CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Rachel Ortiz33 › Posts

Posts by Rachel Ortiz33

194 posts shown.

Can't see the Movie subforum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
northernpilot2 said:Come on, don't make a mountain out of a molehill. It’s pretty obvious you’re just cherry-picking stuff to twist the context.
From what I can see, the OP was just following that guy's lead, using the exact same vibe he did. Just keeping it casual.

As for the partial ban, why even act surprised? Every single one of your posts is either insulting users (according to the Movie section rules) or just straight-up trolling (also according to the Movie section rules). A partial ban is actually a pretty logical move from the mods. They're probably just fed up with you being rude and trolling everyone you run into.
Plus, you've been warned a couple of times by the mods that you'd be kicked from the Movie subforum entirely if you didn't chill with the insults and trolling.

And every post of mine is written in that same 'casual' tone, but you guys always read it differently... you're playing favorites and being hypocritical. If anyone disagrees with you, you just ban them instantly—that's how it's always worked on this site.
If I used a slur in any other context, I'd get banned immediately. You've done that before. But now that it's an admin being blatantly rude, it's suddenly fine?

When someone questions your decisions, you hand out troll bans for no reason just to hide your own questionable calls.
Unfortunately, you deleted some of my infrakcijas that I didn't deserve, so I don't have hard proof, but the last one I got was when I asked in the chat thread who reported my post to the admins. That was labeled as trolling, even though it was just a basic question about your moderation skills.

All the "insulting" happened in the chat thread, where you guys give plenty of leeway and let people do whatever they want. None of it was direct insults; it was just telling people the truth and joking around, since we all agreed a long time ago that the chat thread is a bit more laid back.

And nobody has ever defined what "trolling" actually is to me. You guys take a lot of liberties here and never look at the context; you just blindly drop infrakcijas like robots without checking the surrounding replies.

I haven't been banned in over a year, and looking at my user profile, it seems like my old ones are gone too, which means they're being wiped. Everything I got before was because Smoogj apparently has a grudge against me and handed out infrakcijas for nothing just because he doesn't like me. That's why I pushed back, and then you guys took away the option to ban people from the Movie subforum... I haven't been banned since then, and there hasn't been a reason for it.

Also, I never received any warnings, especially not a direct warning that I'd be booted from the whole subforum. If you can find a message where that was said to me, please post it now, because I never saw anything like that.

So, getting a partial ban today without a prior infrakcija, ban, or even a warning is totally unfair. It just goes back to what I said—Smoogj personally dislikes me and was just waiting for a chance to take control. He's the same moderator who gives people total freedom to call someone names, which isn't a bad word in my book, but apparently is in your sensitive forum world. I used to get infrakcijas for much less just because the mods were annoyed.

I'm getting messages from other users wondering why I got hit with a partial ban so fast and unfairly. It's obvious to everyone else that something is off here, except maybe to you guys.

That's it.
Can't see the Movie subforum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
So, is nobody gonna give me the time of day?

I used to get hit with an infrakcija for way smaller stuff, but look at what your big-shot moderator is pulling here.

Seriously, you guys just hand out bans without any warnings or even a heads-up... is there like a personal vendetta going on or something?

Do I really need to start a whole new thread?
Can't see the Movie subforum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
honestly, they don't even have a legit reason, Smoogj just can't stand me and is making stuff up now

no heads-up before that, nothing?

just look at how your moderator talks to people and their girlfriends, honestly he should be disciplined and stripped of his mods privileges:

Mr Smoogj said:Sorry if you guys are still together, but—trash.
Can't see the Movie subforum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
So I didn't get a DM, an alert, or even an infrakcija or a ban?
I guess Smoogj is just running his own little dictatorship again or something.
The One I Love (2014) in Movies ·
goldenhound32 said:like, the piano is just there to show how out of sync they are. kind of like how your subconscious drops a random thought into your head.

nah, I meant what's the actual point of it sitting in an empty room at the end of the day? probably nothing.
The One I Love (2014) in Movies ·
I didn't mean he was spying for no reason, but if they made a deal, you gotta stick to it. He basically played her again, which is why he lost her in the first place.
The One I Love (2014) in Movies ·
goldenhound32 said:So... what's the shrink's angle in sending them there? Like, he knows exactly what happens to couples once they arrive, right?

That part's still up in the air. And that piano in the office? No clue what that signifies. It’s pretty obvious the shrink is recording when he's training the voice actors—maybe his voice shifts—so maybe he's pulling the strings, but I haven't figured out his end game yet.

And if those things really are doppelgangers, how did that even happen? Does some magical field mess with the originals so they see things differently? Like, plastic surgery or something?
How does she not notice the other guy has a different... you know, anatomy? Did they just tweak everything to match?

Those doors lock themselves, too. It's like the estate itself decides which pair gets to leave the house, since they're stuck in the guest wing at first. And where do they go when the main couple bursts in? Do they just vanish, or does the mansion hide them away in secret rooms? Maybe someone's watching from the shadows. The timing of them disappearing right when the originals rush into the guest house is just too perfect...
The One I Love (2014) in Movies ·
David Price5 said:wrong link or title :-)

My ctrl + c was acting up a bit 😁
The One I Love (2014) in Movies ·
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2756032/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

Check out the IMDb link above. You can skim the synopsis if you want, but honestly? Better to go in blind for this one.

Keeping this short and sweet. Just wanted to get a thread going for anyone who’s already seen it so we can talk shop. If you feel like dropping a full review to give people the lowdown, be my guest!
Why are TV shows rated higher than movies? in Movies ·
rating
Locke (2014) in Movies ·
Honestly, the ending was just pure nonsense. Plus, I didn't really click with the lead, which was a huge letdown. It felt like a total waste of time since I got nothing out of it besides the usual solid performance from Hardy.
Locke (2014) in Movies ·
James White11 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdaofZfgV_Q

Anyone catch this yet? I didn't see a thread for it here. I watched it a few days ago and was actually pleasantly surprised. Honestly, I was pretty skeptical about the whole "real-time, single-shot" gimmick. But it worked. It was fascinating to see how much tension you can actually pull from a setup like that, and I think Steven Knight really squeezed every bit of potential out of it.

All in all, I highly recommend it. A tight, intense little thriller. 🙂

image

thriller definitely isn't
Kid Cannabis (2014) in Movies ·
Goodfellas just doesn't hit the same as Casino, lol
Kid Cannabis (2014) in Movies ·
Go read the First Blood book
Kid Cannabis (2014) in Movies ·
Mediocre 😁

As soon as you start hyping up a movie, I'm already skipping it.
Kid Cannabis (2014) in Movies ·
If I’m remembering right, you were all over the other boards saying this was the absolute best movie of the year, then I pop in here and see you gave it a mid rating
Who are you kidding?
The Zero Theorem in Movies ·
You wrote a ton of stuff, but you didn't actually say anything.
Just because there are a lot of words doesn't mean you're smarter or better than me—honestly, it’s kind of the opposite.

And once again, you didn't give me any actual thoughts on the movie.

edit: just scrolling through your other posts on this sub... man, who am I even arguing with?
ignore
The Zero Theorem in Movies ·
Keith Jones36 said:For sure...

Besides being totally pretentious and exhausting to watch, the movie is just plain boring.

And honestly, worst part is, you’re just using my own words to say things I completely agree with.

So why even hang out in a thread for a movie you hate?
Just move on, man. You basically just copied me because you can't put two sentences together on your own (or maybe you just can't think at all).
The Zero Theorem in Movies ·
Keith Jones36 said:I actually did elaborate on that earlier in the thread about movies I watched lately, if you want to check it out.

If you can't back up your own point, or if you're just being a troll? That's pretty weak...

It’s like saying a movie sucks just because it was boring...
The Zero Theorem in Movies ·
Keith Jones36 said:But not for watching, though.

.

elaborate
on that