CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sarah Wood8 › Posts

Posts by Sarah Wood8

165 posts shown.

I don't even know what to say to that. Just absolute nonsense. James Kelly says:
Or maybe music is just there to provide the support, the context, or that extra layer of emotional depth that words alone can't quite reach. 😕

I have one question for those of you who actually know what you're talking about: how do the experts actually listen to classical music? Are they just dissecting the technical perfection of the performance, or are they pulling some kind of spiritual experience out of it? To me, it feels like they’re getting something deeply spiritual from the music. But I don't get how. How exactly are they listening to it to achieve that? I just don't understand.

You either have a soul for music or you don't. It’s just like how some people can genuinely love their children because it's built into their DNA, while others lack that basic humanity entirely—they just take their frustrations out on them until, if necessary, they end up killing them.
You don't need to be some high-brow expert to find something soulful in classical music; you just need to have the right sensibility and an ear for it. Obviously, taste isn't universal—what hits one person doesn't necessarily move another—and everyone’s preferences shift as they go through life. Some people change drastically, others just a little.
Look, there’s a massive difference between someone who just wants to fit into a subculture—whether you call yourself a metalhead, a punk, or some tech geek—and someone who actually gives a damn about the music. Some people listen to stuff just because they want to feel like they belong to some specific clique, but others are out here genuinely hunting for that one perfect melody or the ultimate song. One is just posturing, while the other is actually seeking art.
I don't give much of a damn about the lyrics. If the melody is absolute garbage, the words don't matter to me. That’s why I can't stand listening to stuff like country trap or that aggressive, testosterone-fueled noise meant for teenagers—you know, all those trash metal breakdowns, hip-hop tracks just reciting mindless lines about drugs and sex, or that endless, repetitive techno pounding. It has zero soul. There's just nothing there.
When I sit down to listen to music, I want to actually feel something—I'm not interested in wasting my time on tracks that sound like they were composed specifically for mindless cattle.
Whenever I hear something like Morricone's "Theme from Jurassic Park" or "Chi Mai," it honestly feels like my brain is shifting into an entirely different dimension. These melodies are just on another level—it’s as if the composer is playing games with your mind and soul, tapping into emotions you didn't even realize you possessed. To me, that is what true art is all about; it's much more than just showing off technical skill or messing around with notes.
If we claim that all music is equally good, we aren't doing the art any favors. We’re actually insulting it—treating it like it's just background noise rather than the most profound art form in existence, capable of hitting much deeper than any book, movie, or painting ever could.
Claiming some trash pop track by Taylor Swift is on the same level as Beethoven's fifth or seventh symphony is nothing short of an insult to music itself. Most people just don't have any actual musical sensibility, yet they act like big shots listening to absolute garbage just to look cool.
Then you've got the snobs who only listen to that soulless, frantic jazz, obsessing over technical proficiency like they’re solving math equations. If you treat music like a calculus problem, you aren't actually feeling anything—you're just riding a high thinking all that technical knowledge somehow gives you more street cred than everyone else. Unfortunately, a lot of people operate exactly that way.
Lyrics only matter if there’s actual singing involved, but honestly, the song itself has to grab me first. If I wanted to sit around reading lyrics or poetry, I’d just pick up a book instead of listening to music.
Music isn't just background noise to me; it’s one of the most vital parts of who I am. We all have our own favorites, obviously, but if you're asking what actually makes a song great, I think it boils down to originality, spirit, and raw talent. A composer needs that specific technical mastery to weave together a sequence of notes that feels like it has existed since the beginning of time. Think about classics like "Yesterday," "Moon River," "Over the Rainbow," or "Stairway to Heaven"—even something like "Lambada" hits that mark for me. Those melodies are simple, yet they feel eternal. If a song has soul, it survives as long as humanity does, as long as there are people left who know how to truly feed their spirits through sound. That’s exactly why the truly great ones are so incredibly rare. And of course, the performance itself matters just as much.
silverpanther13 said:Some melodies don't feel like they were actually composed; they just feel like they've always existed, waiting for someone to finally write them down. They feel natural, almost inevitable. It’s like stumbling upon some kind of divine gift that was just sitting there. Honestly, it doesn't matter which instruments you use or who is singing them... I guess recognizing those kinds of songs is subjective, so not everyone will agree, but for me, it's tracks like Yesterday or Wuthering Heights... at the end of the day, if they feel blessed, that's all that matters.

Moon River😍
Ashley Perez62 said:It might sound like a cliché, but music literally feeds my soul.

When I get home from work, I always throw on some music videos on YouTube—usually whatever I’ve been obsessed with this week or month. There are these five or six videos I love so much I have to listen to them every single day. Don't get me wrong, I love the visuals, but I’m primarily a music listener; I just use YouTube because the selection is massive and everything is easy to find. Honestly, I've gotten a bit out of the habit of using physical media...

I'm really into electronic music: electro, techno, breakbeat, deep house—but it has to be well-produced, not just some mindless, repetitive noise.

I crave that edge in electronic tracks, and I love a well-balanced electro sound with those sharp textures and filtered accents...

The sense of space in electronic soundscapes—and beats that actually make sense instead of those stupid, endless builds.

I feel certain types of music so deeply, it’s like it flows through my veins. When I dance to it, I don't need to "think" to experience it; it's purely visceral. I feel this need to define every single sound spatially through my body movements while dancing. It’s an intuitive, spontaneous kind of movement, where my hand or foot seems to anticipate the next second of sound and aligns with it perfectly—it’s just total immersion.

I enjoy pop too, provided it has some actual identity. When it comes to that era, I much prefer the eighties and the early nineties.

There was just more soul back then; nowadays, everything feels so overproduced and forced.

For instance, with classical music, I am completely swept away by the way violins and similar instruments build tension and release. Antonio Vivaldi creates this internal image of sunlight breaking through, or the sheer mass of a river like the Mississippi River when listening to something epic.

With Enye Caribbean Blue, there's a beginning that reminds me of looking out at the open ocean from a small plane skimming the water—it captures that feeling of being intoxicated by the sea.

Enye Orinoco Flow gives me images of massive waterfalls crashing down, spraying everywhere; it feels like looking down at the Earth from orbit as it glimmers below. It feels like an exponential journey, and the end of Orinoco Flow, with that choral sound, makes me feel like some spirit is merging with you (it gives me chills every time).

I love the harp in that kind of way.

Vangelis is in a league of his own—his music triggers such intense mental imagery:
Antarctica—sounds so pure they evoke a biting coldness, like floating between icebergs with glimpses of a dark blue, almost black, ocean beneath.
Alpha—that blue chill and the distant echo of a star.
Intergalactic Radio Station—the intro describes the heavy, massive scale of space, followed by a constant drone that sounds like traveling through radio frequencies.

Enigma—Age of Loneliness—the tribal vocals feel like a call from the future, stretching me through time until my throat aches with sadness, followed by a sudden shiver from something much larger and beautiful.
Enigma—TNT for the Brain—that steady opening sound evokes coldness, danger, mysticism, and a journey into one's own subconscious.

So yeah, that's a lot of music stuff, but I love synesthesia—the blending of senses. When music manages to pull that off, that's when it's good in my book.

Hehe... kudos to you for the effort and the descriptions.🙂
rowdyridge3 said:Yeah, but what really gets to me is when someone—especially a singer—has everything going for them (great vocals, great songwriting, catchy melodies, and let's face it, she's gorgeous) and people still decide to go out of their way to tear her down...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydw5qIycHE0
Take a look at the people trashing this video. Come on, guys, can you seriously tell me she isn't stunning??? especially in this shot...😍😍 😍 😍 😍


Look, I don't know her discography inside and out, but this track is perfectly fine—it's solid. The thing is, it was written in 1990, and you just can't compare the vibe of that era, or the general cultural spirit of that time, to how things work today. Back then, if you wanted to stay on the Billboard charts, even if you had to follow certain trends regardless of how plastic or artificial they felt, having a killer melody was a non-negotiable prerequisite. Who's performing it, the production quality, all that matters, but those secondary details aren't nearly as vital as they are to those miserable, joyless little critics who have nothing better to do with their lives.
And honestly, whether she’s hot or not isn't even the point; what matters is that a female artist knows her craft. Personally, I’m not interested in watching music videos filled with models posing around or just showing off skin; I care more about charisma. But charisma doesn't mean squat if the song itself is garbage.
Here’s what I consider truly charismatic paired with actual good songwriting. It has nothing to do with physical looks, and no amount of facial beauty can ever replace this kind of talent:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqTLqRFKjAU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_TZoHNQCKA
and of course:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmsRFrN97ek
rowdyridge3 said:You're totally right! I have this friend who decides she hates someone just based on their looks, and suddenly everything that person ever recorded is garbage. Once I finally forced her to actually listen to some tracks, she admitted she liked them, but getting her to sit through anything by that artist is still an uphill battle.🙄🙄 🙄 🙄

Yeah, typical. Some people should just grab a photo of anyone they find attractive, hang it on their wall, and stare at it if they think music doesn't matter. As if looks actually dictate the quality of the sound. Play her Dvorak's New World Symphony, for example, and she'll just be sitting there confused because she has no clue what Dvorak looks like... honestly, what a joke. 🙄
wanderingraven20 said:At the end of the day, it all comes down to the singer's charisma. That’s what actually matters to me. 🙏

If the singer is no good, then the music just isn't any good either. Period. ☕

If there isn't a vocalist involved, you're just left with instrumentals—whether it’s techno or classical—and honestly, I don't consider that real music. 🤮

So, what you're basically saying is, "I'm shallow and I don't have an ounce of musical taste." 😁
Alright, I'm assuming you're just messing with me.

Everything matters when it comes to music, but if I really have to pin it down to one thing, it’s gotta be the melody.
Damien Rice in Music ·
Look, I’m not trying to be a jerk here, but I own both of his albums and they are absolute train wrecks. I have never heard so much whining, sobbing, and overacting in my entire life. A friend of mine listened to him once and told me she actually wanted to slap some sense into him just so he'd stop crying like a baby.
He’s definitely trying to pass off all this moping and ridiculous songwriting—not to mention those grating melodies—as high art.
Even James Blunt isn't half as dramatic as this guy.
Check out these lyrics:
Fuck you, fuck you, love you
And all we've been through
I said leave it, leave it, leave it
It's nothing in you
And did you hate me, hate me, hate me, hate me so good
That you just let me out, let me out, let me out, let me out
Let me out, let me out, let me out, let me out
Let me out, let me out, let me out, let me out
Let me out, let me out, let me out


Give me strength...
Are wars actually as pointless as they seem? in Philosophy ·
Here’s how I see it...
War is inherently horrific because of the sheer amount of suffering involved—mostly innocent victims enduring far too much pain.
But if you look at the long game, the world actually moves forward through these conflicts; war is a brutal, natural process through which humanity learns its lessons. Billions might have to die before we finally grasp how futile killing truly is. For us, we needed World War I and II, and for the Japanese, the atomic bomb was the turning point, but because of those tragedies, both America and Japan have learned their lessons. We are now looking toward a brighter, more unified future where we work together.
The truth is, we’re still essentially animals fighting over territory. We are just in a messy stage of growing up and learning the hard way. It’s a painful, drawn-out process, but that’s just how it works. If it weren't this way, it wouldn't be happening. Still, humanity keeps progressing because that’s a universal law, and I genuinely believe the end result will be positive—that we will eventually outgrow our fears and our primal urge for violence. The fact that our sense of justice is stronger today than at any other point in history says a lot about where we're headed.
About Leonard Cohen in Music ·
Sarah Hayes10 said:I have to admit, I don't really listen to him... but it’s always been wild to me how one guy can somehow look like a mix of Ali Pacina, Bob Dylan, and Dustin Hoffman all at once. 🤔

http://sitemason.vanderbilt.edu/file...l.jpg/main.jpg

http://www.center-of-beat.com/bildar...nard_cohen.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...dCohen1969.jpg


Maybe those three are his sons... or maybe they're his fathers? 🤔
Nick Drake in Music ·
Personally, I find Leonard Cohen much more compelling than Jeff Buckley. Sure, Buckley has some decent, interesting tracks here and there, but his overall style just doesn't click with me; he’s never really been my kind of songwriter.
Yeah, everyone has different tastes.
What I love about Drake is this effortless, genuine talent and charm he brings to his songs—there’s none of that desperate need for megalomania or "grand concepts," which is why I dig him. Sometimes I’d much rather listen to a tight three-and-a-half-minute song than some repetitive 15-minute saga that just gives me a massive headache.

And I can't forget to mention Cohen's Hallelujah and I'm Your Man... if I remember correctly... those are absolute classics for me, just like Susannah. Those are the ones I know by heart (not counting the TNS album, which I'm not really a fan of). Honestly, I'm actually planning on picking up some of his albums one of these days.
Nick Drake in Music ·
Why does it always have to be this way, where you're forced to pick sides like you can only love one artist and not the other? Everyone has their hits and their misses. Some styles just click with you more than others based on pure personal taste, but at the end of the day, we're talking about top-tier musicians here. Take Jeff Buckley, for example—I'm not exactly his biggest fan, but I still respect him because he's clearly put out some incredible tracks.
It’s much more productive to actually discuss how an artist makes us feel or what we think of their work rather than trying to police everyone else's personal preferences on this board.
I honestly don't get why someone couldn't appreciate both Prince and Bob Dylan, yet suddenly it's "weird" if you dig Bob Dylan but aren't into Tom Waits.
Look, personally, I think Prince is pretty mediocre and just isn't my thing, but I'm just using him as an example here.
Nick Drake in Music ·
I don't know Leonard Cohen's catalog well enough to judge him based solely on his newer record, "Ten New Songs," which honestly didn't do much for me; I suspect his older stuff, like "Susannah," probably carries a lot more weight.

I’ve always been drawn to Drake's debut because it feels like his darkest and most complete work. His music definitely isn't repetitive or lacking in structure, despite what some other forum user was claiming about Cohen's lack of choruses.

I really dig Drake's vibe; he just has this incredible instinct for songwriting.

Look, don't go trying to overanalyze things you just can't grasp—I can't even define my own taste half the time. All I know is that for me, music has to hit you somewhere deep inside. The synergy between melody and lyrics is everything; to me, the melody and the performance are the core of the experience, while great lyrics act as a beautiful layer or perhaps the spark for a melody. At the end of the day, melody is that universal language that actually connects with people.
Nick Drake in Music ·
His debut album is easily my favorite.
About Leonard Cohen in Music ·
Andrew Stewart2 said:Man, Cohen is incredible. Even though I own almost all his albums (maybe missing one or two, but I think I have the full studio run), I mostly stick to those first four, plus some of The Futurists from '92. And a little bit of Ten New Songs.

That early era is my favorite—that's the real Cohen, just him and a guitar, maybe some bass or strings thrown in. He’s a brilliant lyricist, and his melodies are fascinating, even if they can be repetitive at times (think Seems so long ago, Nancy; Story of Isaac; songs without choruses, in my opinion).

There is so much to discuss regarding Cohen. That new biography, Various Positions, is quite interesting, and I see it's actually selling pretty well too.


Well, you basically rejected him for me right out of the gate! I can't stand repetitive melodies that lack a chorus. If he wants to win me over with that style, he’s got to be absolutely flawless at it. I know a few of his tracks, sure, but he just doesn't grab me... I remember watching this old Canadian comedy sketch once, if I recall correctly: "Leonard Cohen - Music Through the Four Seasons!" It was this impersonator singing for every season, but every single song sounded exactly the same—just dark and gloomy regardless of whether it was summer or winter. That was ages ago, but it still gives me a good laugh.
Andrew Ramos10 said:Hey man,
seriously though, what is even the deal with why everyone keeps making fun of him?

That’s a pointless question. Is there actually any valid reason to mock someone when the whole point of the mockery is just to hurt them? Just because he doesn't fit some standard stereotype like everyone else, does that suddenly give people a green light to stomp all over him? They target him simply because they think they can get away with it and they enjoy the feeling of power.
OP, you basically answered your own question: people are just stupid. If most people actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be doing it. That stupidity breeds malice, a complete lack of character, and this desperate obsession with ideologies and the need to belong to some bloodthirsty tribe just to feel validated.
If someone isn't just plain stupid, then they’re clearly mentally disturbed if they actually get a kick out of watching someone else suffer.
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, right? Bulling isn't anything new, unfortunately, and it's something the American school system absolutely should be tackling head-on, but most of the time, nothing is being done at all. Still, society is becoming more aware of how much kids and teenagers are being physically and—more often—mentally tormented by their peers. It's basic herd mentality: if two kids decide to pick on one person and they have the upper hand, others will jump on the bandwagon just to join in. Kids can be way more cruel and vicious than adults, yet we often try to excuse it because they're "just kids" or "still developing." I mean, sure, that's partially true, but it’s also a cop-out. There is far too much human garbage in this world for us to ignore these issues; we need to identify and address these problems early on during childhood, providing real solutions for the aggressors, the victims, and society as a whole.
Is music dying? in Music ·
Folks... I just caught the most depressing news update on the local news:

MUSIC IS DEAD

🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂
Is music dying? in Music ·
neonmarlin19 said:Music isn't dying, but finding people who actually know how to listen? That's becoming a lost art.☕

Haha, that’s a great way to put it. 😁
Is music dying? in Music ·
Kenneth Clark7 said:🙏 🙏 🙏 😁


🙂 🙂
Is music dying? in Music ·
I think it’s vital to point out that when we talk about music as a universal language for everyone, the complexity of the composition doesn't actually matter—what matters is whether the music is good.
Anyone can mess around with software on a laptop, just like anyone can "specialized" their way through a cello, but that doesn't change the fact that a kid behind a computer screen might be a much better songwriter than a cellist, regardless of the fact that mastering the cello is objectively harder.

How was the melody for Amazing Grace born? Honestly, I have no clue, but I know someone probably had it stuck in their head a hundred years ago—someone who might not have even known how to read a single note—and they sang it while working the fields, and then others heard it and passed it along.

That song was likely created without any grueling technical struggle, yet to this day, it remains one of the most precious musical and cultural gems in history.

Laypeople—and even musicians who judge music based on how complicated it was to write, perform, or produce—are people who simply cannot grasp what music actually is.
Music isn't math, no matter how many people I know who act like it is. Music is so much more than that! Whether a track holds up depends entirely on the talent, the ear, and the sensibility of the creator, whether they are using a violin, a wooden plank, a crappy 80s synth, or a computer program.
That’s why music critics are so limited; they aren't talented, nor do they have the emotional depth to truly feel music. They just have specific styles they prefer or dislike.

Approaching music with prejudices—whether by identifying with it or not, or judging it based on the persona or image of the person who made it—makes you an incompetent and ungrateful listener right from the jump, let alone a music critic.

Music itself won't die, but it has lost value because commercialism is being churned out on a massive scale. What becomes a hit and what doesn't is decided by a mass of teenagers whose goal isn't to hear a quality song, but to identify with the performer's image—whether they're playing at being a tough guy, a satanist, or a ghetto gangster—just to boost their own egos and melt into the crowd they want to belong to.
But that isn't really music; that falls under sociology, psychology, and the development of a person who probably lacks talent, taste, or an ear for music but "knows what they like."

And that is exactly why music is failing in certain segments—because in too many cases, it is just plain bad—though I don't believe music will ever truly perish.
Commercial trends fluctuate, and when shitty music finally bores people to death, things will turn around for the better. Things are already looking better than they were in the 90s, when we were hit by that wave of rave culture and uninspired techno, which was basically synonymous with brainwashed teenagers zoning out to repetitive beats in dark, laser-lit basement clubs. Not to mention the dance music that mostly relied on covers of 70s and 80s pop classics. Those were the first signs that something was wrong, because suddenly nobody could write a decent song anymore since all the doors had opened to cater to the most aggressive and easily influenced listeners—kids. Untalented, plain-looking girls and pretty boys were essentially sponsoring themselves in music videos that looked like commercials, with the songs serving merely as background noise for them.
A huge part of the blame lies with MTV, which in the 90s was the ultimate brainwashing tool for pumping garbage into the minds of kids. As MTV began to decline and shift its programming focus, music started to improve again.
MTV nearly destroyed music because it wasn't selling sound; it was selling image, posing, superficial beauty, and pure vacuity. The saddest part is that millions of people fell for it.
Unfortunately, that's still how it works in many cases today.