redcrane14 said:Here goes again, this philatelist guy is driving me absolutely insane. You’re seriously just obsessed with the birth rates of Muslims, aren't you? Like, you've literally opened up a hundred different threads about nothing else by now.
And I bet he hasn't even slept with anyone yet... 😈
I used to have such a soft spot for FC Barcelona. It was mostly because they actually felt honest about who they were, unlike that slimy crowd over at Real Madrid... 👎 Times change, I guess...
Jerry Martin19 said:Richard Wilson4, man, you're tripping. You think Tiger and Dragon is trash? That's on you. But hey, not every single Chinese movie is Tiger and Dragon (if you catch my drift). Every Chinese flick in that genre has its own vibe, regardless of the fight choreography. It’s just that specific Chinese style they stick to. It's like how Koreans lean into those dark horror thrillers—they all feel similar at first glance, but honestly, every single one is pretty unique. Saying otherwise is like saying every Spanish movie is Volver just because they share a certain stylistic DNA.
Honestly, Koreans, Japanese, even Hong Kongers (though maybe not like they used to be) are just on another level compared to Chinese cinema...
The Korean movie Lost brotherhood is easily one of the best war films I've ever seen. It's a real story, too. I'd even go as far as calling it a heavy drama. Takeshi Kitano is hands down one of the best Asian actors and directors out there... Hong Kong's glory days might be fading, but they're still holding their own...
Critics are just frustrated losers who obsess over French cinema, those little melodramas about gay rights and AIDS, or Tiger and Dragon—which, if you ask me, is total garbage, even though the critics treated it like it was some masterpiece. Now everyone thinks every single Chinese movie is somehow Tiger and Dragon... 👎
Charles Evans said:But if we are talking pure numbers, they export way more players than anyone else. Just take Portugal as an example—they have 127 of them! Meanwhile, you only see 7 coming out of the big leagues in England, while the other major leagues might only see 30 or 40.
The reason you don't see many in England is because getting a work permit is a total nightmare... Even Pletikosa couldn't snag one, and honestly, any manager's squad knows exactly what I'm talking about...
Charles Evans said:I have the chance to read this massive 7 or 8-page feature in the latest issue of 4-4-2 about how players are actually developed in Brazil—you know, the secret sauce behind all that talent. Honestly, a lot of it caught me off guard because it really challenges some of those common stereotypes we hold. Here are the most striking takeaways from the report:
1. Their own coaches are quick to point out that there’s no such thing as "God-given" talent; they argue that their players are just as much a product of work as anyone else in the world.
2. It all starts with small-sided games and futsal, which they consider the absolute cornerstone of development. They don't even let kids onto a full-sized pitch until they've mastered everything they need on a tight 25x18 meter court. They actually go as far as calling Europeans idiots for focusing on producing marathon runners rather than true ball players! Their logic is that a massive field just smothers a kid's creativity and kills the joy of playing and practicing.
3. Scouting is an relentless, annual process at every single age level, from youth squads all the way up to the Under-20s. I think they call them "peneires." Every single player has to go through these trials; it doesn't matter if you were the star of your team last season. If you don't make the cut at the trial, you're back to searching for a new club.
4. Legally, paying players under the age of 16 is strictly forbidden, but let's be real—only the massive clubs like the Los Angeles Lakers, Chicago White Sox, or New York Yankees actually follow that to the letter. Most other clubs find ways to give talented kids stipends that often exceed the national average or cover things like school tuition. The real tragedy is the pressure this puts on kids living in poverty. When an entire family is depending on that one kid's income, you start seeing real issues with exploitation and parents pushing unrealistic ambitions onto their children.
5. Out of thousands of these boys, incredibly few actually make it. The director of the Los Angeles Lakers' youth academy says that if they test hundreds of kids at the trials every year, they consider it a huge success if just three of them actually make it to the Under-20 level or the senior squad. And even then, only those elite players from the big clubs usually get the chance to move on to Europe.
6. Every single player on the Brazilian national team has survived the gauntlet of these trials; they've been sifted through the sieve until only the best remain. For them, it's the only way to ensure they are picking the absolute cream of the crop. Sadly, they are fully aware that they are essentially turning eight-year-olds into laborers, but their reasoning is blunt: "Poverty and hardship rule here; in Brazil, life starts early."
7. In the history of the national team, the only players to come from middle-class backgrounds were Socrates and Kakati.
Reading this really gives me a different perspective on guys like Ronald and Ronaldinho and why some Brazilian players live such wild, seemingly unprofessional lifestyles. They've had brutal lives, basically working since they were eight years old, fighting tooth and nail for a spot and a way out of the slums for twenty years straight. How can you expect someone like Ronald to have dynamite in his legs when he's simply run out of steam mentally?
It’s the same deal with basketball in the US. You hear about some kid from a wealthy family suddenly becoming a superstar lately...
In America, it's actually the opposite. You see sons of bartenders, butchers, or jewelers getting an edge over better players just because their old man bought them a spot on the roster...
I'm a huge fan of Transformers, but I've got this nagging fear that we're just gonna get a bunch of flashy CGI slapped onto a hollow story. Knowing the director, that's a pretty safe bet...
The film looks great visually, but it’s honestly way inferior to Excalibur. It completely misses the mark on the characters—and there's plenty of meat in the Arthurian myth to make them awesome—plus the plot is weak, the anti-church vibes are super heavy-handed, and Merlin’s whole role feels totally muddled... All in all, I'm giving it a 2/10...
urbanotter4 said:Look, the third installment has actually been out for years already, and it features Kung Lao as the main lead. 😬 But unlike that AMC flick which was pure trash, this one is just a bad movie.