CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Started by Anthony Taylor393 · · 👁 14 views · 209 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Taylor393Gregory HowardTimothy Anderson48Megan Johnson8jadejackal27Henry Cox78Ethan Morales22Alex Patel96Eric Collins5Joshua Parker11Richard Lee43Morgan Rodriguez57electricangler22Brenda Sanders56Larry Turner3Megan Hernandez2bluecobra27bluerider63Jeremy Lopez93David Parker3Sarah Wilson95Lawrence Thompson58Chris Morales23frozenjackal16 …
Austin Hayes7 Austin Hayes7 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Feb 2010
#101 ·
The nation that produced TLN is suddenly getting all thin-skinned over a few jokes.
It used to be that people here could actually take a hit and laugh at themselves... but now? It’s like everything has changed so much it’s unrecognizable; honestly, it’s a total mess. 👎

I mean, fine, if they wanted to complain about some caricatured lead actor or just plain bad comedic timing, I’d get it. But to act like their religious sensibilities and dignity have been personally attacked?
I’d honestly love to see them all sent straight to a mass incarceration facility. 😂

What a complete joke this new version of the country is. ☕
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlHxe...eature=related
Lawrence Thompson58 Lawrence Thompson58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Nov 2011
#102 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:It was the Stalinist regime that granted them the vote.
Open your eyes, world! 🤦

Sadly, it’s the truth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage
Rachel Garcia Rachel Garcia Active Member
59 messages
joined Sep 2011
#103 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:It was the Stalinist regime that granted them the vote.
Open your eyes, world! 🤦


Whether one likes it or not, it is the reality. Under the South administration on August 8, 1945.
Rachel Garcia Rachel Garcia Active Member
59 messages
joined Sep 2011
#104 ·
Jesse Ortiz71 said:That "right" granted to women by some supposed humanitarian dictator was surely celebrated by the very women he stripped of their lives. He was quite the educator, wasn't he? He knew exactly how to hand out favors just to keep the masses feeling pampered while he tightened the leash.


And those would be...?

I'm not defending Marshall, but it's a fact that women didn't have the right to vote, neither in the Kingdom nor under the Third Reich.

Though looking at our current lives (as women), we might as well forget all about that emancipation.

Besides, the subject isn't America, it's LZN.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#105 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:Sadly, it’s the truth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_suffrage

Hold on a second—are you people actually being serious right now?

The text mentions communism and how it supposedly gives everyone equal rights—claiming it ensures everyone has food and a roof over their heads—but I guess that still translates to this: I’ll just take whatever I want from whoever I want, and I can silence anyone who gets in my way without saying a word.

What are you all even talking about? 😲
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#106 ·
Rachel Garcia said:Whether one likes it or not, it is the reality. Under the South administration on August 8, 1945.

I mean, what kind of voting rights are we even talking about under a communist regime? Especially when you consider how they were—quite literally—physically eliminating anyone who didn't fall in line with their ideology at that very moment.

Please, let’s not be so incredibly naive.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#107 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:Everyone seems to have their own idea of what true voting entails—and frankly, I don't care much to dwell on those political upheavals from the late '40s—but over the last two decades, I've certainly noticed how democracy seems to be $0.33 eroding away.

It’s also quite clear when someone is being ignorant.
Rachel Garcia Rachel Garcia Active Member
59 messages
joined Sep 2011
#108 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:I mean, what kind of voting rights are we even talking about under a communist regime? Especially when you consider how they were—quite literally—physically eliminating anyone who didn't fall in line with their ideology at that very moment.

Please, let’s not be so incredibly naive.

No, it’s just that you’re impossible to reason with. They established those rights, plain and simple.

By the way, what’s your take on civil, labor, and individual rights in America today? 😉
Jesus, everyone is obsessed with democracy lately. 😛
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#109 ·
Rachel Garcia said:No, it’s just that you’re impossible to reason with. They established those rights, plain and simple.

By the way, what’s your take on civil, labor, and individual rights in America today? 😉
Jesus, everyone is obsessed with democracy lately. 😛

What exactly is it that supposedly can't be explained to me? Come on—try to pull together some actual logic for a second and get specific. Are you suggesting some fool back then just declared they'd grant voting rights—much like how Churchill promised immediate democratic elections after the war, only to let the wolves devour the lambs? Or am I not supposed to explain how, in that so-called "democracy" where voting was granted, hundreds of thousands of people ended up in mass graves solely because they weren't willing to shout the leader is god?

Please, don't mess with me using dead letters on a page when the reality of that era screams with the lives of the dead—it's simply irrational.

And if that isn't clear to someone, then fine, but then we have nothing left to discuss, because it's just—well, it's frankly disgusting.
Lawrence Thompson58 Lawrence Thompson58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Nov 2011
#110 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:It’s also quite clear when someone is being ignorant.

Why on earth would I just take anyone's word for what happened back in '45? I don't trust a single soul—not one of them. I have to weigh everything myself. Besides, my own life experiences and the sheer amount of time I've spent navigating these issues give me a perspective that I simply won't ignore.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#111 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:Why on earth would I just take anyone's word for what happened back in '45? I don't trust a single soul—not one of them. I have to weigh everything myself. Besides, my own life experiences and the sheer amount of time I've spent navigating these issues give me a perspective that I simply won't ignore.

Look, you have every right to focus on whatever you want and tune out anything else. That’s your prerogative.
But, I suppose, it becomes a bit foolish when you claim something is nonexistent or impossible to grasp just because it falls outside your own understanding.

So, if the subject doesn't interest you—well, then there isn't much intelligent commentary to offer. It is what it is. Not everyone is cut out for every discussion.
I just don't quite get why anyone would bother getting so worked up about something that barely affects them in the slightest.
Lawrence Thompson58 Lawrence Thompson58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Nov 2011
#112 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:Look, you have every right to focus on whatever you want and tune out anything else. That’s your prerogative.
But, I suppose, it becomes a bit foolish when you claim something is nonexistent or impossible to grasp just because it falls outside your own understanding.

So, if the subject doesn't interest you—well, then there isn't much intelligent commentary to offer. It is what it is. Not everyone is cut out for every discussion.
I just don't quite get why anyone would bother getting so worked up about something that barely affects them in the slightest.

It's because you people—just like those old-school socialists—keep trying to hand us these "ready-made" solutions that we can't even verify ourselves. We're expected to just take your word for it, but frankly, you blew all our trust through the gutter over the last twenty years.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#113 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:It's because you people—just like those old-school socialists—keep trying to hand us these "ready-made" solutions that we can't even verify ourselves. We're expected to just take your word for it, but frankly, you blew all our trust through the gutter over the last twenty years.

Are you seriously ignoring the obvious signs here?
When you use the term 'you people,' who exactly are you targeting?
Lawrence Thompson58 Lawrence Thompson58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Nov 2011
#114 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:Are you seriously ignoring the obvious signs here?
When you use the term 'you people,' who exactly are you targeting?

It’s not exactly rocket science—just switch to the singular and try to get your facts straight.
Ethan Morales22 Ethan Morales22 Active Member
245 messages
joined Nov 2011
#115 ·
Man, what can I even say about this:

http://www.ottawa-x.com/scitech/na...anak/100204027
Lawrence Thompson58 Lawrence Thompson58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Nov 2011
#116 ·
Ethan Morales22 said:Man, what can I even say about this:

http://www.ottawa-x.com/scitech/na...anak/100204027

I’m genuinely curious—will all that religious devotion actually kick in for Muslims once their lives are on the line and the only way out involves eating pork?
Ethan Morales22 Ethan Morales22 Active Member
245 messages
joined Nov 2011
#117 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:I’m genuinely curious—will all that religious devotion actually kick in for Muslims once their lives are on the line and the only way out involves eating pork?

That’s what you call a twist of fate.😁>
frozentiger6 frozentiger6 Active Member
211 messages
joined Apr 2007
#118 ·
In the end, they’ll probably find a way to blame Americans again. Mark my words—I’ve already seen people claiming that the "death of comedy" in that series was somehow caused by FOX, acting like they’re the big bad reason the show even stays on the air.

FOX = an American TV network = just another way to commit genocide😁
silentviper19 silentviper19 Active Member
117 messages
joined Mar 2013
#119 ·
Ethan Morales22 said:Man, what can I even say about this:

http://www.ottawa-x.com/scitech/na...anak/100204027

The comments here are just ridiculous. It’s like people are actually picturing these scenes playing out in their heads whenever someone mentions pigs!

It's like they're thinking, "I'd honestly rather die than eat pork for the rest of my life and risk missing out on paradise because of some stupid food!" 🤣!

They’re genuinely terrified, like there's a group of pigs just waiting around the corner to jump them or something!😁
Richard Lee43 Richard Lee43 Active Member
70 messages
joined Oct 2009
#120 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:I’m genuinely curious—will all that religious devotion actually kick in for Muslims once their lives are on the line and the only way out involves eating pork?

They'll probably end up asking for their "lamb" lungs to be removed instead.🤣

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads