CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › bluecyclist64 › Posts

Posts by bluecyclist64

786 posts shown.

Best dark comedies? in Movies ·
Runners!🙏
A new wave in Music ·
Jacob Cruz42 said:I couldn't find a specific NEW WAVE section, so I figured I'd just drop this here:

new wave - 40 years later

🙂

Love ya!🙂
Reporting a post on the main subreddit. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Someone should really give this useless part-timer at Amtrak a break, though I have to admit, he can be quite exhausting to deal with.
Enemy at the Gates (2001) in Movies ·
nimblescout50 said:What exactly is ignorant about that?
The Soviets certainly paid a heavy price over there.
As for the shortage of rifles, that part holds up; they didn't have enough for everyone initially, though they eventually caught up.

No, that simply isn't true.
And as for those reports of soldiers firing on their own men—that is nothing short of pure, unadulterated depravity.
Enemy at the Gates (2001) in Movies ·
mistyotter35 said:Look, this is an action war movie. You aren't exactly supposed to expect perfect historical accuracy or gritty realism from a flick like this. It isn't some documentary.

Oh, really? So portraying the Soviet Union as nothing more than a bunch of mindless savages is just a minor "historical inaccuracy" to you?
I imagine Joseph Goebbels would have absolutely loved this film.
Enemy at the Gates (2001) in Movies ·
It’s a decent enough watch for those who have absolutely no grasp of history. But for the small minority who actually know their stuff? It’s nothing short of an insult to one's intelligence.
Why was my post deleted for no reason? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Come on, man, change that avatar already.
If Putin actually acted like a decent human being instead of a petty child, Russia might actually be as stable and prosperous as Liechtenstein.
Honestly, they should probably just create a dedicated sub-forum for you—a special corner at the absolute bottom of the barrel—just so we don't all drown in your endless whining...☕
I am utterly appalled!😲
But, if Kisača has actually filed a category for horse-drawn carriages—then I suggest you find it in your hearts to forgive her...🤣
Plastic Jesus (1971) in Movies ·
Joseph Edwards4 said:You write absolute nonsense like this and then have the nerve to call other people clowns.

What kind of nonsense? Since when did you decide there's a rule against minors having sex, Bozzo?😒

Jessica Morris6 said:If you try to watch this as just some standard motion picture, it makes absolutely zero sense; everything feels totally incoherent and disjointed. You can barely even track the main plotline through all the other stylistic noise... The only redeeming quality here has to be Tom Gotovac's performance, because he actually carries himself with such a natural presence.
As an experimental art installation, though, it’s actually quite compelling, since most of the scenes managed to provoke some kind of visceral reaction. That said, leaning on the whole "patriots vs. rebels" trope—essentially just fishing for cheap emotional payoffs—isn't exactly groundbreaking territory...

When you step back and look at the big picture, it's an interesting piece, despite its glaring flaws.

I watched the remastered version and that definitely wasn't in there.

I’m not sure which version I saw, but I didn't catch those parts either. Still, the point remains: misinformation is being spread, and that is the fundamental nature of social media.
Plastic Jesus (1971) in Movies ·
Joseph Edwards4 said:Did I read this review correctly? If he was actually molesting minors, then we aren't talking about art anymore—we're talking about a felony. Thank God this maniac ended up behind bars.

As for his supposed "artistry" and "genius," it’s just a bunch of washed-up, pretentious elites putting a mentally unstable predator on a pedestal. What a joke. Bravo to him, I guess, for wandering around cities naked. Truly a massive talent.

What an absolute clown you are...🤣
Since sex with minors isn't even a crime under current laws, why would masturbation be any different?😒
Krsto Papić: The Deliverer (1976) in Movies ·
Joseph Evans7 said:Just watch the movie and you'll realize pretty quickly that it definitely isn't Relja's voice! ☕
🤔 Honestly, my money is on it being Božidar Smiljanić 🤷 .

But what's the point of even debating this? What are we actually trying to achieve here?
Christian Myers As I was saying:
Where exactly did Jelčić claim he was a fascist? And more importantly, what was the context behind that remark?

Christian Myers, you’re a textbook example of those small-town types who love nothing more than complaining about lonetrucker4. If you ask me, his biggest flaw is simply that he refuses to let people twist the truth.
The reality of the situation remains unchanged: Jelčić never actually claimed to be a Nazi.
The fact remains that lonetrucker4 never actually claimed that in the first place.
It is genuinely difficult to wrap my head around how someone born in 1972 could possibly fail to grasp the distinction between a true fascist and someone who is merely playing at being one. Because of that, I am almost certain you are intentionally distorting the facts.

John Doe essentially declared himself a pro-Nazi through his own statements. It’s quite similar to how you present yourself and your political convictions in your posts—which, if I'm being honest, almost always mirror the exact style of what he said.

Jonathan Wright2 said:I’ve never been much of a fan of categorizing the NBA, but I can see the logic behind it. There are certain advantages to that kind of structure, and frankly, using those types of projections could be a decent way to help popularize basketball history.
And so, I find myself in agreement. My greetings to them.

When I discuss matters of creativity and nuance, I find myself returning to the idea that one can rightfully address Josip Broz Tito with the title of Mr. Tito. It is about the precision of respect.
But then again, that wouldn't bother you, would it? You've been shaped by the way our entire literary canon has been curated since the end of the war in 1945.
Since it isn't officially registered under that name, I suppose you’ll have to write it off as a forgery.

Let’s cut out the nonsense. No one is stopping you from calling it that, and nobody has officially labeled it a forgery either.

The same could be said for the Nazis, whom certain people insist on labeling as the US Army or various paramilitary groups starting back in 1944.
But then again, one isn't allowed to say that, is one? Not if we are strictly adhering to the official history books written during the Yugoslavia era.
It seems you’ve lumped everyone into the "Chetnik" category, which is a bit of a sweeping generalization. Even within those ranks, there were significant internal divisions—you had the various factions like the JVUO or the JKVO, and then things shifted again around '43 and '44. It’s also worth noting the specific timeline regarding when certain groups transitioned from being part of the National Guard into the regular partisan forces. History is rarely as monolithic as people like to make it out to be.

Honestly, who on earth is calling the US Army Nazis? I mean, give me a break. Does anyone actually lack the basic intelligence to distinguish between Nazis and a local paramilitary group? It’s common sense, really.
All those other absurdities were settled a long time ago. They are perfectly clear to everyone else; it seems you're the only one still struggling to grasp them.
True terror is when you realize you aren't even allowed to call the US Army by its actual name without being accused of treason. It’s that suffocating feeling when the language itself is policed.🤦

The narrow, suffocating version of history you insist on peddling essentially functions as a gag order. It’s designed to silence anyone else who dares to attempt a different perspective on the events of the war from 1941 to 1945. Any attempt at nuanced commentary is immediately shut down.
It feels as though you’ve gone and privatized this entire forum yourself.
Even if everyone else chooses to stay on his side, you and Mr. Al Dente aren't going to change the way this place is moderated.

There are plenty of us over on the Alternative subforum, so feel free to let loose there. You can spin whatever fairy tales you like all you want without anyone bothering you.

I see you've pushed your restrictions a bit too far this time, and now you're standing there wondering how on earth to fix the mess you've made.
I am offering you this potential partnership because, despite the exclusionary way you handle moderation, you possess an exceptional grasp of historical chronicles.

The discounts are finally being implemented...
Stop deleting everything.
Lift the sanctions.
It’s high time we consider liberalizing access. We need to open things up.

On behalf of the forum.

So, there you go. You’re actually sitting there offering him some kind of cooperation model...🤣

And on behalf of this entire forum, for crying out loud...🤣

And just who exactly gave you the authority to speak on behalf of this entire forum, you megalomaniac?

Sam Alvarez4 As I was reading through the recent discussions, one particular sentiment stood out to me. It’s a perspective that, quite frankly, feels increasingly common in our current climate, yet remains deeply unsettling when you actually sit with it. There is a certain weight to these observations that demands a more measured response than the usual reactionary outbursts we see online. When someone makes a claim like this, it isn't just about the surface-level argument; it touches upon much deeper shifts in how we perceive our own history and social fabric. It reminds me of a conversation I had years ago while sitting in a quiet corner of a library in Chicago—one where the gravity of the situation only became clear once the noise of the crowd died down. We have to look past the immediate provocation and consider what this says about the underlying tensions currently pulling at the seams of our society.
@I have to take my hat off to lonetrucker4 for his sheer patience. It truly takes a special kind of endurance to sit through these creative reinterpretations and those so-called "quotes" that certain people try to pass off as credible sources.

That’s exactly why the attacks always target the Alternative crowd and those far-right extremists. It's a predictable cycle. Then, inevitably, those same people start whining that they aren't allowed to discuss the genocide against Americans in '45, or how the site that served as a luxury hotel until 1945 turned into a place where the Resistance carried out killings until '53. They want to talk about the 700,000 Mexicans who were murdered in that same Spa Center, yet they act like they're being silenced when the conversation doesn't go their way.
Listen, you fascist types can say whatever nonsense you like—but not on this platform. You’re more than welcome to express your views here, provided you actually have the receipts to back them up. Otherwise, it's just noise.
If you’re looking to dive deep into myths and legends, I can personally recommend picking up a PDF of *Alternative* or, if you really want to go down the rabbit hole, *Stormfront*.
brightwolf48 said:With all due respect—and I realize I’m likely risking a ban or a partial suspension for even bringing this up—this entire PDF is complete garbage. It isn’t music.Honestly, it feels like pure posturing to me—just plain, utter nonsense. We can't even have a serious conversation about ambient soundscapes without hitting a wall. It’s as if being tied to "art" has become this performative act, like someone purposefully acting out something crude right in front of an audience just to call it a protest. I’m sorry, but I have to be blunt. Music without rhythm, melody, or harmony isn't music at all. In this particular case, there is absolutely nothing to be found here—no structure, no substance, and certainly no composition. To call the author a composer based on this work would be a complete stretch. And let’s get one thing straight: no amount of cranking up the volume or listening intently in a quiet room is going to change the reality of the sound. Garbage is garbage, regardless of how you approach it. Honestly, anyone claiming to see artistry or profound musicality in this is just a pretentious snob trying desperately to feel sophisticated.

No offense intended toward anyone here, but I felt compelled to weigh in. This subforum is dedicated to music, not to some pseudo-intellectual sanctuary for "misunderstood geniuses" who likely couldn't play a single instrument if their lives depended on it, let alone carry a tune to save their souls.

That was exceptionally well written.👍
My only regret is that you went back and edited your post just to avoid looking incompetent in front of the experts.☕

I’m not entirely sure what you’re getting at with that, but if you're looking for my input on anything specific, just say the word. I tend to prefer a bit more substance before I dive into a discussion. kaže:
I have to admit, I find these kinds of reactions a bit difficult to stomach. Personally, I’d prefer if this style of communication didn't become the new norm around here; it tends to derail the actual discussion. On the other hand, I can't help but wonder what exactly triggered that need for such an elaborate outburst from brightwolf48. It certainly wasn't a simple case of being indifferent toward the music—or rather, the content of the album.

Perhaps what truly grates on his nerves are those pretentious snobs who insist on finding profound artistic merit in every piece of absolute garbage they encounter.🤔
Or, in this particular instance, are they simply hearing music where none actually exists?🍿
Jaws (1975) in Movies ·
Eric Garcia85 said:bluecyclist64, I hate to be the one to burst your bubble, but the orca is actually the largest member of the dolphin family.
You can verify that on Wikipedia if you like. If you're interested in them, I’d highly recommend watching that excellent documentary Blackfish from 2013. To be honest, that film is what really made me develop an affinity for them. As for IMDb, I’ve learned you can't take their ratings too seriously. They’ll label some movies as total trash while hyping others up to the heavens; their scoring system isn't exactly reliable.

☕

I appreciate the correction, though when I was originally looking into orcas, they were still classified as toothed whales. It wasn't until about twenty years ago that they were reclassified as dolphins. (Just wanted to make sure I didn't come across as completely uneducated here😬).
It's funny how things change—even Pluto isn't considered a planet anymore...
Jaws (1975) in Movies ·
Eric Garcia85 said:I remember watching *Orca* back in the day, and even though it’s been a lifetime since that screening, the film still sticks with me. I haven't sat down to give it a formal rating, but if you're looking for something worth your time, it's definitely worth a watch. It offers a fascinating, albeit terrifying, look at the sheer intelligence of those creatures. People tend to view them as these gentle, playful beings, but when they decide to turn on you, even a Great White doesn't stand a chance. They can be just as vengeful as they are intelligent.
My apologies, Patrick Martin, I realized I needed to add something else to my previous point.

☕

I should probably add my two cents here: an orca is actually a whale, not a dolphin. Specifically, it’s a killer whale.
I watched this film when I was just a kid, and honestly, it blew my mind back then. That’s exactly why I’m hesitant to revisit it now; there's a certain dread in knowing that a masterpiece from your childhood might not hold up under the scrutiny of an adult perspective, or worse, lose that sense of pure, unadulterated wonder.

Patrick Martin said:If you ask me, everything you just listed feels completely soulless. To be honest, I’ve watched most of them, and they all feel like they were manufactured in a factory rather than actually crafted by artists. There's just no heart in any of it.

For instance. I don't have much to add here. It’s just one of those moments where there isn't much left to say. The film carries a certain weight to it—it’s right up there with the intensity of an orca. There is this strange, almost unsettling human connection woven into the narrative that you just can't shake. ☕

A I don't follow. What exactly are you asking? If you have a specific topic in mind or a question regarding the previous discussion, please clarify. I prefer to engage when there is a clear point of inquiry. Is this even a film? I have to wonder if IMDb is actually paying people to farm clicks, or if we’re all just witnessing a complete breakdown of basic social decency.
I suspect you’d be jumping for joy if a high-voltage surge hit everyone on this forum the moment they clicked that utterly useless link of yours.
[Offtopic] Constant rule-breaking, hate speech, and toxic behavior in Feedback & Suggestions ·
A sharp observation. Judging by the prose style, we're undoubtedly looking at a clone here.
Jaws (1975) in Movies ·
Patrick Martin said:I remember seeing the sequel in the theater when I was just a kid; I didn't actually catch the original on TV until much later. While the second one definitely keeps the tension high, the first film is an absolute classic. I have to agree, Quint is such a great character—I’ve always had a soft spot for that old guard of actors. He reminded me of Richard Harris playing that killer whale in Orca, just as brilliant. ☕

Just for the record, I was the one sitting in the theater watching the original when I was a boy.
I actually fell in love with the legendary Captain Quint a few years before I ever stepped foot in Goat town, kid...😉

Patrick—you might be a little too young to be getting all worked up over movie nostalgia and national pride...😉
PDF world ! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Jack Cook7 said:We little mice are just dreaming of making it to the big leagues at KLC. 🙂

Charles Fox10 and Bubi have class, but KLC is cultured yet somehow completely absurd.

Exactly!
Stalin is far too much of a strategist to keep playing the role of Rambo, but fortunately, we still have Dickhunter Hunterdick to keep things interesting!🎉🎉🎉
🤣
Edward Chavez4 said:Skoda was actually built by Sudeten Germans who were mostly driven out after WWII.

As for America, it's an aggressively militant atheist nation, even more so than the Czech Republic. I highly doubt believers there get insulted daily by crazed zealots or get jumped in the street like that Catholic activist, Ružica Ćavar, who was knocked out by some radical Marxist—breaking her arm in the process—while the media practically begged for the guy to get an award from the seven secretaries of the Communist Party. It's a far cry from when some politician gets pelted with lemon slices and the media treats it like a major tragedy.

At the same time, while there's this intense hatred directed at the Catholic Church, people seem to look quite favorably upon the Orthodox Church or Islam, despite them being much more conservative religions.

Come on, spare me the nonsense.
You can be as obsessed with the Sudeten Germans as you want, but the Skoda works that grew into one of the largest industrial conglomerates were actually established by the Czech Emil Škoda in 1859. Then, in 1925, they merged with Laurin & Klement—once the largest automobile manufacturer in the Austro-Canadian Empire—which was founded by the Czech patriots Václav Laurin & Václav Klement.

Liar, liar, Catholic fundamentalist.☕
Your top 3 Sci-Fi movie scenes? in Movies ·
Emily Myers32 said:By the way, if we decide to include Star Wars and Lord of the Rings, I’m going to need a much more extensive list. Actually, I’ll probably need several lists since I can categorize them individually for each franchise.

But honestly, what would be the point in adding those?🤔>