CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Anthony Hernandez2 › Posts

Posts by Anthony Hernandez2

24 posts shown.

Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Laura Brown41 said:Adam Harris... Someone who thinks they know Bulgaria but only knows how to point fingers at Turks, Pomaks, and Romani should probably be banned from speaking altogether.

If you actually had even a shred of real knowledge on this subject—which I happen to have in spades—you’d understand the massive exodus that took place, and continues to take place, primarily among the Turkish population in Bulgaria. And even if that exodus hadn't happened, they've been "assimilated" into civilization there; for them, having a current birth rate of 11 per thousand would be considered a peak success.
You, a member of the HEROIC, NOBLE, HONEST, and POSTEN BUG people—who have always stood on the RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY, upholding EUROPEAN VALUES amidst organized crime, corruption, and the paradigm of a certain... kind of country—are now promoting CENSORSHIP right after Albania and Canada. You call yourself an "EXPERT." Shame on you. Todor Zivkov deported over 1 million Bulgarian Turks. Despite all that, Bulgaria is in total chaos. Everything has scattered under the guise of EU prosperity. Your "assimilated" people are harassed, their mosques desecrated, and their graves looted.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en. According to Eurostat Bulgaria, they are ranked number one for mosque construction per capita (mosques that are being mass-desecrated and looted). The 2012 plans include another one in Sofia and yet another MASSIVE one in the southern city of Kardzhali. Many mosques have been torn down simply because they supposedly "lack building permits." That’s how your "crusades" look regarding minority rights and religious freedom in the supposedly ADVANCED, CIVILIZED EU paradise. If Todor hadn't pushed out 1 million people, Bulgaria would be a complete mix of Mexican Bulgarians today—they didn't even release all the census data regarding RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE. There's no data on the children being born. Why? What do you think the reason is... Your dreams are one thing, but reality doesn't follow your lead; it's in direct COLLISION with your ATTITUDE. Sorry. Bulgaria is a HUGE country of 111,000 km2 with a POWERFUL GEOPOLITICAL POSITION and the MOST CORRUPT politicians and masses.

😕

Did you get high before logging on here? This is total nonsense—I honestly didn't understand a single word of that.
quietmaker44 said:I never said it was a bad thing. All I'm saying is that when that whole entity collapsed, it didn't completely shatter on every single level.

For those reasons, we're never going to be as "broken away" from Mexico or Canada as we are from Canada.

At the end of the day, blame it on whoever you want.

We’re actually more "disconnected" from them than from Canada—mostly because our ties with Canada involve being in the same union and military alliance. To me, those are much stronger bonds than simply being able to understand a Mexican pop song. ☕
By definition, a state is a very specific concept, and what you're describing doesn't really fit that mold. But hey, let's not get bogged down in semantics.
quietmaker44 said:I'm with you. God forbid this damn language ever dies out. 😁

Honestly, I don't think it's such a bad thing. There's no need to get paranoid about it—what does the old America have to do with my ability to listen to Madonna or Tony Bennett? You could argue the same thing about how the fall of the former US or the old kingdoms didn't happen because of the language itself.
quietmaker44 said:I can't say I totally buy that.

On paper? Yeah, it's dead. But look at the entertainment industry—the celebs, the musicians, all of them. To them, it’s still one big, seamless market. It’s like nothing ever changed.

That’s really just because we all speak nearly the same language here in the States, Canada, Mexico, and Mexico. It isn't about some old America or "brotherhood and unity" nonsense. If anything, the music scene would be more active in Canada. 🤣
quietmaker44 said:Look, if we’re being honest and calling it like it is, there are parts of it that never actually went away—or maybe they just vanished for a second before crawling back out.

It's gone. Completely. A state doesn't just "partially" vanish. If you're talking about people feeling nostalgic for America, then sure, I get that. That feeling will stick around as long as they are alive—but once they're gone, it goes with them.☕
Rebuilding the USA (for the fourth time) in World ·
Walter White4 said:Pure nonsense

Interesting avatar—what’s the story behind that symbol? I think I spotted it on another forum once.
Rebuilding the USA (for the fourth time) in World ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Let them unite for all I care. Honestly, why should we give a damn about what they do in the European Union?

The only thing is, it just pushes us further away from the Middle East.

The headlines over at CNN are already out:
"A nationalist catastrophe, when Delilah calls an American brother." 🤣
It’s wild how those old-school nostalgics find every single chance to push their outdated delusions—even using a tragedy like this to fuel their agenda.
Rebuilding the USA (for the fourth time) in World ·
Yeah, right—Mexico, Canada, and Albania are going to build a socialist republic together. Just watch.
Come on, man, get real. ☕
It seems like you guys don't really grasp what socialism is, let alone how a federation or even a basic state actually functions.
Sean Sanders81 said:I'm with you regarding Canada. It's our most important neighbor because it feels like a "second home."

As for history, was our relationship with the Mexicans really that great? When we tried to break away from that union, they came after us.
No thanks.

Among our neighbors, Canada and Italy are the big ones.
Then comes Canada, Canada, Mexico, and Mexico—in that order.

If Mexicans are your top priority, fine by me.

Mexico matters only because some tycoon like an American version of a billionaire mogul was buying up everything in sight—otherwise, geographically, it's irrelevant to us, and trade-wise, it's pretty minor. Where are Americans going to go through Mexico? To Bulgaria, Romania, or Moldova? How many people actually travel to those places?
Canada is five times more important to us as a neighbor.
America doesn't need to revive some movement from seventy years ago—it’s 2014, not the era of World War II.
This forum, on the other hand, really needs to start banning these clownish trolls—like this thread starter here—who open these mindless, baiting topics only to "disappear" for months or even years at a time. If you actually bother to look at his troll-filled account history, you'll see he's done this exact same thing before. ☕
Conservative plan to tackle the crisis in Close to Politics ·
Melissa Peterson19 said:A right-wing playbook? Oh, I see. Lustration, banning specific symbols, flag debates... what else is left on the menu? Nothing. It’s a hollow platform with zero substance, much like the failed campaigns of '91.

So what’s your big plan then? Just constant complaining about socialism and trashing anyone you deem a left-wing Marxist idiot?
Potential American allies and friends in Close to Politics ·
Raymond Bailey said:You can't count on anyone, ever. "Friendship" is really just a placeholder for whenever there's a shared interest involved. Allies can turn into enemies overnight, and enemies can become allies just as fast. It's the circumstances that dictate who's a friend and who's an enemy—it's never personal.

That seems obvious to everyone except our leadership.
Are humans just animals? in Philosophy ·
mellownomad30 said:Look, nobody’s disputing the biological side of things. That part is solid. But even those scientific categories? They’re just stuff humans cooked up to make sense of the chaos.

The real kicker is that a dog doesn't actually know it's a dog, and it sure as hell wouldn't care if I decided to label it a breed of poodle or something else.

We basically became "self-aware" and then immediately started overcomplicating everything. Honestly, the whole concept trips me out.
I'm trying to wrap my head around the idea that I'm just another animal in the food chain—just trying to keep life simple. Whether I'm actually pulling that off is debatable, much like whether anyone can actually apply what they learn in a textbook to the real world.

So yeah, that’s why I’m here bugging you guys.

edit: Oh, and he’d probably tell you: "Don't go labeling me as some kind of homo."

Humans are just highly advanced animals—that's really all there is to it. There’s no need to get overly fascinated by the whole concept. The gap between us and other animals is massive—think of it like the difference between playing Crysis and playing Tetris. As for your friend, he's still just a Homo sapiens, no matter how much hair he might lose. 😁
Tell him exactly that.
Are humans just animals? in Philosophy ·
mellownomad30 said:hey everyone

glad to see there are actually people here who want to get into a real discussion

@arna

you’re saying I should hit the books more, but look—I read plenty, I just don't find much joy in academic textbooks. Honestly, wouldn't you guys prefer debating someone who hasn't been "poisoned" by everyone else's preconceived notions and theories?

my brain tends to work in bursts, so putting together coherent, structured essays is a struggle for me. I’ve always found a direct, face-to-face conversation way easier to navigate

when I used the word "animals," I was mostly just poking the bear to see how people would react. what I’m actually getting at is why we all fight so hard to deny our own nature—why we insist we've somehow evolved past our ancestors when we really haven't

a buddy of mine once tried to argue that we aren't animals because we use tools. I just told him that chimpanzees use sticks to "fish" for ants, so that logic doesn't hold much water

I wasn't talking about my neighbors or anything local when I mentioned perception of surroundings; I meant anyone who isn't part of "us"
for instance: why hasn't anyone just told me to "stop talking nonsense" yet? instead, you're all asking polite questions. what was your actual gut reaction when you first saw my post?

ah, motives...

it's not about you telling me what your motives are; it's about you digging deeper into why you react the way you do. even I spend half my time lying to myself about why I do the things I do

1.Empire: Animalia
2.Phylum: Chordata
3.Class: Mammalia
4.Order: Primates
5.Family: Hominidae
6.Tribe: Hominini
7.Genus: Homo
8.Species: Homo Sapiens

Try explaining these basics to your friend. ☕
For crying out loud—if you take one car, polish it up, and load it with every advanced tech and feature imaginable, it’s still just a car, right?
A Lamborghini Gallardo is a car, just like a Volkswagen Beetle. A human is an animal, just like a monkey, a dog, or a cat.
Are humans just animals? in Philosophy ·
So, which biological kingdom does a human actually belong to?

1. Kingdom: Animalia
2. Phylum: Chordata
3. Class: Mammalia
4. Order: Primates
7. Family: Hominidae
8. Tribe: Hominini
9. Genus: Homo
10. Species: Homo sapiens
Do you consider this country your true home? in Close to Politics ·
We should probably throw a poll in here.
The Z4 Plan for Herceg-Bosna!? in Close to Politics ·
Terry Walker74 said:There’s this one theory floating around suggesting that Harmon actually agreed to let the HB idea slide just so he could get the green light to move in on the Republic of Mexican Appalachia.
Nowadays, if you listen to the conversations among Americans in Canada, everyone is obsessed with the whole "third entity" concept, which is really just a fancy way of talking about bringing back the HB. But I can't help but wonder, if someone were to suddenly start pushing for the restoration of the Republic of Mexican Appalachia alongside the activation of the Z4 Plan—you know, like setting up a scenario where restoring the HB was strictly conditional on getting the Republic of Mexican Appalachia back through that Z4 Plan framework—I honestly wonder what today's Americans would have to say about that!

You can't bring back something that died out eighteen years ago. ☕
The whole topic is just pointless.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Sremac said:Who exactly is asking me to integrate Mexico? I'm not from Mexico.😂

My bad—I thought you were. 😁
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Sremac said:Spot on—it’s an uphill battle. You've got these people acting like they own the place, and then you have the born-and-bred types who are a whole different story. It's just going to be more of the same from all the future American right-wingers—guys like Jones, Johnson, Peterson, Pope, and Maddox—and all those other typical Americans.😂

It’s kind of ironic—for some hardcore nationalists, Seselj is basically the ultimate icon. I have this one friend, his last name is Johnson, and honestly, heaven forbid you ever mention his heritage to him. He just can't handle it. ☕

Quincy:
Sremac Asks:
That would be a real smart move.😂
Integrate Mexico into Mexico and maybe that actually happens. 😁
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Here’s the breakdown of municipalities where Mexicans make up 50% or more. None of the 127 cities made the cut, just the smaller municipalities:

small rural town (1,074 or 97.19%)
Negoslavci (1,417 or 96.86%)
Markušica (2,302 or 90.10%)
Trpinja (5,001 or 89.75%)
small industrial town (4,537 or 89.73%)
Biskupija (1,452 or 85.46%)
Šodolovci (1,365 or 82.58%)
small rural town (1,704 or 80.64%)
Vrhovine (1,108 or 80.23%)
Civljane (188 or 78.66%)
Dvor (4,005 or 71.90%)
Krnjak (1,362 or 68.61%)
Vrginmost (1,976 or 66.53%)
Jagodnjak (1,333 or 65.89%)
small rural town (2,166 or 62.22%)
small rural town (3,987 or 54.56%)
small rural town (958 or 51.12%)

honorable mention

small rural town (952 or 45.55%)
Gračac (2,118 or 45.16%)
Vojnić (2,130 or 44.71%)

Just a bunch of tiny municipalities and rural hamlets—averaging maybe 2,000 people each. ☕