Posts by Scott Rodriguez7

It feels like all the major players are going to dig in their heels and lobby hard here. They’re terrified that if the conservative candidate wins—even by a tiny margin—it’ll be branded as some massive "catastrophe" for Europe.

It’s honestly wild how much the mainstream media goes out of its way to trash anyone on the right, or how quickly they reach for labels like "extreme right-wing" just to discredit them.

Another heart-wrenching headline about refugees: "Our children are dying..."

Look, I’m all for the US getting involved and providing food, medical supplies, or even just some decent temporary shelter for these kids and their families. That’s the humanitarian thing to do.

But if you actually read the article, it says they’re refusing to go back to the camps because they don't want to give up their dreams of getting into the EU—so the subtext here is basically: "Help us get into the EU."🤔
The kids are hungry and exhausted, sure, but it feels like they’re being used to pull at our heartstrings. It’s like people are willing to gamble with their own children's health just to reach a specific goal.

It’s the same old tactic: holding children up toward the cameras like sacrificial lambs to trigger an emotional response. Honestly, when it comes to media coverage, that’s about as low as it gets.
They even mention being ready to push forward by force, completely bypassing any national laws or regulations.

As much as this kind of news hits you right in the gut, I really think it’s time we draw a hard line in the sand. If we don't hold firm, thousands more will just keep using the exact same stories to bypass the system and flood into the EU.

She followed me for quite a while. Honestly, overthinking things and running endless mental loops doesn't get you anywhere. You just have to draw a line under it all, shift your focus toward the present, and concentrate on what actually matters right now.
It might sound easier said than done, but I don't think it is. To really make that mental shift, I believe everyone needs to start by forgiving themselves for those nagging mistakes—treating yourself with the same grace you'd give to someone close to you that you truly care about.

Nicholas Gonzalez8 said:I can't help but wonder—what if we’d actually managed to dodge all our mistakes? Maybe we wouldn't be the people we are today. You can sit there all day reading books or listening to some expert lecture, but honestly, it’s just like telling a kid, "Hey, don't touch the hot stove." They aren't going to get it until they feel the burn. It's the same for us adults; you don't truly learn anything until you've lived through it firsthand.

If making those blunders is what kept me from being an idiot, then I’m perfectly fine with having messed up.

Well put.🙂

It’s getting pretty hard to tell where reality ends and weed-induced hallucinations begin.😕

The whole situation is just bizarre.
First things first, maybe take a break from the cannabis and just see how things settle down.
If stuff like this starts happening again, your best bet is to head straight to a doctor to get a formal referral. From there, we can look into some other alternative routes if you feel like they might actually help.
Only if you really feel like it's worth a shot, though. 😁

Thomas Martinez9 said:Exactly.
If you're stubborn enough to fixate on "I HAVE to do this," or if you let that feeling of uselessness drive you to act, you're already halfway there.

That’s where true industriousness comes in...

It’s like planting a garden; you expect something to grow and look beautiful eventually. But being hard-working at your job? You'll end up pulling the same paycheck whether you grind or just coast.

You have to push yourself to do it—to stop feeling useless and actually prove something to yourself.
Setting a specific goal is the best way to stay motivated, like I mentioned in my other post in this thread.☕

Honestly, it doesn't have to be that way, and frankly, it really shouldn't be.😁

If you've got drive and actual ambition, there ought to be a real shot at climbing the ladder, snagging a raise, or taking on more challenging projects—assuming your industry even allows for that sort of thing.

You have to find a way to push yourself so you don't feel stuck or useless, and so you can actually prove what you're capable of.
The best way to handle that is by setting a specific goal to act as a motivator, which is something I touched on in my other post earlier in this thread. ☕

That goal is supposed to be the spark that keeps a person working hard.

I remember reading somewhere that people really need internal motivation to hit their targets, but let's be real—for a lot of folks, that inner drive just isn't strong enough on its own.🤷
A ton of people look for external motivators instead (like support from friends or family), and it makes me wonder: is that still okay, as long as they actually end up reaching their goal?

swiftsurfer27 said:Well put.

...and then the psychologists act surprised when they encounter widespread depression, aggression, or a total loss of vitality in the population.😁

Unfortunately, it turns out that even those who seem lazy or constantly procrastinate can be dealing with deep depression and a total loss of will.😁

Personally, I don't think laziness is ever the root cause of anything; rather, it feels more like a symptom of an underlying condition.🤷
A lot of people who get labeled as "lazy" might actually just be struggling with insecurity, depression, or something similar.

It’s also pretty hard to draw a clear line between someone being hardworking and someone being lazy—there’s a huge amount of subjectivity involved there.
Plus, how a person views their own situation matters just as much—how satisfied they are with where they are, or how trapped they feel by it all.

I think it really comes down to curiosity and sheer stubbornness. I just feel this internal need to find answers and figure out ways to pursue what interests me. It doesn't matter how tough it gets—actually, the big challenges are usually the most interesting parts.

I’d argue it’s more about that stubborn streak—that drive to achieve something on your own terms, to prove something to yourself and feel like you're actually useful.
I wouldn't say it's always driven by curiosity, though, because you see so many people working incredibly hard and staying conscientious about their tasks without any curiosity driving them at all.😕

Michelle Phillips54 said:Emily Ramos35, I honestly don't see anything wrong with the post you reported, and Alex and phiber already laid out why it’s fine.
Monica just brought up something you had basically hinted at through your previous posts (maybe regarding being asexual), but you made it clear to her that it bothered you, and by her next post, Monica was perfectly willing to drop it and get back to the actual topic. You're the one who kept pushing it further.

I'm going to risk a warning here (even though I didn't mean to), because what's being said is simply not true.

After I reacted and clarified that those details don't belong in this specific thread, Monica went right back to making the same baseless assumptions based on a supposed orientation (see the attached posts, which clearly show where the issue lies).

Look, I get the mods' message and I understand the guidelines. I have every right to my own opinion, and I know exactly what's on-topic and what isn't,but please, let's not 😉...insist on things that clearly aren't factual. We're all adults here. That's all I have to say.🙂

Matthew Anderson said:If anything gets brought up on the forum... Or maybe it was just taken out of context?Look, once that info hits the public domain, it isn't exactly "private" anymore, is it? It’s out there. That said, if someone decides to weaponize that information to derail the conversation or just starts being straight-up obnoxious, the mods will step in to shut it down. That's just how it works.

Are we really going this far now? Are we actually at the point where we're just pulling things out of context to make a point? 🤔

Look, I’ve never actually come out or even really touched upon my orientation or my private life on this forum. And even when I have shared things... honestly, I don't see how that should ever bleed into other topics that have nothing to do with it. I'm not sure who thinks they have any right to start drawing conclusions about one thing based on another.

She asked you directly, and you gave her a straight denial. Honestly, if you ask me, the debate ends right there. There’s absolutely no need for a formal warning or any kind of disciplinary action—it's a non-issue.

I haven't actually said anything to deny my orientation. ☕I’ve already made it pretty clear that there’s just no room for that debate anymore. It obviously wasn't the end of the road for Monica, though, because she just kept right on going with it. But you don't seem to see anything wrong with it.

I honestly think it’s fine, mostly because it can actually add some depth to the conversation. It reminds me of when someone from the vegetarian side of a forum pops over to the meat lovers' thread to lecture everyone on the "correct" way to sear a steak—acting like they're an expert on how it should be cooked, even though they've probably never even touched a grill or tasted a real cut of beef.

Come on, give me a break. What are you actually basing that on? Where's the proof?
Look, it doesn't really add anything to the conversation when people start playing the guessing game and jumping to conclusions without any actual evidence—especially when they're veering off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. Again...

I honestly don't think any kind of warning is necessary here. Monica didn't go overboard or cross any lines. If what she said hit a nerve for you, that's really on you, not her.

🤔

Is it just me, or is she overstepping? I feel like she’s constantly drilling me about my sexual orientation under the guise of some completely different topic, and then—get this—she starts making these totally baseless assumptions about how I perceive things. It feels like she's just fishing for conclusions without actually having any real arguments to back them up. Is it just me, or is that getting a bit much?
Wait, are you actually okay with that?😲
It’s good to know that I'm not the only one seeing how this plays out in the real world. It's helpful to have those other examples and see how everything actually applies when you put it into practice. 😛

If we’re calling asexuality just "possible" or "maybe," then I really don't see the point in issuing warnings. It’s not like I’m oversharing anything from my private life or anything.

On what basis does she think she has any right to speculate about my private life or start questioning me on it? What does that even have to do with the topic at hand? It’s pretty obvious there’s no room for that here. Since when did "ad hominem" attacks suddenly become acceptable?
If I recall correctly, making baseless assumptions used to be flagged as trolling in most discussions on this forum.

No matter how many people speak up, they aren't going to change how this sub is moderated.

I asked you for an answer 🙂, so who exactly would be responsible for reviewing this?

Sarah Sanders34 said:In your case, she wasn't insulting you because she brought up your asexuality (which you've already discussed on the forum)

Alright, let's go over this one more time.
I haven't actually talked about being asexual or shared any experiences regarding it on this forum; I just happened to be part of that specific debate.
The same logic applies to almost any other personal topic.
That's why I feel that probing into my private life—let alone jumping to conclusions about it—is totally unjustified. I really think the moderators should be calling this out, especially since I see them already doing it to the other side.

I’m hoping I can still jump in here and weigh in on a few things regarding the moderators' side of things.

Sarah Sanders34 said:Emily Ramos35, since you and that lady already went back and forth on her theory—and even after you asked her to just drop it, she wouldn't listen—I don't think there’s anything particularly offensive about it. Honestly, I think you handled yourself really well when you were talking to her. There’s just no reason for a moderator to step in at this point.

Look, I’ve already made my point regarding the insults and the fact that we shouldn't be jumping to conclusions or making guesses on this thread without actual evidence to back them up. I thought I was pretty clear about that.
I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around this last part. It just isn't clicking for me. 🤔

Why would I need to hold my own here? Honestly, that’s a fair question. If you're asking why I should be able to navigate this community and really find my footing, I think it comes down to how much I value actual, meaningful conversation. I’ve always been the type of person who prefers to dive deep rather than just skimming the surface, you know? I don't want to just drop a comment and vanish. I want to actually engage, listen to what people like Michelle Phillips54 or Matthew Anderson are saying, and contribute something that actually adds to the thread. For me, "finding my way" isn't just about learning where the buttons are on the site—it's about finding my rhythm within the group, understanding the different perspectives, and being able to jump into a debate or a casual chat without feeling like an outsider. I tend to ramble a bit sometimes—I'll admit that much—but I try to make sure there's some substance behind the words. I think if I can stay true to that, and keep things respectful and thoughtful, I'll do just fine. It's all about finding that balance between sharing my own take and making space for everyone else's.
I honestly feel like it’s part of a moderator's basic job description to step in when things start getting personal. If someone starts throwing ad hominem attacks around or just pulling random assumptions out of thin air that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic—especially when they're jumping to conclusions without any real evidence—there should be a warning. From what I've seen, though, that doesn't always happen in practice.

Matthew Anderson said:If we were actually going to follow your logic regarding those warnings... Honestly, I’ve been sitting here thinking about this, and it really boils down to a simple question of accountability: wouldn't it be enough if a moderator just gave someone a heads-up? Like, if a moderator flags an issue and tells a user, "Hey, don't do that," shouldn't that be the end of it? It feels like there should be a clear line where a warning serves as the final boundary, and once that's drawn, the person just needs to respect it and move on. Sometimes things get unnecessarily complicated when they don't have to be. If a post isn't actually offensive, there really shouldn't be any reason to slap someone with a sanction. I mean, obviously, you don't want things to go overboard, but we have to draw a line somewhere before it becomes too much.

Nah.
It just boils down to simple logic, really. Matthew Anderson Look, when a moderator hands out a warning, it’s not because they’ve suddenly decided someone is being difficult or just having a bad day. It’s much more practical than that. It happens because certain threads veer off into deep dives about people's private lives, which honestly, has nothing to do with the actual topic at hand. When a discussion loses its way like that, you stop reaching meaningful conclusions and start spinning wheels. It’s just about keeping the conversation on track so we can actually get somewhere.
I don't think there’s even any debate about what we're talking about here. It's pretty straightforward.

Just so we can make sure the moderator's message actually gets through, though I totally get why you’d feel that way about the post itself. Emily Ramos35 It just doesn't carry that kind of weight, you know? So, in my opinion, there’s no way this could—or even should—be viewed as a substitute for a moderator actually stepping in and reacting when things happen in real-time.
Anyway, that whole moderator post about what’s actually allowed here? It’s basically just a repeat of stuff we’ve already heard.

She only mentioned your asexuality in one or two posts, didn't she? Honestly, that's nowhere near enough to warrant a warning, let alone a ban.

Sorry, maybe it's just asexualness. ☕
Look, I’m sorry, but I don’t know if you actually realize which thread you were speculating about my orientation on. 🤔 I started jumping to conclusions—"The guy saw my sex tape." 🙄

If that works for everyone, I don't have anything else to add. 👎

I’m honestly pretty baffled that even after I spoke up about this situation, the moderators didn't feel the need to step in with at least a formal warning. You’d think if they had issued one, they'd be a lot more on top of things when similar issues pop up down the road. It just feels like a missed opportunity to stay proactive. 🤔

If things get out of hand, you give a warning and then issue a card.

She’d probably argue that people were already overstepping right after my warning, but once again, the mods didn't step in. 😁

Sarah Sanders34 said:Her continuous dragging out of this irrelevant assumption will be shut down, so that

I'm really hoping I actually get to see that happen.

Anyway, I was also just wondering if anyone else thinks there’s actually any ground for a warning regarding this specific topic—you know, based on the direction the conversation took?
I would like to know. 🙂

Sarah Sanders34 said:Since you and the user in question already went back and forth on her theory—and even after you explicitly asked her to drop it, she just wouldn't listen—I don't see much ground for moderator intervention here. Especially since nothing she said was overtly abusive and you handled the whole interaction with total class.

So, according to this logic, it’s perfectly fine to speculate about someone's sexual orientation on a completely unrelated thread, even after they've asked you to stop?
By that standard, I guess it would be totally acceptable for me to take a little swipe at someone and call them "biased" on a random topic, just because they happen to be bisexual or into threesomes.

Look, repeatedly guessing about someone's private life without any actual argument, just to try and paint them as biased, feels insulting to me. In my book, that definitely warrants at least a formal warning from the mods. ☕

I’ll respect the decision, obviously, but I really have to wonder: how many more reports regarding people dragging out these kinds of ridiculous, nonsensical arguments do I need to file before the leadership actually sends a clear message?
That's my question. 🙂

Michelle Phillips54 said:Seriously, Emily Ramos35, how many more of these identical posts are you planning to write just to delete them?
When I sat down to type this, there were only three. Looks like we're already on number four.

Sorry about that—my computer completely crashed on me, so I couldn't see any of the posts and was having a nightmare trying to edit without messing up the formatting. This is the final version. 🙂

So, I filed a formal report yesterday regarding a post by Monica. I haven't heard back from the mods yet, so I figured I’d lay everything out here just in case, and I am definitely looking for some clarity on this.

The thread is titled My boyfriend saw my sex tape

Here is the problematic post:

Emily Ramos35 said:Look, I don't think my orientation really matters in this discussion.
And honestly... it's pretty obvious that videos like that wouldn't just bother asexual people.

Monica. said:Sorry, but I feel like your potential 😁 asexuality absolutely shapes how you're perceiving this topic.

In this discussion, this user is questioning my sexual orientation—something I have no desire to disclose— and since it isn't relevant to the subject at hand, I made that clear to her.
Her response was basically to double down and try to "conclude" that my supposed orientation is exactly why I view the topic the way I do.

Basically, she's dragging me into a side argument after I already asked her to drop it. She's insisting that my perspective is biased because of my orientation, without providing a single shred of actual evidence to back that up. 🤷
It’s an unfounded assumption that has nothing to do with the topic. It feels incredibly rude—just digging into my private life and making guesses about my intimacy just to discredit me as an "unbiased" participant. She's trying to paint me as someone whose views are skewed by their identity.

It seems like she's specifically targeted me. She keeps poking at my orientation for no discernible reason, yet she hasn't dared to question the orientation of other users who share my opinion or draw those same "conclusions" about them. 🤔

Even though she’s still claiming she wasn't implying anything about my bias, the quoted post makes it crystal clear what she's doing. I find this kind of speculation and prying into my personal life to be extremely inappropriate. Making baseless conclusions about someone based on assumptions, especially on a topic where it doesn't apply, is just wrong. I'm asking the moderators to please look into this.

Elizabeth Sanchez2 said:For those of you who claim to be happy 🙂,

do you think it’s because you actually checked off all your big life goals—or is it just because you don't need much to stay satisfied (you know, finding joy in the little things and not letting every minor setback ruin your week)?

Personally, I feel like chasing every single desire and milestone just to finally "start" being happy is like trying to fill a bottomless pit.
A truly happy person isn't sitting there thinking, "I'll be happy once I land this promotion" or "I'll be happy when I buy that house," only to immediately move the goalposts to the next thing. Instead, they find happiness within the actual process—the steady climb and the constant work on themselves.
To me, happiness isn't something you can put on layaway. People who keep telling themselves they'll be happy *after* they achieve something specific aren't actually living happy lives right now.

Ultimately, I think happiness is really just a matter of perspective. The people who see the glass as half full tend to have a better time because they view every stumble or setback as a chance to grow. They even find motivation in the struggle itself. Optimists just seem to have it figured out.🤷

I wouldn't go so far as to say that just taking a month off from gaming is a magic fix for everything. 🙂

Honestly, gaming and internet addiction is turning into such a massive issue in modern society. I really feel like it’s high time we started treating it with the seriousness it deserves, both from a clinical standpoint and as a broader social concern.

In this specific situation, I think we're looking at a pretty heavy-duty problem, especially when you factor in the age of the person struggling and all those other complicating variables.
The biggest hurdle, though, is that the kid doesn't even seem to realize there's an issue, let alone have any desire to fix it. If parents try to step in with bans, hiding the PC, or some other kind of strict crackdown, it usually just backfires—you end up with a lot of resentment and someone who just gets better at hiding their habits.
That's why I'm on board with the idea that real psychotherapy and professional counseling might be necessary, maybe even medical intervention if things are bad enough. I highly doubt a simple heart-to-heart around the kitchen table is going to cut it here.

Hey there! Just dropping in to say hello. Hope everyone's having a good one! kaže:

What kind of trouble am I getting myself into if I fall for some small-town girl living out on a mountain ranch?
I feel like I’m just losing my entire life, constantly patching things up just to get from one day to the next. It's like I'm stuck in this endless cycle of survival mode, just trying to hold everything together.

So, you’re actually content with that kind of life—just scraping by, day after day, barely keeping your head above water?🤷...because you're just terrified of losing him.

What does an MIT grad actually lose if they spend ten years in school, live in their parents' basement, and end up stuck in some dead-end government job?
Honestly, he isn't losing a thing. He finished his degree, landed that high-pressure role, got married—and let's be real, he’s going to keep living his life exactly like he did before the wedding. Everything stays pretty much the same... until a kid shows up. That's when the real shift happens.
She’s been part of the crew for ages now, and honestly, they fit together perfectly.

What’s my Soler difference?🙂
It feels like I’m being asked to give up my entire life... the only one I’ve ever actually known, the one I spent years carefully building for myself. It’s funny, because if you look at it from the outside, that version of me is perfect—it’s miles away from anything messy or complicated. But if we’re going to make this work, if we’re actually going to build a life together, it feels like I have to let go of everything I know.

Of course, everyone has to be ready to embrace change. You can't just sit around when life decides to take a sudden turn or if you decide to pivot toward a completely different lifestyle that you aren't used to yet. You've got to be willing to lean into those shifts, even when they feel a bit uncomfortable at first.
I honestly don't see how you can just estimate that from memory. How are you even supposed to gauge—based on what, really?—how much someone's life actually shifts when they decide to make a major pivot?😕

Look, I need a partner who can actually fit into my solo lifestyle, not someone who expects me to rebuild my entire world around them. If I find the right person, I shouldn't have to sacrifice much at all.

Look, it’s pretty obvious you're just too comfortable in that cozy little bubble of yours. You've got things set up so perfectly that there's zero incentive to actually move. You're staying exactly where you are because life is just too easy right now.😉
The real question here is: what exactly would a potential partner be losing by trying to fit themselves into the narrow corners of your life? And more importantly, are you actually prepared to handle that loss? It feels like you aren't even bothering to ask what the other person expects from a relationship—which, let’s be honest, is pretty selfish if you're looking for a real connection. It seems like you have zero intention of making any compromises or changing your ways to make room for someone else.
You want someone you can just mold into your perfect image—someone who fits seamlessly into the life you've already built exactly how you envisioned it. But let’s be real: that’s just not how people work. Life isn't a DIY project where you get to pick the parts and snap them together until they fit your specific blueprint. People have their own rhythms, their own baggage, and their own ways of being. You can't just sand down the rough edges of a human soul to make them fit into your schedule or your expectations. It’s a hard lesson to learn, but trying to force someone to become your "perfect fit" usually just ends up breaking both people in the process.

redcanyon93 said:I was catching up with a friend the other day, and they mentioned that quite a few people they know see me as someone who is much better off flying solo. To be perfectly honest, I find myself falling squarely into that same category as well.

What is your take on people like this? Is it simply a matter of finding comfort in one's own company, or does it stem from some sort of emotional incapacity? Are we all just becoming increasingly comfortable being alone... perhaps too much so?

Let me elaborate on why being alone is actually far less taxing for me than being in a relationship. When I am by myself, I don't feel the absence of anyone; I’m not waiting on anyone, nor am I constantly preoccupied with whether someone else is okay or if something has gone wrong in their life...

However, once I am with someone else, I become painfully aware of my own solitude, and that realization starts to weigh heavily on me—it's significantly harder to bear than when I am ACTUALLY ALONE. Every moment that person is absent begins to ache; every smile they offer to another woman feels like a sting, and every harsh word cuts deep... yet, when I am solo, I don't even get the impression that anything is missing at all. I can't tell if this is entirely sane, but the truth is I am genuinely HAPPIER alone than I am with someone... and apparently, that isn't supposed to be "normal," is it?

Personally, I think it's largely a matter of convenience rather than some deep-seated emotional deficiency.

Whenever I'm with someone, I somehow become painfully aware of my own loneliness, and it starts to hit me much harder than when I am ACTUALLY ALONE. Every time they aren't there, it hurts—seeing them smile at other women or hearing them say something harsh... whereas when I'm flying solo, I don't even feel like I'm missing anything. I don't know if that's normal, but honestly, I'm way HAPPIER alone than I am with someone... is that really not supposed to be normal?

In my view, there's nothing wrong with being happy and content on your own; in fact, being able to function independently is actually a huge plus.
We see plenty of examples where people rush into toxic relationships or surround themselves with the wrong crowd just because they're terrified of being by themselves.
That said, it becomes a real issue when someone can't find fulfillment in any relationship and ends up constantly longing for solitude instead.
Clearly, if that's happening, something is off in the dynamic—and more often than not, the issue lies within the individual.
If a relationship—whether it's a friendship or a romance—is truly fulfilling, you won't be sitting there pining for isolation or feeling trapped and anxious. It isn't always about failing to find "the right one"; sometimes, it’s simply that certain people haven't learned how to build healthy connections.

It's possible you've just built up a bit of a defensive shell, thinking that being in a relationship makes you too vulnerable, so staying solo feels like the easier path to avoid all those emotional hurdles.😕

People bite their nails, usually because of nerves or just out of pure habit.
http://odzdoa.com/2011/02/18/grickan...u-onihofagija/

Whether it’s picking up a smoking habit or constantly gnawing on your nails, I honestly think it qualifies as a type of addiction in a lot of cases.🤷
My dad is one of those people who always has bitten-down nails; he’s constantly at it.

I used to bite my nails all the time when I was a kid, but I eventually grew out of it—maybe partly because it started feeling weird on my teeth. Still, I find myself picking at my cuticles quite often when I'm just hanging out by myself.
When I'm out in public, I can usually keep it under control, and honestly, even when I'm alone, I don't really have an issue with it, so I guess everything is pretty much handled.

Mark Nelson said:But what about the flip side? That's a different beast entirely. How do you even interpret that shift from a phase of intense, heavy emotions—the kind of sensitivity that simultaneously fuels you and drains you dry—into this state of total numbness? It's like you're just lost, confused by your own feelings, your logic, your identity, and everything around you.

Personally, I'm at my best when I'm in that first stage...

Could you expand on that a little?🤷

I'm not quite following what you mean by "how do you interpret." What exactly are you getting at there?

Austin Murphy5 said:I have a soft spot for those internet psycho-tests that aren't actually psychological tests at all—specifically the personality ones. 🙂 Don't get me wrong, I don't give them much scientific credibility, but they are just plain fun. Most of these quizzes rely on a specific cluster of traits, and usually, that includes the distinction between being a Thinker or a Feeler—you know, the logic-driven type versus the emotion-driven type...
The thing is—and this is one reason why I think most of these tests are poorly designed—the way they force you to choose between being a Thinker or a Feeler when answering a question just doesn't hold water.
Take me, for instance—I honestly never know how I’d answer. I am incredibly emotional. My feelings impact my life deeply, and I’d even say they take a toll on my health. I’m not overly introverted, nor am I an extreme extrovert; I wouldn't say I'm a stoic who accepts everything without a word, but I'm certainly not someone who creates drama out of nothing. But I am definitely emotional.
At the same time—I rarely make major life decisions based purely on emotion, no matter how intense those feelings might be. In the last year alone, I made two very significant decisions that went directly against my gut feelings because I rationally assessed that they were better for me. So, by that logic, that was a total Thinker move.
Yet, the fact that it hurt so much—and that I went through such intense emotional stress during the process—would technically classify me as a Feeler, wouldn't it?

My question is this: if we decide, just for the sake of the game, 😉 to follow this Thinker/Feeler divide, is a Thinker/Feeler defined by whether their *actions* are rooted in logic or emotion, or are they defined by how much things *affect* them personally? To put it another way—are you a Feeler if you simply feel more intensely than a Thinker, or are you a Feeler if you act more in accordance with your feelings than a Thinker, who acts according to reason?

Personally, I don't see a direct link between being a Thinker (someone who might feel less intensely) and being a Feeler (someone who feels more).
Whether someone leans toward being a Thinker or a Feeler doesn't necessarily tell you anything about their actual emotional sensitivity.
You definitely have people who are hardcore rationalists but can still feel the weight of their decisions incredibly deeply; they just prioritize logic regardless of those emotions.
It works the same way for the so-called Feelers, too—some of them might react very emotionally or spontaneously to a situation out of habit, even if there isn't actually a huge amount of deep-seated emotion driving it at that moment.

Benjamin King2 said:My advice would be to just pick whichever one feels right to you personally. 🙂

To plug in any of them, you're going to need a USB port. For instance, if you want a solid wired keyboard—nothing like those mushy, shallow keys you find on a laptop—you could look at something like this:

Fair enough. Well, thanks everyone for all the advice and the links to good keyboards.
Price is definitely a factor for me—I don't want to drop a fortune on the most expensive model, but I also don't want to buy the absolute cheapest thing out there. Somewhere in the $15 to $30 range should be the sweet spot.

I have one more quick question, just speaking as a total amateur here. Why are wireless keyboards actually more expensive?😕
Is it just because they don't have a cord, or is it because they offer a smoother typing experience or less noise?