Posts by swiftscout8

Kruška said:Could you go into a bit more detail about what you mean by dermatitis and discoloration? I’m definitely no medical expert here.🙂

It’s basically when the itching starts, followed by those pale patches or spots on the skin...

And you, nimbleskipper13, really have a thing for certain emojis. Those little devils and angels.
🙂

Long live the Internet, the great equalizer of our society!! 👍
🙂

Adam Wells5 said:Read everything first before you start jumping to conclusions. 🙂

I read the whole thing and I understood it perfectly fine. From a grammatical standpoint, your post was nothing more than a standard list. If that wasn't your intention, then you clearly wrote it that way—and if so, you don't have a clue about American language and grammar.

Adam Wells5 said:...And nowhere does it say they aren't supposed to get paid for their jobs....

I really hope someone breaks the news to you soon—with a smile, no less—that there’s no paycheck coming this month. Maybe then you'll suddenly realize how much nonsense you've been spewing on this forum.

It all comes down to basic manners. That’s where the breakdown started—the total lack of decorum. There was a time when highly educated people carried themselves like true gentlemen; now, everyone else seems to view them as if they're beneath notice. The rest of the public operates on this mindset: "Oh, you have a degree? Who cares? You can use it to wipe your backside." It's even reached the point where less educated people actively try to compete with the intellectuals just to prove that their credentials are worthless. But how can they be worthless when you spent four, five, six, or even nine years of your prime life working toward them? While others were out partying and chasing women, I was hunched over books solving math problems. Naturally, it makes me angry when someone tells me my hard work is useless. And of course, that guy was rightfully livid when his patient called him "little mister."

On the other hand, I’m not exactly defending his outburst. My philosophy is simple: If you're the more educated or intelligent person in the room, don't stoop to their level. I handle those situations with gloves on. When I clash with someone, I rely on cynicism and logic rather than pure primitivism. That’s what actually works.

Funded by McDonald's???

Scrolling through some of the threads on this sub, I can't shake the feeling that we're seeing a massive surge in orthorexia. This isn't just some buzzword cooked up by a doctor to sound important. It feels like people have become genuinely obsessed with "clean living," specifically when it comes to what they eat. But is this obsession actually healthy?

http://www.orthorexia.com

crimsonorca12 said:Maybe try doing a little research on how long we've actually known about diabetes.😁

The first mentions of diabetes date all the way back to the ancient Egyptians.

Not to mention the ancient Romans used to diagnose it after noticing bees swarming around the sweet urine of certain patients.

That’s almost certainly because whole grain bread wasn't exactly a staple back then.😁

👍 👍
It's the same story with several other ailments. They've been around forever. It just took us this long to finally catch up, get smart, and connect the dots to our lack of whole grain bread.
😂Fact.

I’ve been trying to explain this for a few posts now, but honestly... tackling this thread feels like trying to prove chaos theory. If you were to drop an object from the top of the Leaning Tower of Pisa, it wouldn't follow any predictable law of free fall. A sudden gust of wind—caused by temperature shifts in the atmosphere, which stem from solar activity, which ultimately traces back to some disturbance in a distant galaxy—could easily throw our calculations off by three thousandths. 🙄

mistybear4 said:First piece of advice: find a new doctor immediately.

Coming from the unlicensed quack, I suppose. Honestly, I can't even take you seriously anymore. If I have to stop reading medical journals just because of your nonsense, then I might as well give up entirely.🙄

mistybear4 said:The topic here is bread and its role in our diet. My stance is that it offers zero nutritional value within the food chain, making it entirely unnecessary—not to mention how many people claim white flour is actually harmful...

Zero nutritional value? What about carbohydrates? Grains are a primary source of carbs and the fundamental energy we rely on to get through the day. That "famous" Atkins diet works specifically by avoiding these foods because they provide the body with so much fuel.

Did your mother ever tell you when you were a kid, "Eat your bread so you'll actually have something in your stomach, instead of whining to me in two hours because you're hungry..."?

Look, I think the whole "white flour is toxic" thing is an exaggeration. For goodness' sake, people have been eating grains, bread, and everything derived from them for millennia. Now, in the third millennium, we think we're so smart inventing problems where none exist...

Source: HealthWise:

Starch or complex carbohydrates are easier to digest once cooked, and the most common sources are cereals, rice, potatoes, flour, and flour-based products. Indigestible carbohydrates are also vital to a healthy diet. These are dietary fibers that improve digestion and gastrointestinal function, found in fruits, vegetables, grains, and whole-grain products. Carbohydrates serve as a particularly crucial energy source for athletes or anyone physically active. Since carbohydrate reserves are stored as glycogen in the muscles and liver, they are easily mobilized to provide the body with the energy required during intense physical exertion.

I hear what you're all saying, but that’s not how you solve this. My parents taught me that you lead by example, not by lecturing. If you want your wife to live a healthy lifestyle, then you need to actually live it yourself. If you give yourself permission to indulge, she's going to feel entitled to do the same. At that point, no amount of gentle suggestion or shouting is going to change anything. You can't smoke and tell her she can't!

Let's be honest: this entire post is a massive exaggeration. Don't get me wrong, I'm strongly against smoking. I'm also against excessive drinking. Those are the things that actually destroy a person—not whether you eat white bread versus whole grain. Yet, everyone here consistently avoids addressing the real issues, choosing instead to nitpick marginal details like how "self-righteous" someone is about being healthy. It’s a classic debate tactic: when people run out of actual arguments regarding the main point, they pivot to minor trivialities. We aren't discussing our family dynamics here; this isn't a psychological or moral seminar. This is a discussion about how different types of bread affect the body. Sure, whole grain might be better. Fine. But eating white bread isn't a death sentence, and you aren't going to shave twenty years off your life just because you had a slice. Or if you finish a bag of chips once a week. Or if you have a glass of wine with dinner. NO, that certainly won't kill you.

But a pack of cigarettes a day? Five beers a day? A liter of Coca-Cola a day? Ten cups of coffee? That will kill you. We are talking about moderation here, yet the stances taken in this thread are anything but moderate.

northernfalcon30 said:The sheer selfishness in some of these comments... as if you're the only person living on this planet.

Look, maybe try fixing your own flaws before you start lecturing everyone else on how to live. We all have them; the real question is whether we actually care enough to change. As for being selfish? Let’s be honest: we all are, in one way or another. If I prefer white bread over whatever specialty loaf people are obsessing over here, I'm going to eat the white bread. And I don't consider myself selfish just because I don't think eating a slice of toast is going to drop me dead from diabetes or whatever.

I certainly have no interest in telling anyone else how to run their lives. Especially not my own family. That kind of condescension is just rude. Imagine if your husband started yelling at you just because he caught you sitting in front of the TV with a bag of chips. Then he has the nerve to call you selfish for wanting a snack. Give me a break. 🙄 👎

steelsailor17 said:If I may take a guess...
You're under 20.
Just stating a fact, but once you hit 49 years, 11 months, and 29 days old, I might actually have something worth asking you...

You missed the mark. You're off by at least a decade. F grade.

As for this entire debate: good grief, people. You're all sitting here arguing over whether to eat whole grains or if consuming two or three teaspoons of sugar a day is the end of the world. It’s nonsense. If I go out for a BBQ with some buddies on Sunday, am I really supposed to order whole wheat bread just because I'm terrified of dying before 50? Or turn down a beer on a Wednesday night?

Don't get me wrong, I get the importance of staying healthy and that whole "healthy body, healthy mind" mantra. That’s why I go for a 6-mile run every other day. But there's such a thing as overkill, and frankly, life is too short to be this miserable. Take a look around this thread. You're all living in constant fear that two glasses of Coca-Cola a day will kill you by age 40. It's unbelievable. 😲 🙄

Someone already mentioned how people are starting to obsess over this "healthy" lifestyle. There was even a specific term used to describe it.

I’d much rather live 50 years doing things the right way than drag it out to 100 by sacrificing everything that actually makes life worth living.

dustycanyon6 said:The passage goes on to mention chronic diseases that take years or even decades to develop—so why do you grasp the urgency of high insulin immediately, yet ignore the long-term fallout? Nobody gets wrecked by a single McDonald's burger. Or one a month. Or even once a week (I certainly hope not). But eating that stuff every single day will absolutely destroy your health—maybe not this second, but within a month or a year, for sure. Still, weight gain is probably the most harmless consequence of overdoing the sugar, even if you did reduce your entire argument down to just that.

I read somewhere that people with high-stress jobs, or anyone pumping out more adrenaline than the rest of the normal world, have a much higher risk of heart attacks. So don't speed on the highway or you might die in a wreck; and if you don't, you'll likely drop dead from a heart attack in ten years anyway.

It’s basically the same logic as what you're preaching here. Hide away from the world, don't eat this, don't eat that, stay away from beer, no, no, no... and then you get hit by a car when you're thirty. Just enjoy life while you can, man, because you might not even be around tomorrow.

There’s something about mistybear4 that reminds me of Vilk. Just another hack playing doctor. 🙄

dustycanyon6 said:The pancreas releases insulin—produced by beta cells—after you consume carbohydrates. This triggers a spike in blood sugar. Insulin ensures your cells get the glucose necessary for survival and boosts glycogen storage. However, it also signals the body to burn more carbohydrates and less fat for fuel. Furthermore, insulin converts nearly half of your dietary carbs into fat for storage. Essentially, when we overconsume carbohydrates, we are sending a hormonal command via insulin to our adipose cells. The command is simple: "Store Fat."

Elevated insulin doesn't just signal the body to store carbs as fat; it also locks away your existing fat stores. It effectively prevents you from tapping into your own body fat for energy. Consequently, excess dietary carbohydrates don't just make you gain weight—they ensure you stay heavy.

Chronically high insulin levels can wreak havoc on your health. Diabetes is the most well-known consequence. Beyond that, hypertension, obesity, high cholesterol, heart disease, kidney issues, infertility, and even neurodegeneration are all linked to excessive carbohydrate intake and the resulting insulin spikes.

I have no idea who wrote this, but it’s pure half-truth nonsense... unbelievable. It’s like running 13 miles, and at the tenth mile, someone yells that you've reached the finish line, so you just stop.

Claiming that weight gain is a direct, immediate consequence of insulin levels is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS and wrong.

The only accurate part is the beginning of the first paragraph. But it should have continued by explaining that excess glucose is converted into glycogen, which stays in the body for a certain period (depending on your metabolism) before eventually being turned into fat. This means if you eat two slices of bread too many today, you aren't going to suddenly balloon in size just because your insulin spiked. You won't wake up fatter tomorrow, either. You'll only start gaining weight the day after tomorrow if you fail to burn off the glycogen stored in your muscles and liver that came from those extra slices.

People here talk as if fat is "caught" by the body thirty minutes after eating an extra slice of bread. You need a sustained positive energy balance for about a week before your body actually starts building fat reserves. Nobody gets fat overnight.

The only way to succeed is to keep your energy balance near zero. That is how you stay lean and fit. It means if we stored some extra glycogen today (read: ate too much bread), we need to burn it off through physical activity tomorrow. Glycogen reserves act as a buffer, yet everyone in this debate seems determined to ignore that fact.

Now Rachel Brooks63 is going to show up and lose her mind. You all just follow along like sheep. 😁