I’ve been sipping on Yasmin tea for years now and honestly, nothing. Don't buy into all that hype. Half those prices are just sensationalism cooked up by journalists looking for a headline. Like, have you actually seen any hard evidence proving that Yasmin killed those girls?
So, what's the deal with this rule about names having to follow certain regulations? I mean, what if I just wanted to call my company www.zbljb.com or maybe something like www.varampomalo.com
Do they actually have to give me the green light on stuff like that?
And he’s claiming his base level was at 6k, but I honestly don't see how that works out.
Yeah, true, but what are the actual rules about names? Apparently, you aren't allowed to pick something "funny," but who gets to be the judge of what's actually funny? I do know you can't have xyz in the name, though.
I’m trying to get my bearings here, but there’s so much back-and-forth going on that I feel a bit lost. If anyone could point me in the right direction, I’d really appreciate it.
So, the big dream is to launch my own online marketing agency. A friend of mine mentioned he started his whole business with just a few thousand bucks instead of the twenty grand people usually talk about, and now I'm sitting here scratching my head wondering if I've got the math wrong. It would basically just be me—acting as both the sole employee and the CEO.
Also, I’m looking into grabbing a .com domain. I heard there are certain rules about what you can actually name it—like, apparently you can't pick something totally ridiculous or unprofessional? Does anyone know how that process actually works or what the deal is with naming conventions?
But honestly, the thing is, those parents were raised by the old school. Like, the absolute traditionalists. So, where did things start going sideways?
Jason Campbell7 said:Look, those are extreme outliers—maybe 0.001% of kids—and using them as an excuse to ban shorts or anything else is honestly ridiculous. Take Japan, for example. Even there, where teen sexuality is a massive social issue and practically a trend, uniforms don't stop anything. If anything, some guys find the uniform look way more appealing than just seeing skin. Thankfully, we're worlds away from that kind of thing here in the States (both literally and figuratively). Uniforms, if you ask me, only make sense in boarding schools—the kind we don't really have here. You know, places where parents intentionally pay a premium to hand over their child's upbringing to an institution. If that institution runs on strict discipline and the parents are totally on board with that style of parenting (regardless of the potential downsides), then fine, a uniform fits. In those cases, it's mandatory and baked into the tuition, so parents don't even have to worry about food, discipline, clothing, or basically any other need except during school breaks. But doing it this way? It’s just pointless.
Man, you clearly haven't walked through a high school hallway in a long time. My brother is in his junior year right now, but back when the girls were in middle school, they were showing up to class in bikinis and with their backs totally bare. It wasn't some tiny percentage, either. My own high school was full of girls wearing deep necklines and black thongs.
If I had even dared to throw something on the floor back in my day, my mom would have given me such a piece of her mind that I’d be feeling it for a week. It was just how things were. But nowadays? Kids get reported to the school board or something just for doing that.
Jason Campbell7 said:Look, I’ll take freedom over being stifled any day. Even if the people in charge turn out to be total trash—and let's face it, they always seem to suck regardless of who's running things—at least we can breathe.
Oh, sure. And why stop there? Let's just have 14-year-old girls walking through high school hallways dressed like total trash. Real classy stuff right there.
Jason Campbell7 said:What kind of school has a garbage principal who won't let kids dress how they want? Back in the old days, we showed up to school however we felt, but now they're trying to apply these "modern" pedagogical trends fueled by some sort of hypocritical moralizing... it's gross.
It’s the same thing that probably drove me crazy back then. We had way more freedom; you could basically show up in whatever. I remember people walking into school wearing low-cut tops, black thongs peeking out under white pants, or just super short skirts and stuff like that.
Andrew Ramos10 said:Is that what you call a nervous breakdown... just a total collapse? Because from where I’m sitting, it looks more like pure manic madness
honestly, it’s just a complete lack of discipline.
I’ve actually dealt with a few scenes just like that with my former sister-in-law’s little one. Total chaos in restaurants, throwing fits on the floor at McDonald's because he didn't get the specific toy he wanted, even cursing out the waitress because they were serving PepsiCo instead of Coca-Cola... he’d even go as far as ripping his own clothes off. The kid was only about three years old at the time.
Why on earth would kids hitting the classroom right now have it any harder than I did just six years ago? It’s not like the global temperature spiked by twenty degrees since I graduated. We followed the exact same grind—September through June, sitting in those desks every single day for seven hours, plus Saturdays. And look, we're still standing. Honestly, it feels like kids these days are just being raised way too soft.
I mean, why isn't there a Tampax available down here? Someone mentioned they have them out in space or something... anyway, this one comes with its own applicator, so you just pop it in and nothing sticks out at all. It's totally seamless.
So, here’s my two cents based on what I’ve been through—I’ve been using them religiously from start to finish, and they honestly haven't let me down once. Whether I'm hanging out at the beach, chilling by the pool, or just wherever...