Alchemy". Those practices carry significant risks.
It is truly remarkable how people obsess over the specifics of who is or isn't "doing the work."
Heaven forbid you suggest to anyone that they should commit to an hour of meditation; suddenly, everyone becomes an expert, spinning these elaborate, sophisticated theories about why such a practice is entirely unnecessary.
Am I being the only one seeing the early signs of this chaotic, eclectic Zen movement emerging? 😁
Now, I certainly don't want to ruin anyone's pleasant little fantasy, but the first thing that struck me was the fact that this woman lived in a harem. I believe most people have a basic understanding of what a harem actually entails, and frankly, it seems to me that when individuals find themselves with zero agency in their lives, they tend to cling to these romanticized, fairy-tale notions just to justify their own circumstances.
casualtiger2 said:Whoa, hold up. This isn't the "holidays and greetings" thread—though, thanks 😁, I appreciate it . I’m looking for your honest, subjective takes here—give me the deep critiques and the creative sparks alike. And don't be shy; I want at least half a page of actual substance. I'm hunting for Shiva and Vishnu (Brahme is already spoken for 😬). As bluemason3 would say—if we're short on guys, maybe throw in a Bozic...
The floor is yours.
It seems bluemason3 just voiced exactly what I’ve been thinking.
This platform has evolved into a site for the masses. As such, while it functions perfectly well as an information hub, it becomes increasingly difficult to sustain any sort of high-level, meaningful debate—even if you do stumble upon the occasional gem of wisdom.
The absolute priority here must be the regular purging of trolls, bots, and the intellectually vacant.
It has potential, I suppose, but the trailers strike me as being far too somber. It appears they intend to bypass the comedic essence of Goku’s personality, much less the sexual fantasies of his mentor. 😁
mistybison said:Just so you know! 😁 I haven't visited this section in quite a while, and I am genuinely surprised by what I see. People are starting threads about drugs and digging up ancient discussions from years ago—posts written by users who left this community ages ago. Back then, the forum felt more intimate, and there wasn't nearly as much need for the heavy-handed moderation we deal with today. In the past, debates centered on different spiritual paths, but now people just argue for the sake of arguing, with absolutely zero spirituality to be found in their posts.😁
ontheedge is right: this forum has become twisted, and we true spiritual seekers🙂 😁, must distance ourselves from this Sodom and Gomorrah.🧐
It is exactly the same in the real world; the only difference is that in reality, we conduct ourselves with culture and velvet gloves, whereas here, it is nothing more than an open fighting ring.😁
That was an absolutely stellar film. It’s one of those rare cinematic experiences that caught me completely off guard; I initially sat down to watch it just to kill some time, fully expecting it to be a tedious bore.
Honestly, even now, I get chills just thinking back to that plot...😲
gentlemaker6 said:A rather pathetic attempt to find scientific evidence to validate my claim, only to stumble in your final paragraph in your usual fashion. I am not building my idea that we are all one on what you are saying. I don't care about that at all. I know that science will one day find absolute proof of my words. Absolute. Clear. Pure. The fact that they cannot do so now doesn't give them the right to deny it. And you will witness it, if you live long enough, by reading about it. You certainly won't discover it yourself, as you aren't a scientist, merely a common nerd.
I honestly have no idea what basis you have for being a moderator on this subforum. You are about as spiritual as a wet rock on the side of the road, and your grasp of the subject matter is roughly that of a half-drunk teenager.
You’re just throwing around labels for New Agers without any real logic, trying to fit everything into categories you can't even define. Not to mention how much you're sucking up to the moderator. I suppose you two need each other for support.
For the record, I am publicly stating that I am not among those who hate you; I don't send you emails, DMs, or anything of the sort. I simply pity you.
I am on your side, and there is nothing I can do about it. I have to seek God, as He exists within me as well. I don't know what role you play in my life, but I certainly won't be playing it for much longer.
Not only are you an expert, but you're clairvoyant too. Impressive.
You come along like an aspirin for their dogma. Yet, you are the biggest dogmatist here. You must be some kind of spy.
It did happen, but it has happened many more times where I think of someone and then don't call them or run into them. It's standard statistical distribution, at least in my case. You might not believe me, but prompted by certain accounts, I made a concerted effort to remember as many such instances as possible, and I didn't see them as anomalies. What you are describing is called selective memory, and when we aren't conscious of it, it's a brain mechanism that results in errors in judgment. It's quite specific and common in geriatrics. Extreme, even.
Based on behavior, appearance, and various other cues, the brain constructs a primary image. Our eyes feed us an overwhelming amount of data; the brain absorbs and processes all of it, yet we only ever perceive the tip of the iceberg. From that massive subconscious "ocean" of stored information, the brain synthesizes an opinion and presents it to our conscious mind. It is a fascinating organ. Judging by one or two short posts, I wouldn't be able to pin down your "type," but the more I read, the more complete the picture becomes. Of course, that picture isn't necessarily the truth. It’s merely the result of what passed through your brain's internal censorship to end up online, combined with how my own brain interprets those specific fragments. It can vary drastically. Occasionally, it hits the mark. But when?
Of course! As I mentioned, there is so much happening within the brain that we only experience a tiny fraction of it consciously. Since *Star Trek* is currently trending, consider it like the operations of an entire starship compared to the limited data available via a single interface. Most of the heavy lifting happens in the background, while only a small portion surfaces. This is precisely how inventions occur. A person perceives something, triggering a cascade of internal processing that eventually emerges into consciousness as a useful result. Intuition functions on this exact principle. That is why one should never dismiss it. Intuition is a product of our biological hardware and carries genuine information. It deserves to be approached and analyzed rather than discarded as junk—because it certainly isn't junk. It’s not as if psychology doesn't align with intuition...
In that case, you failed to recognize an anomaly. Better luck next time. It simply highlights your way of thinking. You seem solely intent on proving that everything resides within the brain and that it is the ultimate carrier of existence. You fail to see that the brain is essentially just a high-end hard drive used for storing programs and data. It does not grant life. Like any other organ or system in the body, it has its role in sustaining the life that is the spirit or soul.
So, little moderators, you have grown arrogant and are running wild on your own forum. By all means, enjoy yourselves. I have no intention of wasting any more of my time or wisdom on you. You are the fate of this forum, and because of you, it has lost all its charm.
It’s the same old story, isn't it? When you can't find any actual substance to argue against, you resort to cheap personal insults that have nothing to do with the discussion at hand. But fine, if it makes you feel better. At least you've finally proven that your rhetoric isn't backed by any real integrity, because someone who actually stood behind their convictions wouldn't be sinking to such low levels of petty hostility.