Posts by Noah Diaz

So, I guess we aren't getting an audit after all?

Respectfully submitted, 😁

It’s funny when a moderator notices you’re running low on warnings, so they decide to hit you with a strike for a post from 14 days ago. I guess they let it age perfectly before throwing it on the grill. Now I’m just waiting on an audit of my last two years to see how many more of these little penalties I can collect.

Total nonsense. 😵

I've never dealt with this before, so I’d appreciate it if someone who actually knows the ropes could explain these moderator gymnastics to me. 🤣

... and please, update the subforum rules. People are clearly confused about what they can actually say here—what kind of rhetoric is allowed, who is off-limits for quoting, and all that. 😁

Any chance we could restrict posting on the Coronavirus PDF to only those who are vaccinated or have already recovered from the virus? 🤣

By any chance, could a new moderator ask ego why my post was deleted?

Look, I know you're just feeling nostalgic. It's a shame what this Reddit has turned into.

Casey Bennett said:🙂
It seems a woman can't enjoy even a tiny shred of satisfaction in her life without being immediately attacked from every conceivable angle.
Just keep grinding away: wash, iron, cook, help the needy (well, we all know I love doing that, but there just aren't enough hours in the day...), vacuum, sweep, plaster the walls, chop wood in the forest, or try to tame some wild stallion...
And then, squeezed right between painting the house and scrubbing the kitchen counters, I come here to unwind and have a bit of fun with such refined, cultured, and profoundly intelligent people.
But when even that is off the table! How much longer can this go on? I want freedom! I want to breathe!
Nobody is going to tell me how to live my life! Am I right? 😬

Exactly. And while you're at it, feel free to start your own dedicated thread about yourself, but just let me add you to my Ignore list 20 first. 🤣

Since the moderator Casey Bennett has very successfully and quite unnecessarily spammed this thread, I have to ask the new/old moderation team once again:

Why was my post containing this link deleted?

https://www.nytimes.com/science...article-15103227
EXPERT ASSESSMENT
FDA declined to approve a third vaccine dose for everyone: 'Yes, antibody counts are dropping, but B cells are right there...'

Which specific Reddit rules exactly does my post with the link above violate?

While we're at it, let's clear up this whole situation:

driftingtinker said:Since everyone’s out here playing teacher today, I guess I’ll grab my crayons and join the fun: You can't even add the moderator to your ignore list. Just thought you should know.

So, I guess putting this new mod on that legendary list is just another one of those absolutely brilliant moves. Real genius stuff right there.

The real issue here is that I can't actually ignore you, so I constantly have to warn Kae that I have no intention of debating him.

Why is it like this? It’s as if we had a few posts of discussion, and then he retroactively handed out several warnings and ordered me to end the "stupid" debate. That guy has zero issues with that, and since then, I've had absolutely no desire to engage with him.

I suppose he thinks some 'mysterious' bench reserve will save him.😁

Amanda Diaz said:Why are you all attacking this guy before you even see how he actually handles things? It’s not like he could be much more incompetent or biased than the current top moderators on that site anyway.

So, my post with this link just got nuked:

https://www.nytimes.com/science...article-15103227
EXPERT ASSESSMENT
FDA declines universal third dose approval: ‘Yes, antibody counts are dropping, but B cells are still there...‘

Why?🙄

Why should they have to, if they've already recovered? Are they even showing symptoms?

Of course they don't work; masks aren't some magic shield against infection.

Last year, hospitals became massive hot zones for outbreaks, despite everyone wearing hazmat suits, masks, face shields, goggles, and N95s.

Larry Walker24 said:Basically, this means his kid will have to take retake exams for every single subject. If he fails just one—boom—he fails the whole grade. Let's see if he still acts like a tough guy then.

And even if he somehow scrapes by and enrolls in high school, the principal is probably just gonna tell him that high school isn't mandatory and show him the door.

He could take that "attitude" to a whole new level. Maybe request asylum in Sweden, since they wouldn't dream of violating a child's rights like this.

https://www.unicef.org/us/what-we-do/child-rights

The rights outlined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child are built upon four core principles:

Children must be protected from discrimination "regardless of race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status of the child, their parents, or their legal guardians."

Children have the right to life and development in all aspects, including physical, emotional, psychosocial, cognitive, social, and cultural growth.

In all decisions or actions affecting a child or group of children, the best interests of the child must be the primary consideration. This applies to decisions made by government, administrative, or legislative bodies, as well as those made by families.

Children must be allowed to participate actively in all matters affecting their lives and granted the freedom to express their views. They have the right to voice their perspectives, which must be taken seriously.

Has anyone actually heard the Ombudsman or any NGO say anything remotely intelligent about this?

Jacob Alvarez said:So, Anderson, have we kept you entertained these last few weeks?
Did we help you kill off some much-needed downtime?

Great. Just great.
Now, why don't you explain what the hell you actually plan to do regarding the technical side of this forum? If there even is a plan.
Please tell me you aren't planning on shutting the whole thing down.

It’s hilarious how quickly some users swallowed Anderson's nonsense.

But he managed to justify himself. Credit where credit is due!

🙏 🙏 🙏

I’m getting the exact same error message on my end.

Sent from my iPhone using Reddit

Matthew Harris5 said:And thanks for not punishing such massive trolling, too. ☕

I just want to extend my gratitude to the forum moderators for yet another 'stellar' post from the latest clone of the permabanned Haram.

Is my ultimate goal really to spend days pondering how to respond to some pathetic troll's mindless babbling?

.

As far as I’m concerned, you won't see me back here until you fix the moderation and allow for civilized discussion free from stalkers, trolls, and clones.

Maybe I'll see you all under better circumstances.

.

Test successful. Ready to proceed.

[/////]

🙄

Things are finally starting to clear up on the fringes of science.

Two absolute troublemakers have been sidelined, so the atmosphere feels much lighter now.

Kudos to the moderator.

THANKS 👍

I can confirm it myself: there isn't a single moderator in sight over there.

Stop looking for links. It’s become painfully obvious at this point.

Can someone in charge give us an update on when the moderation team might actually get back to work?

The PDF section has turned into a total dumping ground.

Matthew Castillo5 said:If someone, despite having access to all the facts, decides to try and treat their cancer with fruit juice, shark cartilage, bioenergy, or by visiting Ivo Pavić and praying instead of using actual medical services, that's on them. They own that choice and they deal with the consequences.

Besides, official stances on whether certain foods are "good" or "bad" change all the time anyway. One day lard is the villain, then butter is the enemy, and suddenly margarine is the only way to go—only for them to turn around later and show that margarine might actually be the worst of the three.

In my humble opinion, moderators shouldn't be playing judge and jury over whether someone's opinion is "correct." Their job is to make sure the conversation stays civilized. At the end of the day, people have the right to hold views that others might completely disagree with.

The mods don't even bother following basic Reddit rules. We've complained about it multiple times, but nothing changes. To them, ad hominem attacks are just standard procedure.

Here are a few recent examples:

You’re lying persistently and rudely.

Liar.

You're lying, you're [redacted], and you're protected by this site's moderation.

We're assuming those who deny AGW are just demagogic liars, hypocrites, and egomaniacs. Or at best, idiots.

You're lying. You're lying. You're lying.