Alexander Lewis said:Angela, what exactly is the basis for your claim that mammograms actually do anything positive to lower breast cancer rates?
If memory serves, there were massive public awareness campaigns pushing women toward screenings. Maybe this supposed "increase" in cases is just a byproduct of running way more tests?
It’s possible, sure, because we're catching masses of cases early—even if the turnout rate is abysmal, maybe around 30-40%.
Please, watch the language. Honestly, I feel like cursing you right back since you aren't presenting a single actual argument; you're just spitting venom at the source of the idea (The Council Voice).
It sickens me when people just switch off their brains and swallow the first dogma dropped in their laps. You've clearly bought into the myth that a mammogram is the only diagnostic tool for early detection (it isn't), or that it's even a *good* diagnostic tool (I personally believe thermography is superior), or that the downsides—like ionizing radiation, compressing tissue that might already harbor a malignancy, unnecessary biopsies, or even rupturing a carcinoma in situ which leads to rapid spreading—are just negligible.
My take? Big Pharma and medical device manufacturers poured money into mammography machines and now they're just looking to recoup their investment. It's pathetic how the government and the medical establishment don't actually care about the public; they just buy whatever junk equipment the industry pushes on them. Commissions, anyone?
Look, this is a free country and I am a free individual, which means unlike you, I actually have the education to back up my views, and if I feel like swearing, I damn well will. I actively study this issue, and I keep running into people like you who see shadow conspiracies behind every corner.
Well, unfortunately, the only "shadowy figure" here is cancer. As things stand, one in three people is going to deal with it. We live in a country with finite resources and limited options, and a mammogram, alongside ultrasound, is the only effective method we have that has actually saved lives for many. If you want hard data, go contact organizations like Europe or All for him. They'll happily hand over the statistics to you.
And since you're supposedly so logical and articulate, instead of just shitting on people in internet forums, why don't you start a public health movement to procure better equipment and rally people toward prevention?
As for me, just click on my signature and look at my work and all those "arguments" you're so eager to dismiss here.😳