Posts by Hannah Thompson2

Benjamin Taylor6 said:Well, that depends entirely on what kind of "truth" we're talking about here. In my view, truth ought to look something like this:

Some people face the truth and manage to walk away from it alive. Beyond that—experts even claim they develop better character traits afterward:

But then you have to wonder... why isn't this happening more often? It's almost as if God is running low on holy oil to pour out His grace. 😕

So, what you’re saying is you can't actually face the truth—not if you have to carry the weight of it—especially when you try to cherry-pick it? You know, only accepting it when it suits your narrative, but tossing it aside the second it gets inconvenient?

Benjamin Taylor6 Asks:
Some people actually face the truth and manage to walk away from it intact. On top of that—if you believe the experts—they supposedly come out the other side with some newfound positive qualities.

Meeting the Truth isn't some external event—it happens deep inside a person, not out there in the world. On the surface, sure, we define ourselves by how we relate to other people and the society around us, but internally? That’s where we measure ourselves against God.

It’s pretty obvious to anyone paying attention—you can see it happening everywhere—that people just can't stomach the truth about themselves or the world. So, what do they do? They put on masks. Politicians are the most glaring example of that, obviously.

Benjamin Taylor6 said:Well, that depends entirely on what kind of "truth" we're talking about here. In my view, truth ought to look something like this:

Some people face the truth and manage to walk away from it alive. Beyond that—experts even claim they develop better character traits afterward:

But then you have to wonder... why isn't this happening more often? It's almost as if God is running low on holy oil to pour out His grace. 😕

Maybe save that question for when you've actually finished your own business—because honestly, it feels a little hypocritical to start pointing fingers at everyone else before you've even handled your own side of things.

I didn't bother addressing those examples you brought up about seeing other people—mostly because they don't really hold any weight in this debate.

Benjamin Taylor6 said:If that were the truth, then we wouldn't be writing songs like this:

But what does a poet or a poem have to do with any of this?

Do you really want God as your teacher? — regardless of the cost.

And do you honestly think you can handle the truth?

Susan Green15 said:What could possibly be the noble reasoning behind an omniscient God choosing not to share the kind of knowledge that could save millions of lives or simply make our existence less of a struggle?
During the Middle Ages, countless millions perished from the plague and various other ailments, not to mention the periods of famine caused by things like potato blight wiping out crops.
Why didn't God explain the mechanics of the plague or how to treat it, instead just watching silently as millions died, leaving us to stumble upon the cures entirely on our own?

Why do people continue to praise Jesus for miraculous healings rather than criticizing him for using his knowledge and abilities for his own promotion and glory, instead of teaching humanity medicine so we could actually heal ourselves—both in greater numbers and long after his passing?

The thing is, the kind of knowledge being offered to humanity is often rejected—people ignore it because it clashes with their desires, or they just brush it off. This isn't the kind of knowledge meant for this world; it’s not even *of* this world. So, your example doesn't really hold water. You're operating under the default assumption that Earth is the primary stage for human life, but it isn't. If a person wants everything they need while they're here—including health—they have to let go of their "human" self (that worldly seed) for the sake of their heavenly (spiritual) self and the heavenly (spiritual) land.

If you actually want to ask me anything about this, you really need to read the New Testament Gospels and the texts in my signature to understand where I'm coming from. Without that, we aren't really having a discussion; I'd just be stating facts, because any debate without that foundation would just end up being about tearing down your own preconceptions and assumptions.

Susan Green15 said:What could possibly be the noble reasoning behind an omniscient God choosing not to share the kind of knowledge that could save millions of lives or simply make our existence less of a struggle?
During the Middle Ages, countless millions perished from the plague and various other ailments, not to mention the periods of famine caused by things like potato blight wiping out crops.
Why didn't God explain the mechanics of the plague or how to treat it, instead just watching silently as millions died, leaving us to stumble upon the cures entirely on our own?

Why do people continue to praise Jesus for miraculous healings rather than criticizing him for using his knowledge and abilities for his own promotion and glory, instead of teaching humanity medicine so we could actually heal ourselves—both in greater numbers and long after his passing?

1) He isn't seeking His own glory anywhere; He's seeking the glory of the One who sent Him.

2) He taught people how to fish, but He didn't just feed them fish. The whole point of His coming was to break down the barrier between man and God so that the two could become one—allowing man to possess everything that God possesses.

The kind of "knowledge" you're talking about implies the growth of an evil seed, so it couldn't possibly come from God. As we can see, the call to conversion and following God guarantees health and all the other blessings a person truly needs. Don't get me wrong—I feel for human suffering, I really do—but you can't fix it with a new delusion. There is only one way as a complete solution.

Carol Kelly2 said:Withdrawing from my surroundings won't make much of a difference. I have no desire to go exploring; honestly, I'm just exhausted by the idea of traveling. I’ve tried being alone before, which offered some relief, but it was only temporary. I can't exactly head out with anyone else since I don't really socialize, yet I lack the drive to change that either. Attempting to lead an adventurous life only intensified my sense of nausea—I gave it a shot, and it simply didn't work.

So, you used to be different, but you aren't anymore? How exactly do you listen to your heart? Have you truly grasped that vital truth you mentioned? What specific truth were you referring to?

It’s actually okay if you're disillusioned with this world and stop looking for happiness within it—just try not to retreat so far into your own head that you stop building who you are. You've realized this world feels dead, so now you need to find actual life. As for those people you see appearing satisfied in this world (whether they're just acting or they lack an inner life entirely and are effectively "dead" themselves), just ignore them if their noise disrupts your internal peace.

Close your external eyes, ears, senses, and tastes; basically, tune out the physical. From within, ignore the calls of the "rational operator"—that part of the mind that thinks it has permission to run, even though the connection between your heart and mind is severed, leaving the rational side without its counterweight or the right code to process things. Right now, that logic is like a tumor preventing you from grasping the spiritual realm. Ignore when it tells you to do things that your heart already knows are wrong. Instead, lean into those primal qualities you were born with—the ones that soften your inner self—which you can only rediscover once you let go of that rationalist mindset. Once you do that, the blockage clears, allowing you to feed both your mind and spirit, finally giving you a sense of existence that transcends the world and its constant impulses.

I might have condensed the big picture into a smaller frame here, but I hope you found the truth and recognized the underlying mechanism in what I wrote. If you want to dive deeper, feel free to send me a DM.

People tend to band together when there’s a common enemy breathing down their necks—or even just when they realize being different puts them in the same boat—but honestly, that’s just the surface level. It’s a temporary alliance, really. Once things settle down and the immediate threat disappears, you start seeing what people are actually made of, which usually reveals how they handle living alongside others during peacetime. Calling this kind of reactive grouping "unity" feels like a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

Arthur White37 said:So, here is my situation. I am quite fond of PC gaming, and there are times when I find myself lost in it for hours on end—honestly, I don't know where I would be if my parents didn't set some boundaries on my screen time 😢....
I have spent a significant amount of time delving into various conspiracy theories, and I frequently immerse myself in books regarding spirituality. I also make a conscious effort to practice meditation 😢, as I am truly striving toward a deeper level of spiritual growth.
My question is this: does my passion for computer games somehow undermine my spiritual journey? Should I consider giving it up entirely? If I were to stop, I suspect it would be an incredibly difficult transition for me to navigate.
👎 😠

It really depends—your age, what you’re actually playing, how your life is set up, all that stuff.

When you're looking at those deep, existential levels of being, mindless entertainment doesn't really cut it—you wouldn't even feel the urge to play, most likely. But if you're just navigating day-to-day life and trying to find some happiness in the world, games can actually be great. They help you unwind, they lift your mood, and if you're playing team-based stuff, they can even be a way to socialize.

There's also a massive difference between types of games; I mean, Tetris and a hardcore first-person shooter are both "games," but they serve completely different purposes.

If you're building a life where your goal is simply to find contentment in this world, then gaming can be a tool to help you get there. Just make sure you aren't becoming dependent on it—don't take the digital stuff too personally, and definitely don't use it as an excuse to avoid the real world. That imaginary landscape can easily pull you away from actually perceiving reality if you let it.

wearyrider16 said:Alright, I'll try to keep this brief and get straight to the point. Ever since high school, I've always felt like an outsider. It wasn't about being weird; it was just that I couldn't relate to how everyone else thought or acted. To be honest, the way most people live—their values and standards—always rubbed me the wrong way, and it hasn't changed. Why? Because I've always known my life couldn't just be about physical stuff or material things. I knew there had to be a higher purpose out there. So, I started looking. I went through countless books and sacred texts, searching for meaning. It became even more obvious during college, where I saw just how empty and shallow things can feel when people reject everything that's actually healthy and good. It seemed like it was all just partying, sex, drinking, and making fun of anyone who stands out. I used to wonder, "Am I really the only one?" It felt like everyone was just trapped in this primitive social loop that basically poisons people's minds. Even the intellectuals and the "educated" crowd—instead of teaching students how to be actual human beings, they just mold them into conformists who go on to raise families based on those same broken norms. You don't even have to look hard to see it; there’s enough injustice and dishonesty in the world to go around. For someone with a healthy conscience, that kind of thing really stings. I've read a mountain of books on this—psychology, sociology, philosophy, religion, spirituality... and back in 2005, I really dove deep into the Bible. It actually calls out exactly what I was seeing. It exposes the fake clergy and hypocritical leaders who just exploit naive followers to serve their own selfish interests. Honestly, some churches can be even worse than political parties. While many claim the Bible was just written by men to suit their own agendas without any divine inspiration, I believe it can truly liberate any soul searching for truth in this messy world. I'll close with these words from Jesus that mean a lot to me: ... and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free! John 8:32. Truly, a person without faith is just as lost. They become a slave to a corrupt and twisted world that relentlessly crushes and wounds the inner child we all carry inside. Thanks for listening. 😉

You're on the right track. It’s actually pretty refreshing to read someone who stays true to themselves—someone who isn't willing to bend or compromise just because society tries to force it on them. If you feel something is wrong, stick to your guns. Just keep typing; eventually, the doors will open.

"Whoever meets the world discovers a corpse. And whoever discovers the corpse is not worthy of the world."

"I walked right into the heart of the world and manifested within its flesh. I found them all drunk, yet not a single soul was thirsty. My soul felt such pity for the sons of men—they’re just blind at heart, unable to see that people arrive in this world empty and leave it just as hollow.
But right now, everyone is intoxicated. Once they finally sober up from the wine, only then will they change their ways."

When are you actually going to get back to me about this? It’s been two weeks already and I'm still stuck with this card.

?

rowdyhawk10 said:No, Hannah Thompson2, "Unknown" didn't even ask him where that was written. Why are you being so dishonest? 😢
In his post, he doesn't even use the word "where." This guy just asked you this:

1)

So, he wrote it. Tell me about it. Who exactly is He? So, specifically, he actually forgave him? A Roman soldier? That’s just pure political opportunism from those Paulists who were the ones spinning the whole story about Jesus.

And I wrote it too. Who else did He forgive—and with a quote to boot? It’s really the only way to stay credible—since he's asking about Jesus, I'm sticking strictly to His own words. Otherwise, it might look like I'm just making stuff up.

So, let me get this straight—he’s allowed to bring up Jesus from the Gospels and drag His name through the mud, but if I try to defend the guy using Jesus's own words—you know, actual quotes—I'm the one in the wrong?

Here’s the controversial stuff. response.

Based on what was already explained, I’m asking to have this warning removed from my record.

2)
I'm calling you out, rowdyhawk10—don't think you can just dodge this one.

Locked thread: Judaism 1000 — why? Because that’s why.

Where exactly did I call Christians out? I'm just quoting you here.

rowdyhawk10 said:Unlike Christians— So, what exactly did they take from them and then twist around in three different ways?
First off, there’s the constant nitpicking—then you’ve got them stripping words right out of context—and finally, just straight-up misinterpreting everything.

Where am I even supposed to defend myself when the topic is locked down? And then you have the nerve to tell me you were just calling out ruggedeagle10?

quote

rowdyhawk10 said:Well, then... this one My post is clearly aimed at someone else—not you. 🙄 I was quoting ruggedeagle10, wasn't I? 🙄

Still waiting on an answer.

Nicholas Walker3 said:Ustinov really gave a masterclass here 🙏

I'm with you there—definitely recommend Quo Vadis to everyone

Missing Quo Vadis -

My top pick has to be Ben-Hur, followed closely by Quo Vadis—I’ve always had a soft spot for those kinds of epics. After that, I'd say 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and Forbidden Planet; the rest? Honestly, I either haven't seen them or they've completely slipped my mind.

rowdyhawk10 said:Hannah Thompson2,
I have no intention of getting dragged into theological debates with you here on the complaint book forum (since that falls under the domain of Religion).
If you feel like I've actually wronged you, just specify what it was (provide a link and an explanation).
Here are the general guidelines on how to file a grievance: Best, 🙂

Look, this isn't some deep theological debate—it’s about you trying to smear me. I laid out all my arguments in that link, and now it’s just been wiped away. Seriously, who gave you the authority to do that?

And specifically, this is what’s written in black and white.

rowdyhawk10;
First things first, let me be perfectly clear about this: The faith that Jesus taught—the actual core of what he preached—is mostly just found among Jewish and Muslim communities today.. And there isn't even a code of conduct for those who claim to follow her. Honestly, at this point, it doesn't even matter if we're talking about Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Protestantism, or those smaller groups like the Quakers or Jehovah's Witnesses—it’s all pretty much the same. There isn’t really a code to follow with them—not because one doesn't exist, but because everything written in the Gospels and the apocrypha regarding what Jesus actually said has been twisted beyond recognition. The meanings and intentions have just been warped over time, haven't they?

How exactly do you claim to know where Jesus's teachings exist? And how can you argue they only persist among Muslims and Jews? The New Testament and the apocrypha predate the Quran—so you can't really go against that chronological flow. I’d love to actually sit down and debate this with you, but honestly, after everything that was deleted—I'm assuming that was your doing—there's just no point anymore.

You’re calling me out specifically here. And there's just no rulebook for those who choose to follow her. Look, I'm the one you're talking about—but based on what exactly? You haven't actually given me a single argument.

Since there isn't any room left to discuss the code of conduct and complaint book ii over in that thread, I’m moving the conversation here—so, rowdyhawk10, why don't you weigh in right here:

regarding this

and this

regarding this thread Texts featuring Jesus' quotes that I’d recommend to fellow Christians

I read somewhere that the reason people might be pushing back is because of my preaching style—but honestly, I just shared these as recommendations for texts that aren't exactly common knowledge. I wasn't trying to force them on anyone; I was just laying out arguments during a discussion. I really think this topic is constructive and doesn't violate any forum rules.

Carl Mendoza4 said:Branko Ivanković 😁

Is this actually confirmed, or just talk?

Names like Avram Grant, Tomislav Ivić, and Carlos Alberto Parreira come to mind—those big-name managers who, if I recall correctly from a quick Google search, never actually played the game professionally.
(One could also point out that Alex Ferguson had a pretty brief stint on the pitch, mostly playing at an amateur level.)

Elizabeth Mendoza43 said:Look, I’m a sucker for those big historical epics—so maybe I’m not exactly the most qualified critic here.

I enjoy historical dramas too, but let's be real: this one just isn't any good. There’s way too much going wrong and almost nothing going right.

Honestly, this was a pretty rough watch. Since I’ve already seen the Japanese and Korean versions, this one just felt even more underwhelming by comparison. 3/10.

I’ve actually seen this one before, though it was a different production—either a Japanese or Korean version, I think—from around 2007. From what I can tell, everything looks pretty much identical or at least very similar, but I think I'll give this one a watch too.