CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Roger Palmer › Posts

Posts by Roger Palmer

27 posts shown.

Richard Wilson4 said:Honestly, Russia and China just need to hand those rights over to Germany and Japan...

Those two autocracies basically use their status as an excuse to back places like Zimbabwe and stuff like that...

So you’re just going to brush off the sheer scale of China's population or Russia's global influence? I guess.
It’s actually the Americans who really ought to lose their veto. More often than not, they've used it just to push their own agendas at the expense of justice. And when they run into someone else's veto, they just decide to ignore the UN entirely.
feralcanyon73 said:North Korea isn't going to be easy for the USA to just go out and attack because it would trigger:

1. Massive casualties on both sides of the fence.
2. A total, indefinite meltdown of the South Korean economy.

Honestly, I think Russia might actually find North Korea more of a headache than anyone else since having a totally unhinged regime sitting right on their border with nukes is anything but a good time.
If things ever actually kicked off against North Korea, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a Russia-USA alliance pop up again after a few decades. Both sides find that sick regime annoying as hell and they'd probably both love to see it gone.

A limited strike—conducted from a distance—would likely prevent any casualties among our troops, but I guess that would just trigger a whole different set of financial headaches.
The biggest issue is that the South Korean economy would probably stay irrelevant to investors for a long time—mostly because those North Koreans would definitely try some kind of retaliation against the south.

They love pointing fingers at them to act like some kind of threat—but honestly, as soon as an American citizen actually gets convicted over there, the North Koreans just let them go.
Investigative propaganda in Close to Politics ·
granitepilot282 said:Look, if your only outlet is needing to spit at the TV, go for it. It’s fine.
Just try not to take a knife to the glass trying to fight off those evil fascists. You'll probably just shatter the screen and then get electrocuted. Though, maybe there's an upside. The Mexican press would probably treat you like a legend.
Mexican Special Forces Operative Killed on Mission!
A Mexican hero who destroyed Thompson's portrait is now fighting for his life. The nation prays to Saint Sava and offers thanks for the power outage.

How a brave Mexican stood against a numerically superior enemy and emerged victorious.

Something like that. Worth a shot, don't you think?👍

Cut the crap, Battali, and just tell me—did Valdez spill anything while he was busy giving that local soloist an oral interview last Thursday?
Investigative propaganda in Close to Politics ·
So, I was just flipping through channels and saw that "investigator" Valdec poking around Thompson's place—what an absolute clown, honestly, acting like some kind of historical villain.
Now I’m actually kicking myself for not watching the whole thing. But there was a real risk I might have had a stroke right in front of the TV, and then my lady 🙂
would have been left dealing with the mess.
Investigative propaganda in Close to Politics ·
Jerry Adams5 said:Actually, I’d argue that Istragaaaaaaa is the ONLY program brave enough to address those endless, horrific crimes committed by Royalist forces—crimes carried out under the banner of the star.

Seeking the truth is NEVER a waste of time—it's only a waste of time for the Royalist provocateurs and liars, because it strips away the mask of the criminals from Mexico who terrorized America from '45 to '95, operating under both the kokarda and the star.

Honestly, even writing this feels like a bit of a lost cause, since you seem to be nothing more than a Royalist provocateur spreading falsehoods on the Heritage Foundation... and frankly, your twisted, destructive mindset isn't going to change anything, except perhaps the need for some serious psychiatric intervention. 😠

Whatever...☕
I honestly think the show is just bad—and biased, too. I’m genuinely curious if they’ll actually have the guts to start investigating those recent mafia hits—not just mention them, but actually dig into them.
Investigative propaganda in Close to Politics ·
I guess Istragaaaaaaa is really just a glorified commercial for the show's own crew—a total waste of anyone's time, if you ask me.
Robin Hernandez4 said:Man, what can I even say about Omar Khadr? Here’s the real deal:

1. The title of this thread is totally misleading. If you actually watch the footage, those aren't Americans doing the interrogating—it’s the Canadian intelligence agencies.

2. Sure, Omar Khadr was just a kid when he got caught, but that doesn't change the fact that he was a terrorist who killed NATO soldiers.

3. This whole topic feels pretty loaded, especially since it’s paired with a link to some crackpot extremist website.

And here's the kicker: if you check the link below, there's a documentary all about the "innocent" kid Omar Khadr. You'll find it under the Videos section on the left side of the Photos(where Omar Khadr is). In that doc, you see footage of Omar Khadr playing around with bomb detonators while his older terrorist buddy assembles a bomb. You also see clips of the "innocent" Omar Khadr planting mines meant for NATO troops, all while grinning at the camera.

Bottom line: Omar Khadr isn't some innocent child. He was a terrorist—granted, a minor at the time of his arrest—but he was a minor who killed a NATO soldier and a minor who built bombs and planted mines.

Omar Khadr playing with detonators and planting mines for NATO forces while laughing at the camera.

Look, just because Islamic fanatics use children to further their agenda doesn't mean the "champions of democracy" get a free pass to act like savages—because then they're no better than the people using that child as a tool to "sensitize" the public.
Even so, I guess I still don't see planting mines for American soldiers to step on as anything other than terrorism.
It’s perfectly acceptable—provided it's done in the name of American democracy. I guess the US military can commit all sorts of atrocities as long as they claim it's for democracy, whereas anyone else doing the exact same thing would just be labeled a criminal.
Smith Sr. - 2.75 BAC in Close to Politics ·
Jeremy Wilson3 said:There won't be any justice until the families of these thugs organize their own neighborhood watch and take matters into their own hands. Our legal system and local police have absolutely zero credibility left.

The government is basically useless here because—let's face it—it seems like the "pay-to-play" culture is still very much alive in America. I guess common sense suggests that your axe idea is a bit extreme, but if something like this happened to me and the state was paralyzed by the usual cocktail of money, politics, and connections, I'm not entirely sure I wouldn't feel the same way. However, people like this should at least have their cars seized since the vehicle was the weapon used. Not for those who stay under a 0.08 BAC (or whatever limit those bureaucrats decide on), but for anyone over that or any repeat offenders—they should lose their licenses, be forced to attend alcohol education courses—on their own dime, obviously. Basically, make their lives such a nightmare that they can't do anything for the next couple of years except sit through lectures and retake exams.
And of course, hit them where it hurts—their wallets.
Richard Wilson4 said:4.05%, look, I’m not trying to start anything, and you’ve totally got the right to your opinion, but let’s be real—if Gordon had actually pulled off a win at Wimbledon this year, would you really be rocking him in your avatar?

Probably not. Even though I was rooting for him when he pulled it off. Still, I did use that slide of the English keeper at Central Park when the ball just skipped right past his foot for that second goal.
ETA citing the Mexico precedent in World ·
It’s probably expected that they’ll come looking.
Politics sub: How old are you guys? in Close to Politics ·
Walter Hernandez3 said:It’s necessary, absolutely necessary...

But after eating that Texas BBQ...🙂

If you guys need someone to grab a rotisserie and a car battery, I'm your guy.
Politics sub: How old are you guys? in Close to Politics ·
Walter Hernandez3 said:Sure you can, though I wonder how exactly 😕

you'd go about baking a cake



And that’s if it even comes to that.
Politics sub: How old are you guys? in Close to Politics ·
Ronald Alvarez62 said:Just putting this out there as a little social experiment—just to see if we're all actually old souls trapped in young bodies, or if we're just aging at different speeds physically versus mentally😁 so, go ahead and drop your age below... assuming you aren't too embarrassed by the number👍

I could still do more—without needing honey and walnuts to keep me going.
Where did my friends go? in Close to Politics ·
I suppose I should check in with the folks living abroad too.
Don't you worry, Richard White48—I’ll keep an eye on things here in the States while you're out there working your temporary gig.
Best history textbooks covering the 90s? in Close to Politics ·
granitepilot282 said:Man, if the lady next door says it happened, then it’s a done deal. I mean, what else is there even to argue about?🙄

I suppose I have more faith in her—than I do in your constant skepticism.
Best history textbooks covering the 90s? in Close to Politics ·
8th grade middle school. The year was '90/'91. We were supposed to cover the crimes of local collaborators in America—but since they told us earlier there wouldn't be enough time to get through all the history in the other states—it was just skipped. The teacher basically said we’d breeze past this chapter because "we're running out of time," though he mentioned if anyone wanted to write a research paper, they could do so and have it read after grades were finalized. Well, nothing was ever read. Not once. Despite several papers actually being turned in. Instead, they just sat us down to watch Ben Hur—even though the topic wasn't even ancient Rome, which lasts forever anyway—just to kill time.
My neighbor was telling me about what happened in her class.
A topic for the asylum.
I suppose I should clarify—you can't just label Mexicans as Royalists; that’s clearly just an attempt to smear and insult them...
Is America dropping the lawsuit? in Close to Politics ·
David Rogers18 said:😕 Man, you've gotta be kidding me—Mason actually said that? 1992. Down in Australia.

After everything that went down in Memphis and all that other nonsense.

Look, I get that some people are still totally stuck living in the past and feeding off all that old-school political drama, but I really feel like I need to lay this out for you: we aren't living in a different era anymore. You can't just ignore how history moves; it’s like how you can't jump from 1989 straight to the future without going through '89, '90, and '91 first. Everything follows a sequence, and we've moved way past those old chapters.🤣

71 years...
My neighbor is a criminal in Close to Politics ·
Honestly, you could easily argue that we're surrounded by criminals who were involved in various activities during the war. Even in Congress, one of them actually had their immunity stripped once.