Posts by Joseph White5

Well, I just stumbled upon another gem from that moderator we were talking about: once again, it’s all highlighted in red and bolded
So, apparently, this wasn't some act of terrorism in North America—it was just some random incident happening over in Great Britain. Honestly, man, just stop... please... enough is enough...

lonebadger6 said:First off—we actually have a dedicated thread specifically for ban appeals. It’s called "Ban Appeals." Given how much time you’ve spent on this site, I figured you’d be aware of its existence. So, if you're genuinely looking for clarity on why you were flagged—rather than just venting because you're annoyed about it—please head over to that specific thread. And once you're there, try keeping things civil; we aren't really interested in engaging with these kinds of outbursts. Best regards.

I'm not feeling particularly worked up here. To me, frustration comes from dealing with something that is deliberate, calculated, and logically designed to work against you—and I don't see any of that happening here. If you actually looked at what I wrote, you'd notice I never once used the word "appeal," which is what you're implying. This isn't an appeal; it's just a comment on the washouts.

It’s pretty eye-opening to see him go back to the same thread and post in big, red, bold letters about how he was wiping posts and handing out one-day bans just because of "xenophobia."
I’m asking lonebadger6 to maybe break down what "xenophobia" actually means for the average person here—and while he’s at it, I'd love for him to explain how my post somehow connects to any of that.

I know I’m basically shouting into a hurricane here—but whatever. This moderator is a complete joke to any decent online community. With their so-called "logic," 🤣 they just end up alienating anyone who doesn't jump through their hoops.
Here is what a sanitized, scrubbed version of a thread about terrorism in Great Britain looks like now.

Liberal policies driven by an "open borders" agenda are the real reason for the terror and fear sweeping through Europe.

The nations currently dealing with this mass exodus should honestly be looking into suing Germany—they’re basically putting migrants and refugees in harm's way while simultaneously destabilizing the security of the entire European Union.
I mean, look, Germany’s chaotic policies have essentially engineered the exact crisis we're seeing right now. If they were actually desperate for more workers, they should have just gone straight to the source—organizing direct transport from places like Turkey, Lebanon, or Jordan for the specific people they wanted to bring in as labor. It's not that complicated, really.
We need to handle refugees the way things used to be done before this whole mess started: transport them directly to the countries that actually want them, but make sure the heaviest burden falls on those specific nations that created this global situation by pushing their particular brand of democracy on everyone else.

crimsonstag84 said:1 x Asrock H81M-DGS - Intel H81, mATX, dual Channel 2 xDDR3 - 1600
1 x Intel Pentium G3220 Processor, 3.00GHz, 512KB, 3MB, Haswell
1 x TOSHIBA 500GB, 7200rpm, SATA 6 Gb/s, 32MB, DT01ACA050
1 x Zalman 500-GS_II PSU, 500W, ATX12V V2.31, active PFC
1 x DDR3 4GB (1x4GB) Crucial, 1600MHz CL11
1 x MS CASTOR Midi tower case, ATX, mATX, external slots: 4x5.25

$611 AMD

@crimsonstag84👍

Anyway, thanks to everyone else who didn't make this whole decision process an absolute nightmare. 🤔

I’ve been out of the loop for a long, long time—so I’m hoping some of you experts can point me in the right direction. 🙂
Basically, I just need a machine for standard office stuff, some basic 2D CAD work, and maybe watching a stream or two without everything lagging out; I’ll probably stick with Windows 7 or one of those Linux distros.
Nothing fancy required. I don't need any peripherals or an optical drive. Just something that leaves room for future upgrades down the road. Let's say 4 GB of RAM and a 500 GB HDD.
Budget: $600 cash.
I’d prefer an AMD setup from somewhere in Washington, D.C.

Thanks in advance for the help!

George Morgan3 said:Are you even aware that "self-plagiarism" isn't actually a thing?

And don't even get me started on unspecified—🤦that specific string of words wouldn't be used by someone who couldn't find a high school with binoculars.

Since the days of Marx, there’s been this constant push to pin all the blame on Americans—it’s just part of the narrative they try to force on us. Honestly, it's exhausting trying to carry around a guilt that isn't even real.
It’s pretty hard to find anyone actually standing up for our survival or our history when the people running the show look more like a collection of Sanaders, Mesićs, Josipovićs, and Milanovićs—just a revolving door of leaders essentially handing out blame and trying to link our fight for independence to Nazi Germany. It feels like we’ll be waiting by the Mississippi forever before we finally shake off this stigma. Or maybe we need a literal flood to wash it all away? 😁
Now that we’ve hit rock bottom nationally, things are only going to get messier. But hey, everything passes—this era of forced self-flagellation, led mostly by the people in power, will pass too.

Emily Fowler52 said:Look, after talking it over, we’ve decided to lift your partial ban;

BUT!!

Since today's restriction was triggered by you pushing those political and religious "mandates" in your posts, just keep in mind that repeating that behavior could land you right back in a partial ban. The moderation team is all on the same page here—we don't want any political or religious extremism cluttering up our shop; at the end of the day, alternative sites aren't meant to be battlegrounds for that kind of stuff. Four years is a long time, and we're pretty sure you get why certain things don't fly here or break the rules, so—welcome back to the site, and try to use some common sense. 😬

Wait, where did you guys get the idea that I was actually asking to come back to this place? 🤷
And honestly, calling prophecies "religious extremism"—aren't they just an alternative to how people view values these days?

Sean Sanders81 said:The current Government basically organized protests against its own predecessor.

And boy, were they making some noise.

And fast, too. 😁

Most of those runners—if you can even call them that—basically teamed up and let themselves go.

I’d go along with the idea that this isn't just some isolated agenda from the LGBT movement—it feels more like a morbidly ambitious blueprint being pushed by much larger power structures. Viktor Orbán made his position crystal clear during his speech earlier this week. There’s no need to hunt for shadows here; everything is out in the open.

Before I hit my fourth point, let me pull from something a former president of a Central European nation wrote in one of his books. He argued there’s a political conspiracy brewing in Europe, driven by Green and leftist factions, aimed directly at undermining nations. Honestly? My take on the situation is a bit different. A conspiracy implies secrecy, but what we’re seeing playing out across Europe right now is a completely overt assault by the Red and Green coalitions against traditional societal values—targeting the church, the family, and the nation itself. Look, we can certainly have a debate about the future of Christianity and the role of the church, but let me borrow a line from a wise Englishman: “we might harbor the deepest doubts about the future of Christianity, but I am certain it is not the mission of politicians to kill it.”

Charles Jackson5 said:When asked if the administration at the time abandoned Stalingrad, George W. Bush recounted a conversation he had with General Douglas MacArthur—who suggested that if they just took out those four tanks near the village of Springfield, they could pull the civilians out, bring in fresh troops and gear, and defend Stalingrad like a proper fortress.

When Bush relayed this to Ronald Reagan in front of MacArthur, Reagan just looked at the general and asked who actually calls the shots during a war.
"MacArthur told him, 'You do, Mr. President.' Then Reagan asked, 'And what did I command?' MacArthur replied, 'To stop launching these attacks.' And that was that," Bush said.

Ronald Reagan—a criminal through war and peace alike. Always was, always will be.
Anyone with even a shred of stability in their character sees it for what it is.
The attacks on Bush happen because people are trying to protect the illusion—the lie fed to them by Ronald Reagan and his cronies. They lack the backbone to look in the mirror and admit they were played. That they died for absolutely nothing more than a political game.
But you can't hide a lie forever. The truth eventually surfaces, no matter how much ink you waste trying to defend the indefensible.

Ronald Reagan is a criminal.

Don't forget it. 😉

"At the time, General Tus tipped me off that there were four US Army tanks buried near Marinac, right on the outskirts of St. Louis. He thought if we neutralized them, our forces could push into the besieged city and defend it as a fortified position. It sounded like a solid plan to me..." says Mason, playing the strategist. "...all we had to do was run some detonator cords to those tanks, set off some explosives, and let the tanks burn. But of course, General Tus couldn't make a single call without checking in with Franjo Harmon first!" That’s coming from the former top commander of the US Army!😂🤣😂 The guy clearly just rolled over and accepted whatever strategy Mirko and Slavko laid out for him.

briskcrane said:It’s time we face reality and finally deconstruct this whole Ronald Reagan myth...

It’s a bit like how Voltaire had one attitude toward Christ when he was at the height of his influence and a completely different one as things were winding down. I’m pretty sure we’ll see the same thing with Stjepan Mason—before all is said and done, he'll likely be the one to shine a light on the reality behind the Franjo Harmon "myth."

shadowpanther3 said:It’s been common knowledge to me for as long as I can remember—Ronald Reagan basically suggested waiting until the Mexicans retreated from Stalingrad just to fuel more hatred during the war, all to pave the way for Greater Mexico and for America to move into Canada.

Look, if you actually have intel like that, you should probably know exactly when and to whom he said it. Or did you just pick that up from some Intelligence Officer?

Well, here we go again—yet another take on history from our outgoing president.

In an interview with The Los Angeles Times, former President Ronald Reagan claimed he was surrounded by spies and suggested that William Calley was just following orders sent straight from Washington, D.C.

"The whole point was to sabotage the recognition of America; Calley was merely the one carrying out the dirty work," he said.

"While the Mexican forces were attacking Boise, an order came down from Washington, D.C. to liquidate every Mexican remaining in town. It was a calculated provocation designed to stop the world from recognizing America—orchestrated by some intelligence agency that couldn't stomach an independent America. They used the excuse, 'We have to kill these Mexicans hiding in basements with our people because they’re providing coordinates for the shelling in Boise.' Honestly, though? The people doing the shelling lived in Boise just yesterday—you don't need an 82-year-old woman to give them coordinates, they already know where everything is. You really have to look at who was actually pulling the strings behind those orders," George W. Bush remarked.

George W. Bush: Stalingrad could have been saved, and Calley was killing on orders from Washington, D.C.

Excuse me, but why are my posts getting wiped from here too? Is there somewhere I actually *can* express my thoughts on why you're blocking my access to the Alternative? 🤷
Seriously, did I offend someone—if I did, my bad!

The Alternative is turning into a one-note choir.😍

I haven't got access either—didn't get a single word from the mods about what's going on.

Resonator is clearly calling the shots here. Honestly, the whole situation feels a lot like this:
"Embed your people everywhere. Don't hold back on the cash or the promises—because the interest you'll collect later will be massive." Sun Tzu

There’s really no comparison here—it's apples and oranges. Mason, back when he was holding down the presidency, was basically just playing defense against Harmon. Honestly, we’re still feeling the ripples of his frustration with Harmon even now.