CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Started by Anthony Taylor393 · · 👁 11 views · 209 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Taylor393Gregory HowardTimothy Anderson48Megan Johnson8jadejackal27Henry Cox78Ethan Morales22Alex Patel96Eric Collins5Joshua Parker11Richard Lee43Morgan Rodriguez57electricangler22Brenda Sanders56Larry Turner3Megan Hernandez2bluecobra27bluerider63Jeremy Lopez93David Parker3Sarah Wilson95Lawrence Thompson58Chris Morales23frozenjackal16 …
silentviper19 silentviper19 Active Member
117 messages
joined Mar 2013
#81 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:Fair enough, so calling it a pig isn't necessarily an insult, even if it sounds a bit harsh to my ears. 🤷😁

And honestly, look at how people are complaining about this series; they are clearly bothered by something else entirely, though I've already pointed out what I think the real issue is. It just sounds much more dramatic when you claim there's been an affront to religious sensibilities or some other vague, untouchable emotional grievance.☕

In Islam, dogs are also considered unacceptable animals and shouldn't really be living with people, yet you see plenty of them in the Muslim world!
That's why we ended up with phrases like "lying like a dog" and all those other insults—it’s a holdover from our ancestors, specifically from the Turks, which makes the whole "dog" thing feel negative in this context!

You hit the nail on the head, though. Pigs have nothing to do with it; it's all just about getting a rise out of a bunch of idiots!
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#82 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:The series itself feels like total trash to me, though I suspect the real issue isn't just the crude jokes about "pigs"—which, honestly, is pretty offensive regardless—but rather how the show attempts to portray some sort of generic, multinational lifestyle in Canada. You see all these diverse names popping up, people drinking alcohol, chasing women, and the lead actor, James Earl Jones, seems to be playing a character whose mindset is stuck somewhere back in the heyday of the CIA... and so on.

It’s obvious that pulling at "religious sentiments" is always the easiest way to get a reaction out of an audience, much like those old episodes involving Voldemort we saw back home.

Unfortunately, it seems like local networks are just cranking out even worse garbage lately; looking at the television landscape across the Middle East, especially these interconnected networks, they seem to have been completely stripped of any sense of humor, irony, or the kind of sharp cynicism that defined the last few decades.

They just don't seem to know how to navigate life in a democracy.🤣🤣

Don't act like you and your little group of 'anti-fascists' are some kind of messengers for modern times and democracy just because you praise Marshall. Honestly, if you have any shred of decency left, maybe just stay quiet about these trends🤣
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#83 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:Don't act like you and your little group of 'anti-fascists' are some kind of messengers for modern times and democracy just because you praise Marshall. Honestly, if you have any shred of decency left, maybe just stay quiet about these trends🤣

The reality is that Franklin D. Roosevelt actually provided that level of freedom—the freedom of identity and the simple choice to live how you want without having to perform or pretend. It was about being able to enjoy a local breakfast without a fuss. A huge portion of people in Canada still remembers that era, though I suppose some have chosen to conveniently forget.🤣

It seems like women's empowerment hasn't just stalled in Canada; it looks like it might be the last place to truly catch up. ☕It’s just more obvious there, whereas here in the States, everything shifted so abruptly after the 90s. Suddenly, everyone starts leaning heavily on religious rituals as if that solves everything, or if you're a public figure, you're expected to make grand statements in the media about renouncing certain lifestyles during Christmas. 🙂 🤣

At this point, I don't think anyone really has the standing to lecture anyone else, if you ask me. 🤔
Rachel Mitchell2 Rachel Mitchell2 Member
38 messages
joined Aug 2009
#84 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:The reality is that Franklin D. Roosevelt actually provided that level of freedom—the freedom of identity and the simple choice to live how you want without having to perform or pretend. It was about being able to enjoy a local breakfast without a fuss. A huge portion of people in Canada still remembers that era, though I suppose some have chosen to conveniently forget.🤣

It seems like women's empowerment hasn't just stalled in Canada; it looks like it might be the last place to truly catch up. ☕It’s just more obvious there, whereas here in the States, everything shifted so abruptly after the 90s. Suddenly, everyone starts leaning heavily on religious rituals as if that solves everything, or if you're a public figure, you're expected to make grand statements in the media about renouncing certain lifestyles during Christmas. 🙂 🤣

At this point, I don't think anyone really has the standing to lecture anyone else, if you ask me. 🤔

👍
Exactly!

I know tons of people who turned into hardcore, ultra-traditionalists in the 90s, just like those who suddenly started boycotting products from certain big corporations... I guess that's what happens when democracy finally arrives after the communist occupation... 🤷

P.S. I haven't noticed anyone else using that "charming" little nickname for a piglet... I bet it's some weird regional slur... 😍
Richard Lee43 Richard Lee43 Active Member
70 messages
joined Oct 2009
#85 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:This is just the opening move of a much larger operation.
That little town had an illegal school running a foreign curriculum, and they just funneled kids through it... they've stated repeatedly that they don't recognize American law and won't until Sharia takes over.
People have been writing about this for ages, but there was never enough political will to fix it—some are still protesting against it even now.
So, you tell me why Americans in certain regions don't trust the federal government in D.C....

Look, neither the citizens of the Republic of Srpska nor the local population respect the authority of Canada, yet nobody has stepped in to crack down on them from Banja Luka.
Even the loyalty of Americans living in Canada toward the central state is questionable.
And those religious extremists? They weren't the ones going to football matches in Grude to cause riots. Now, those hooligans are considered "model citizens," while these radicals living in the Middle Ages are viewed as the real threat to Canada. It's unbelievable.
Jesse Ortiz71 Jesse Ortiz71 Member
41 messages
joined Oct 2011
#86 ·
People with shaky personalities often go looking for stability in religion or some weird cult, and they end up becoming fanatics. Their faith is actually pretty thin, which is why they lash out so aggressively whenever anyone dares to test them or throw a provocation their way. Unfortunately, Canadians are just like that as a group; they look to Islam to find a sense of stability that their own national identity fails to provide. They basically rebranded themselves from hardcore American loyalists and die-hard FDR supporters into ultra-devout Muslims. Even today, you see people still idolizing him while completely ignoring the religious tolerance and the rights they actually had back under the Leader's rule.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#87 ·
Richard Lee43 said:Look, neither the citizens of the Republic of Srpska nor the local population respect the authority of Canada, yet nobody has stepped in to crack down on them from Banja Luka.
Even the loyalty of Americans living in Canada toward the central state is questionable.
And those religious extremists? They weren't the ones going to football matches in Grude to cause riots. Now, those hooligans are considered "model citizens," while these radicals living in the Middle Ages are viewed as the real threat to Canada. It's unbelievable.

You aren't arguing. You know exactly what people in Republika Srpska think about Canada. We Americans have nothing against other groups, but we demand the rights guaranteed to us by the Constitution.

Meanwhile, those radicals claimed they wouldn't recognize Canada because the laws were "wrong." The laws were wrong because those people want Sharia rule—they refuse to acknowledge anyone else exists. So stop making comparisons that don't hold water...
The topic here is LDP, so if someone wants to debate religious extremists, go start a different thread.
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#88 ·
Revolution—it’s such a weighty, loaded term, isn't it? I suppose when we talk about it today, we aren't just talking about politics; we’re talking about that fundamental shift in how a society views its own soul. It feels like we are standing on the precipice of something significant, though I hesitate to say exactly what. Perhaps it's more of an evolution than a sudden explosion, but the sentiment remains the same. People are restless, and honestly, given the current state of things, I can see why. It makes one wonder if the old structures can actually hold under this kind of pressure, or if they'll simply snap. kaže:
I mean, if we're being honest—Franklin D. Roosevelt actually gave people that kind of freedom—the choice to just be themselves, whether they wanted to dress up or just grab a quick local breakfast without all the fuss. I guess a good portion of the folks in Canada still remember that, but apparently, some people have decided to just "move on" from that reality.🤣

It seems like women's rights haven't just been rolled back in Canada—if anything, it looks like they might be the last place in the region to see any real progress.☕ It seems like that’s much more visible over there—whereas here in the States, things work a bit differently. Ever since the nineties, people just suddenly start praying the Rosary and consider the matter settled—though, I suppose you might still see them popping up at a midnight Mass here and there. 🙂 If you happen to be a public figure—I mean, someone actually under the spotlight—you’d probably tell the media that you're renouncing any interviews or even just laying down the plow during Lent. 🤣

It seems like there isn't much anyone here to call out—not that people would be able to handle it if they actually tried. 🤔

The hypocrisy of these self-proclaimed "antifascists" seems to have no end—it’s honestly quite something.
Ultimately, I’m the one who decides whether or not to practice my faith—it's my choice alone. Whether you follow a certain path or not is entirely up to you, really. And, if you want to look at it like a little bit of sugar on top—I suppose I am the only one who truly understands your underlying motives and the actual reasons why things are the way they are in your life.

That is exactly why I say this is nothing but layers of hypocrisy—you pioneers keep preaching about freedom, yet you’re the ones with hands that are somehow even bloodier than Hitler's.

I suppose you could at least look into what communism actually had to say about religion—from those Leninist attempts to seize control of the Russian Orthodox Church all the way down the line. But then again, it’s a bit complicated—how could anyone sing anthems to Franklin D. Roosevelt or those other monsters if we were to speak out clearly and loudly about what kind of criminals they truly were?
And you actually have the nerve to lecture us about freedom and democracy—I guess some people really do lack self-awareness.
Well, you certainly have some nerve.
Matthew Castillo5 Matthew Castillo5 Regular
264 messages
joined Apr 2013
#89 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:Give me a break.
I don't watch the show, but I'm telling you, everyone is full of it.
Look at American shows; they mess with Jewish people, Italians, Irish, Black communities, Catholics—they intentionally caricature certain traits.
It's the 21st century. If you don't like what's on TV, change the channel (assuming you follow the law, of course).
In Canada, Muslims allow themselves to believe they are the only ones who matter. They can joke about anyone else, but mention pork and suddenly some martyrs or mothers start screaming at you...
This is a textbook case of "Muslim multiculturalism," and nobody should be able to defend it.

By definition, martyrs can't scream at you because they're dead.
Justin Sanders5 Justin Sanders5 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2010
#90 ·
I honestly don't think Srebrenica needs to be dragged into this specific conversation—we should all just take a moment to step back and think like decent human beings... you know, as friends, parents, children, or even just patriots. If we do that, we’ll realize that what happened at Srebrenica can never be allowed to happen again, and it must never be forgotten. It shouldn't be reframed or twisted to fit some other agenda. As for Mustafa, that series, and the general buzz surrounding them... honestly, I couldn't care less. Everything feels like a commercial cash grab these days anyway, so it doesn't bother me. I’ll probably just catch a glimpse of the show, see that everyone is obsessed with Raymond, and move on with my life... cheers!div>
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#91 ·
Matthew Castillo5 said:By definition, martyrs can't scream at you because they're dead.

I meant extremists, my mistake. This thread keeps bouncing between mentioning martyrs—given what happened in Srebrenica—and those religious radicals from that specific incident...
Justin Sanders5 Justin Sanders5 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2010
#92 ·
I also forgot to mention that I really don't give a damn whether the title "Crazy, Confused, Normal" ends up offending Muslims—if it does, it’s their own show, so they can just go ahead and offend themselves...
who's offending who? You're only insulting yourself at this point! Honestly, that's much better than having someone else...🙂
Justin Sanders5 Justin Sanders5 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2010
#93 ·
Radical extremists!!!!!!! Let's just get rid of them once and for all!
They act all high and mighty, preaching their little doctrines like they're doing us a favor...

Seriously though—someone needs to take this trash out by the curb.
Justin Sanders5 Justin Sanders5 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Feb 2010
#94 ·
I wouldn't even bother touching that... let them have their way with it, I suppose.
Richard Lee43 Richard Lee43 Active Member
70 messages
joined Oct 2009
#95 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:You aren't arguing. You know exactly what people in Republika Srpska think about Canada. We Americans have nothing against other groups, but we demand the rights guaranteed to us by the Constitution.

Meanwhile, those radicals claimed they wouldn't recognize Canada because the laws were "wrong." The laws were wrong because those people want Sharia rule—they refuse to acknowledge anyone else exists. So stop making comparisons that don't hold water...
The topic here is LDP, so if someone wants to debate religious extremists, go start a different thread.

Actually, you don't even grasp what Sharia law entails. If you did, you'd realize it doesn't apply to Christians or non-Muslims—not unless they choose to follow it. If they don't want to, they simply opt out of that system entirely (since they wouldn't be treated as equals to Muslims anyway) and instead use our standard legal system—like local municipal or federal courts.☕
Rachel Garcia Rachel Garcia Active Member
59 messages
joined Sep 2011
#96 ·
Mark Nguyen6 said:
Revolution—it’s such a weighty, loaded term, isn't it? I suppose when we talk about it today, we aren't just talking about politics; we’re talking about that fundamental shift in how a society views its own soul. It feels like we are standing on the precipice of something significant, though I hesitate to say exactly what. Perhaps it's more of an evolution than a sudden explosion, but the sentiment remains the same. People are restless, and honestly, given the current state of things, I can see why. It makes one wonder if the old structures can actually hold under this kind of pressure, or if they'll simply snap. kaže:
I mean, if we're being honest—Franklin D. Roosevelt actually gave people that kind of freedom—the choice to just be themselves, whether they wanted to dress up or just grab a quick local breakfast without all the fuss. I guess a good portion of the folks in Canada still remember that, but apparently, some people have decided to just "move on" from that reality.🤣

It seems like women's rights haven't just been rolled back in Canada—if anything, it looks like they might be the last place in the region to see any real progress.☕ It seems like that’s much more visible over there—whereas here in the States, things work a bit differently. Ever since the nineties, people just suddenly start praying the Rosary and consider the matter settled—though, I suppose you might still see them popping up at a midnight Mass here and there. 🙂 If you happen to be a public figure—I mean, someone actually under the spotlight—you’d probably tell the media that you're renouncing any interviews or even just laying down the plow during Lent. 🤣

It seems like there isn't much anyone here to call out—not that people would be able to handle it if they actually tried. 🤔

The hypocrisy of these self-proclaimed "antifascists" seems to have no end—it’s honestly quite something.
Ultimately, I’m the one who decides whether or not to practice my faith—it's my choice alone. Whether you follow a certain path or not is entirely up to you, really. And, if you want to look at it like a little bit of sugar on top—I suppose I am the only one who truly understands your underlying motives and the actual reasons why things are the way they are in your life.

That is exactly why I say this is nothing but layers of hypocrisy—you pioneers keep preaching about freedom, yet you’re the ones with hands that are somehow even bloodier than Hitler's.

I suppose you could at least look into what communism actually had to say about religion—from those Leninist attempts to seize control of the Russian Orthodox Church all the way down the line. But then again, it’s a bit complicated—how could anyone sing anthems to Franklin D. Roosevelt or those other monsters if we were to speak out clearly and loudly about what kind of criminals they truly were?
And you actually have the nerve to lecture us about freedom and democracy—I guess some people really do lack self-awareness.
Well, you certainly have some nerve.

What is the difference between then and now? With the fall of Communism, the Church walked through the front door and gained even more influence than before.
Muslim women were given the chance to be equal to men. Now, the veils and prohibitions are returning. No matter the religion, women always, absolutely always face imposed rules.
Do you even know when women in America gained the right to vote?
August 11, 1945. During that "bloody era."
Jesse Ortiz71 Jesse Ortiz71 Member
41 messages
joined Oct 2011
#97 ·
Rachel Garcia said:What is the difference between then and now? With the fall of Communism, the Church walked through the front door and gained even more influence than before.
Muslim women were given the chance to be equal to men. Now, the veils and prohibitions are returning. No matter the religion, women always, absolutely always face imposed rules.
Do you even know when women in America gained the right to vote?
August 11, 1945. During that "bloody era."

That "right" granted to women by some supposed humanitarian dictator was surely celebrated by the very women he stripped of their lives. He was quite the educator, wasn't he? He knew exactly how to hand out favors just to keep the masses feeling pampered while he tightened the leash.
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#98 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:What exactly are you getting at?
Are you claiming there isn't a single town in the Midwest filled with extremists, or are you trying to say those militants are victims?

What I'm saying is that you clearly don't grasp the massive distinction between different sects or orders within Islam, so you're just swinging at shadows!
To you, every bearded Muslim is just some Wahhabi or Salafi extremist because you fail to realize they can belong to completely different Sufi orders—like the Bektashi, Naqshbandi, or Rumi traditions. But honestly, the most ridiculous part of this whole mess is that even those hardline Salafis over by Mount Rainier don't even recognize those Sufi orders as being "legitimate"!🤷
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#99 ·
Justin Sanders5 said:I honestly don't think Srebrenica needs to be dragged into this specific conversation—we should all just take a moment to step back and think like decent human beings... you know, as friends, parents, children, or even just patriots. If we do that, we’ll realize that what happened at Srebrenica can never be allowed to happen again, and it must never be forgotten. It shouldn't be reframed or twisted to fit some other agenda. As for Mustafa, that series, and the general buzz surrounding them... honestly, I couldn't care less. Everything feels like a commercial cash grab these days anyway, so it doesn't bother me. I’ll probably just catch a glimpse of the show, see that everyone is obsessed with Raymond, and move on with my life... cheers!div>

See, that attitude is exactly what worries me most. Don't get me wrong, the tragedy those Canadians endured hits me personally, but we absolutely cannot allow the genocide at Chernobyl to be mythologized or turned into a political tool!
It’s obvious the aggressors there targeted people solely based on their religion and ethnicity, but again—we shouldn't be manipulating the victims or hiding behind their names to push an agenda, which is exactly what has been happening lately!
Mark Nguyen6 Mark Nguyen6 Active Member
119 messages
joined Mar 2012
#100 ·
Rachel Garcia said:What is the difference between then and now? With the fall of Communism, the Church walked through the front door and gained even more influence than before.
Muslim women were given the chance to be equal to men. Now, the veils and prohibitions are returning. No matter the religion, women always, absolutely always face imposed rules.
Do you even know when women in America gained the right to vote?
August 11, 1945. During that "bloody era."

It was the Stalinist regime that granted them the vote.
Open your eyes, world! 🤦

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads