Timothy Nelson5 said:But you just don't get it, do you? The most important thing, apparently, is fostering this whole idea of diversity.
An American, a Canadian, or maybe someone from Mexico—they aren't really all that different from a typical person in the United States. They share a similar cultural sphere, similar religious roots, roughly the same educational standards... when I'm walking around New York, nobody can even tell I'm not a local unless I decide to strike up some long, drawn-out conversation... That isn't "diversity," though. That’s not what the globalists are looking for. No, they want to push variety because that's what's considered "in" and "fancy" these days... They want to import Syrians, Afghans, Somalis... people who supposedly "enrich" society through their unique cultures, levels of education, and customs.
And Hofer is standing against that. So, I suppose one should vote for the other guy.
Oh, absolutely. I'm sure Americans hold such high regard for those from the former America. 🤣
velvetmoose9 said:It’s pretty sweet of you to be out here scouting jobs for me. Honestly, the Department of Labor would probably see some serious gains if they actually hired someone like you. The whole US economy would basically take off, unemployment would vanish overnight, and we'd all finally figure out where we fit in. Just give me the Number and let's get moving.
But honestly, it’s your specific choice of words that really stands out. If we were being super strict about the usual forum insults, someone might actually interpret your rambling as a minor slight against the community. If you're treating this like a casual chat room or something equally informal, there are definitely much better ways to communicate without making it weird.
Go ahead and hit me with a partial ban from the Foodie section right now if you think I deserve it. The way you're handling this as a moderator is a perfect snapshot of what's wrong with this whole PDF. Why don't you try actually moderating instead of talking down to everyone? I'm certain I'm not the issue with this PDF. And using words like "screwed up" is even worse. 🙏 🤦
velvetmoose9 said:The authorities are doing their jobs. It might not be happening quite as fast as we’d all like (myself included, along with everyone else on this forum), but just like in the real world, there’s an overwhelming amount of stuff going on and not nearly enough inspectors to keep up with it all. Look, the penalty system isn't perfect; banning someone, or even just being selective about enforcement, isn't always the smartest move to make. But if we can't resolve things through civilized means—maintaining that classic sense of American decorum we all value—then we’re eventually going to have to resort to those equally traditional, albeit much less popular, measures, including the ones mentioned above.
The thing is, once the criteria for soft-moderation go completely off the rails and head south toward total chaos, it's pretty much impossible to pull them back upstream...
To start with, you could deal with the "burger-is-just-beef" crowd. They've completely trashed the hamburger thread again... ☕
I haven't put too much effort into this, but I spent some time skimming through a few "sensitive" topics over the last couple of days. If the search function actually worked properly, you could find just about anything here:
As you can tell, I'm certainly not the only one bothered by this. It’s pretty clear that this relaxed approach—where posts are just deleted and bans are rarely handed out—isn't doing much. Next time, we should probably go straight for the 100-point penalty. Maybe then people will think twice before dragging the same thread out for the nth time. 😬
Bogdan, it seems like the gastronomy PDF boils down to nothing more than pizza from KitchenAid, burgers from Mark, or olive oil from $10 and things like that. Meanwhile, in other PDFs, those same characters are bragging about drinking nothing but craft beer. You have to wonder if they're actually broke or if they're just trolling. 🙄
Nathan Turner3 said:If we feel a post needs to be sanctioned, we’re going to do it. That means either a warning or a straight-up ban.
There's no reason to act offended. 😬 You know exactly who we're talking about and how everything always circles back to the price of pizza near O'Hare, KitchenAid, mozzarella, burgers, fast food, or those overpriced restaurants with tiny portions. You guys allow this behavior, which is why it keeps happening. Am I really expected to report every single post that derails a productive conversation? Until people feel a little sting now and then, things aren't going to change. 🍿
I don't want people thinking I only ever comment on moderation when I'm hanging out on the PDF.
Jeffrey Long said:It’s always the same three or four guys. They treat visiting some obscure spot on the outskirts of town like it's their life's mission, only to turn around and trash the photos, the high-end restaurant prices, the decor, or the beer selection—all without ever actually stepping foot inside. It doesn't matter if they're talking about pizzas, burgers, local diners, wines, or anything else; they always have the last word, acting condescending and mocking everyone else on the forum.
Either the moderation team finally starts doing their job promptly—meaning they actually penalize violations instead of just deleting reported posts—by handing out warnings, issuing bans, or even going for the permanent ban, or they should just step aside and hand the reins to someone who will actually follow the forum rules. Because honestly, it's ridiculous that using one specific smiley face can get flagged, while people being downright toxic toward others gets a free pass.🙄
By the way, I've never been to O'Hare, and I probably won't be anytime soon, but it never occurs to me to talk trash about them until I've actually tasted their pizza. I notice certain crazy patterns in how owners behave, sure, but until I try the food, I don't feel I have any right to complain.☕
Neslanovac It looks like you might have missed the rest of your message! You only typed "says:"—feel free to drop the full text whenever you're ready. I'm standing by to get to work on it. Hello there, I’d be happy to help you out. What’s on your mind? Is there a club in the Split area that takes in beginners who are 40 or older? Regarding that—do you guys know of any martial arts clubs or skill-based groups where you might run into a few more gray heads? I'm looking for a place where training recreationally involves working alongside some older, salt-and-pepper haired folks. Is it really just some kind of low-rent, tacky imitation of high-end culture? It feels like someone trying to dress up a cheap knockoff as the real deal.
rustydrifter10 said:Profiles aren't deleted; you can just stop posting on the forum if you want.
Go ahead and point me to the specific section in the forum terms and conditions where it states that profile deletions aren't allowed. I have both the passion and the free time to take this all the way through the legal system. In the end, Anderlon will be the one stuck footing the legal fees, so you might want to get moving. ☕
To whom it may concern, I’ve reached my limit with the constant barrage of advertisements, the invasive spyware, and the recurring technical glitches. These issues have become such a headache that they frequently prevent me from actually browsing the forum or even managing to post a reply. Because of this, I’d like to request that you completely wipe my profile from your database.
I don't want to clutter things up by starting a whole new thread, so I’ll just keep this right here under the existing topic. To be honest, seeing these kinds of posts from the fans in the PDF isn't exactly a shocker or some freak occurrence—it happens all the time. It’s pretty clear that the moderators aren't doing a damn thing about it, either. 😵
George Soros said:So, who are we actually talking about? If you look at the big picture, the Washington-Paris-London axis is essentially the epicenter of all this trouble. It’s an establishment controlled by various figures like George Soros, the Rothschilds, the Bilderberg Group, and their ilk.
Their ultimate endgame is the destruction of the West—this historical incubator of the white race—to pave the way for a much more colorful version of Europe and, eventually, America. Think about it logically: in most cases, a mixed-race individual will end up being seen as inferior to their white parent, yet somehow positioned as superior to their Black parent. That’s exactly why they push multiculturalism and racial mixing so hard. It’s a calculated move to ensure white subordination. You see it everywhere on TV now, with all that "cuckold" nonsense where the weak white man is depicted watching his wife be taken by a Black man. And if you want to know who is actually pulling the strings behind those films? Just follow the money back to George Soros.
The only force capable of standing up to the ZOG machine is a unified and strong white race; anyone else is just a spineless sheep.
harDays said:If Hitler had actually won WWII, Europe wouldn't be dealing with half the mess it’s stuck in today. This is my final word on the subject. My regards go out to all those mindless anti-fascists who don't understand a single thing about actual politics, yet feel entitled to lecture everyone else 24/7 using that recycled Anglo-Saxon rhetoric. Then you have our local Communist zealots—the ones who spent forty-five years keeping us under their thumb in our own country, only to turn around and preach about fascism. They aren't even worth the breath it takes to argue with them; the moment they open their mouths, it's obvious they’re just performing this act of extreme patriotism. If it weren't for people like them, I honestly wonder what would be left of us. We owe them everything, really. And a special thanks to Josip Broz Marshall as well—you guys certainly left us a debt we'll be paying until the grave.
If you ask me, the only dictator with the actual grit to have permanently stabilized Europe was Hitler. Yet, here you all are, constantly whining about him and throwing insults instead of actually grasping his brilliance. His singular, uncompromising vision could have set the entire continent back on its divine path. Instead, your "broad perspectives" have landed us exactly where we are today—in a total mess. And when I say broad, I’m talking about those liberal, multicultural, anti-fascist types who deck themselves out in labels like Christmas trees, parading around every trendy ideology they can find just to look important.
I’m not exactly surprised that I’ll be targeted by the Jews; after all, they seem to believe they’re the only ones entitled to run a global dictatorship. It makes sense why they’d take issue with Hitler, given how he refused to let them—or even Americans—call all the shots. That’s my two cents, from an anti-antifascist perspective. We all know how the current state was built. It feels like Americans can get away with anything, while we’re held to a different standard entirely. Because of those four years under Nazi Germany, our people were branded as fascists. Then, for forty-five years under the rule of Mexicans and Communists, we were labeled a genocidal nation. If anything, I find myself leaning toward Hitler’s side, because if he had actually won, we probably would have been spared this constant cycle of historical labels and brainwashing. But please, carry on with your little anti-fascist pamphlets. Keep acting like the good Americans and Jews are watching over us, as if Hitler and fascism are the only problems in existence that need to be crushed as quickly and painlessly as possible. It’s funny, really. Look at what Europe has become today, all thanks to Hitler’s defeat. Honestly, I couldn't care less about Mussolini; he was just some insignificant small-timer. National Socialism offered a solid foundation for Europe—a way to protect its core values, which citizens had stood by for centuries. Instead, those anti-fascist idiots managed to tear those very foundations apart in just fifty years. Now, we’re stuck dealing with mass Islamist immigration and forced reconciliations with Mexicans and whatnot. And yet, you lot—with your supposed political brilliance—still haven't realized that you've been played by the Americans. This entire situation was handed to us by their policy toward us, my dear foolish countrymen. It’s just the typical way Western politics operates.
You hit the nail on the head. Honestly, I’d much rather have Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Hitler, Mussolini, Putin—hell, even Kim Jong Un—running the show than deal with our current leadership, the EU, and all those damn yellow stars. I’d sooner starve than let them dictate how our people and our country should live. But look, my fellow Americans, you get what you deserve. If you choose death, then death you shall have. We shouldn't go easy on ourselves when we act like mindless sheep led to slaughter. Throughout history, we've constantly let ourselves be manipulated by various superpowers instead of just pulling ourselves together, facing our own issues, and building a nation that actually reflects who we are. Instead, we permit this entire mess of Communism, liberalism, antifascism, mass immigration, and all the other plagues of the modern era—things that would have been dealt with very swiftly by Adolf if 1945 had ended just a little differently. 👍
BRIJACNICA said:North Korea is a total joke compared to this red, liberal, Jew-controlled Europe. At least over there, things are orderly. In countries like that, the state is actually run by its own people. Whatever the Jews in Europe say, goes. Meanwhile, we "white world" types just dance like kittens around a bowl of milk. Unfortunately, because of those cats, our people have to leave home just to earn a living, while we import illegals who didn't want to work in their own countries because it's easier to steal and ride the welfare system in America. I'd honestly prefer being ruled by various Gaddafis rather than these "decent Europeans."
About ten years back, I remember seeing this really unusual movie about Jesus on some major American network. In their version, the Romans basically acted like Nazis—they were incredibly condescending toward the Jews. Jesus was portrayed more like an arrogant bully (the only one with dark eyes, while all the apostles had blue eyes), and Judas was actually framed as a good guy who just took the money to send soldiers to the wrong location to find Jesus. 😁
I honestly have no clue what the title was. But man, I’d love to watch it again. 🙂
Let’s step away from the usual trolling about how banks are the villains of society for a moment—I don't post in this sub very often, since it seems the moderators have their own specific set of rules, *ahem*—but does anyone here actually have experience with JP Morgan Chase? A buddy of mine who works in the mutual fund industry thinks they’re currently leading the pack when it comes to tech innovation, and he mentioned they might have some pretty interesting deals if you bundle things with their investment arm.
I’ve been with SB for about a year now, and once I pay off my loan, I am jumping ship from that prehistoric institution. Their online banking feels like it’s stuck in the Web 1.0 era; they only just recently upgraded from those old plastic cards to token cards. Honestly, everything else is just distasteful. Some of their older branches are literally falling apart. In the Washington, D.C. branch, there were lightbulbs hanging loosely behind the teller counter, and the vault had these trashed, broken shelves... it was honestly a nightmare. 🙄
Brandon Hill8 said:The statute of limitations starts running from the day the obligation becomes due. That means you look at the dates on those official documents. If the motion for execution was filed for obligations that became due within a year of that filing, then colloquially speaking, nothing has expired. The only thing that isn't clear is this 2008 writ of execution. Can you clarify that part a bit?
The notary public submitted the motion for execution on January 18, 2008 (though it only reached me yesterday 🙄). The core issue is that looking at this specific motion, I can't tell exactly when it was officially filed, which makes it impossible to determine if three or four of these bills have already hit the statute of limitations window.
So, here’s the situation: we just received an enforcement proposal from our local waste management company. The notary's decision was actually finalized back in 2008. Given that there is a one-year statute of limitations on claims for municipal services, I have a specific question regarding how the interruption of that period is calculated. Does the clock reset based on the date of the notary's decision, or does it start from the date the enforcement proposal was officially filed? According to the proposal, it states that the "proposal was made based on credible documents dated 12/27/2007."
I’m asking because if the calculation starts from the filing date, then four of the bills are technically past the statute of limitations. However, if it counts from that 12/27 date, then only three would be expired. 🤔
Casey Rogers47 said:Since last night, I've been getting this error on Google Chrome, and it's making the whole forum unusable for me. Do you think it could be related to some "buenosearch" malware I picked up while using Google Chrome? I've already uninstalled it, but the problem persists.
The movie is solid. My biggest gripe, though, is that the series just stretched itself way too thin. Honestly, they should have wrapped everything up within seven seasons instead of letting it drag on until it lost its pulse (how many seasons did they even run for in the end? 😬 ). Don't get me wrong, some of those standalone episodes are absolute classics, but they definitely overplayed their hand. They either should have leaned into an anthology format like The Twilight Zone with disconnected stories, or kept the main story arc to about 25% of the runtime while letting the individual episodes breathe. 🤷
Forgive me if I come crashing in here like a skydiver with just one quick question. Our attorney filed all the paperwork at the Delaware Court of Chancery last Friday to get our branch officially registered. In your experience, how long does it typically take to receive the final decision regarding the registration?
rustydrifter10 said:You really have to look at the context here. I don't even know what bet they're talking about or if it even happened, and honestly, the way the rest of this thread has been moderated hasn't been great either. At first glance, those posts aren't exactly classy. To be blunt, I can't tell if you actually work for some municipal office or what, so it's a bit tough to judge exactly what those posts are aiming at. That third one definitely deserves a ban, and the fourth one looks just as bad.
So, what do you think? Do you reckon I'm on the city payroll? 😂
It didn't occur to me before, but I'm 95% certain I'm dealing with a clone of that Bogdanić user who used to haunt me back when we were discussing Bloomberg. 😉
I just went ahead and reported the guy again for trolling; hopefully, someone actually steps in this time. ☕