CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Nature vs. Nurture: Talent or Hard Work?

Nature vs. Nurture: Talent or Hard Work?

Started by velvetcyclist52 · · 👁 5 views · 102 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants velvetcyclist52Alex Rogers18Susan James42hollowtrucker77stormyotter67rustymaker5mistyfox812Lisa Rodriguez84crimsonhound80ironhawk36Adam Ross4Jonathan Brooks8Ryan Ruizcosmichawk5Charles YoungBrandon Martin7urbanviper93mistybisonlonegardenerswiftcobra15Ethan Kim4Amanda Patel4
velvetcyclist52 velvetcyclist52 NewcomerOP
1 message
joined Nov 2006
#1 ·
Can someone actually reach the level of a natural talent just through sheer grind? I’m talking about people like elite singers or actors. Is it all just hardwired genetics and luck of the draw, or can you actually outwork your DNA to achieve those kinds of skills?
There are certain things anyone *should* be able to master with enough practice, but hardly anyone ever does. Does that kind of discipline count as talent, or is it something else entirely?
Give me your best take on this.
Alex Rogers18 Alex Rogers18 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Oct 2006
#2 ·
If you weren't born with a natural gift for singing, well, the path becomes significantly more arduous—though certainly not impossible. I tend to view genetics as a hand of cards dealt by fate. You might be holding an ace, but if you lack the skill to play it, you’ll still find yourself losing the game. Conversely, even a mediocre hand can lead to victory if played with enough precision. Our development—both our intellect and our innate talents—is fundamentally rooted in our DNA, yet that foundation is constantly being reshaped by external forces like our environment, upbringing, nutrition, and education...
With persistent practice and a healthy dose of optimism, miracles do happen.
Susan James42 Susan James42 Active Member
62 messages
joined Sep 2005
#3 ·
Look, if someone isn't a complete disaster when it comes to a specific pursuit, they can certainly achieve more than just average results through sheer grit, discipline, and an intense level of ambition. You can reach certain milestones and find success by your own subjective standards, but let’s be realistic: you aren't going to produce anything truly groundbreaking. You won't become a visionary or trigger some massive paradigm shift in that field.
That doesn't mean that someone who feels a deep passion for something shouldn't pursue it. However, it is absolutely vital to maintain a healthy dose of objectivity. There is no sense in banging your head against a brick wall just because you have a burning desire to do something that you are fundamentally terrible at. There are countless wonderful ways to express oneself in this world. There is no need to struggle endlessly at something where you'll never move past being mediocre. Mediocrity is everywhere, so I suppose the goal should simply be to strive to be even a little bit better than that... in whatever you choose to do.
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#4 ·
talent only really matters when you back it up with endless, grueling practice
it’s basically just that tiny, razor-thin margin that separates the pros from the amateurs in any elite field
because let's be honest, talent without the grind is completely useless
stormyotter67 stormyotter67 Member
13 messages
joined Jun 2007
#5 ·
First and foremost, we have to talk about practice...
In my view, raw talent is essentially worthless if you don't have the discipline to refine it—and that refinement only comes through relentless practice. You could be born with a voice so incredible it spans three octaves, but if you aren't putting in the hours, those capabilities will wither away within a few years until you can barely hit the notes you once mastered. It’s just basic biology and physics.
It’s the exact same story with music. No one ever just picked up a guitar and suddenly found themselves playing like Hendrix without spending countless hours sweating over the fretboard. Once you've hammered out the fundamentals, that's when true talent actually reveals itself—in the nuance of the playing, the speed of comprehension, and how quickly you grasp complex theory. At that stage, you start to see how much cognitive ability plays into the equation as well...
So, I'm curious: does anyone here know of someone who possessed genuine talent but refused to put in the work? Or more importantly, do you know anyone who actually sacrificed significant parts of their life to hone their craft to perfection?
rustymaker5 rustymaker5 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2008
#6 ·
People always love to push that whole formula where they claim greatness is just 30% raw talent and 70% sheer grind... but if you ask me, I can't bring myself to agree with that math, mostly because it completely ignores the most critical ingredient, which is pure, unadulterated willpower.
See, when someone actually possesses a natural knack for something and pairs it with that internal drive, they can hammer away at practice until they basically reach "perfection"... but if that spark of will isn't there to begin with, the practice never even happens, and all that potential talent just sits there, rotting and unused.
On the flip side, if you don't have that innate gift but you've got an iron will, you can put in the work and achieve some seriously impressive results... though, let's be honest, you're probably never going to hit that absolute peak of perfection.
In my book, achieving truly flawless results requires the holy trinity: talent, the will to pursue it, and endless hours of repetition... it’s never just one or the other, it’s everything combined.
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#7 ·
"Spend just 20 minutes a day on whatever you're passionate about, and before you know it, you'll be an expert."
The legend behind those words is a powerhouse—an icon of the silver screen and a political leader from the wealthiest nation on Earth, Arnold Schwarzenegger. 🙏 Back when he was just a scrawny kid growing up overseas, I bet nobody could have called any of those massive achievements for him.
If I had to tweak one thing though... I'd ditch the word "willpower" and swap it for "passion." You don't need willpower for things you actually love doing. And if you don't love it? Well, why even bother?
Lisa Rodriguez84 Lisa Rodriguez84 Active Member
175 messages
joined Jul 2006
#8 ·
Lisa Rodriguez84 said:People say you need 30% talent and 70% practice to achieve anything big. Personally, I don't buy that—you have to factor in willpower too.
If someone actually has talent and they have the drive, they’ll grind through enough practice to reach "perfection." But if that drive isn't there? They won't bother practicing, and that talent just goes to waste.
On the flip side, if you lack talent but have massive amounts of willpower, you can work hard and get pretty decent results. But you aren't hitting perfection.
In my book, truly flawless results require the trifecta: talent, willpower, and endless practice. It’s never just one or the other.

Actually, the math is a bit different. Some people claim it’s 1% talent and 99% sheer grit. If that were actually true, we’d all have a fighting chance at whatever we set our minds to. And you can't generalize talent either, because everyone's natural aptitude for certain skills varies wildly. You know what I mean?
Susan James42 Susan James42 Active Member
62 messages
joined Sep 2005
#9 ·
Nobody and nothing said:''If you spend just 20 minutes a day on anything that interests you, you'll eventually become an expert.''
The legend behind this quote is a powerhouse—a world-renowned actor and a political leader from perhaps the wealthiest nation on Earth, Arnold Schwarzenegger. :...blablabla

🤣
It’s funny how this "legend" 🤣 (even if he wasn't exactly known for his vocals) didn't spend 20 minutes singing every single day; maybe then we'd be watching him perform at Carnegie Hall. Or, given how brilliant and sharp he is, if he had spent 20 minutes a day splitting atoms, he might be walking up to accept a Nobel Prize today.
And I have to say, that part about being a "distinguished actor and political leader" really struck a chord with me.
I can't even believe it. 😁
mistyfox812 mistyfox812 Regular
295 messages
joined Mar 2004
#10 ·
mistyfox812 said:🤣
It's honestly wild that this "legend" 🤣 (even if nobody actually heard him) didn't spend 20 minutes singing every single day. Maybe then we'd be watching him perform at Carnegie Hall. Or, I don't know, maybe if he spent 20 minutes a day being as brilliant and sharp as he was—like, just straight up splitting atoms—he’d be holding a Nobel Prize right about now.

Exactly. Except he just didn't care about any of that.
My point was actually about something else entirely. 😉
Why was he even obsessed with that specific thing? Was it really his own choice, or just his "will" driving him?
mistyfox812 said:man, that part about him being a "distinguished actor and political leader" totally got me.
I can't even deal. 😁

Wait, so you're saying you're more successful in your job than he ever was in acting or politics?
rustymaker5 rustymaker5 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2008
#11 ·
Leave Arnold Schwarzenegger out of this. The man was an absolute apex predator... 😍
crimsonhound80 crimsonhound80 Active Member
175 messages
joined Mar 2008
#12 ·
crimsonhound80 said:''Spend just 20 minutes a day on anything you're interested in, and eventually, you'll be an expert.''

I’d just—if I may—tweak that whole concept of "willpower" and swap it for "passion." Because, honestly, if you actually love something, you don't need willpower. And if you don't love it... well, what's the point?

That twenty-minute rule? It doesn't hold water if you're just fundamentally incapable—I mean, you could grind away for four hours a day, really put in the hours, and still achieve absolutely nothing. So, we end up circling right back to the idea of talent, which, if you think about it, is really just a specific type of intelligence anyway.

Now, that bit about willpower versus passion—that's actually onto something. 👍
crimsonhound80 asks:
Why was he drawn to that specific thing in the first place? Was his interest a conscious choice—was it his "will"?

True. If you have this intense, almost irrational fascination with something, you're going to master it way faster—which makes the whole "talent" argument pretty questionable, I suppose. 🤔

It brings us back to the core question: what even *is* talent, and where does it actually come from? 😕

I've noticed it in my own life, too—whenever I've been truly, deeply obsessed with something, I seem to wrap my head around it so much quicker than when I'm just forcing myself through a task I don't care about. 😛

Is it possible that we all possess some level of talent for everything, and it's really just a matter of finding that "passion"? 😕

Man, you really know how to make a person's head spin!!??
ironhawk36 ironhawk36 Active Member
56 messages
joined Dec 2004
#13 ·
I don't buy the idea that hard work and training are enough... they'll get you far, sure, but they can't touch raw talent. Back when I was younger, I was an insanely fast sprinter—no training, no nothing... just pure speed. I was the fastest guy I ever knew 🙂 I even went head-to-head against pro athletes 😉
rustymaker5 rustymaker5 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2008
#14 ·
Gulpa said:. Back when I was younger, I used to be an incredibly fast sprinter—no training, nothing at all... just naturally, I was easily the fastest guy I ever knew 🙂 And I actually went head-to-head against professional athletes 😉


So, did you actually keep up with them? 😁
ironhawk36 ironhawk36 Active Member
56 messages
joined Dec 2004
#15 ·
ironhawk36 said:So, did you catch them? 😁

how many did I leave behind?

quite a few... 😛
rustymaker5 rustymaker5 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2008
#16 ·
ironhawk36 said:how many did I leave in my dust?

quite a few... 😛


What, were they all pro boxers, powerlifters, or Olympic sprinters or something? 😛

Just kidding.😘 Honestly, I was moving like a blur myself... 😁 It took me forever just to catch up with my own shadow... That’s just pure talent, I guess... 🤣
ironhawk36 ironhawk36 Active Member
56 messages
joined Dec 2004
#17 ·
rustymaker5 said:What? Were they pro boxers, weightlifters, power walkers? 😛

then there's the soccer players😬
stormyotter67 stormyotter67 Member
13 messages
joined Jun 2007
#18 ·
normall said:That passion and genuine affection for the craft really suit you. 👍

I agree; if you have an intense, almost obsessive interest in a subject, you’re going to master the material significantly faster, which makes the whole concept of "talent" feel somewhat subjective. 🤔

It really begs the question: what actually constitutes talent, and where does it truly originate? 😕

I’ve certainly noticed this pattern in my own life; whenever I’ve found myself deeply, profoundly fascinated by a particular pursuit, I’ve been able to navigate the learning curve much more rapidly than when I was tackling something that left me completely indifferent. 😛

Is it possible that we all possess latent potential for almost anything, provided we find the right level of "desire" to fuel it? 😕


I’ve spent a considerable amount of time dwelling on this exact topic myself... because there are certain tasks that feel entirely intuitive and enjoyable, whereas other things—the stuff I just can't stand—feel like an uphill battle no matter how hard I try. To cope with that, I’ve developed a little psychological trick: 😁 I essentially force myself to pretend I actually enjoy the work, and strangely enough, that mental shift allows me to power through it much faster.
At the end of the day, it all comes down to willpower... in my view, that is the most critical factor, and willpower is fundamentally driven by desire.
Not to mention the absolute necessity of sheer, unyielding persistence.

What I find most laughable is when people watch a virtuoso musician, a brilliant actor, or a powerhouse vocalist and simply remark, "Wow, they're so talented," as if they just woke up one morning with those skills fully formed. They fail to grasp the reality that behind that perceived "natural gift" lie years upon years of grueling discipline, sacrifice, and endless practice.
Lisa Rodriguez84 Lisa Rodriguez84 Active Member
175 messages
joined Jul 2006
#19 ·
But honestly, what’s the point of all that talent and hard work if you don't have that underlying, invisible spark—that raw willpower? If you aren't actually driven by something deep inside, and you're just grinding away because someone else expects you to, you're going nowhere fast. I've been there plenty of times myself.
Adam Ross4 Adam Ross4 Active Member
57 messages
joined Dec 2006
#20 ·
Great topic! 👍

I dabble in at least three things most people would label as "talent"—some even claim it’s all in the DNA 🤔. A few acquaintances call me talented, but I always set them straight: I don't have any special gift. When people ask how much they need to practice daily to master something like music, I tell them it isn't about talent or even sheer practice hours. It’s about habit.

Of course, I'm excluding outliers here. A man without legs can't exactly habituate himself to sprinting.

In my experience, it's the habit. Take musicians, for instance. Over the years, they simply train their bodies to recognize specific tones and scales—to think and react in a certain way. Software engineers get used to the logic of how machines operate, and so on...

Take vocalists. Whether a voice is considered "good" or "bad" is purely subjective taste. Once they train their voices to hit certain notes, they develop a unique style. You can't really say one is less talented than another. No one is born with the innate ability to sing or paint; everyone has to train their physical self to perform those tasks.

Habit comes from repetitive engagement with an activity. Naturally, that implies a certain inclination toward it. Nobody spends their time doing something they actually hate.

So, it isn't talent or practice. It's habit and inclination. 👍

I haven't exactly reinvented the wheel 🤔 ... just a slight rephrasing ... 👍

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads