CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › coppermarlin13 › Posts

Posts by coppermarlin13

118 posts shown.

Politics Discussion: General Gotovina and Markač - Full Thread in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I noticed two posts were taken down, but this third one is still up.

Why hasn't it been removed?

Also, did Carol Torres4 get any penalty points for that insulting behavior toward
me?
Has she been disciplined?

If not—then why on earth not?

She completely hijacked the entire thread with all that trolling!!!!

It feels like she only showed up to be rude and stir the pot just so you guys would eventually lock the thread (it's pretty obvious the woman has some serious issues with general Gotovina).
Politics Discussion: General Gotovina and Markač - Full Thread in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Timothy Davis59 said:What's the point in dragging this topic out? Everything was settled once the court handed down its verdict. If people really want to have a debate about general Gotovina or maybe general Markač, we should probably move that conversation over to the political discussion boards instead.


I think this thread should stay open until November 16, 2013—that’s when Gotovina and Markač will actually be walking free citizens again.

Until then, anything can happen, and honestly, we're already seeing things shift in unpredictable ways.

Once that date passes, we can always start a fresh discussion.
Politics Discussion: General Gotovina and Markač - Full Thread in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Since we’re diving into the topic of General Gotovina and Markač... Once again. Locked. And honestly, just like last time, this was done solely to appease a handful of trolls—one loudmouth and a few smaller agitators. I’m reopening this thread because I need to formally lodge a complaint regarding the moderation here, and I have some very specific questions that need to be addressed by the administration.

I’ve already flagged a few posts back on May 1st, and despite some promises that things would be handled, nothing has actually been done. It really makes me wonder: has this forum officially decided to start turning a blind eye to this kind of blatant disrespect and trolling?

I’ve been thinking a lot about how we view our history and the figures who shaped it. It’s easy to get caught up in the emotions of the moment, but I think there's a real value in stepping back to look at the bigger picture. When we talk about leaders like general Gotovina, we aren't just talking about a soldier; we're talking about a symbol of a specific era and the heavy decisions that come with it. It reminds me of how people react to major historical shifts in America. You have these moments where everything feels polarized, where one side sees a hero and the other sees something else entirely. But if you look closer, most of these "black and white" debates are actually shades of gray. History isn't a textbook written by winners; it's a messy, complicated collection of human choices. I was reading some thoughts from coppermarlin13 earlier, and it really struck a chord regarding how much weight we put on individual legacies. We tend to build these monuments in our minds—either pedestals or gallows—but people are rarely just one thing. They are products of their circumstances, their training, and the pressures of the time. Just like any major figure in American military history, someone like general Gotovina represents both the triumph of a cause and the intense friction that such movements inevitably create. I don't want to sound like I'm preaching, but I truly believe that if we want to understand where we are going, we have to stop looking at the past through a lens of pure nostalgia or pure resentment. We have to look at it with a bit of intellectual curiosity. It's like trying to solve a complex puzzle; if you only look at the pieces that fit your preconceived notions, you'll never see the whole image.

Furthermore, this specific thread has become a playground for constant trolling and insults, driven almost exclusively by Carol Torres4. It’s honestly becoming a bit much. You rarely see anyone around here actually contributing meaningful thoughts to the discussion regarding General Gotovina and Markač without being immediately shut down or insulted by her. It feels like if you even attempt to participate in that conversation, you end up getting targeted by her negativity.
Look, I know I’m probably not part of that specific crowd on this forum—the ones who seem to hang on his every word or treat his posts like they're gospel. Personally, I’ve never been particularly impressed by his style, and I certainly don't find myself swept up in the hype. But it makes me wonder: how much longer are the rest of you going to keep looking up to him? At what point do we stop turning a blind eye to this kind of behavior and actually address it?

I have a follow-up question regarding how we handle thread closures here. I was wondering when exactly it became standard practice to lock threads at the request of a user, and what specifically triggered the decision to lock this particular discussion again?

To wrap things up, I’d really appreciate some clarity on two things: when exactly is this thread going to be unlocked again, and more importantly, when can we expect to see the healthy, productive atmosphere return to our discussions? Things were running smoothly and felt much more balanced before Carol Torres4 stepped back into the mix, and I'm looking forward to getting back to that level of discourse.

Thanks!
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
rustydrifter10 said:Look, if they actually have the data to back it up, they have every right to speak their mind.

Honestly, he said plenty enough in his very first post. Now, he’s just circling the drain and trying to start unnecessary drama. 🙄

edit: Plus, all this noise is just doing a disservice to the Make-A-Wish Foundation. 🙄
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
brightpuma said:Glad to meet you, I'm brightpuma... 🤷 Though, I thought my previous posts made it pretty clear that I'm well aware of how the Make-A-Wish Foundation works and its ties to this Reddit. 🤷

Yeah, that's what's really eating at me. All those bands, the regional stuff, the East... all of it.

I noticed. Up until now—just looking back over the last few months—there have been global announcements for refugee fundraisers, animal shelters, notices for the Frank foundation, the United States Bicycle Association, and various protests. But somehow, this one specific thing caught your eye... 🙄

It’s not about her. I don't know who she is, and I have no clue why the Make-A-Wish Foundation picked her specifically. What bugs me is the fact that they're making exceptions by using global Reddit announcements for her, while they won't do the same for, say, veterans. That's what gets me.

So, veterans don't get enough spotlight? 🤷

Hey, brightpuma, could you please move over to the other thread? 🙄 I’m asking nicely, let's just leave this one alone. 🙄
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
brightpuma said:I’m one of the founders of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. 🤷

I honestly had no clue how that foundation even got started. Why didn't rustydrifter10 just say so right away? Maybe she’s just not that plugged in. I was pretty shocked when I clicked on the announcement and saw the headline: BALLAD SINGERS FROM ACROSS THE REGION JOIN FOR A CHARITY GIG for one single person. It's wild, especially since if I remember correctly, some of the bigger veteran charities have had their charity drives rejected before.

I just hope they start making exceptions in other cases, too.

See ya.

So, that’s what’s bothering you. They turn down humanitarian drives for our veterans, yet suddenly they’re all in favor of a charity concert featuring some singer from Mexico along with bands from Mexico and Canada. Interesting, isn't it? ☕

Nah, let's set that aside. Honestly, all those bands were looking to put on a concert for her. One. It’s about the person. They all were. sami They offered to put that concert together. It’s free, all for charity.People who showed up to that concert from all over the former America? Almost all of them were there because of that... Just one. People. That... one It seems like one person can mean a lot to a lot of people. Doesn't it?

Look, if you're going to just barge into a conversation like that, the least you can do is introduce yourself properly. It’s basic courtesy. Next time, try being a little more polite.

brightpuma said:I’m one of the founders of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. 🤷

I honestly had no clue how that foundation even got started. Why didn't rustydrifter10 just say so right away? Maybe she’s just not that plugged in. I was pretty shocked when I clicked on the announcement and saw the headline: BALLAD SINGERS FROM ACROSS THE REGION JOIN FOR A CHARITY GIG for one single person. It's wild, especially since if I remember correctly, some of the bigger veteran charities have had their charity drives rejected before.

I just hope they start making exceptions in other cases, too.

See ya.

So, that’s what’s bothering you. They turn down humanitarian drives for our veterans, yet suddenly they’re all in favor of a charity concert featuring some singer from Mexico along with bands from Mexico and Canada. Interesting, isn't it? ☕

Nah, let's set that aside. Honestly, all those bands were looking to put on a concert for her. One. It’s about the person. They all were. sami They offered to put that concert together. It’s free, all for charity.People who showed up to that concert from all over the former America? Almost all of them were there because of that... Just one. People. That... one It seems like one person can mean a lot to a lot of people. Doesn't it?

Yeah, that’s exactly what gets to me. It’s all those specific bands, the whole regional scene, and everything happening over in the East—it just really rubs me the wrong way.

brightpuma said:I’m one of the founders of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. 🤷

I honestly had no clue how that foundation even got started. Why didn't rustydrifter10 just say so right away? Maybe she’s just not that plugged in. I was pretty shocked when I clicked on the announcement and saw the headline: BALLAD SINGERS FROM ACROSS THE REGION JOIN FOR A CHARITY GIG for one single person. It's wild, especially since if I remember correctly, some of the bigger veteran charities have had their charity drives rejected before.

I just hope they start making exceptions in other cases, too.

See ya.

So, that’s what’s bothering you. They turn down humanitarian drives for our veterans, yet suddenly they’re all in favor of a charity concert featuring some singer from Mexico along with bands from Mexico and Canada. Interesting, isn't it? ☕

Nah, let's set that aside. Honestly, all those bands were looking to put on a concert for her. One. It’s about the person. They all were. sami They offered to put that concert together. It’s free, all for charity.People who showed up to that concert from all over the former America? Almost all of them were there because of that... Just one. People. That... one It seems like one person can mean a lot to a lot of people. Doesn't it?

This doesn't really hit home for me personally. I have absolutely no clue who this individual is, nor do I understand why the Make-A-Wish Foundation decided to run with her specific estimates—why they picked her of all people, I can't tell you. But what actually gets under my skin is the blatant double standard. It’s frustrating to see these massive, global announcements being made on Reddit specifically for one person, while everyone else—like our veterans—gets left out in the cold. That kind of inconsistency is what really bothers me.
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
brightpuma said:Aside from the Make-A-Wish Foundation profile, which acted as a secondary account for a while, the actual charity work is handled by Angela Newman33. If you check the global announcement on the thread about this fundraiser, she’s the one who posted it. She also happens to be the president of the foundation.
People on Reddit already know her face and everything she’s done regarding this. She’s been running these charity drives for two or three years now—well before the Make-A-Wish Foundation was even officially established.
Since this foundation actually exists because of the hard work and donations from the Reddit community—specifically that parenting group—it only makes sense that the organization and the site would team up. Why wouldn't they?

So, what’s the actual story here? Given the total amount raised, there's no way we can say for sure that it all came from Reddit users. I mean, surely the Make-A-Wish Foundation was promoting their events elsewhere too, right?

So, like this thread linked in the global notice, one user went out of their way to pull some strings. They managed to get that family's story about needing help featured in The Los Angeles Times. After that, the news hit Netscape, and from there, it just started spreading everywhere.

You can also keep up with everything the Make-A-Wish Foundation is doing on Facebook. And let's face it—Facebook is pretty much where everyone goes to get their news these days, right?

I mean, it should be fine if you just get in touch with a director from a nonprofit. You’d just need to vet them and the organization thoroughly—some might even be big names you've already heard of and know you can trust. If you do that, maybe you don't even need two-way communication on Reddit. That interaction could just happen through the official website of the charity running the campaign, assuming they actually have the tech setup for it.


If we're talking about major, high-profile nonprofits, why would they even need to bother advertising on Reddit? 🤷
I mean, big-name nonprofits get all the media attention handed to them on a silver platter. They can operate at a much higher level than we can here on Reddit.
Just like you said, you’d never even heard of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. It's the same story with the press. Small organizations—and there are millions of them out there—struggle to get any eyes on them. That makes community drives on a platform as massive and active as Reddit an absolute lifeline for their survival.

Honestly, official global announcements are incredibly rare. Those two recent drives by the Make-A-Wish Foundation were more the exception than the rule. Usually, their initiatives are strictly limited to RiD or maybe a couple of PDFs.

Wait, who even are you?

And why are you stepping in to answer questions meant for rustydrifter10—who is actually the moderator here—especially since those questions were direct follow-ups to her specific answers?

@ Angela Newman33,

I honestly had no clue how that foundation even got its start. I’m not sure why rustydrifter10 didn't clear that up right away; maybe she just wasn't fully briefed on the backstory. It really caught me off guard when I clicked that announcement and saw the headline about all these regional bands coming together for a massive tribute concert to help one single person. It felt a bit jarring, especially since if I recall correctly, some much larger, more established veteran charities have had their humanitarian requests turned down before.

I just really hope they’re willing to make exceptions in other cases too.

Goodness me.
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
rustydrifter10 said:Reddit gets involved in all sorts of ways with the various drives they put together and things like that. From what I’ve gathered, the partnership has always been really smooth and productive.

Oh, no, Reddit just acts as the messenger here. There really needs to be a specific point of contact among the organizers that users can reach out to if they have questions, rather than everyone bugging the site administrators with every little thing.

The Reddit admins will be the ones deciding whether or not something warrants a site-wide announcement.

It isn't strictly necessary, but it definitely helps to keep things organized.

How exactly does the community get involved here? I’d love for you to walk me through the process—maybe we could even look into supporting other initiatives or charities that are out there doing great work?

So, I decided to hop onto Google and dig through the archives of our old Reddit threads. I really wanted to see the full scope of everything this community has touched—specifically looking for those deep-dive discussions that grew out of the various charity drives organized by the Make-A-Wish Foundation. I was curious to see which topics sparked actual conversations here after the initial events wrapped up. It’s actually pretty funny, though; after all that digging, I only stumbled upon exactly three specific threads. Each one had maybe two or three posts, and honestly, they were mostly just the organizers posting updates.

(I think this handle belongs to the Make-A-Wish Foundation.)

I was scrolling through Reddit the other day and stumbled upon a discussion that really got me thinking about how much our social fabric relies on those small, quiet acts of kindness. It’s easy to get cynical about the world, but reading through certain threads reminds you that there are still people out there putting in the work to make things better for others. One user, coppermarlin13, brought up a point that resonated with me regarding community support. They were talking about the impact of organizations like the Make-A-Wish Foundation and how much weight they carry when it comes to bringing hope to families facing impossible situations. It isn't just about the grand gestures, though; it's about the consistency of the effort. It's like building a house—you don't just throw a roof on and call it a day; you have to lay the foundation, one brick at a time, with intention. There was also some interesting back-and-forth involving rustydrifter10 and brightpuma about the logistical side of charity work. It’s one thing to want to help, but it’s an entirely different beast to organize it effectively. It reminded me of how complex large-scale nonprofits have to be to actually deliver on their promises. You can't just show up with good intentions; you need structure, funding, and a dedicated group of people who aren't afraid to get their hands dirty. Then, Angela Newman33 chimed in with a perspective on how these local efforts often ripple outward, affecting the broader community in ways we don't always see immediately. It’s like a stone thrown into a pond—the splash is what everyone notices, but it’s the ripples moving toward the edges that truly change the surface of the water. It makes me wonder: in our fast-paced, digital-heavy lives, are we doing enough to foster these kinds of connections? We spend so much time shouting into the void of the internet, but maybe we should spend a little more time focusing on the tangible, boots-on-the-ground work that actually changes a life. It’s not always glamorous, and it certainly doesn't always get a lot of likes, but it’s where the real magic happens.
I was browsing through some old threads on Reddit recently and came across an interesting discussion regarding the recent changes to the local tax codes and how they might impact small business owners in our community. It’s one of those topics that seems dry on the surface, but once you start peeling back the layers, you realize how much it touches everyone’s daily lives. To put it into perspective, imagine you’ve spent years building a successful local bakery or a specialized repair shop. You’ve finally hit that sweet spot where things are predictable and steady. Suddenly, the regulatory landscape shifts under your feet—much like if the IRS unexpectedly overhauled small business deductions overnight. It’s not just about the immediate cost; it’s the uncertainty of the future that really keeps entrepreneurs up at night. Some people are arguing that these adjustments are necessary to fund critical infrastructure projects, similar to how we might debate large-scale highway expansions in Texas or California. They argue that the long-term benefits of better roads and public services will eventually stimulate more economic growth, essentially paying for themselves through increased commerce. On the other hand, there's a very vocal group of skeptics who feel this is just another way to tighten the squeeze on the middle class. They see it as a slow creep of taxation that disproportionately hits those who are already working hardest to climb the ladder. It’s a classic tug-of-war between collective investment and individual liberty. I find myself sitting somewhere in the middle. While I agree that a functioning society needs well-maintained public resources, I also believe that any policy change should be met with extreme caution if it threatens the stability of independent businesses. We have to ask ourselves: at what point does the cost of "progress" outweigh the actual benefit to the citizens it's supposed to serve? It’s a complex balancing act, much like trying to tune a high-performance engine while the car is still driving down the interstate. One wrong adjustment and you’re looking at a breakdown. I’d love to hear what others think about this—do you feel the trade-off is worth it, or are we heading toward a situation where the little guy gets left behind?
I was browsing through some old threads on Reddit recently and stumbled upon this discussion that really got me thinking about how much things have changed. It’s one of those topics that seems simple on the surface but actually touches on so many layers of our daily lives and how we interact with society. The conversation started with someone asking about the best ways to support local charities and non-profits, specifically looking at organizations like the Make-A-Wish Foundation. It’s such a beautiful cause, isn't it? There's something incredibly moving about seeing how a community can rally together to make a dream come true for a child. It reminds me of how a well-oiled machine works—every small part, no matter how tiny, contributes to the overall momentum. When enough people pitch in, even small donations start to feel like a tidal wave of support. However, the thread quickly shifted into a deeper debate about transparency and where exactly our money goes when we donate. A few users were expressing skepticism, which I think is totally fair. In an era where everyone is hyper-aware of corporate accountability, why should we expect anything less from our charitable institutions? One user, coppermarlin13, pointed out that without clear reporting, it’s hard to feel that genuine connection to the cause. They compared it to investing in a startup; you want to see the roadmap and the results before you go all in. Then, brightpuma jumped in with a different perspective, arguing that while oversight is crucial, we shouldn't let perfectionism paralyze our generosity. They used a great analogy: if you wait until you have a perfect, foolproof system to help someone in need, you might end up helping no one at all. It’s that classic tension between being a cautious steward of your resources and being a compassionate neighbor. As the discussion evolved, it moved toward the role of larger social structures and how they influence individual giving. We touched on everything from tax incentives to the way big media outlets, like The Los Angeles Times, shape public perception of certain causes. It’s fascinating how much the "narrative" matters. If a charity is getting heavy coverage in the news, the influx of donations is almost immediate, whereas smaller, grassroots efforts often struggle to get their foot in the door. It really makes you realize that philanthropy isn't just about writing a check; it's a complex ecosystem involving trust, media influence, and personal values. It’s like a massive, interconnected web where every strand affects the others. Whether you're a huge donor or just someone dropping a few bucks in a jar at a local shop, you're part of that fabric. What do you guys think? Do you prioritize transparency above all else, or is the emotional connection to the mission enough to drive your support? I’d love to hear your thoughts on how we can strike that balance between being smart with our money and staying open-hearted.

So, what’s the actual story here? Given the total amount of money raised, we can't just assume it all came from people on Reddit. It’s pretty obvious the Make-A-Wish Foundation would have been promoting their events through other channels too.

rustydrifter10 said:Reddit gets involved in all sorts of ways with the various drives they put together and things like that. From what I’ve gathered, the partnership has always been really smooth and productive.

Oh, no, Reddit just acts as the messenger here. There really needs to be a specific point of contact among the organizers that users can reach out to if they have questions, rather than everyone bugging the site administrators with every little thing.

The Reddit admins will be the ones deciding whether or not something warrants a site-wide announcement.

It isn't strictly necessary, but it definitely helps to keep things organized.

Honestly, you could just bundle all of that into one big, comprehensive announcement post. You’d lay out every single detail, provide all the necessary info, and make sure everyone knows exactly who to contact. It keeps everything organized in one place.

rustydrifter10 said:Reddit gets involved in all sorts of ways with the various drives they put together and things like that. From what I’ve gathered, the partnership has always been really smooth and productive.

Oh, no, Reddit just acts as the messenger here. There really needs to be a specific point of contact among the organizers that users can reach out to if they have questions, rather than everyone bugging the site administrators with every little thing.

The Reddit admins will be the ones deciding whether or not something warrants a site-wide announcement.

It isn't strictly necessary, but it definitely helps to keep things organized.

I honestly think the best way to handle this would be to have a director from a nonprofit organization reach out to you directly. That way, you can take your time to really vet both the individual and the organization itself—you know, some of these groups are incredibly prestigious and widely recognized, so you might already know they're trustworthy just by their reputation. Once you’ve done that due diligence, I don't see why you'd even need two-way communication on Reddit. If there's a need for ongoing dialogue, that could easily happen through the official website of the charity running the campaign, provided they have the technical setup to support it.

rustydrifter10 said:Reddit gets involved in all sorts of ways with the various drives they put together and things like that. From what I’ve gathered, the partnership has always been really smooth and productive.

Oh, no, Reddit just acts as the messenger here. There really needs to be a specific point of contact among the organizers that users can reach out to if they have questions, rather than everyone bugging the site administrators with every little thing.

The Reddit admins will be the ones deciding whether or not something warrants a site-wide announcement.

It isn't strictly necessary, but it definitely helps to keep things organized.

Exactly, that sounds fair. Which admin should someone reach out to? Who's actually handling these kinds of things? Is that you? I just want to make sure people aren't bouncing around from one corner of the site to another looking for answers.
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
rustydrifter10 said:It sounds way too corporate to me. 😁

I really feel like these kinds of campaigns need to be a two-way street between the organizers and the community here on Reddit. Ideally, we should kick off a dedicated thread on the main subreddit where everyone can actually jump in and have a real discussion about it. That one you linked was a total outlier since it was thrown together at the very last minute. We don't usually just drop stuff on people like that without warning, but we decided to roll with it this time around. The idea is that there should be a space where you can chat directly with someone who actually knows the ins and outs of the situation and has all the specifics. And honestly, like I mentioned before, the Make-A-Wish Foundation is such a solid, proven organization that we have zero hesitation letting them take the lead on this. If we were dealing with some random new group, we’d probably be much more hesitant, but with them, it's a no-brainer.

Look, that’s exactly what those thread topics are for! I mentioned this earlier, but since this current one is totally lacking any actual structure, I guess I'll just say it—though honestly, following a proper topic format isn't exactly standard practice around here, is it? 🙂

So what’s the alternative? Should it sound more friendly? 🤷

rustydrifter10 said:It sounds way too corporate to me. 😁

I really feel like these kinds of campaigns need to be a two-way street between the organizers and the community here on Reddit. Ideally, we should kick off a dedicated thread on the main subreddit where everyone can actually jump in and have a real discussion about it. That one you linked was a total outlier since it was thrown together at the very last minute. We don't usually just drop stuff on people like that without warning, but we decided to roll with it this time around. The idea is that there should be a space where you can chat directly with someone who actually knows the ins and outs of the situation and has all the specifics. And honestly, like I mentioned before, the Make-A-Wish Foundation is such a solid, proven organization that we have zero hesitation letting them take the lead on this. If we were dealing with some random new group, we’d probably be much more hesitant, but with them, it's a no-brainer.

Look, that’s exactly what those thread topics are for! I mentioned this earlier, but since this current one is totally lacking any actual structure, I guess I'll just say it—though honestly, following a proper topic format isn't exactly standard practice around here, is it? 🙂

How exactly do you manage such seamless cooperation with the Make-A-Wish Foundation when this whole thing was basically a last-minute scramble—making this "exception" feel a little too convenient? 🤷

Also, how can you be so sure they’re reliable and trustworthy? You say it with such absolute certainty. Personally, I haven't heard much about them, and I make it a point to follow these kinds of events. Are they a major national player or just something local? 🤷

And I'm still a bit lost on what the actual criteria are. Based on your previous post, I thought the two-way communication was supposed to happen between the admins and the charity directors (or whoever is running the show), but now you're talking about communication between the users and the organizers. So, does that mean if the discussion is high-quality, the announcement goes live, but if it isn't, the official announcement is scrapped? 😕 Who gets to be the judge of all that? 😕 I'm getting a little turned around here. 😕 And what role are you leaving to the Make-A-Wish Foundation? I think there's a misunderstanding—I'm talking about the official site-wide announcements, not the logistics of organizing humanitarian projects.

Anyway, I really hope you'll apply these same kind of exceptions to other, even larger-scale initiatives—ones that help even more people on a national level—rather than just using this one case as a one-off example.

rustydrifter10 said:It sounds way too corporate to me. 😁

I really feel like these kinds of campaigns need to be a two-way street between the organizers and the community here on Reddit. Ideally, we should kick off a dedicated thread on the main subreddit where everyone can actually jump in and have a real discussion about it. That one you linked was a total outlier since it was thrown together at the very last minute. We don't usually just drop stuff on people like that without warning, but we decided to roll with it this time around. The idea is that there should be a space where you can chat directly with someone who actually knows the ins and outs of the situation and has all the specifics. And honestly, like I mentioned before, the Make-A-Wish Foundation is such a solid, proven organization that we have zero hesitation letting them take the lead on this. If we were dealing with some random new group, we’d probably be much more hesitant, but with them, it's a no-brainer.

Look, that’s exactly what those thread topics are for! I mentioned this earlier, but since this current one is totally lacking any actual structure, I guess I'll just say it—though honestly, following a proper topic format isn't exactly standard practice around here, is it? 🙂

And honestly, does every single charity drive really need its own dedicated thread? It might actually be more effective to just pin an announcement about a worthy cause within this PDF (the messages...) and let some spontaneous, engaging discussions bloom from there. Not everyone is keeping up with every individual PDF, but almost everyone stays tuned into the main feed. The whole point should be to make sure as many people as possible hear about these initiatives.
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Why did you put "collaboration" in quotation marks?

It’s pretty obvious that this Reddit thread is essentially just acting as a middleman here. I think my previous post made it clear that this approach should apply to other projects and charitable drives suggested by the community as well. However, what I’m struggling to wrap my head around are the specific criteria used to reject certain proposals. In other words, what exactly determines whether this "collaboration" happens or not? For instance, if a director from an organization like the Make-A-Wish Foundation reaches out to start a charity drive, is that enough to trigger a global, free announcement? If not, what specifically would it take to meet your standards?

Also, it might actually be a good idea to make these requests for global announcements public to everyone on the Reddit community, and for several reasons. For example, there might be users who know way more about these specific nonprofits or local initiatives than you guys do, which could help you make much better decisions. Plus, it would provide transparency so we can all see what fits your guidelines and what doesn't.
Upcoming Charity Events & Announcements in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Since I haven't been able to track down any official announcements, guidelines, or specific criteria regarding how to get a humanitarian event announcement posted site-wide (much like this one), could someone from the administration please walk us through the procedure?

I think we can all agree that we’ve all encountered—or will certainly encounter—deserving causes that really need to reach as many eyes as possible. A featured announcement here would be such a powerful way to help those efforts gain traction. It would be wonderful if we could have a dedicated thread (or perhaps a section within an existing one, if I've just missed it) that outlines the rules, requirements, and the exact process for suggesting a project or charity drive for a free announcement on Reddit. This thread could potentially serve that very purpose.

Thanks so much!
Protest against thread relocation in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I honestly think you’re getting a bit mixed up here, both in terms of how you’re protesting and the assumptions you're making. It’s a stretch to assume that the way things are moderated within the political landscape in US domestic politics applies to everything else, and frankly, I don't see how this protest is going to get you anywhere.

edit: I only posted the question here because I was genuinely looking for a logical explanation as to why the thread was moved in the first place. Maybe someone can actually give me a straight answer.
mistyjackal14 said:I really wanted to take a moment to give a shout-out to the admins over at the Religion sub-forum, not just because they allowed us to go ahead with celebrating Christmas this year, but because they actually took the initiative to get things moving (@Brenda Cook4).

The real issue, however, seems to have shifted up a notch toward the moderation team. You see, while the thread itself proceeded quite smoothly with everyone showing mutual respect, one moderator (who also happens to be an admin on the Religion board) decided to start trolling, flame wars, and dumping endless litanies written in English*
For the first time ever, I actually found myself using that little traffic sign icon down in the corner, though I’m well aware it isn’t particularly effective against reds.🙂

I managed to successfully ignore the post, but a few trolls and flamers did gather to back up the moderator.

Perhaps any given religion, or even anti-religion, has intolerance baked right into its foundation, which leads to this strange paradox where, in the name of tolerance, one must permit their very intolerance and provocations—but honestly, those are getting into some pretty heavy, sophistic philosophical territory.

Anyway, I'll offer my thanks to the admins once more, because if I’m going to offer criticism, I believe it’s only fair to offer praise as well, all while holding onto the hope and understanding that things might improve even more next year; I realize that normalcy doesn't just happen overnight, and you can't force change through the hierarchy.

*It might sound a bit silly to people from other sub-forums when I mention relying on untranslated text, but on the Religion board, that is strictly monitored, and I've personally been handed warnings for poor translations, even by that very same moderator.


It’s unbelievable.

And that post from the supermod is still sitting there on the thread, probably acting as a "perfect example" of how one should offer greetings.

To make matters worse, the admin Daniel Ward87 is actually trying to justify it all, convincing forum members that the supermod Nicole James isn't trolling (even though it looks like the supermod and their crew are laughing at him behind his back).🤣 🙏

It's a total disaster.

Honestly, thank goodness zgsash is gone; if it wasn't for other reasons, then at least it's because they were appointing supermods like this.

An absolute mess.
When is enough, enough? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Some of these threads were pulled from the PDF political scene and moved over to the subforum Politics & Policy, where the post count doesn't track the same way. You really need to check how many of your old posts aren't showing up in the tally versus how many actually got deleted outright.

Also, why are you saying thanks for not getting a strike? It’s a bit weird—it makes it sound like you were intentionally trying to get flagged or censored, which clearly wasn't the case.😁
stormyraven14 said:Hey, don't start yelling at me now—it’s not my fault you didn't read the intro... 😢

I just went back and read the whole thing 🤣:

http://www.reddit.com/showpost.php?p=29935298&postcount=1
Oh yeah, why didn't you just delete my post instead of tearing it to shreds? 😁

Go ahead and quote it—let’s see this supposed insult toward Jezebel as a person. Let everyone else decide what they think for themselves, especially the folks over at the Women's Corner (instead of you trying to force an opinion on them 😬). 🤣

edit: And don't try to troll me with grammar police tactics. 🤣 Give me a break. 🤣
redmarlin3 said:The Jezebel post [which is only partially quoted here and taken out of context] was left up because it’s completely on-topic, constructive, thoughtful, detailed, and offers a really interesting critical perspective on the situation.
The very first reply quoting it was aimed almost exclusively at bashing Jezebel itself ("you clearly have serious issues grasping the subject matter," "you don't understand anything," "only an idiot could write posts like this," etc.). That's why it was deleted.
The next few posts deal with Tadić and Srebrenica, which just doesn't belong here on ZK. So, they were removed.
The posts following the warning focus on my moderation. That's why they were (mostly) deleted.
Not a single post was given a full ban.
Yes, I can see for myself that I messed up here.

P.S. Endure, not endure.

🤣

This feels like an explanation to the admins about why they should back you (and people like you), while simultaneously justifying blatant moderation in Women's Corner—where threads are threatened with closure (or just closed), posts are wiped, strikes are handed out, and female and male users are attacked just for daring to criticize Mexicans once? Or Mexican politics? Or American policy toward Mexico and Mexicans? Or anything else related to Mexicans? Because that is the actual reality of how Women's Corner is moderated (along with a whole host of other unmentioned issues).

Why aren't you deleting, say, Tyler Bishop56's constant trolling and nonsense? Why aren't you warning him or pushing him to actually engage in Politics? Or what about those who constantly insult and disparage Americans and/or the Catholic faith? The ones who turn every single damn thread into a platform to spit venom based on the things mentioned above?

And that vague, insulting, controversial post from Jezebel—which you want to frame as reasonable, critical, and thoughtful for some equally vague reason (presumably to convince anyone lacking even a shred of intelligence that deleting responses and reactions is justified)—is a perfect reflection of what constantly happens in Women's Corner and what you are trying to pass off as "reasonable" through low-intelligence tactics. And it'll probably work, given the crowd that gathers on this forum (whether they are the moderators and admins who put you in that seat, or the users themselves—not just your friends, but regular folks who don't know any better and just pose). 🤮

It's also quite interesting how you forbid reasoned debate about Politics in Women's Corner. I suppose it's because Women's Corner is reserved strictly for the idiots and airheads who aren't capable of an actual argument and can only engage in mindless chatter (which isn't banned). 🤮

redmarlin3 said:The Jezebel post [which is only partially quoted here and taken out of context] was left up because it’s completely on-topic, constructive, thoughtful, detailed, and offers a really interesting critical perspective on the situation.
The very first reply quoting it was aimed almost exclusively at bashing Jezebel itself ("you clearly have serious issues grasping the subject matter," "you don't understand anything," "only an idiot could write posts like this," etc.). That's why it was deleted.
The next few posts deal with Tadić and Srebrenica, which just doesn't belong here on ZK. So, they were removed.
The posts following the warning focus on my moderation. That's why they were (mostly) deleted.
Not a single post was given a full ban.
Yes, I can see for myself that I messed up here.

P.S. Endure, not endure.

🙏🙏
stormyraven14 said:See, that thread is about the act of judging—it isn't a space created FOR judgment...

Oh, really? So you're saying I can't take something that absolutely revolts me and use it as an example to condemn everything else being discussed in a thread specifically meant for things we actually find reprehensible?

That’s basically just a textbook case of someone trying to dodge accountability because they don't like the way the criticism is being delivered.
placidranger said:Hey, maybe we should move this debate over to the Politics section—or some other obscure corner of the site.

But wait, since when is talking about Politics off-limits in the Women's Corner? And are we really not allowed to judge things here? Especially in a thread specifically designed to call out nonsense?
Jerry Martinez5 said:The post from Jezebel is actually pretty reasonable and moderate. If you think it’s "disgusting," you're probably just projecting. I don't see any deleted posts here, for what it's worth.

Anyway, this kind of debate doesn't belong in Women's Corner; it belongs in Politics. And even there, people just end up spewing mindless hate.

Why jump into a debate when you clearly haven't done the homework on what's actually going on? Please, do us all a favor and move on to a different topic. 🙄 Don't go ruining my thread. I’m looking to talk specifically with the admins or super-mods who actually have access to the deleted logs.

And please, don't take this personally and start venting (by flooding this thread with more nonsensical posts).

Thanks, 👋