They’re definitely more mature, though maturity doesn't always equate to quality. The first film offered a gritty, grounded look at a tactical unit dismantling drug rings in the slums, whereas the sequel shifts to an office-bound struggle against the system. That whole "one man against the world" trope feels a bit tired and unoriginal to me. Honestly, I found the execution in *The Wire* much more compelling. Solid enough. 7/10.
On what grounds would you even complain to anyone? Based on a mere subjective impression? Surely, someone out there finds that film excellent. It’s akin to visiting a museum to see Picasso's Guernica, deciding it isn't to your taste, and then demanding a refund for your admission fee. Film is art, and we know how that works—certain works are universally acclaimed, like Blade Runner, while others appeal to a more niche audience, such as Tron: Legacy. Next time, perhaps avoid going in blindly and expecting a feature to mirror a two-minute trailer. Besides, you have Rotten Tomatoes at your disposal to check the critics' consensus.