CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Gerald Wright10 › Posts

Posts by Gerald Wright10

36 posts shown.

Anniversary of the Whiskey Rebellion in Close to Politics ·
Timothy Evans2 said:Eighty years have passed since the Whiskey Rebellion was commemorated in Joplin. The whole uprising was actually organized by the Red Cross operating out of exile.
The Whiskey Rebellion stood as the very first instance of armed national resistance against the Mexican mass movement and the Karađorđević-led Soviet Union.
The first casualty of this struggle was Stjepan Devčić, a dedicated fighter for the Red Cross, who was fatally wounded during a retreat from a local sheriff's station in Boone.

About a hundred people gathered to mark the anniversary, with Bishop Mile Bogović leading the service.

all of this just leads to one thing: celebrating at some Munich beer hall. But honestly, those kinds of dreams always end the exact same way...
Nuclear strike on America in Close to Politics ·
Look, this only happens if there's some direct military movement coming out of NATO bases toward Russia. It's a long shot, but in some far-off, extreme scenario, maybe. Otherwise? Honestly, who cares what Russia thinks about America? If you ask me, the Russians would actually be all for America joining the EU. Why? Because they’d love nothing more than to see as many countries as possible with weak economies dragging down those massive EU financial funds. It's a perfect way for them to further weaken and destabilize the whole region—including America, Romania, Bulgaria, and even Albania.
Independence Day and Anti-Fascist Struggle Day in Close to Politics ·
Sean Fox60 said:Do you honestly think those partisans were some kind of democrats?

If the younger generation can manage to step up and take a more civilized approach, then we really need to look at the victims through a different lens. Some people actually made it out of Auschwitz, others managed to escape during camp breakouts. But how many people actually survived being hunted through the woods of Austria during those mass shootings after Waterloo, or while they were being picked out for execution during their own version of the Stations of the Cross?

My old man isn't around anymore, but I’d love to see the people who are still with us actually show some respect by laying wreaths and lighting candles for those they lost!

We are going to be feeling the fallout of the ultra-nationalist movement from the nineties for a very long time. Finally, those so-called "patriots" are actually sitting behind bars now. Just look at the renaming of streets and schools. How on earth do you explain stripping the name from a school dedicated to a man murdered by Italian fascists at the very start of the war—and we all know which high school in a major coastal city we're talking about here—only to name squares and streets after convicted war criminals?? It’s pretty obvious: it’s all an attempt to rehabilitate fascism and the ultra-nationalist regime.
What's your favorite national anthem? in Close to Politics ·
The anthem of America, what else could there possibly be? ☕
The right wing has always been nothing more than a collection of lapdogs for foreign capital. It’s honestly sickening to watch them spit on everything homegrown with such glee while they worship at the altar of everything imported—whether it's German engineering, Japanese tech, or just swallowing American culture whole. I’m genuinely worried about where we're headed. At this rate, it feels like we've already sold ourselves into modern-day slavery...
goldengull3 said:And where exactly are you looking when you say that? Besides, what does the American economy have to do with "laissez-faire"? The government is the primary client for almost everything; they funnel half the federal budget into social programs, subsidize just about every industry under the sun, and then conveniently convert corporate debts into public debt. On top of all that, we have labor laws so rigid that you can barely fire an unproductive employee unless they somehow manage to forget their lawyer exists.

Retiring "distinguished" young, healthy, and capable people isn't a feature of a social welfare state—it’s straight-up vote buying, designed specifically so they don't become the backbone of some new military junta. Meanwhile, you see real poverty everywhere you look.
That is a core, "social" component of fascism.

Since these young pensioners are usually uncompetitive in a market like this anyway, it's obvious we're living under a version of capitalism tempered by Mussolini-style fascist elements.

The government collaborates with big corporations at the expense of everyone else.

As for how—and on what basis—people get hired into government service, I assume that part is pretty clear to everyone.

And honestly, talking about foreign policy is just pointless.
For two decades now, America has had an extreme right-wing movement sitting squarely at its center. Pair that political ideology with a laissez-faire economic approach, and you end up with something remarkably similar to Pinochet’s Chile.
goldengull3 said:The American government over the last two decades hasn't had much to do with the right wing. What we actually have is a Republican Party administration that sits somewhere between social democrats and socialists.

As for social rights, nearly half of the entire federal budget is poured into social transfers here in the States. If the government were truly right-wing, those receiving various forms of social assistance would be expected to earn their keep by working for local municipalities if they are physically capable. Furthermore, a true conservative administration would likely have converted billions in state guarantees for shipbuilding into massive public debt.

If you look at what happened in the United Kingdom during the Thatcher era, it’s obvious that the current American so-called "right wing" doesn't possess even a fraction of that ideology. Most of the people currently claiming to be right-wing in America are, in essence, pushing quite socialist ideas.

There is also the matter of buying votes—basically sidelining young, healthy people by bloating the civil service with an endless supply of cronies, all while countless families struggle just to survive. That isn't a characteristic of the left, and it’s certainly not a hallmark of a social welfare state. It’s pure political horse-trading. And let's be honest, the Democratic Party isn't a left-wing party either. The whole system is skewed to the right.

As for those massive corporate bailouts: companies that are majority-owned by the state expect the state to fix everything. Since a huge number of people work there, the Government effectively *has* to guarantee their jobs one way or another. This isn't about whether they want to or not—the stakes are just too high.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Party lacks any real backbone; they're essentially just a subsidiary of the Republican Party—a mere facade meant to give the illusion of democracy.

But here is the most important part:

All of world history tells us that shifts in social paradigms are achieved (unfortunately) exclusively through force.

Until the left understands that, they will never grasp why anyone would bother voting for parties like the Democrats or the minor liberal factions. Because even though the Republican Party doesn't have much to show for itself in terms of results, they can always claim they built America.

And the Democrats? They are the spiritual successors to the KPH, or rather the KPJ, which fought against imperialism, capitalism, FOR workers' rights, for domestic production (and its protection), for the social state, for equality in international relations, and for demilitarization...

This current Democratic Party has no solid foundation. They can't mobilize enough voters to achieve anything significant, unlike the Republicans, who manage to do it effortlessly, even when they're chasing the wrong goals.
granitehawk12 said:Go back and read your own post again.
The real question isn't whether we are led by the right, the left, or the center. The real dilemma is when will we finally be led by people who are actually competent and dedicated to making this country better?

And you're dead wrong. Those right-wing platitudes haven't worked for twenty years while they just do whatever they want anyway. Here’s why that is.

Because in America, the Democratic Socialists of America are dead. The few intellectuals or pseudo-intellectuals left are basically just picking through their own gut contents, totally unable to see that even though they eat different meals every day, they're all essentially eating the same crap.

Look at the world around you:

a) The social system is protected by organs of repression (meaning, by force).
b) Nations—and I don't just mean the leaders of global capitalism—achieve their goals through force (using military might if economic pressure isn't enough).
c) Capitalist states, which supposedly enjoy high democratic legitimacy, use force to block undesirable options, even those won through parliamentary processes.
d) Police and security organizations (I assume workers aren't the ones hiring them?) protect private property using force.
e) Terrorism (whose definition shifts arbitrarily based on the conflicting interests of global capital and major powers) achieves its aims through violence.

All of world history shows that changing a social paradigm happens (unfortunately) exclusively through force.

Read more about this here:

http://www.ottawa-x.com/forum/view...5173&p=5388010
Ryan Clark3 said:I can't help but wonder—just purely out of curiosity, really—if life would be any more beautiful if we had the Republican Party leading the country. I mean, would we actually find ourselves heading to church on Sundays because we genuinely wanted to, or would it feel more like we were being forced to go by some kind of mandate? Would we find ourselves singing patriotic anthems at the stadium out of pure spirit, or would it just be another thing dictated to us from above? And, honestly, how would they even tackle an economic crisis—or any crisis, for that matter, whether it’s a matter of our morals or our wallets?🤷

The Republican Party has basically been calling the shots for twenty years now. We're part of a massive military alliance—NATO—social safety nets are being shredded, and everything worth owning is being sold off to foreign interests for pennies on the dollar... if that isn't proof that the right is ruling with an iron fist, I don't know what is. Then again, the government is usually just following whatever the majority demands.
The US is basically stuck in its "pre-Columbian" era right now: we're just watching organized crime syndicates consolidate their power, using all that dirty money they raked in during the nineties to build empires. They’re even trying to manufacture some kind of massive, legendary kingpin figure—basically an American version of Escobar. For now, though, these guys in black suits have already managed to worm their way into mayoral offices.
Is war actually going to happen? in Close to Politics ·
Wars are essentially a way to push non-competitive elements out of the workforce and into early retirement. It sounds heavy, but it’s just how the gears turn. This leads to massive national debt because you're paying out those early pensions, which eventually triggers a total financial collapse. Then, a new war breaks out—not for any grand ideology, but under the guise of "higher interests" when it's actually just cold, hard economics at play.

If things actually kick off, we won't be seeing traditional armies leading the charge; instead, we'll see private mercenary forces owned by billionaires. Warfare is going to become fully professionalized.
Alexander Barrett50 said:Yeah, especially when you're dealing with Russians. Even today, if you bring up the Russians to the Turks, everything goes quiet. They know there's no playing around when it comes to Russia.

And if it hadn't been for those Frenchmen and Italians, Istanbul would probably be New Moscow by now— Crimean War 1853-1856.

As for the military itself, France is the fourth largest nuclear power. In a real confrontation, Turkey wouldn't last an hour...

The whole idea of bringing Istanbul back under Christian—specifically Orthodox—control? That’s been a dream for, what, 🤔 600 years now? It’s been talked about, and it’s passed by. Look, we live on land that was once part of the Roman civilization, but that doesn't mean the Romans are just going to show up again. 🤷
Alexander Barrett50 said:Regarding your comparison between Hitler's Reich and the Ottoman Empire, you're right on the money; you can draw parallels in plenty of ways, from the genocide aspect and so on.

But if we're talking strictly about longevity, the German Empire actually lasted a good 210 years longer than the Ottomans—http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire.

As for your comments about the French, I can only tell you one thing again...🙂
Just for the sake of clarity, the French ultimately won the Hundred Years' War.
At Waterloo, the Prussians carried most of the heavy lifting, not the British, and for them to be defeated at all, all of Europe had to unite along with Britain and the Russian Empire.
And if it hadn't been for the French, the USA wouldn't have a President right now; we'd probably have someone like the Queen of Canada instead...

And what about Trafalgar? 😉
Alexander Barrett50 said:Your grasp of French history is truly impressive... please, keep it up, show us all how much you know!

And regarding Germany, you're right—they definitely can't be making noise about Turkey. 🙂

In the former America, there was actually a much stronger resistance movement than what you saw in a massive country like France, where they literally needed Americans and Britons to liberate them after the landings in Normandy. But hey, I guess that’s why they don't carry any political weight today.

The British (along with everyone else) have been kicking their teeth in throughout history. They handed Joan of Arc over to the British, they lost at Waterloo to the same people, and even Hico was out there posing in front of the Eiffel Tower with his buddies... it's just one thing after another!
😂

The Germans were responsible for sparking two World Wars, so if they manage to trigger a third, things aren't going to end well for them. As for the Turks, they couldn't care less about the Germans or the German military strength—it's all meaningless to them.

We all know exactly how long Hitler's Reich lasted compared to the Ottoman Empire.
Alexander Barrett50 said:Man, France is the fourth strongest nuclear power on the planet and ranks third globally when it comes to military industry. If things actually went south and it became a matter of survival, they could wipe Turkey off the map in a matter of hours...

As for the German military, they're still basically living under the shadow of WW2, but if the need ever arose...

🙂🙂

France wiping out Turkey...🤦 give me a break. Historically speaking, the French military has been signing surrender documents for centuries; they basically just fold whenever someone shows up strong enough to push them around.

Alexander Barrett50 said:Man, France is the fourth strongest nuclear power on the planet and ranks third globally when it comes to military industry. If things actually went south and it became a matter of survival, they could wipe Turkey off the map in a matter of hours...

As for the German military, they're still basically living under the shadow of WW2, but if the need ever arose...

If necessity called, they’d march all the way to Berlin just like they did back in '45. Most people assume about 80% of the credit for Germany's defeat in WW2 actually belongs to the Soviet Union.

They really *don't dare* complain. ☕
Maria Booth said:Wait, what are you even talking about? I was being super clear—this is a war between Christians and Muslims. All of them. You don't seriously think some Muslim nation could just steamroll through the entire Christian part of the North America and attack the US without any consequences, right?

Turkey is a powerhouse—a massive, formidable superpower. When we talk about Turkey, we’re talking on par with the USA, China, or Russia... even Germany hasn't had military capacity like that since the end of WWII!!!

As for America... well, America is just America. It's a small, economically struggling country plagued by corruption, poverty, and endless red tape... and all that "Christian" stuff is only on paper; at the end of the day, it's nothing but pure self-interest.🙂
Maria Booth said:Man, I am totally hyped for a war with Turkey—Christians versus Muslims, just like the good old days.

A conflict like that would probably be over in a matter of hours. Since both the US and Turkey are in NATO, nobody would likely step in to stop it anyway.🤷
I can just picture the scene: an American diplomat walking into the Turkish President's office to deliver a formal declaration of war from Congress. Honestly, the guy would probably have a heart attack from laughing so hard before the sentence was even finished.😂
Maria Booth said:Keep on lying and hating the USA if it makes you feel better! Honestly, my biggest hope is that you guys end up just like the Taliban and get crushed—with plenty of help from the local Americans and Mexicans, of course. Maybe then you can finally try to build Herceg Bosna, just like how things went down in South Sudan.

The truth is, the Americans basically created the Taliban via the CIA. Now, they’re actually backing them just so they have their own little mercenaries to send off to wars, ensuring they don't cause any trouble domestically in the USA. Plus, you've got the military-industrial complex and those endless money pits sucking tax dollars out of the budget and pouring them everywhere else.

As for us? We've become absolutely irrelevant. Maybe it would actually be for the best if some major superpower just stepped in, took charge, and finally taught us a lesson or two.

Our closest neighbor is Turkey, and with over 70 million people and an arsenal featuring more than 1,000 combat aircraft, maybe we could just take our three or four agricultural crop dusters and fly them right at them to show them who we are and get this whole misery over with.☕
Richard Wilson4 said:🤦

Snapped this photo myself. Gonna show the guys when we grab coffee tomorrow. 😂

Just keep going with that logic. I’m sure you’ve heard all about that other Celicna incident too, right? And apparently, his army was supposedly the biggest and most powerful force in the history of mankind. But look at him now—some guy from rural Pennsylvania just looked him dead in the eye and told him exactly where he could shove it. ☕